(a) Joint planning. Planning efforts that involve overlapping or neighboring jurisdictions will be favored over single unit planning efforts.
(b) Coordination with state goals. Applications that are accompanied by a statement that the plans would meet the following state policy goals will be favored over applications that do not include these goals:
• Promotion of the redevelopment of lands with existing infrastructure and public services and the maintenance and rehabilitation of existing residential, commercial and industrial structures.
• Encouragement of neighborhood designs that support a range of transportation choices.
• Protection of natural areas, including wetlands, wildlife habitats, lakes and woodlands, open spaces and groundwater resources.
• Protection of economically productive areas, including farmland and forests.
• Encouragement of land uses, densities and regulations that promote efficient development patterns and relatively low municipal, state government and utility costs.
• Preservation of cultural, historic and archaeological sites.
• Encouragement of coordination and cooperation among nearby units of government.
• Building of community identity by maintaining physical separation between urban areas, revitalizing main streets and enforcing design standards.
• Providing an adequate supply of affordable housing for all income levels throughout each community.
• Providing adequate infrastructure and public services and supply of developable land to meet existing and future market demand for residential, commercial and industrial uses.
• Promoting the expansion or stabilization of the current economic base and the creation of a range of employment opportunities.
• Balancing individual property rights with community interests and goals.
• Planning and development of land uses that create or preserve varied and unique urban and rural communities.
(c) Smart growth areas. Planning efforts that identify smart growth areas to which state and local infrastructure and other investments will be targeted will be favored, if the areas will: (i) promote the development and redevelopment of lands with existing infrastructure and municipal, state and utility services, where practicable; and (ii) encourage efficient development patterns that are both contiguous to existing development and at densities which have relatively low municipal, state government and utility costs.
(d) Implementation. Planning efforts, including subsequent updates and amendments that include development of implementing ordinances, including but not limited to zoning, subdivision and land division ordinances, will be favored over planning-only efforts.
(e) Completion. Planning efforts that promise completion within 30 months of the date on which the grant would be awarded will be favored.
(f) Public participation. Planning efforts that provide opportunities for public participation throughout the planning process will be favored.
Assembly: Delete provision.
Senate: Modify the comprehensive planning recommendations of Joint Finance as follows:
Assessment of Certain State Agencies to Fund the Comprehensive Planning Grants Program. Modify the procedure that directs the Secretary of DOA to assess six agencies $250,000 each, on an annual basis, by modifying the provision that directs the assessments to be applied against each agency's GPR-funded general program operations appropriations to instead specify that the assessments could be made against any of the agency's appropriations for general program operations.
Conference Committee/Legislature: Delete the Senate provision and instead modify the comprehensive planning recommendations of Joint Finance as follows:
Assessment of Certain State Agencies to Fund the Comprehensive Planning Grants Program. Delete the provision directing the Secretary of DOA to annually assess six agencies $250,000 each to support planning grants and the costs of program delivery.
Funding and Staffing under DOA for Comprehensive Planning Grant Activities. Delete $1,430,000 PR in 1999-00 and $1,288,200 PR in 2000-01 provided by Joint Finance for comprehensive planning grants and instead provide $1,500,000 GPR in 2000-01 for this purpose. These grant modifications reflect a conversion of the source of funding for the program and a delay in the implementation of the first planning grant funding cycle until the 2000-01 fiscal year. Delete $50,000 PR annually and 1.0 PR position and instead provide $12,500 GPR in 1999-00 and $50,000 GPR in 2000-01 and authorize 1.0 GPR position in DOA's Office of Land Information Services to support the operation of the new planning grants program. These position modifications reflect a conversion of the source of funding for the administrative support for the program and a delay in providing start-up resources for the program during 1999-00.
Purpose of the Comprehensive Planning Grants. Replace the requirement that allows DOA to require grantees to finance from local resources not more than 25% of the costs of the product or services to be supported by the planning grant with a provision that directs DOA to require local governments to finance a percentage of the planning costs from local resources. Direct DOA to determine the local percentage based on the availability of funding and the number of applications.
Approval of Comprehensive Planning Grants. Modify the provision that requires the Wisconsin Land Council to favor grant applications that contain elements relating to joint planning, coordination with state goals, smart growth areas, implementation, completion, and public participation to clarify that the Council is to favor applications that contain all of these elements. Modify the element relating to coordination with state goals as follows:
· Rename the element "coordination with local comprehensive planning goals" and clarify that the goals are local comprehensive planning goals, as opposed to state policy goals;
· Delete the reference to "maintaining physical separation between urban areas" from the goal relating to the building of community identity;
· Clarify that the goal regarding the creation of employment opportunities extends to the state, regional and local levels; and
· Create an additional goal relating to providing an integrated, efficient and economical transportation system that provides mobility, convenience and safety and which meets the needs of all citizens, including transit-dependent and disabled.
Modify the element relating to smart growth areas to clarify that planning efforts must meet either of two enumerated criteria, as opposed to both criteria. Modify the element relating to public participation to clarify that public participation should take place throughout the planning process.
Veto by Governor [B-26]: Delete the scheduled July 1, 2010, repeal of: (a) the comprehensive planning grants program; (b) the enumerated factors that DOA must use in awarding grants under the program; and (c) the GPR-funded grant appropriation and associated administrative appropriation under DOA.
[Act 9 Sections: 12m, 12n, 110m, 110no, 110p, 110q, 110s, 110t, 110w, 509v, 509x, 2353m, 2353n, 9101(19g) and 9401(2zu)]
[Act 9 Vetoed Sections: 110n, 110r, 509w, 509y and 9401(6zu)&(6zv)]
4. SMART GROWTH DIVIDEND AID PROGRAM
Joint Finance: Require DOA and DOR to jointly propose a smart growth dividend aid program in their biennial budget requests for 2001-03 which provide aids to localities beginning in 2005-06. Require the proposal to include provisions that would distribute aid to towns, villages, cities and counties which meet the following requirements: (a) the local government has adopted a comprehensive plan that the Wisconsin Land Council and DOA have determined meets provisions established under administrative rule; (b) the local government has implemented the plan in accordance with provisions under the comprehensive planning statute; and (c) the population density within the local government's boundaries has increased. Require the proposal to include a provision requiring the Wisconsin Land Council to approve or disapprove grant applications within 60 days of submission.
Assembly: Delete provision.
Senate: Modify the requirements that local governments would have to meet to receive aid payments to specify that local governments must have zoning and subdivision ordinances that are consistent with their comprehensive plans and to specify that aid would be distributed to eligible local governments on the basis of credits that the local governments would accumulate for new housing units that are sold or rented in the previous year on lots of one-quarter acre or less and for new housing units that were sold at prices less than 80% of the median sale price for new homes in the county in the previous year.
Conference Committee/Legislature: Delete the requirement that the 2001-03 budget requests of DOA and DOR contain a provision that would require aid recipients to be local governments where the population density has increased, and, instead, require the aid recipients to have zoning and subdivision ordinances that are consistent with their comprehensive plan. Specify that aid would be distributed to eligible local governments on the basis of credits that the local government would accumulate for new housing units that were sold or rented in the previous year on lots of one-quarter acre or less and for new housing units that were sold at prices less than 80% of the median sale price of new homes in the county in the previous year.
[Act 9 Section: 9101(18zo)]
5. LAND COUNCIL DUTIES: INFORMATION ON THE TRANSFER OF CERTAIN LAND RIGHTS
Joint Finance: Direct the Wisconsin Land Council, by January 1, 2000, to develop and distribute a form, that is in triplicate, which would be sent, to DNR, DOR and to the appropriate county register of deeds. Specify that these entities are to make such forms available to persons requesting them. Provide that the form would be designed to capture information with respect to the conveyance of certain land rights, defined as a nonpossessory interest in land that imposes a limitation or affirmative obligation, the purpose of which is to retain or protect natural, scenic or open space values of land, assuring the availability of land for agricultural, forest, wildlife habitat or open space use, protecting natural resources or maintaining or enhancing air or water quality. Specify that the information on the form would include the following: (a) the name and address of each party involved in the transaction; (b) the date of the transaction; (c) the approximate size of the parcel to which the land rights relate; (d) the approximate total size of the parcel to which the land rights constitute a portion; (e) the classification of the subject property for assessment purposes; (f) the amount paid by the purchaser for the land rights; and (g) the source of any public funds that were used in the conveyance of the land rights.
Specify that any person who is a party to a transaction, as a purchaser or purchaser's agent or as a seller or seller's agent, may prepare and sign the form. Provide that if the person prepares and signs the form, one copy must be sent to the Land Council and one copy to the register of deeds of the county in which the transaction is recorded. Stipulate that beginning July 1, 2000, if the transfer of a land right involves the use of public funds, a copy of the form must also be recorded when the transaction itself is recorded.
Provide that if public funds have been used to support the conveyance of a land right to a not-for-profit organization, the amount involved in the transaction would not be deemed to be confidential under s. 77.265 of the statutes and would be available to the public.
Specify that the Land Council would be required to post the form on the Internet when a site for a statewide computerized land information system is created and makes such a posting possible. Provide that all of these new provisions would apply through August 31, 2003, at which time the Land Council and associated statutory provisions sunset under current law.
Senate/Legislature: Modify Joint Finance provision that would have directed the Wisconsin Land Council, by January 1, 2000, to develop and distribute a form designed to capture information with respect to the conveyance of a "nonpossessory interest" in a land holding by deleting the requirements that the form: (a) be in triplicate; (b) be sent to DNR, DOR and to the appropriate county register of deeds; and (c) be recorded with the register of deeds of the county in which the transaction is recorded. Specify instead that for a transaction involving a nonpossessory interest completed after June 30, 2000, any person who is a party to a transaction, as a purchaser or purchaser's agent or as a seller or seller's agent, must prepare and sign the form and send a copy to the Land Council. Newly require the Land Council to create and maintain a directory of the forms.
Also, delete the Joint Finance requirements that the form contain the following items of information: (a) the classification of the subject property for assessment purposes; (b) the amount paid by the purchaser for the land rights; and (c) the source of any public funds that were used in the conveyance of the land rights. With these modifications the form would still have to contain the following information: (a) the name and address of each party involved in the transaction; (b) the date of the transaction; (c) the approximate size of the parcel to which the land rights relate; and (d) the approximate total size of the parcel to which the land rights constitute a portion.
Further, delete the Joint Finance requirements that: (a) if public funds have been used to support the conveyance of a land right to a not-for-profit organization, the amount involved in the transaction would not be deemed to be confidential under s. 77.265 of the statutes and would be available to the public; and (b) the Land Council post the form on the Internet when a site for a statewide computerized land information system is created and makes such a posting possible. All of these modifications and new provisions would apply through August 31, 2003, at which time the Land Council and associated statutory provisions sunset under current law.
Veto by Governor [B-28]: Delete provision.
[Act 9 Vetoed Sections: 43h and 43j]
Attached Programs
1. HEARINGS AND APPEALS -- INCREASED COSTS FOR PROBATION AND PAROLE HEARING ACTIVITIES
GPR $20,200
Governor/Legislature: Provide $20,200 in 2000-01 for costs associated with the Division of Hearings and Appeals staff who conduct probation and parole hearings for the Department of Corrections. The funding would be used for: (a) purchase of five personal computer replacements [$4,100 (plus $3,400 of base resources)]; (b) user charges to provide dial-in access by staff to the Division's information data base ($5,100); (c) maintenance costs of the Division's scheduling and case tracking software ($6,000); and (d) increased transcript preparation services ($5,000).
2. HEARINGS AND APPEALS -- AUTO DEALER BOND CLAIM HEARINGS
