Senate Bill 255
Relating to: federal waivers under the food stamp program.
Read a second time.
Senator Moore, with unanimous consent, asked to be added as a coauthor of Senate Bill 255.
Senator Moore, with unanimous consent, asked to be added as a coauthor of Senate Bill 156.
Senator Moore, with unanimous consent, asked to be added as a cosponsor of Assembly Bill 117.
Senator Moore, with unanimous consent, asked to be added as a cosponsor of Assembly Bill 279.
Senator Moore, with unanimous consent, asked to be added as a cosponsor of Assembly Bill 300.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Chvala, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Senate Bill 255
Read a third time and passed.
Senate Bill 262
Relating to: the regulation of massage therapists and bodyworkers, creating a massage therapy and bodywork examining board, granting rule-making authority and providing a penalty.
Read a second time.
Senator Burke, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate Bill 262 be referred to the Joint Committee on Finance.
Senate Bill 269
Relating to: the number of members on the system board in certain federated library systems; nomination and approval of members of a library system board in a federated public library system; public library advisory committees; exemption from the county property tax levy for library services; the establishment by counties of standards for public libraries; convening a public library and school library technology conference; public library system aids; reports on the effectiveness of public library systems; withdrawal from and participation in public library systems; appeals to the state superintendent of public instruction of a county library board or county board of supervisors' disapproval of a town's request to establish a public library; authorizing private colleges and universities to participate in telecommunications networks; and requiring counties to pay public libraries for services provided to residents of the county that reside in municipalities that do not maintain public libraries.
Read a second time.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate Bill 269?
Adopted.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 2 to Senate Bill 269?
Adopted.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 269?
Adopted.
Senator C. Potter moved rejection of Senate amendment 4 to Senate Bill 269.
The question was: Rejection of Senate amendment 4 to Senate Bill 269?
Rejected.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 5 to Senate Bill 269?
Adopted.
Senator C. Potter moved rejection of Senate amendment 6 to Senate Bill 269.
The question was: Rejection of Senate amendment 6 to Senate Bill 269?
Rejected.
Senate amendment 7 to Senate Bill 269 offered by Senator C. Potter.
Senator Potter, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate amendment 7 to Senate Bill 269 be withdrawn and returned to author.
Senate amendment 8 to Senate Bill 269 offered by Senators Panzer, Huelsman and Darling.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 8 to Senate Bill 269?
Adopted.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Moen, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Senate Bill 269
Read a third time and passed.
Senate Bill 287
Relating to: default judgments in municipal court cases.
Read a second time.
__________________
Senator Farrow, with unanimous consent, asked that the Senate recess until 2:14 P.M..
1:45 P.M.
__________________
2:14 P.M.
The Senate reconvened.
Senator Risser in the chair.
Senator Chvala, with unanimous consent, asked that all action be immediately messaged to the Assembly.
Senator George moved that Senate Bill 287 be referred to the committee on Judiciary, Campaign Finance Reform and Consumer Affairs.
The question was: Shall Senate Bill 287 be referred to the committee on Judiciary, Campaign Finance Reform and Consumer Affairs ?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 11; noes, 21; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Breske, Burke, Darling, Farrow, George, Moore, Panzer, Risser, Rude, Welch and Wineke - 11.
S454
Noes - Senators Chvala, Clausing, Cowles, Decker, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Fitzgerald, Grobschmidt, Huelsman, Jauch, A. Lasee, Moen, Plache, C. Potter, Roessler, Rosenzweig, Schultz, Shibilski, Weeden, Wirch and Zien - 21.
Absent or not voting - None.
Referal Refused.
Senate amendment 1 to Senate Bill 287 offered by Senator George.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate Bill 287?
Adopted.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Chvala, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Senate Bill 287
Read a third time and passed.
Senate Bill 315
Relating to: eliminating the office of health care information and transferring functions related to collection, analysis and dissemination of health care information to the department of health and family services, confidentiality of patient health care records, granting rule-making authority, providing a penalty and making appropriations.
Read a second time.
Senator Moen, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill
315 be laid on the table.
Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 2 to Senate Bill 315 offered by Senator Roessler.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 2 to Senate Bill 315?
Adopted.
Senate amendment 2 to Senate substitute amendment 2 to Senate Bill 315 offered by Senator Huelsman.
Senator Huelsman, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate amendment 2 to Senate substitute amendment 2 to Senate Bill 315 be laid on the table.
Senate amendment 3 to Senate substitute amendment 2 to Senate Bill 315 offered by Senator Huelsman.
Senator Panzer moved rejection of Senate amendment 3 to Senate substitute amendment 2 to Senate Bill 315.
The question was: Rejection of Senate amendment 3 to Senate substitute amendment 2 to Senate Bill 315?
Rejected.
Senate amendment 4 to Senate substitute amendment 2 to Senate Bill 315 offered by Senator Roessler.
Senator Moen moved rejection of Senate amendment 4 to Senate substitute amendment 2 to Senate Bill 315.
The question was: Rejection of Senate amendment 4 to Senate substitute amendment 2 to Senate Bill 315?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 20; noes, 12; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Cowles, Decker, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, George, Grobschmidt, Huelsman, Jauch, Moen, Panzer, Plache, Risser, Rude, Weeden and Zien - 20.
Noes - Senators Darling, Drzewiecki, A. Lasee, Moore, C. Potter, Roessler, Rosenzweig, Schultz, Shibilski, Welch, Wineke and Wirch - 12.
Absent or not voting - None.
Rejected.
