The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 2 to Senate Bill 259?
Adopted.
Senator Potter moved rejection of Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 259.
The question was: Rejection of Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 259?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 16; noes, 16; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Grobschmidt, Jauch, Moen, Moore, Plache, C. Potter, Risser, Shibilski, Wineke and Wirch - 16.
Noes - Senators Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Roessler, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 16.
Absent or not voting - None.
Rejection refused.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 259?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 16; noes, 16; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Roessler, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 16.
Noes - Senators Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Grobschmidt, Jauch, Moen, Moore, Plache, C. Potter, Risser, Shibilski, Wineke and Wirch - 16.
Absent or not voting - None.
Adoption refused.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Moen, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Senate Bill 259
Read a third time.
The ayes and noes were required and the vote was: ayes, 24; noes, 8; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Darling, Decker, Fitzgerald, George, Grobschmidt, Huelsman, Jauch, A. Lasee, Moen, Moore, Plache, C. Potter, Risser, Roessler, Rude, Schultz, Shibilski, Wineke, Wirch and Zien - 24.
Noes - Senators Cowles, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Panzer, Rosenzweig, Weeden and Welch - 8.
Absent or not voting - None.
Passed.
Senator Chvala, with unanimous consent, asked that Assembly Bill 688 be considered for action at this time.
Assembly Bill 688
Relating to: litigation by persons incarcerated, imprisoned, confined or detained in a jail or prison, immunity from civil liability, the time period for the state to respond to an action and limiting access to public records.
Read a second time.
Senator Chvala, with unanimous consent, asked that Assembly Bill 600 be considered for action at this time.
Assembly Bill 600
Relating to: the placement of a child with a relative for adoption and application of the interstate compact on the placement of children; the time by which a juvenile court must hold a hearing on a petition for adoptive placement of a child with a nonrelative and a petition to terminate parental rights that is filed with a petition for adoptive placement; removal of a child from a foster home, treatment foster home or group home for the purpose of placing the child by an agency for adoption; education about adoption and school age parents programs; who may be adopted; the documentation required in a permanency plan for preadoptive placement of a child in foster care or treatment foster care under a voluntary agreement; payments by an adoptive or proposed adoptive parent for the expenses of a birth parent or child; the release of identifying information by an agency that placed a child for adoption or that was appointed guardian of a child who was adopted; advertising related to adoption; the time by which a petition for a rehearing on the ground of new evidence must be filed in a juvenile court proceeding; and providing a penalty.
Read a second time.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Chvala, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Assembly Bill 600
Read a third time and concurred in.
Assembly Bill 688
Relating to: litigation by persons incarcerated, imprisoned, confined or detained in a jail or prison, immunity from civil liability, the time period for the state to respond to an action and limiting access to public records.
Read a second time.
Senator Chvala, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 688 be laid on the table.
Senator Chvala, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate amendment 2 to Assembly Bill 688 be laid on the table.
Senator Chvala, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate amendment 3 to Assembly Bill 688 be laid on the table.
Senator Chvala, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate amendment 4 to Assembly Bill 688 be laid on the table.
Senate amendment 5 to Assembly Bill 688 offered by Senators Moore, Wirch and Chvala.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 5 to Assembly Bill 688?
Adopted.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Chvala, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Read a third time.
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 29; noes, 3; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Cowles, Darling, Decker, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Grobschmidt, Huelsman, Jauch, A. Lasee, Moen, Panzer, Plache, C. Potter, Roessler, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Shibilski, Weeden, Welch, Wineke, Wirch and Zien - 29.
Noes - Senators George, Moore and Risser - 3.
Absent or not voting - None.
Concurred in as amended.
Senator Roessler, with unanimous consent, asked to be added as a coauthor of Senate Bill 493.
Senator Welch, with unanimous consent, asked to be added as a cosponsor of Assembly Bill 743.
Senator Welch, with unanimous consent, asked to be added as a cosponsor of Assembly Bill 755.
Senator Chvala, with unanimous consent, asked that Assembly Bill 645 be considered for action at this time.
Assembly Bill 645
Relating to: changes to the probate code.
Read a second time.
__________________
1:20 P.M.
Senator Moore in the chair.
Senate amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 645 offered by Senators Risser and Burke.
Senate amendment 2 to Assembly Bill 645 offered by Senators Risser and Burke.
Senator Huelsman, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 645 be placed after Senate amendment 2 to Assembly Bill 645.
Senator Huelsman moved rejection of Senate amendment 2 to Assembly Bill 645.
The question was: Rejection of Senate amendment 2 to Assembly Bill 645?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 16; noes, 16; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Roessler, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 16.
Noes - Senators Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Grobschmidt, Jauch, Moen, Moore, Plache, C. Potter, Risser, Shibilski, Wineke and Wirch - 16.
Absent or not voting - None.
Rejection refused.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 2 to Assembly Bill 645?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 16; noes, 16; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Grobschmidt, Jauch, Moen, Moore, Plache, C. Potter, Risser, Shibilski, Wineke and Wirch - 16.
Noes - Senators Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Roessler, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 16.
Absent or not voting - None.
Adoption refused.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 645?
Adopted.
Senator Risser moved the vote by which Senate amendment 2 to Assembly Bill 645 was refused adoption be reconsidered.
The question was: Shall the vote by which Senate amendment 2 to Assembly Bill 645 was refused adoption be reconsidered?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 16; noes, 16; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Grobschmidt, Jauch, Moen, Moore, Plache, C. Potter, Risser, Shibilski, Wineke and Wirch - 16.
Noes - Senators Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Roessler, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 16.