SB573, s. 28
24Section
28. 885.235 (1) (a) 1. of the statutes is amended to read:
SB573,10,7
1885.235
(1) (a) 1. The fact that the analysis shows that
there was more than
20.0% but less than 0.08% by weight of alcohol in the person's blood or more than 0.0
3grams but less than 0.08 grams of alcohol in 210 liters of the person's breath the per
4son had an alcohol concentration of more than 0.0 but less than 0.08 is relevant evi
5dence on the issue of being under the combined influence of alcohol and a controlled
6substance or any other drug, but, except as provided in par. (d) or sub. (1m), is not
7to be given any prima facie effect.
SB573, s. 29
8Section
29. 885.235 (1) (a) 2. of the statutes is amended to read:
SB573,10,159
885.235
(1) (a) 2. The fact that the analysis shows that
there was more than
100.0% but less than 0.1% by weight of alcohol in the person's blood or more than 0.0
11grams but less than 0.1 grams of alcohol in 210 liters of the person's breath the person
12had an alcohol concentration of more than 0.0 but less than 0.1 is relevant evidence
13on the issue of being under the combined influence of alcohol and a controlled sub
14stance or any other drug but, except as provided in par. (d) or sub. (1m), is not to be
15given any prima facie effect.
SB573, s. 30
16Section
30. 885.235 (1) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:
SB573,10,2317
885.235
(1) (b) Except with respect to the operation of a commercial motor ve
18hicle as provided in par. (d), the fact that the analysis shows that
there was more than
190.04% but less than 0.1% by weight of alcohol in the person's blood or more than 0.04
20grams but less than 0.1 grams of alcohol in 210 liters of the person's breath the person
21had an alcohol concentration of more than 0.04 but less than 0.1 is relevant evidence
22on the issue of intoxication or an alcohol concentration of 0.1 or more but is not to be
23given any prima facie effect.
SB573, s. 31
24Section
31. 885.235 (1) (bd) of the statutes is amended to read:
SB573,11,7
1885.235
(1) (bd) Except with respect to the operation of a commercial motor ve
2hicle as provided in par. (d), the fact that the analysis shows that
there was more than
30.04% but less than 0.08% by weight of alcohol in the person's blood or more than 0.04
4grams but less than 0.08 grams of alcohol in 210 liters of the person's breath the per
5son had an alcohol concentration of more than 0.04 but less than 0.08 is relevant evi
6dence on the issue of intoxication or an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more, but is
7not to be given any prima facie effect.
SB573, s. 32
8Section
32. 885.235 (1) (c) of the statutes is amended to read:
SB573,11,139
885.235
(1) (c) The fact that the analysis shows that
there was 0.1% or more
10by weight of alcohol in the person's blood or 0.1 grams or more of alcohol in 210 liters
11of the person's breath the person had an alcohol concentration of 0.1 or more is prima
12facie evidence that he or she was under the influence of an intoxicant and is prima
13facie evidence that he or she had an alcohol concentration of 0.1 or more.
SB573, s. 33
14Section
33. 885.235 (1) (cd) of the statutes is amended to read:
SB573,11,2115
885.235
(1) (cd) In cases involving persons who have 2 or more prior convic
16tions, suspensions or revocations, as counted under s. 343.307 (1), the fact that the
17analysis shows that
there was 0.08% or more by weight of alcohol in the person's
18blood or 0.08 grams or more of alcohol in 210 liters of the person's breath the person
19had an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more is prima facie evidence that he or she
20was under the influence of an intoxicant and is prima facie evidence that he or she
21had an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more.
SB573, s. 34
22Section
34. 885.235 (1) (d) of the statutes is amended to read:
SB573,12,323
885.235
(1) (d) The fact that the analysis shows that
there was 0.04% or more
24by weight of alcohol in the person's blood or 0.04 grams or more of alcohol in 210 liters
25of the person's breath the person had an alcohol concentration of 0.04 or more is
1prima facie evidence that he or she was under the influence of an intoxicant with
2respect to operation of a commercial motor vehicle and is prima facie evidence that
3he or she had an alcohol concentration of 0.04 or more.
SB573, s. 35
4Section
35. 885.235 (1m) of the statutes is amended to read:
SB573,12,185
885.235
(1m) In any action under s. 23.33 (4c) (a) 3., 346.63 (2m) or (7) or
6350.101 (1) (c), evidence of the amount of alcohol in the person's blood at the time in
7question, as shown by chemical analysis of a sample of the person's blood or urine or
8evidence of the amount of alcohol in the person's breath, is admissible on the issue
9of whether he or she had
a blood an alcohol concentration in the range specified in
10s. 23.33 (4c) (a) 3., 346.63 (2m) or 350.101 (1) (c) or
a measured an alcohol concentra
11tion
above 0.0 under s. 346.63 (7) if the sample was taken within 3 hours after the
12event to be proved. The fact that the analysis shows that
there was more than 0.0%
13but not more than 0.1% by weight of alcohol in the person's blood or more than 0.0
14grams but not more than 0.1 grams of alcohol in 210 liters of the person's breath the
15person had an alcohol concentration of more than 0.0 but not more than 0.1 is prima
16facie evidence that the person had
a blood an alcohol concentration in the range spe
17cified in s. 23.33 (4c) (a) 3., 346.63 (2m) or 350.101 (1) (c) or
a measured an alcohol
18concentration
above 0.0 under s. 346.63 (7).
SB573, s. 36
19Section
36. 885.235 (4) of the statutes is amended to read:
SB573,12,2520
885.235
(4) The provisions of this section relating to the admissibility of chemi
21cal tests for alcohol concentration
, or intoxication
or blood alcohol concentration shall
22not be construed as limiting the introduction of any other competent evidence bear
23ing on the question of whether or not a person was under the influence of an intoxi
24cant, had a specified alcohol concentration or had
a blood an alcohol concentration
25in the range specified in s. 23.33 (4c) (a) 3., 346.63 (2m) or 350.101 (1) (c).
SB573, s. 37
1Section
37. 905.04 (4) (f) of the statutes is amended to read:
SB573,13,42
905.04
(4) (f)
Tests for intoxication. There is no privilege concerning the results
3of or circumstances surrounding any chemical tests for intoxication or
blood alcohol
4concentration
, as defined in s. 340.01 (1v).
SB573, s. 38
5Section
38. 939.22 (3) of the statutes is created to read:
SB573,13,66
939.22
(3) "Alcohol concentration" has the meaning given in s. 340.01 (1v).
SB573, s. 39
7Section
39. 940.09 (1g) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:
SB573,13,118
940.09
(1g) (b) Causes the death of another by the operation or handling of a
9firearm or airgun while the person has
a blood an alcohol concentration of
0.1% 0.1 10or more
by weight of alcohol in that person's blood or 0.10 grams or more of alcohol
11in 210 liters of that person's breath.
SB573, s. 40
12Section
40. 940.09 (2) of the statutes is amended to read:
SB573,13,1713
940.09
(2) The defendant has a defense if he or she proves by a preponderance
14of the evidence that the death would have occurred even if he or she had been exercis
15ing due care and he or she had not been under the influence of an intoxicant or did
16not have
a blood an alcohol concentration described under sub. (1) (b) or (bm) or (1g)
17(b).
SB573, s. 41
18Section
41. 940.25 (2) of the statutes is amended to read:
SB573,13,2319
940.25
(2) The defendant has a defense if he or she proves by a preponderance
20of the evidence that the great bodily harm would have occurred even if he or she had
21been exercising due care and he or she had not been under the influence of an intoxi
22cant or did not have
a blood an alcohol concentration described under sub. (1) (b) or
23(bm).
SB573, s. 42
24Section
42. 967.055 (1) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:
SB573,14,6
1967.055
(1) (b) The legislature intends to encourage the vigorous prosecution
2of offenses concerning the operation of motorboats by persons under the influence of
3an intoxicant, a controlled substance or both to a degree which renders him or her
4incapable of operating a motorboat safely, or under the combined influence of an in
5toxicant and any other drug to a degree which renders him or her incapable of operat
6ing a motorboat safely or having
a blood an alcohol concentration of
0.1% 0.1 or more.