Concerning procurement, the authority is not covered by the law which
requires, with certain exceptions, purchasing by open competitive bidding or
negotiated competitive proposals, by the law which requires state agencies in the
executive branch to make purchases through DOA nor by requirements to purchase
certain computer services from DOA, by laws requiring the purchase of products
made from recycled or recovered materials, by requirements to make purchases on
the basis of life-cycle costs, by requirements to purchase certain materials from
prison industries and work centers for the severely handicapped and to do certain
business with minority-owned enterprises, or by the laws requiring payment of
interest on late payments to vendors and requiring the purchase of materials
procured from Wisconsin-based businesses and materials manufactured in the
United States. The authority is subject to nondiscrimination requirements in
procurement. Under the bill, the authority may, with the consent of DOA, purchase
materials, supplies, equipment or services from the UW System by mutual consent
or may enter into cooperative purchasing arrangements with the UW System.
Purchases by or through the UW System are generally subject to all state
procurement laws.
Other University of Wisconsin System
This bill imposes a freeze upon salary increases granted to incumbents in
certain administrative positions at the UW System during the period beginning on
the date on which the bill becomes law and ending on June 30, 1997. Under the
proposal, the salary paid to the incumbent in an affected position during this period
may not exceed an annualized rate of $100,000 or the annualized salary paid to the
incumbent in the same position on January 1, 1995, whichever is greater. The freeze
does not apply to any salary increase that is granted under the state compensation
plan before July 1, 1995, or by the board of regents of the UW System before February
1, 1995.
Currently, the salaries for these positions are set by the board of regents subject
to limitations set forth in the state compensation plan.
Under current law, the board of regents of the UW System may invest not more
than 75% of the trust funds held and administered by the board in common stocks.
This bill increases the allowable percentage to 85%.
Current law authorizes the board of regents of the UW System to use balances
in program revenue appropriations as contingent funds for the payment of
miscellaneous expenses if immediate payment is necessary, but not exceeding a total
of $4,000,000.
This bill authorizes the board of regents to use balances in program revenue
appropriations as contingent funds for the payment of miscellaneous expenses only
if DOA determines that immediate payment is necessary. In addition, the daily
balance of the contingent funds may not exceed $3,000,000 and total disbursements
from the funds may not exceed $100,000,000 in any fiscal year.
Current law appropriates general purpose revenue and academic student fees
to the board of regents of the UW System for laboratory modernization. The
appropriations are set to expire at the end of the 1995-96 fiscal year. This bill
eliminates the expiration date.
This bill modifies the appropriation to the board of regents of the UW System
for nonincome sports. Currently, $481,900 annually from moneys received from
parking for all events at athletic facilities at UW-Madison is appropriated; this bill
appropriates all moneys received from the sale of parking provided for all events at
athletic facilities at the UW-Madison, less related expenses. The bill also allows the
funds to be used for debt service on any sports-related facility.
With certain specified exceptions, current law prohibits the furnishing of
complimentary or reduced-price tickets to any UW System athletic event for which
an admission fee is normally charged. One of the exceptions is for complimentary
or reduced-price tickets required by rules of intercollegiate athletic conferences in
which the UW System participates.
This bill modifies that exception. The bill allows complimentary and
reduced-price tickets if such tickets are permitted by rules of intercollegiate athletic
conferences in which the UW System participates and if the chancellor of the
institution participating in the athletic event has approved the furnishing of such
tickets.
Other educational and cultural agencies
Currently, HEAB administers the academic excellence higher education
scholarship program. The program awards higher education scholarships for up to
4 years to certain students who had the highest grade point averages in their high
schools.
This bill establishes a maximum amount for a scholarship under the program
of $3,000 per academic year. The bill also requires the program and its scholarship
recipients to be referred to as the governor's academic excellence higher education
scholarship program and governor's scholars, respectively, in all printed material
disseminated or otherwise distributed by HEAB.
Under current law, HEAB administers a stipend loan program for resident
nursing students, a minority teacher loan program, a minority undergraduate
retention grant program and a program to award grants to resident students who are
currently recipients of aid to families with dependent children (AFDC).
This bill provides that HEAB may not award any original grants or loans under
these programs, except for minority undergraduate retention grants to students
enrolled at private, nonprofit institutions of higher education in this state.
This bill eliminates the higher educational aids board (HEAB) effective July 1,
1996, and transfers all functions of HEAB to DOE. On the same date, the bill also
transfers all functions of the educational approval board (EAB) (currently attached
to the technical college system board) to DOE and transfers EAB itself to DOE as an
advisory council.
Beginning in the 1997-98 fiscal year, this bill directs the board of regents of the
UW System annually to transfer to the state historical society an amount equal to
33% of the cost of acquisitions for and operation of the historical society library, or
$515,000 (adjusted annually for inflation), whichever is greater. The 2 agencies may
agree to transfer a higher amount. In each of the 1995-96 and 1996-97 fiscal years,
the board of regents must transfer $515,000.
The bill also permits the state historical society to collect a fee for use of the
historical society library. Any member of the state historical society, any member of
the faculty or academic staff of the UW System and any student enrolled in the UW
System is exempt from such fees.
Current law establishes a schedule of fees to be collected by the state historical
society for admission to the following historic sites: Old World Wisconsin, Madeline
Island, Pendarvis, Stonefield Village, Villa Louis and Old Wade House. The
historical society is prohibited from collecting any group child admission fee for
admission to any historic site owned and operated by the historical society.
This bill eliminates the fee schedule and the prohibition on group child
admission fees. The historical society may establish and collect a fee for admission
to these historic sites.
Under current law, the historical society operates the Wesley W. Jung Carriage
Museum located at Old Wade House state park. This bill requires the department
of natural resources (DNR) to transfer title to Old Wade House state park, including
the Wesley W. Jung Carriage Museum, to the historical society on July 1, 1996.
Effective July 1, 1996, this bill transfers the transmission and engineering
functions of the educational communications board (ECB) to DOA. The bill permits
the secretary of administration to transfer FTE positions in ECB performing duties
that are primarily related to the transmission and engineering functions, together
with the incumbents in those positions, to DOA on that date, and requires the
secretary to submit a plan to the chairpersons of JCF for the transfer of other FTE
positions in ECB performing those duties, to become effective no later than July 1,
1997. Upon submittal, DOA may implement the plan.
The bill also requires ECB and DOA to enter into an affiliation agreement with
the board of regents of the UW System with respect to broadcasting station WHA and
WHA-TV. The bill does not transfer any programmatic responsibilities of ECB.
This bill creates a Wisconsin regranting program to be administered by the arts
board. Under the program, the arts board awards grants to local arts agencies and
municipalities. The bill requires a matching fund contribution from a grantee equal
to the amount of the grant awarded under the program.
Under current law, the arts board is attached to DOA. This bill transfers the
arts board to the department of tourism and parks, as created by the bill.
Current law directs the state technical college system board to develop a
program relating to recycling. This bill eliminates this duty.
Employment
Currently, the employment relations commission is authorized, and directed in
some cases, to attempt to mediate labor disputes in private, local government and
state employment. During mediation, the mediator attempts to identify and narrow
differences between the parties and to encourage a voluntary settlement of the
dispute. The commission employs staff members for the purpose of providing
mediation services, which are available at state expense.
This bill prohibits any officer or employe of the commission from engaging in
mediation or facilitating mediation of a labor dispute by any other person. Under the
bill, the parties to a labor dispute may retain any person other than an officer or
employe of the commission to provide mediation services. The cost of those services
is divided equally between the parties. In labor disputes involving local government
or state employment, the bill requires each party or the parties jointly to notify the
commission in writing of the name and address of any mediator who is retained by
the parties.
This bill directs the employment commission, as created by this bill, to study
its procedures, recommend ways to streamline its operations and report its findings
and recommendations to the secretary of administration by October 31, 1996. See
also State government, state employment.
Under current law, various state agencies administer various state and federal
employment and education programs. This bill consolidates oversight over those
programs under the governor's council on workforce excellence which is created by
the bill. The bill requires the council, consisting of the heads of the state agencies
responsible for administering employment and education programs and
representatives of the public school system, 4-year postsecondary educational
institutions, technical college districts, community-based organizations that
provide employment training, business and industry and organized labor, to:
1. Identify the workforce development needs of the state and recommend goals
for meeting those needs and steps for meeting those goals.
2. Recommend a strategic plan for coordinating the provision of services and
the allocation of funding and resources under the various state and federal
employment and education programs.
3. Monitor the provision of those services and the allocation of that funding and
those resources and evaluate the effectiveness of those programs in meeting the
state's workforce development needs.
4. Recommend the seeking of waivers of federal laws, regulations or policies
that impede the effectiveness or coordination of those employment and education
programs.
5. Recommend occupations for the youth apprenticeship program and skill
standards for the school-to-work program.
The bill further consolidates the state's employment and education programs
by:
1. Directing the council to prepare, by January 15, 1996, a plan that terminates
other state advisory bodies that are duplicative of the council or whose duties and
responsibilities can be taken over by the council and a plan that reorganizes all
substate boundaries for the local administration of employment and education
programs so that those boundaries are contiguous with the technical college district
boundaries.
2. Directing the department of industry, labor and human relations (DILHR)
to prepare, by February 15, 1996, a plan that structures the new functions and
personnel of DILHR, as affected by this bill.
3. Upgrading the office of workforce excellence in DILHR, which currently
coordinates and implements DILHR's workforce excellence initiatives, to the
division of workforce excellence and expanding the duties of that new division to
include planning, coordinating, administering and implementing the youth
apprenticeship program, under which young people receive classroom and
on-the-job training in skilled trades, and the school-to-work program, under which
young people receive training in the skills necessary to make the transition from
school to work.
4. Terminating the youth apprenticeship council and assigning the duties of
that council to the council on workforce excellence.
Currently, a school district is required to bargain collectively in good faith with
the majority representative of its employes in a collective bargaining unit concerning
the wages, hours and conditions of employment of the employes.
This bill provides that a school district is not required to bargain collectively
concerning any decision to create a performance recognition plan or concerning the
amount of any performance recognition award made under such a plan (see also
Education, primary and secondary education).
The bill also provides that a school district is prohibited from bargaining
collectively with respect to reassignment of employes, with or without regard to
seniority, resulting from the decision of the school board to contract with an
individual or group to operate a school as a charter school, as authorized by the bill,
or to convert a school to a charter school, or with respect to the impact of any such
decision on the wages, hours or conditions of employment of the employes who
perform services for the school district; and, in the Milwaukee Public Schools, the
reassignment of employes, with or without regard to seniority, resulting from the
decision of the school board to close or reopen a school, the decision of the school board
to contract for the management or operation of a school, or the decision of the school
board to contract with a nonprofit, private school or agency to provide educational
programs, or the impact of any of these decisions on the wages, hours and conditions
of employment of the employes in the school district.
Currently, subject to certain limitations, the employment relations commission
decides which employes of a school district shall be included in the same collective
bargaining unit with other employes of the school district, but the commission is
directed to avoid fragmentation of units. This bill provides that, upon request of 30%
of the professional employes of a school district who perform any services at a charter
school, the commission must conduct an election for the purpose of permitting the
employes to decide whether they wish to be represented in a separate collective
bargaining unit from any unit that includes other employes of the school district. If
a majority of the employes voting in the election decide to be represented in a
separate unit, the commission must place the employes in such a unit (see also
Education, primary and secondary education).
Environment
Water quality
Under the clean water fund program, this state provides financial assistance
to local governments for projects related to the control of water pollution, including
sewage treatment plants. Under current law, the department of natural resources
(DNR) and the department of administration (DOA) administer the clean water fund
program. This bill increases the amount of general obligation bonds that the state
may issue for the clean water fund program. The bill also establishes the present
value of the subsidies for clean water fund assistance that may be provided in the
1995-97 biennium.
Under current law, the clean water fund program may not provide below
market rate (subsidized) financing for the portion of a project that treats waste from
industrial users. This bill eliminates that restriction.
Currently, the clean water fund program provides financial hardship
assistance to certain communities to further reduce the costs of financing water
pollution control projects. Generally, clean water fund program financial assistance
is provided in the form of a below-market interest rate loan; however, hardship
assistance may be provided in the form of a grant. Under this bill, clean water fund
hardship assistance may only be provided in the form of a no-interest loan.
The bill also changes the eligibility criteria for clean water fund hardship
assistance. Currently, eligibility for clean water fund hardship assistance is based
on the level of wastewater treatment charges in a community compared to adjusted
gross income and property values in the community, per capita adjusted gross income
in the community compared to per capita adjusted gross income in this state and the
average equalized value of a parcel of improved residential property in the
community compared to the average equalized value of a parcel of improved
residential property in this state. Under the bill, a municipality is eligible for clean
water fund hardship assistance if both of the following apply:
1. The median household income in the municipality is 80% or less of the
median household income in this state.
2. The estimated total annual charges per residential user in the municipality
that relate to wastewater treatment would exceed 2.5% of the median household
income in the municipality in the absence of hardship assistance.
The current eligibility criteria for hardship assistance continue to apply to
municipalities that received hardship assistance for project planning and design
during fiscal years 1991 to 1995 or whose construction projects appeared on the 1993,
1994 or 1995 hardship funding list.
Current law earmarks 18% of the total amount of subsidy available under the
clean water fund program in a state fiscal biennium for hardship assistance, 74% of
the total subsidy for ordinary clean water fund program projects and 8% for
additional costs associated with approved clean water fund program projects. This
bill eliminates the earmarking of clean water fund subsidy, but provides that during
the 1995-97 biennium the total value of subsidies used to provide hardship
assistance may not exceed $9,600,000.
In addition, the bill makes a number of changes in the process for obtaining
financial assistance under the clean water fund program and transfers some clean
water fund program administrative responsibilities from DNR to DOA. Under
current law, the clean water fund program has an annual funding cycle. Under this
bill, funding decisions are made on a continuing basis. Under current law, if there
is insufficient funding for all eligible projects during a fiscal year, funding is
distributed using a priority ranking established by DNR. Under this bill, funding
is distributed in the order in which projects are ready to be constructed. If no funding
is available for a project when it is ready to be constructed, DOA places the project
on a list to be funded when funding is available.
Current law requires DNR and DOA jointly to prepare 3 versions of a biennial
finance plan for the clean water fund program. Under this bill, DNR and DOA
prepare amendments to the biennial finance plan to reflect the biennial budget bill
and the biennial budget act, rather than new versions of the plan. The bill also
eliminates requirements that the biennial finance plan include certain information.
The bill requires the biennial finance plan to include audited financial statements
of the clean water fund program.
Under current law, DNR is required to complete plans to implement the
nonpoint source water pollution abatement program (which provides financial
assistance for measures to reduce water pollution from diffuse sources) in priority
watersheds (those watersheds in which the need for nonpoint source pollution
abatement is most critical) by December 31, 2000. This bill changes the date by
which the plans must be completed to December 31, 2015.
This bill reduces the amount of general obligation bonding that may be incurred
for the nonpoint source program by $4,000,000. The bill increases the amount of
general obligation bonding that may be incurred for environmental cleanups in or
adjacent to the Great Lakes by $4,000,000.
Current law prohibits the building commission from incurring over
$15,500,000 in general obligation bonding for the nonpoint source program without
the approval of the secretary of administration and the joint committee on finance.
This bill eliminates that prohibition.
Under current law, DNR provides lake management planning grants to provide
information on the quality of water in lakes and to aid in the selection of projects to
improve water quality. This bill adds nonprofit conservation organizations as
eligible recipients of lake management planning grants.
Under current law, DNR provides lake management grants to improve or
protect the quality of water in lakes. This bill eliminates the current $100,000
maximum amount for a lake management grant.
Air quality
