Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Farrow, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Assembly Bill 483
Read a third time.
The ayes and noes were required and the vote was: ayes, 33; noes, 0; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Adelman, Andrea, Breske, Buettner, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Cowles, Darling, Decker, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, George, Grobschmidt, Huelsman, Jauch, A. Lasee, Moen, Moore, Panzer, Petak, C. Potter, Risser, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Shibilski, Weeden, Welch, Wineke and Zien - 33.
Noes - None.
Absent or not voting - None.
Concurred in.
Senator Ellis, with unanimous consent, asked that all action on Assembly Bill 483 be immediately messaged to the Assembly.
Senator Ellis, with unanimous consent, asked that all action be immediately messaged to the Assembly.
Special Order
Senate Bill 565
S721 Relating to: recovery of enforcement costs by the department of agriculture, trade and consumer protection in drainage district cases; transferring responsibility for administration of the Wisconsin consumer act; transferring responsibility for supporting the uniform commercial code statewide lien system; correcting references in certain appropriations of the department of financial institutions; the number of unclassified division administrator positions in the department of financial institutions; reversion of transferred funds to the Wisconsin development fund; minority business early planning projects; renumbering the appropriation for administrative services for regulation of industry, safety and buildings; the Milwaukee parental choice program; waiver of relocation payments and services when property is acquired by an entity vested with the power of eminent domain; collection of certain fees by the employment relations commission; payment of principal and interest on bonds issued for the clean water fund program; purses for horse races and pari-mutuel tax for simulcast races; establishing a Mendota juvenile treatment center; a plan to assure continued funding for the mental health institutes; transferring an appropriation for principal repayment and interest from the department of industry, labor and job development to the department of health and family services; changing references to low-income and at-risk child care funding; state involvement with certain municipal boundary changes; refunding of municipal bonds; a performance evaluation audit of the University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics Authority; the initial period of the lease agreement and affiliation agreement between the University of Wisconsin System and the University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics Authority; the contractual services agreement between the University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics Board and the University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics Authority; storage and management of records of the University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics Authority; applicability of municipal ordinances and regulations to certain buildings, structures and facilities constructed for the benefit or use of local professional baseball park districts; changing the name of the Kickapoo valley governing board; the effective date and initial applicability of adjustments in certain lobbying regulation fees; railroad stockholder reports; granting rulemaking authority; and making and decreasing appropriations.
Read a second time.
Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senators Chvala, Moen and Shibilski.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
Senator Chvala, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 be withdrawn and returned to author.
Senate amendment 2 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senator Rude.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 2 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
Adopted.
Senate amendment 3 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senators Clausing, C. Potter, Jauch, Chvala, Moen, Andrea, Wineke and Shibilski.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 3 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
Senator Weeden moved that Senate amendment 3 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 be laid on the table.
The question was: Shall Senate amendment 3 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 be laid on the table?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 17; noes, 16; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Buettner, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Petak, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 17.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Andrea, Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Grobschmidt, Jauch, Moen, Moore, C. Potter, Risser, Shibilski and Wineke - 16.
Absent or not voting - None.
Tabled.
Senator Ellis, with unanimous consent, asked that the Senate recess until 4:21 P.M..
4:04 P.M.
__________________
RECESS
4:21 P.M.
The Senate reconvened.
__________________
in the chair
4:21 P.M.
Senator Rude in the chair.
Senate amendment 4 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senator Weeden.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 4 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
Adopted.
Senate amendment 5 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senators Decker and A. Lasee.
Senate amendment 6 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senator Wineke.
Senate amendment 7 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senators Andrea, Adelman, Clausing, C. Potter, Breske, Moen, Chvala, Grobschmidt, Panzer and Moore.
Senate amendment 8 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senators Decker, A. Lasee and Welch.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 5 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
Senator Decker, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate amendment 5 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 be laid on the table.
Senator Decker, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate amendment 8 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 be laid on the table.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 6 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
Senator Weeden moved that Senate amendment 6 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 be laid on the table.
The question was: Shall Senate amendment 6 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 be laid on the table?
Tabled.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 7 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
__________________
in the chair
4:43 P.M.
Senator Lasee in the chair.
Senator Zien moved rejection of Senate amendment 7 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565.
The question was: Rejection of Senate amendment 7 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 17; noes, 16; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Buettner, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Petak, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 17.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Andrea, Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Grobschmidt, Jauch, Moen, Moore, C. Potter, Risser, Shibilski and Wineke - 16.
Absent or not voting - None.
Rejected.
Senate amendment 9 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senators Chvala, Moen and Shibilski.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 9 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
Senator Weeden moved that Senate amendment 9 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 be laid on the table.
The question was: Shall Senate amendment 9 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 be laid on the table?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 17; noes, 16; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Buettner, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Petak, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 17.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Andrea, Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Grobschmidt, Jauch, Moen, Moore, C. Potter, Risser, Shibilski and Wineke - 16.
Absent or not voting - None.
Tabled.
Senate amendment 10 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senators Jauch, Andrea and Shibilski.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 10 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
S722 Senate amendment 1 to Senate amendment 10 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senator Jauch.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate amendment 10 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
Adopted.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 10 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
Senator Weeden moved that Senate amendment 10 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 be laid on the table.
The question was: Shall Senate amendment 10 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 be laid on the table?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 17; noes, 16; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Buettner, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Petak, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 17.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Andrea, Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Grobschmidt, Jauch, Moen, Moore, C. Potter, Risser, Shibilski and Wineke - 16.
Absent or not voting - None.
Tabled.
Loading...
Loading...