__________________
Read and referred:
Senate Joint Resolution 49
Relating to: commending the City of Milwaukee on its 150th anniversary.
By
Senators
Burke, Darling, George, Grobschmidt, Moore, Rosenzweig, Andrea, Buettner, Chvala, Clausing, Cowles, Moen, Panzer, Risser and Rude; cosponsored by Representatives Krug, Bock, Bell, Coggs, Cullen, Krusick, Kunicki, Notestein, R. Potter, Riley, Rutkowski, Schneiders, Walker, Wasserman, Baldus, Grothman, Hahn, Hanson, Klusman, Lorge, Prosser, Olsen, Ott, Otte, Plombon, Turner and Zukowski
.
To committee on Senate Organization.
Senator Farrow, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate Joint Resolution 49 be withdrawn from the committee on Senate Organization and taken up at this time.
Senate Joint Resolution 49
Relating to: commending the City of Milwaukee on its 150th anniversary.
Read.
Adopted.
Senate Joint Resolution 50
Relating to: the life and public service of Robert Zimmerman.
By
Senators
Rude, Ellis and Risser; cosponsored by Representatives Prosser and Jensen
.
Read.
Considered as privileged and taken up.
Adopted by unanimous rising vote.
Senate Joint Resolution 51
Relating to: an advisory referendum on the question of enacting the death penalty in this state.
By
Senators
A. Lasee, Zien, Buettner, Fitzgerald, Petak, Welch, Ellis and Drzewiecki; cosponsored by Representatives Kaufert, Handrick, Hoven, Seratti, Freese, Brandemuehl, Ainsworth, Ott, Dobyns, Owens, Musser, Kreibich, Vrakas, Foti, F. Lasee, Ladwig, Otte, Green and Skindrud
.
To committee on State Government Operations and Corrections.
__________________
Read first time and referred:
Senate Bill 506
Relating to: wages for Wisconsin conservation corps crew leaders.
By
Senators
Rude, Andrea, Breske, Buettner, Burke, Clausing, Darling, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, Jauch, Moen, Panzer, C. Potter, Risser, Rosenzweig, Schultz, Grobschmidt, Shibilski, Wineke, Zien and Moore; cosponsored by Representatives Gard, Handrick, Brancel, Albers, Baldus, Baumgart, Bell, Bock, Brandemuehl, Carpenter, Coggs, Dobyns, Duff, Foti, Freese, Goetsch, Green, Gronemus, Grothman, Gunderson, Hahn, Harsdorf, Hasenohrl, Hubler, Huebsch, Hutchison, Johnsrud, Kaufert, Kreibich, Krug, Kunicki, Ladwig, La Fave, Lehman, Linton, Meyer, Musser, Nass, Olsen, Ott, Otte, Ourada, Owens, Plache, Plombon, Porter, Powers, Prosser, Reynolds, Riley, Schneider, Seratti, Silbaugh, Springer, Turner, Underheim, Vander Loop, Vrakas, Ward, Wasserman, Wirch and R. Young, by request of the Wisconsin Conservation Corps Board
.
To committee on Environment and Energy.
Senate Bill 507
Relating to: exempting farm trucks from the motor vehicle emission inspection and maintenance program.
By
Senator
A. Lasee
; cosponsored by Representative Otte
.
To committee on Transportation, Agriculture and Local Affairs.
Relating to: training programs for fire fighters.
By
Senators
Zien, Fitzgerald, Rude, Schultz, Breske and Decker; cosponsored by Representatives Porter, Vrakas, Grothman, Musser, Hahn, Lehman, Goetsch, Powers, Otte, Silbaugh, Hasenohrl, Lorge and Nass
.
To committee on Human Resources, Labor, Tourism, Veterans and Military Affairs.
Senate Bill 509
Relating to: the method of reviewing and establishing revised operator's license examination standards and granting rule-making authority.
By
Senator
A. Lasee
; cosponsored by Representative Brandemuehl
.
To committee on Transportation, Agriculture and Local Affairs.
Senate Bill 510
Relating to: the election of certain persons to a city, village or town planning commission.
By
Senators
Rude and Schultz; cosponsored by Representatives Huebsch, Hanson, Musser, Albers, Goetsch, Olsen, Turner, La Fave, Powers, Silbaugh, Johnsrud and Klusman
.
To committee on Transportation, Agriculture and Local Affairs.
__________________
The joint committee on Finance reports and recommends:
Senate Bill 204
Relating to: by-products from prison industries recycling operations and prison industry interest payments.
Passage.
Ayes, 15 - Senators Weeden, Schultz, Cowles, Petak, Rosenzweig, George, Decker, Brancel, Foti, Porter, Schneiders, Ourada, Harsdorf, Linton and Coggs.
Noes, 0 - None.
Senate Bill 331
Relating to: special distinguishing registration plates associated with professional athletic teams, payments to D.A.R.E. Wisconsin, Ltd., and making an appropriation.
Passage.
Ayes, 13 - Senators Weeden, Schultz, Cowles, Petak, Rosenzweig, Brancel, Foti, Porter, Schneiders, Ourada, Harsdorf, Linton and Coggs.
Noes, 2 - Senators George and Decker.
Timothy Weeden
Senate Chairperson
The committee on Insurance reports and recommends:
Assembly Bill 416
Relating to: group health insurance market reform, including preexisting condition exclusions and limitations, guaranteed acceptance, portability and contract termination and renewability; and collective bargaining of certain health care coverage requirements.
Introduction and adoption of Senate substitute amendment 1.
Ayes, 5 - Senators Schultz, Huelsman, Buettner, C. Potter and Jauch.
Noes, 1 - Senator Shibilski.
Concurrence.
Ayes, 5 - Senators Schultz, Huelsman, Buettner, C. Potter and Jauch.
Noes, 1 - Senator Shibilski.
Dale Schultz
Chairperson
__________________
State of Wisconsin
Office of the Secretary of State
To the Honorable, the Senate:
Sincerely,
Douglas La follette
Secretary of State
State of Wisconsin
Department of Public Instruction
January 29, 1996
The Honorable, The Senate:
As required by s.
119.23, Wis. State., enclosed for distribution to the appropriate standing committees is the fifth-year report on the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program. Authored by John Witte, professor with The Robert M. La Follette Institute of Public Affairs and the Department of Political Science of the University of Wisconsin-Madison, the report is a balanced, independent review of the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program. The fifth-year report is an abbreviated version of earlier reports.
The report features a description of the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program, a description of choice families and students, a five-year report on outcomes, and a brief response to some of the criticisms of previous reports. It does not contain any information on the 1995-96 school year.
Among the findings of the report are the following:
•
The program accomplishes its intent of making alternative school choices available to low-income families in Milwaukee. Choice parents had a slightly lower income than low-income MPS parents in the first four years of the program. Incomes of 1994 choice families increased to an average of $14,210.
•
The leading reasons given for participating in the choice program were the perceived educational quality and the teaching approach and style in the private schools. That was followed by the disciplinary environment and the general atmosphere that parents associate with choice schools.
•
Choice parents were significantly more involved in the prior public school education of their children than MPS parents and continued to be more involved in their child's education at choice schools than MPS parents. Parental satisfaction with choice schools increased significantly over satisfaction with their prior public school.
•
Despite their economic status, choice parents reported higher education levels than either low-income or average MPS parents. Choice mothers were more educated than MPS mothers, which should have produced higher scores for choice students but did not.
S558
•
Reading scores for choice students essentially remained the same over the past three years. In 1995, there was a 1.5 drop in the Normal Curve Equivalent math scores. Regression results, using a wide range of modeling approaches, generally indicated that choice and public school students where not much different. If there was a difference, MPS students did somewhat better in reading.
•
The attrition rate, which was initially very high, is on a downward trend. Excluding students in alternative programs, the attrition rate from choice schools was 44 percent in the first year, 32 percent in the second year, 28 percent in the third year, 23 percent in the fourth year, and 24 percent in the fifth year. Attrition rates are higher with alternative schools and included 46 percent, 35 percent, 31 percent, 27 percent, and 28 percent. Reasons given for leaving were primarily for family-specific reasons, including moving. Other respondents to follow-up questions about attrition were critical of some aspect of the choice program or private schools.
