The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 2 to Assembly Bill 73?
Adopted.
The question was: Adoption of Senate substitute amendment 2 to Assembly Bill 73?
Adopted.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Farrow, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Assembly Bill 73
Senator Chvala, with unanimous consent, asked to be added as a cosponsor of Assembly Bill 73.
Senator Zien, with unanimous consent, asked that Assembly Bill 73 be referred to a second reading.
Senator Decker objected.
Senator Zien moved Assembly Bill 73 be referred to a second reading.
Senator Zien, with unanimous consent, asked to withdraw his motion to refer Assembly Bill 73 to a second reading.
The question was: Shall Assembly Bill
73 be concurred in?
The ayes and noes were required and the vote was: ayes, 24; noes, 9; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Adelman, Andrea, Breske, Buettner, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Fitzgerald, George, Huelsman, Jauch, Moen, Moore, Petak, Plewa, C. Potter, Risser, Rude, Shibilski, Wineke and Zien - 24.
Noes - Senators Cowles, Darling, Farrow, A. Lasee, Leean, Panzer, Rosenzweig, Schultz and Weeden - 9.
Absent or not voting - None.
Concurred in as amended.
Senator Ellis, with unanimous consent, asked that all action be ordered immediately messaged to the Assembly.
Senator Ellis, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate Bill 104 be withdrawn from the committee on Senate Organiztion and taken up.
Senate Bill 104
Relating to: the assessment of agricultural land, requiring recommendations and granting rule-making authority.
Read a second time.
Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 104 offered by Senators A. Lasee, Fitzgerald and Schultz.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 104?
Senator Moen asked unanimous consent that the Senate stand recessed.
The senate stood recessed.
1:28 P.M.
__________________
2:13 P.M.
The senate reconvened.
Senator Rude in the chair.
Senate Bill 104
Relating to: the assessment of agricultural land, requiring recommendations and granting rule-making authority.
Read a second time.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 104?
Senator Ellis asked unanimous consent that the Senate stand informal for 1.
The senate stood infromal.
2:15 P.M.
__________________
2:16 P.M.
The senate reconvened.
Senator Rude in the chair.
Senate Bill 104
Relating to: the assessment of agricultural land, requiring recommendations and granting rule-making authority.
Read a second time.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 104?
Senator Chvala moved rejection of Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 104.
The question was: Rejection of Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 104?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 15; noes, 18; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Andrea, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Jauch, Moen, Moore, Plewa, C. Potter, Risser, Rosenzweig, Shibilski and Wineke - 15.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Breske, Buettner, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Leean, Panzer, Petak, Rude, Schultz, Weeden and Zien - 18.
Absent or not voting - None.
Rejection refused.
Senator Huelsman in the chair.
2:39 P.M.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 104?
Adopted.
Senate amendment 2 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 104 offered by Senators Clausing, Wineke, Chvala, Andrea and C. Potter.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 2 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 104?
Senator Rude in the chair.
3:06 P.M.
Senator A. Lasee moved that Senate amendment 2 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill
104 be laid on the table.
The question was: Shall Senate amendment 2 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill
104 be laid on the table?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 18; noes, 15; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Breske, Buettner, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Leean, Panzer, Petak, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden and Zien - 18.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Andrea, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Jauch, Moen, Moore, Plewa, C. Potter, Risser, Shibilski and Wineke - 15.
Absent or not voting - None.
Tabled.
Senate amendment 3 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 104 offered by Senators Chvala, Andrea, Jauch, Wineke, Burke, Plewa, Shibilski, Clausing, Breske and Moen.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 3 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 104?
Senator A. Lasee moved that Senate amendment 3 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill
104 be laid on the table.
The question was: Shall Senate amendment 3 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill
104 be laid on the table?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 17; noes, 16; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Buettner, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Leean, Panzer, Petak, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden and Zien - 17.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Andrea, Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Jauch, Moen, Moore, Plewa, C. Potter, Risser, Shibilski and Wineke - 16.
Absent or not voting - None.
Tabled.
Senate amendment 4 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 104 offered by Senators Wineke, Moen, Andrea, Clausing, Chvala, C. Potter, Burke, Shibilski and Moore.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 4 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 104?
Senator Leean moved that Senate amendment 4 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill
104 be laid on the table.