Noes - Senators Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Lazich, Panzer, Roessler, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Welch and Zien - 16.
Absent or not voting - None.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Chvala, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Senator Panzer objected.
Senator Chvala, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Senator Panzer objected.
__________________
Senator Chvala, with unanimous consent, asked that the Senate recess until 6:40 P.M.
5:15 P.M.
__________________
6:40 P.M.
The Senate reconvened.
Senator Risser in the chair.
__________________
Senate Bill 274
Relating to: credit union membership, powers and operation; the application of agriculture, trade and consumer protection statutes to credit unions and providing a penalty.
Read a second time.
Senate amendment 4 to Senate Bill 274 offered by Senator Rude.
Senate amendment 5 to Senate Bill 274 offered by Senator Fitzgerald.
Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 274 offered by Senator Moore.
Senator Erpenbach moved rejection of Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 274.
The question was: Rejection of Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 274?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 22; noes, 11; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Baumgart, Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Cowles, Decker, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Erpenbach, Grobschmidt, Jauch, A. Lasee, Moen, Plache, Risser, Robson, Roessler, Schultz, Shibilski, Wirch and Zien - 22.
Noes - Senators Darling, Farrow, Fitzgerald, George, Huelsman, Lazich, Moore, Panzer, Rosenzweig, Rude and Welch - 11.
Absent or not voting - None.
Rejected.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate Bill 274?
Adopted.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 2 to Senate Bill 274?
Adopted.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 274?
Adopted.
Senator Erpenbach moved rejection of Senate amendment 4 to Senate Bill 274.
The question was: Rejection of Senate amendment 4 to Senate Bill 274?
Rejected.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 5 to Senate Bill 274?
Senator Erpenbach moved rejection of Senate amendment 5 to Senate Bill 274.
The question was: Rejection of Senate amendment 5 to Senate Bill 274?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 25; noes, 8; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Baumgart, Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Cowles, Decker, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Erpenbach, George, Grobschmidt, Jauch, A. Lasee, Moen, Moore, Plache, Risser, Robson, Roessler, Rude, Schultz, Shibilski, Wirch and Zien - 25.
Noes - Senators Darling, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, Lazich, Panzer, Rosenzweig and Welch - 8.
Absent or not voting - None.
Rejected.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Chvala, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Senate
Bill 274
Read a third time.
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 24; noes, 9; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Baumgart, Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Cowles, Decker, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Erpenbach, George, Grobschmidt, Jauch, A. Lasee, Moen, Moore, Plache, Risser, Robson, Roessler, Rude, Shibilski, Wirch and Zien - 24.
Noes - Senators Darling, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, Lazich, Panzer, Rosenzweig, Schultz and Welch - 9.
Absent or not voting - None.
Passed.
Senator Chvala, with unanimous consent, asked that all action be immediately messaged to the Assembly.
Relating to: automatic teller machine fees and requiring the exercise of rule making-authority.
Read a second time.
Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 325 offered by Senators Lazich, Darling, Drzewiecki, Rude, Farrow, Panzer, Huelsman and Zien.
Senator Lazich, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill
325 be withdrawn and returned to author.
Senator Welch moved that Senate Bill 325 be referred to the committee on Privacy, Electronic Commerce and Financial Institutions.
The question was: Shall Senate Bill 325 be referred to the committee on Privacy, Electronic Commerce and Financial Institutions?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 16; noes, 17; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Lazich, Panzer, Roessler, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Welch and Zien - 16.
Noes - Senators Baumgart, Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, Erpenbach, George, Grobschmidt, Jauch, Moen, Moore, Plache, Risser, Robson, Shibilski and Wirch - 17.
Absent or not voting - None.
Referal Refused.
Senate substitute amendment 2 to Senate Bill 325 offered by Senators Lazich, Darling, Drzewiecki, Rude, Farrow, Panzer, Huelsman and Zien.
Senator Robson moved rejection of Senate substitute amendment 2 to Senate Bill 325.
The question was: Rejection of Senate substitute amendment 2 to Senate Bill 325?
Rejected.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Jauch, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Senate
Bill 325
Read a third time.
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 16; noes, 17; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Baumgart, Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, Erpenbach, George, Grobschmidt, Jauch, Moen, Moore, Plache, Risser, Robson and Wirch - 16.
Noes - Senators Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Lazich, Panzer, Roessler, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Shibilski, Welch and Zien - 17.
Absent or not voting - None.
Refused passage.
__________________
Assembly Joint Resolution 95
Relating to: the life and public service of Representative Francis J. Lallensack.
Read.
Senator A. Lasee, with unanimous consent, asked to be added as a cosponsor of Assembly Joint Resolution 95.
Concurred in by unanimous rising vote.
Assembly Bill 44