Conduct of Soil Surveys and Soil Mapping. Authorize the Land Information Board rather than DOA to: (a) conduct of soil surveying and mapping activities; (b) assess state agencies for the costs of conducting soil surveys and soil mapping activities; and (c) contract with the Board of Commissioners of Public Lands for the conduct of soil surveys and mapping activities on the Board's trust lands.
Schedule and Funding Modifications to the Soil Survey and Soil Mapping Project. Modify the funding requirements for the soil survey and soil mapping project to reflect the spreading of project costs over six years instead of four years. As a result of these modifications, delete $205,000 annually appropriated from register of deeds recording fees for these projects and instead restore these amounts to the Board's aids to counties appropriation. There would be no net fiscal change associated with these offsetting adjustments. In addition, delete $620,000 annually earmarked for soil survey and soil mapping activities associated with the PR-service appropriation for land information systems repealed above. Finally, delete $134,800 annually of funds derived from agency assessments to reflect this revised six-year project schedule. [Reductions of $67,400 annually would also be made under the budgets of both DNR and DOT to reflect these project schedule changes. Further, a reduction of $10,200 annually would be made under the budget of the Board of Commissioners of Public Lands to reflect these project schedule changes.]
Extension of Scheduled Sunset Dates. Extend the current September 1, 2003, sunset date for the Land Information Board and associated functions and the collection of a state share of register of deeds recording fees to September 1, 2005.
Veto by Governor [B-26]: Conduct of Soil Surveys and Soil Mapping. Delete the authority of the Land Information Board to assess any state agency for any amount that the Board determines is required for soil surveying and soil mapping activities, including the ability to make assessments on a premium basis, pay costs on an actual basis and contract with the Board for soil surveys and mapping on its lands. In addition, delete the words "Land information board" from the title of the appropriation to which the agency payments would be made for soil surveying and mapping activities and also eliminate references to assessments levied by the Board from the statutory purpose of the appropriation. Make the modified soil surveys and mapping appropriation (funded from state agency support) permanent by eliminating its scheduled September 1, 2005, repeal. Because the Governor's veto results in the deletion of the statutory authority to assess state agencies for soil survey and mapping costs, no revenue stream is anticipated to support the $265,200 PR annually of expenditure authority included in the biennial budget act in the soil survey and mapping state agency support appropriation. Consequently, no expenditures from this appropriation are projected.
Extension of Scheduled Sunset Dates. Retain the current law sunset date of September 1, 2003, applicable to all current law provisions governing the Land Information Board. Establish a September 1, 2003, sunset date for the Board's new authority to undertake soil surveying and soil mapping activities and to the associated new appropriation that funds these activities, by deleting the following nonstatutory effective date provisions relating to other budget items: (a) the effective date for the repeal for the appropriations to fund a 27th biweekly payroll period; (b) the effective date for the repeal of the appropriations to fund pay rate or pay range adjustments for correctional officers and related positions; (c) the effective date for the repeal of the comprehensive planning grants program; and (d) the title and a portion of the text of the provision relating to the effective date for the repeal of the Wisconsin Land Council's duties under the comprehensive planning grants program on September 1, 2003, in order to utilize that sunset date and have it also apply the Land Information Board soil surveying and mapping and associated funding provisions.
[Act 9 Sections: 114m, 114n, 512 thru 514, 518, 519, 527 and 9401(2zt),(2zu)&(6zv)]
[Act 9 Vetoed Sections: 110n, 110r, 114m, 172 (as it relates to s. 20.505(1)(kt)), 509w, 509y, 527, 527e, 615, 617, 619, 621, 623, 625, 627, 3262m, 3262n and 9401(2zu), (4), (5), (6zu) & (6zv)]
2. PLANNING GRANTS TO LOCAL UNITS OF GOVERNMENT [LFB Paper 949]
SEG $2,000,000
Governor: Establish a grant program to finance local government planning activities as follows:
Local Planning Grant Program. Establish a new grant program under DOA and authorize the agency to provide grants to a county, city, village, town or regional planning commission to finance the cost of planning activities. Specify that the activities eligible for funding would include contracting for planning consultant services, public planning sessions and other planning outreach and educational activities, or for the purchase of computerized planning data, planning software or the hardware required to utilize that data or software. Stipulate that DOA must require the grantee to finance from local resources at least 20% of the costs of the product or services to be supported by the planning grant.
Funding. Create an annual appropriation under DOA to fund planning grants to local units of government. Provide $1,000,000 annually for such grants, to be funded from the transportation fund by transfers from DOT's highway administration and planning federal funds appropriation. Modify DOT's highway and planning federal funds appropriation to permit the transfer of such monies to DOA. The amount of the DOT transfer would equal the amounts appropriated under DOA for the planning grants.
DOT Approval of Planning Grant Expenditures. Specify that prior to the award of any planning grant from the new appropriation, DOA would be required to forward a detailed statement of the proposed grant expenditures to the Secretary of DOT and obtain the Secretary's written approval of the proposed expenditures. Federal law requires each state to designate one agency to administer federal highway aid. Since DOT is the designated agency in Wisconsin, the Secretary of DOT would have to approve the grants made by DOA under the new planning grant program.
Joint Finance/Legislature: Specify that: (a) DOA may require a local match, not to exceed 25%, rather than requiring a 20% local match in all cases, for planning grants to a county, city, village, town or regional planning commission; and (b) the planning grants could be awarded only for purposes related to the transportation element of a comprehensive plan [See "General Provisions" for information on comprehensive planning.].
[Act 9 Sections: 110w, 352 and 529]
3. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING GRANTS PROGRAM
Joint Finance: Establish a new comprehensive planning grant program, as follows:
Comprehensive Planning Grants to Local Units of Government. Create a new PR-funded, annual appropriation under DOA for the purpose of making comprehensive planning grants to a county, city, village, town or regional planning commission. Authorize DOA to make an annual assessment against the state agencies enumerated below to fund this comprehensive planning grant program. Specify that this appropriation, DOA's authority to assess agencies and the associated grant program would be repealed, effective July 1, 2010.
Assessment of Certain State Agencies to Fund the Comprehensive Planning Grants Program. Provide that annually the Secretary of DOA shall assess DOA, DATCP, Commerce, DNR, DOR and the UW System $250,000 each to support the planning grants and the costs of program delivery. Provide that the annual assessment would be applied among each agency's individual GPR-funded general program operations appropriations, in amounts as determined by the Secretary of DOA, such that the total assessed from all such appropriations under each agency would total $250,000. Provide that the amounts assessed would be credited to the PR-funded planning grant appropriation account, after first deducting the amounts separately appropriated to support DOA staffing for comprehensive planning grant activities and the UW-Extension's Local Planning Educational and Technical Assistance Program and Model Ordinance Development Initiative (described under "University of Wisconsin System").
Funding and Staffing under DOA for Comprehensive Planning Grant Activities. From the amounts assessed, provide total expenditure authority under the new DOA comprehensive planning grants appropriation of $1,430,000 in 1999-00 and $1,288,200 in 2000-01. Provide an additional $50,000 annually and authorize 1.0 PR position in DOA's Office of Land Information Services under a new annual appropriation funded from the agency comprehensive planning grant assessments to support the operation of the new planning grant program. [The remaining funds from the annual assessments, $20,000 in 1999-00 and $161,800 in 2000-01, would be appropriated under the University of Wisconsin System.]
Purpose of the Comprehensive Planning Grants. Specify that the activities eligible for funding under the DOA comprehensive planning grants appropriation would include contracting for planning consultant services, public planning sessions and other planning outreach and educational activities, or the purchase of computerized planning data, planning software or the hardware required to utilize that data or software. Stipulate that only those planning efforts containing all nine planning elements enumerated under the comprehensive planning provisions of the bill [see description under "General Provisions"] would be eligible for grants. Specify that DOA may require grantees to finance from local resources not more than 25% of the costs of the product or services to be supported by the planning grant.
Approval of Comprehensive Planning Grants. Specify that prior to the awarding of any comprehensive planning grants, DOA would be required to forward a statement of the proposed expenditures to the Wisconsin Land Council and, through August 31, 2003, obtain the Land Council's written approval of the expenditures. In making such a funding determination, require the Land Council to favor grant applications if they contain the following elements:
(a) Joint planning. Planning efforts that involve overlapping or neighboring jurisdictions will be favored over single unit planning efforts.
(b) Coordination with state goals. Applications that are accompanied by a statement that the plans would meet the following state policy goals will be favored over applications that do not include these goals:
• Promotion of the redevelopment of lands with existing infrastructure and public services and the maintenance and rehabilitation of existing residential, commercial and industrial structures.
• Encouragement of neighborhood designs that support a range of transportation choices.
• Protection of natural areas, including wetlands, wildlife habitats, lakes and woodlands, open spaces and groundwater resources.
• Protection of economically productive areas, including farmland and forests.
• Encouragement of land uses, densities and regulations that promote efficient development patterns and relatively low municipal, state government and utility costs.
• Preservation of cultural, historic and archaeological sites.
• Encouragement of coordination and cooperation among nearby units of government.
• Building of community identity by maintaining physical separation between urban areas, revitalizing main streets and enforcing design standards.
• Providing an adequate supply of affordable housing for all income levels throughout each community.
• Providing adequate infrastructure and public services and supply of developable land to meet existing and future market demand for residential, commercial and industrial uses.
• Promoting the expansion or stabilization of the current economic base and the creation of a range of employment opportunities.
• Balancing individual property rights with community interests and goals.
• Planning and development of land uses that create or preserve varied and unique urban and rural communities.
(c) Smart growth areas. Planning efforts that identify smart growth areas to which state and local infrastructure and other investments will be targeted will be favored, if the areas will: (i) promote the development and redevelopment of lands with existing infrastructure and municipal, state and utility services, where practicable; and (ii) encourage efficient development patterns that are both contiguous to existing development and at densities which have relatively low municipal, state government and utility costs.
(d) Implementation. Planning efforts, including subsequent updates and amendments that include development of implementing ordinances, including but not limited to zoning, subdivision and land division ordinances, will be favored over planning-only efforts.
(e) Completion. Planning efforts that promise completion within 30 months of the date on which the grant would be awarded will be favored.
(f) Public participation. Planning efforts that provide opportunities for public participation throughout the planning process will be favored.
Assembly: Delete provision.
Senate: Modify the comprehensive planning recommendations of Joint Finance as follows:
Assessment of Certain State Agencies to Fund the Comprehensive Planning Grants Program. Modify the procedure that directs the Secretary of DOA to assess six agencies $250,000 each, on an annual basis, by modifying the provision that directs the assessments to be applied against each agency's GPR-funded general program operations appropriations to instead specify that the assessments could be made against any of the agency's appropriations for general program operations.
Conference Committee/Legislature: Delete the Senate provision and instead modify the comprehensive planning recommendations of Joint Finance as follows:
Assessment of Certain State Agencies to Fund the Comprehensive Planning Grants Program. Delete the provision directing the Secretary of DOA to annually assess six agencies $250,000 each to support planning grants and the costs of program delivery.
Funding and Staffing under DOA for Comprehensive Planning Grant Activities. Delete $1,430,000 PR in 1999-00 and $1,288,200 PR in 2000-01 provided by Joint Finance for comprehensive planning grants and instead provide $1,500,000 GPR in 2000-01 for this purpose. These grant modifications reflect a conversion of the source of funding for the program and a delay in the implementation of the first planning grant funding cycle until the 2000-01 fiscal year. Delete $50,000 PR annually and 1.0 PR position and instead provide $12,500 GPR in 1999-00 and $50,000 GPR in 2000-01 and authorize 1.0 GPR position in DOA's Office of Land Information Services to support the operation of the new planning grants program. These position modifications reflect a conversion of the source of funding for the administrative support for the program and a delay in providing start-up resources for the program during 1999-00.
Purpose of the Comprehensive Planning Grants. Replace the requirement that allows DOA to require grantees to finance from local resources not more than 25% of the costs of the product or services to be supported by the planning grant with a provision that directs DOA to require local governments to finance a percentage of the planning costs from local resources. Direct DOA to determine the local percentage based on the availability of funding and the number of applications.
Approval of Comprehensive Planning Grants. Modify the provision that requires the Wisconsin Land Council to favor grant applications that contain elements relating to joint planning, coordination with state goals, smart growth areas, implementation, completion, and public participation to clarify that the Council is to favor applications that contain all of these elements. Modify the element relating to coordination with state goals as follows:
· Rename the element "coordination with local comprehensive planning goals" and clarify that the goals are local comprehensive planning goals, as opposed to state policy goals;
· Delete the reference to "maintaining physical separation between urban areas" from the goal relating to the building of community identity;
· Clarify that the goal regarding the creation of employment opportunities extends to the state, regional and local levels; and
· Create an additional goal relating to providing an integrated, efficient and economical transportation system that provides mobility, convenience and safety and which meets the needs of all citizens, including transit-dependent and disabled.
Modify the element relating to smart growth areas to clarify that planning efforts must meet either of two enumerated criteria, as opposed to both criteria. Modify the element relating to public participation to clarify that public participation should take place throughout the planning process.
Veto by Governor [B-26]: Delete the scheduled July 1, 2010, repeal of: (a) the comprehensive planning grants program; (b) the enumerated factors that DOA must use in awarding grants under the program; and (c) the GPR-funded grant appropriation and associated administrative appropriation under DOA.
[Act 9 Sections: 12m, 12n, 110m, 110no, 110p, 110q, 110s, 110t, 110w, 509v, 509x, 2353m, 2353n, 9101(19g) and 9401(2zu)]
[Act 9 Vetoed Sections: 110n, 110r, 509w, 509y and 9401(6zu)&(6zv)]
4. SMART GROWTH DIVIDEND AID PROGRAM
