The question was: Shall Senate amendment 3 to Senate
Bill 144 be laid on the table?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 12; noes, 18; absent or not voting, 2; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Burke, Clausing, Darling, Farrow, George, Huelsman, Jauch, Moore, Risser, Rosenzweig, Weeden and Wineke - 12.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Breske, Buettner, Chvala, Cowles, Decker, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Fitzgerald, A. Lasee, Panzer, Petak, C. Potter, Rude, Schultz, Shibilski, Welch and Zien - 18.
Absent or not voting - Senators Andrea and Moen - 2.
Tabling refused.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 144?
Adopted.
Senate amendment 4 to Senate Bill 144 offered by Senator Zien.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 4 to Senate Bill 144?
Adopted.
Senate amendment 5 to Senate Bill 144 offered by Senator Zien.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 5 to Senate Bill 144?
Senator Rosenzweig moved rejection of Senate amendment 5 to Senate Bill 144.
The question was: Rejection of Senate amendment 5 to Senate Bill 144?
Rejected.
Senate amendment 6 to Senate Bill 144 offered by Senator Zien.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 6 to Senate Bill 144?
Senator Rosenzweig moved rejection of Senate amendment 6 to Senate Bill 144.
The question was: Rejection of Senate amendment 6 to Senate Bill 144?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 20; noes, 10; absent or not voting, 2; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Adelman, Buettner, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Cowles, Darling, Ellis, Farrow, George, Huelsman, Jauch, Moore, Panzer, C. Potter, Risser, Rosenzweig, Rude, Weeden and Wineke - 20.
Noes - Senators Breske, Decker, Drzewiecki, Fitzgerald, A. Lasee, Petak, Schultz, Shibilski, Welch and Zien - 10.
Absent or not voting - Senators Andrea and Moen - 2.
Rejected.
Senate amendment 7 to Senate Bill 144 offered by Senator Zien.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 7 to Senate Bill 144?
Senator Huelsman moved rejection of Senate amendment 7 to Senate Bill 144.
The question was: Rejection of Senate amendment 7 to Senate Bill 144?
Rejected.
Senate amendment 8 to Senate Bill 144 offered by Senator Zien.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 8 to Senate Bill 144?
Senator Huelsman moved rejection of Senate amendment 8 to Senate Bill 144.
The question was: Rejection of Senate amendment 8 to Senate Bill 144?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 20; noes, 10; absent or not voting, 2; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Adelman, Buettner, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Cowles, Darling, Decker, Farrow, George, Huelsman, Jauch, Moore, Panzer, C. Potter, Risser, Rosenzweig, Rude, Weeden and Wineke - 20.
Noes - Senators Breske, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Fitzgerald, A. Lasee, Petak, Schultz, Shibilski, Welch and Zien - 10.
Absent or not voting - Senators Andrea and Moen - 2.
Rejected.
Senate amendment 9 to Senate Bill 144 offered by Senator Zien.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 9 to Senate Bill 144?
Senator Rosenzweig moved rejection of Senate amendment 9 to Senate Bill 144.
The question was: Rejection of Senate amendment 9 to Senate Bill 144?
Rejected.
Senate amendment 10 to Senate Bill 144 offered by Senator Zien.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 10 to Senate Bill 144?
Senator Risser moved rejection of Senate amendment 10 to Senate Bill 144.
The question was: Rejection of Senate amendment 10 to Senate Bill 144?
Rejection refused.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 10 to Senate Bill 144?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 12; noes, 18; absent or not voting, 2; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Breske, Buettner, Cowles, Drzewiecki, Fitzgerald, Petak, Rude, Schultz, Shibilski, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 12.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Darling, Decker, Ellis, Farrow, George, Huelsman, Jauch, A. Lasee, Moore, Panzer, C. Potter, Risser, Rosenzweig and Wineke - 18.
Absent or not voting - Senators Andrea and Moen - 2.
Adoption refused.
Senate amendment 11 to Senate Bill 144 offered by Senator Zien.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 11 to Senate Bill 144?
Adoption refused.
S360
Senate amendment 12 to Senate Bill 144 offered by Senator Zien.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 12 to Senate Bill 144?
Senator Farrow moved rejection of Senate amendment 12 to Senate Bill 144.
The question was: Rejection of Senate amendment 12 to Senate Bill 144?
Rejected.
Senate amendment 13 to Senate Bill 144 offered by Senator Zien.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 13 to Senate Bill 144?
Senator Rosenzweig moved rejection of Senate amendment 13 to Senate Bill 144.
The question was: Rejection of Senate amendment 13 to Senate Bill 144?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 18; noes, 12; absent or not voting, 2; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Adelman, Buettner, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Cowles, Darling, Ellis, Farrow, George, Huelsman, Jauch, Moore, Panzer, Risser, Rosenzweig, Weeden and Wineke - 18.
Noes - Senators Breske, Decker, Drzewiecki, Fitzgerald, A. Lasee, Petak, C. Potter, Rude, Schultz, Shibilski, Welch and Zien - 12.
Absent or not voting - Senators Andrea and Moen - 2.
Rejected.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Farrow, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Senate Bill 144
Read a third time and passed.
__________________
Assembly Joint Resolution 47
Relating to: proclaiming the Merrimac Ferry an official sesquicentennial landmark.
Read.
Concurred in.
Assembly Bill 8
Relating to: charging a fee for the temporary use of school property.
Read a second time.
Senator Risser, with unanimous consent, asked that Assembly Bill 8 be referred to the committee on Judiciary.
Senator Darling objected.
Senator Ellis, with unanimous consent, asked that Assembly Bill 8 be placed at the foot of the calendar of September 27, 1995.
Assembly Bill 18
