S721 Relating to: recovery of enforcement costs by the department of agriculture, trade and consumer protection in drainage district cases; transferring responsibility for administration of the Wisconsin consumer act; transferring responsibility for supporting the uniform commercial code statewide lien system; correcting references in certain appropriations of the department of financial institutions; the number of unclassified division administrator positions in the department of financial institutions; reversion of transferred funds to the Wisconsin development fund; minority business early planning projects; renumbering the appropriation for administrative services for regulation of industry, safety and buildings; the Milwaukee parental choice program; waiver of relocation payments and services when property is acquired by an entity vested with the power of eminent domain; collection of certain fees by the employment relations commission; payment of principal and interest on bonds issued for the clean water fund program; purses for horse races and pari-mutuel tax for simulcast races; establishing a Mendota juvenile treatment center; a plan to assure continued funding for the mental health institutes; transferring an appropriation for principal repayment and interest from the department of industry, labor and job development to the department of health and family services; changing references to low-income and at-risk child care funding; state involvement with certain municipal boundary changes; refunding of municipal bonds; a performance evaluation audit of the University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics Authority; the initial period of the lease agreement and affiliation agreement between the University of Wisconsin System and the University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics Authority; the contractual services agreement between the University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics Board and the University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics Authority; storage and management of records of the University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics Authority; applicability of municipal ordinances and regulations to certain buildings, structures and facilities constructed for the benefit or use of local professional baseball park districts; changing the name of the Kickapoo valley governing board; the effective date and initial applicability of adjustments in certain lobbying regulation fees; railroad stockholder reports; granting rulemaking authority; and making and decreasing appropriations.
Read a second time.
Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senators Chvala, Moen and Shibilski.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
Senator Chvala, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 be withdrawn and returned to author.
Senate amendment 2 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senator Rude.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 2 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
Adopted.
Senate amendment 3 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senators Clausing, C. Potter, Jauch, Chvala, Moen, Andrea, Wineke and Shibilski.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 3 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
Senator Weeden moved that Senate amendment 3 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 be laid on the table.
The question was: Shall Senate amendment 3 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 be laid on the table?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 17; noes, 16; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Buettner, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Petak, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 17.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Andrea, Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Grobschmidt, Jauch, Moen, Moore, C. Potter, Risser, Shibilski and Wineke - 16.
Absent or not voting - None.
Tabled.
Senator Ellis, with unanimous consent, asked that the Senate recess until 4:21 P.M..
4:04 P.M.
__________________
RECESS
4:21 P.M.
The Senate reconvened.
__________________
in the chair
4:21 P.M.
Senator Rude in the chair.
Senate amendment 4 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senator Weeden.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 4 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
Adopted.
Senate amendment 5 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senators Decker and A. Lasee.
Senate amendment 6 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senator Wineke.
Senate amendment 7 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senators Andrea, Adelman, Clausing, C. Potter, Breske, Moen, Chvala, Grobschmidt, Panzer and Moore.
Senate amendment 8 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senators Decker, A. Lasee and Welch.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 5 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
Senator Decker, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate amendment 5 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 be laid on the table.
Senator Decker, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate amendment 8 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 be laid on the table.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 6 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
Senator Weeden moved that Senate amendment 6 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 be laid on the table.
The question was: Shall Senate amendment 6 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 be laid on the table?
Tabled.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 7 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
__________________
in the chair
4:43 P.M.
Senator Lasee in the chair.
Senator Zien moved rejection of Senate amendment 7 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565.
The question was: Rejection of Senate amendment 7 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 17; noes, 16; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Buettner, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Petak, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 17.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Andrea, Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Grobschmidt, Jauch, Moen, Moore, C. Potter, Risser, Shibilski and Wineke - 16.
Absent or not voting - None.
Rejected.
Senate amendment 9 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senators Chvala, Moen and Shibilski.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 9 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
Senator Weeden moved that Senate amendment 9 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 be laid on the table.
The question was: Shall Senate amendment 9 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 be laid on the table?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 17; noes, 16; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Buettner, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Petak, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 17.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Andrea, Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Grobschmidt, Jauch, Moen, Moore, C. Potter, Risser, Shibilski and Wineke - 16.
Absent or not voting - None.
Tabled.
Senate amendment 10 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senators Jauch, Andrea and Shibilski.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 10 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
S722 Senate amendment 1 to Senate amendment 10 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senator Jauch.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate amendment 10 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
Adopted.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 10 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
Senator Weeden moved that Senate amendment 10 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 be laid on the table.
The question was: Shall Senate amendment 10 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 be laid on the table?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 17; noes, 16; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Buettner, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Petak, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 17.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Andrea, Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Grobschmidt, Jauch, Moen, Moore, C. Potter, Risser, Shibilski and Wineke - 16.
Absent or not voting - None.
Tabled.
Senate amendment 11 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senator Wineke.
Senate amendment 12 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senators Decker, A. Lasee and Welch.
Senate amendment 13 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senators George, Moore and Burke.
Senate amendment 14 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senator Panzer.
Senate amendment 15 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senator Wineke.
Senate amendment 16 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 offered by Senator Wineke.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 11 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
Senator Wineke, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate amendment 11 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 be laid on the table.
Senator Wineke, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate amendment 15 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 be laid on the table.
Senator Wineke, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate amendment 16 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 be laid on the table.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 12 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
Adopted.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 13 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565?
Senator Weeden moved that Senate amendment 13 to Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 565 be laid on the table.
Loading...
Loading...