Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly substitute amendment 2 to Assembly Bill 651 offered by Representative Huebsch.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly substitute amendment 2 to Assembly Bill 651 be adopted?
Motion carried.
Assembly amendment 3 to Assembly substitute amendment 2 to Assembly Bill 651 offered by Representatives Wood and Huebsch.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 3 to Assembly substitute amendment 2 to Assembly Bill 651 be adopted?
Motion carried.
Assembly amendment 4 to Assembly substitute amendment 2 to Assembly Bill 651 offered by Representative Huebsch.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 4 to Assembly substitute amendment 2 to Assembly Bill 651 be adopted?
Motion carried.
Assembly amendment 5 to Assembly substitute amendment 2 to Assembly Bill 651 offered by Representatives Lazich and Schneider.
Representative Huebsch moved that Assembly amendment 5 to Assembly substitute amendment 2 to Assembly Bill 651 be laid on the table.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 5 to Assembly substitute amendment 2 to Assembly Bill 651 be laid on the table?
The roll was taken.
The result follows:
Ayes - Representatives Ainsworth, Baldwin, Baumgart, Bock, Brandemuehl, Coggs, Dobyns, Duff, Foti, Freese, Gard, Goetsch, Green, Gronemus, Hahn, Handrick, Hanson, Harsdorf, Hebl, Hoven, Huber, Huebsch, Hutchison, Jeskewitz, Johnsrud, Kaufert, Kelso, Kreibich, Kreuser, Krug, La Fave, Ladwig, F. Lasee, J. Lehman, M. Lehman, Meyer, Murat, Musser, Notestein, Ott, Ourada, Owens, Plouff, R. Potter, Powers, Riley, Ryba, Schafer, Seratti, Skindrud, Spillner, Springer, Steinbrink, Sykora, Underheim, Urban, Vander Loop, Vrakas, Ward, Wieckert, L. Young, R. Young and Speaker Jensen - 63.
Noes - Representatives Albers, Black, Boyle, Carpenter, Cullen, Dueholm, Grothman, Gunderson, Hasenohrl, Hubler, Kedzie, Klusman, Kunicki, Lazich, Linton, Lorge, Morris-Tatum, Nass, Olsen, Otte, Plale, Porter, Reynolds, Robson, Schneider, Travis, Turner, Walker, Wasserman, Williams, Wood, Ziegelbauer and Zukowski - 33.
Absent or not voting - Representatives Krusick and Staskunas - 2.
Motion carried.
The question was: Shall Assembly substitute amendment 2 to Assembly Bill 651 be adopted?
Motion carried.
The question was: Shall Assembly Bill 651 be ordered engrossed and read a third time?
Motion carried.
Representative Foti asked unanimous consent that the rules be suspended and that Assembly Bill 651 be given a third reading.
Representative Schneider objected.
__________________
Representative Baumgart moved that Assembly Bill 71 be withdrawn from the joint committee on Finance and referred to the committee on Rules.
Representative Gard moved that the motion to withdraw Assembly Bill 71 from the joint committee on Finance and refer it to the committee on Rules be laid on the table.
The question was: Shall the motion to withdraw Assembly Bill 71 from the joint committee on Finance and refer it to the committee on Rules be laid on the table?
The roll was taken.
The result follows:
Ayes - Representatives Ainsworth, Albers, Brandemuehl, Dobyns, Duff, Foti, Freese, Gard, Goetsch, Green, Gronemus, Grothman, Gunderson, Hahn, Handrick, Hanson, Harsdorf, Hoven, Huebsch, Hutchison, Jeskewitz, Johnsrud, Kaufert, Kedzie, Kelso, Klusman, Kreibich, Ladwig, F. Lasee, Lazich, M. Lehman, Musser, Nass, Olsen, Ott, Otte, Ourada, Owens, Porter, Powers, Ryba, Schafer, Seratti, Skindrud, Spillner, Sykora, Underheim, Urban, Vrakas, Walker, Ward, Wieckert, Zukowski and Speaker Jensen - 54.
Noes - Representatives Baldwin, Baumgart, Black, Bock, Boyle, Carpenter, Coggs, Cullen, Dueholm, Hasenohrl, Hebl, Huber, Hubler, Kreuser, Krug, Kunicki, La Fave, J. Lehman, Linton, Lorge, Meyer, Morris-Tatum, Murat, Notestein, Plale, Plouff, R. Potter, Reynolds, Riley, Robson, Schneider, Springer, Steinbrink, Travis, Turner, Vander Loop, Wasserman, Williams, Wood, L. Young, R. Young and Ziegelbauer - 42.
Absent or not voting - Representatives Krusick and Staskunas - 2.
Motion carried.
Representative Musser asked unanimous consent to be recorded as voting on the following questions during his leave of absences on March 10, March 11 and March 12, 1998. Granted.
Tuesday, March 10
The question was: Assembly Bill 589 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed? "Aye".
The question was: Assembly Bill 773 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed? "Aye".
The question was: Senate Bill 321 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in? "Aye".
The question was: Assembly Bill 648 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed? "Aye".
The question was: Shall Senate Bill 315 be rereferred to the committee on Health? "No".
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 11 to Senate Bill 315 be laid on the table? "No".
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 8 to Senate Bill 315 be laid on the table? "No".
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 17 to Senate Bill 315 be adopted? "No".
The question was: Shall Senate Bill 315 be laid on the table? "Aye".
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 17 to Senate Bill 315 be laid on the table? "No".
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 28 to Senate Bill 315 be adopted? "Aye".
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 15 to Senate Bill 315 be laid on the table? "No".
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 26 to Senate Bill 315 be laid on the table? "Aye".
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 30 to Senate Bill 315 be laid on the table? "No".
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 23 to Senate Bill 315 be laid on the table? "No".
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 23 to Senate Bill 315 be rejected? "No".
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 23 to Senate Bill 315 be adopted? "Aye".
The question was: Shall Senate Bill 315 be ordered to a third reading? "Aye".
The question was: Shall Assembly Bill
75 be withdrawn from the committee on Urban and Local Affairs and referred to the committee on Rules? "Aye".
Wednesday, March 11
The question was: Assembly Bill 638 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed? "Aye".
The question was: Assembly Bill 734 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed? "Aye".
The question was: Assembly Bill 787 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed? "Aye".
The question was: Senate Bill 61 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in? "Aye".
Thursday, March 12
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly Joint Resolution 111 be laid on the table? "Aye".
The question was: Senate Bill 315 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in as amended? "No".
The question was: Assembly Bill 180 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed? "No".
The question was: Senate Bill 258 having been read three times, shall the bill be concurred in? "Aye".
The question was: Assembly Bill 833 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed? "Aye".
The question was: Assembly Bill 579 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed? "Aye".
The question was: Assembly Bill 687 having been read three times, shall the bill be passed? "Aye".
The question was: Shall the rules be suspended and Assembly Bill 746 be withdrawn from the committee on Rules and taken up at this time? "No".
The question was: Shall the rules be suspended and Assembly Bill 230 be withdrawn from the committee on Rules and taken up at this time? "No".
__________________
Communications
March 18, 1998
Charles Sanders
Assembly Chief Clerk
1 East Main Street, Suite 402
Madison, WI 53708
Dear Charlie:
Please register me as voting "Aye" on the questions from Wednesday, March 18 during my leave of absence:
Concurrence of SA 1 to Assembly Joint Resolution 11
Passage of Assembly Bill 491
Passage of Assembly Bill 797
Sincerely,
Peggy Krusick
97th Assembly District
__________________
Representative Hasenohrl asked unanimous consent that the Assembly adjourn in honor of Katie Lassa, who is celebrating her 13th birthday today, and is the sister of his legislative aide Julie Lassa. Granted.
