The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 19; noes, 11; absent or not voting, 2; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Adelman, Breske, Buettner, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Petak, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 19.
Noes - Senators Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Jauch, Moen, C. Potter, Risser, Shibilski and Wineke - 11.
Absent or not voting - Senators Andrea and Moore - 2.
Rejected.
Senate amendment 2 to Senate amendment 32 to Assembly Bill 1 offered by Senator Wineke.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 2 to Senate amendment 32 to Assembly Bill 1?
Senator Schultz moved rejection of Senate amendment 2 to Senate amendment 32 to Assembly Bill 1.
The question was: Rejection of Senate amendment 2 to Senate amendment 32 to Assembly Bill 1?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 18; noes, 13; absent or not voting, 1; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Breske, Buettner, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Petak, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 18.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Jauch, Moen, Moore, C. Potter, Risser, Shibilski and Wineke - 13.
Absent or not voting - Senator Andrea - 1.
Rejected.
Senator Petak, with unanimous consent, asked to be added as a coauthor of Senate amendment 32 to Assembly Bill 1.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 32 to Assembly Bill 1?
Adopted.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 5 to Assembly Bill 1?
Senate amendment 1 to Senate amendment 5 to Assembly Bill 1 offered by Senator Chvala.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate amendment 5 to Assembly Bill 1?
Senator Potter, with unanimous consent, asked to be added as a coauthor of Senate amendment 5 to Assembly Bill 1.
Senator Welch moved rejection of Senate amendment 1 to Senate amendment 5 to Assembly Bill 1.
The question was: Rejection of Senate amendment 1 to Senate amendment 5 to Assembly Bill 1?
Rejected.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 5 to Assembly Bill 1?
Senator Burke moved rejection of Senate amendment 5 to Assembly Bill 1.
The question was: Rejection of Senate amendment 5 to Assembly Bill 1?
Senator Rosenzweig moved that Senate amendment 5 to Assembly Bill 1 be laid on the table.
The question was: Shall Senate amendment 5 to Assembly Bill 1 be laid on the table?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 20; noes, 11; absent or not voting, 1; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Adelman, Breske, Buettner, Burke, Clausing, Darling, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, Jauch, A. Lasee, Moore, Panzer, Risser, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Shibilski, Weeden and Zien - 20.
Noes - Senators Chvala, Cowles, Decker, Drzewiecki, Ellis, George, Moen, Petak, C. Potter, Welch and Wineke - 11.
Absent or not voting - Senator Andrea - 1.
Tabled.
Senate amendment 33 to Assembly Bill 1 offered by Senator Decker.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 33 to Assembly Bill 1?
Senator Ellis moved rejection of Senate amendment 33 to Assembly Bill 1.
The question was: Rejection of Senate amendment 33 to Assembly Bill 1?
Rejected.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Ellis, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Assembly Bill 1
Read a third time.
__________________
Senator Moen, with unanimous consent, asked that the Senate recess until 11:15 P.M..
10:41 P.M.
__________________
11:15 P.M.
The Senate reconvened.
Senator Rude in the chair.
The question was: Concurrence in Assembly Bill 1 as amended?
The ayes and noes were required and the vote was: ayes, 15; noes, 16; absent or not voting, 1; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Adelman, Buettner, Burke, Darling, Drzewiecki, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, Jauch, Panzer, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden and Zien - 15.
Noes - Senators Breske, Chvala, Clausing, Cowles, Decker, Ellis, George, A. Lasee, Moen, Moore, Petak, C. Potter, Risser, Shibilski, Welch and Wineke - 16.
Absent or not voting - Senator Andrea - 1.
Refused to concur in as amended.
Senator Potter moved reconsideration of the vote by which Assembly Bill 1 was refused concurrence.
__________________
Senator Moen, with unanimous consent, asked that the Senate recess until 12:36 A.M..
11:20 P.M.
__________________
12:36 A.M.
The Senate reconvened.
Senator Rude in the chair.
S390
Senator Potter, with unanimous consent, asked that the vote by which
Assembly Bill 1 was refused concurrence be reconsidered.
Reconsidered.
The question was: Concurrence in Assembly Bill 1 as amended?
The ayes and noes were required and the vote was: ayes, 15; noes, 16; absent or not voting, 1; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Adelman, Buettner, Burke, Darling, Drzewiecki, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, Jauch, Panzer, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden and Zien - 15.
Noes - Senators Breske, Chvala, Clausing, Cowles, Decker, Ellis, George, A. Lasee, Moen, Moore, Petak, C. Potter, Risser, Shibilski, Welch and Wineke - 16.
Absent or not voting - Senator Andrea - 1.
Refused to concur in as amended.
__________________
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The final adjournment of the September 1995 special session.
By
Senators
Ellis, Rude, Farrow, Jauch and Risser
.
Read.
Considered as priviledged and taken up.
Adopted.
__________________
Senator Ellis, with unanimous consent, asked that the Senate recess until 3:33 A.M..
12:39 A.M.
__________________
3:33 A.M.
The Senate reconvened.