4. Rates of attendance or of high school graduation.
The substitute amendment specifies the information about a school or school
district that DPI may use to measure performance in each of the above areas.
For a private school participating in a PCP, the substitute amendment directs
DPI to use for each area only the information that pertains to pupils attending the
private school under the PCP. The substitute amendment, however, allows a private
school participating in a PCP to submit to DPI achievement data from a test
administered to all of the pupils attending the private school if the test is a nationally
recognized, norm-referenced test that has been approved for this use by DPI. (See
below.) If a private school does so, its report card must display a grade derived from
data generated by all pupils attending the school, but this grade may not be used to
determine whether a sanction should be imposed.
The substitute amendment requires DPI to issue an annual accountability
report for each school and school district that grades the school's or school district's
overall performance on the following scale:
1. Significantly exceeds expectations.
2. Exceeds expectations.
3. Meets expectations.
4. Meets few expectations.
5. Fails to meet expectations.
The substitute amendment directs DPI to provide a school or school district an
opportunity to review a preliminary version of a report in order to correct errors.
The substitute amendment allows DPI to downgrade a school's rating if DPI
determines that the percentage of pupils taking the statewide assessments is
inadequate.
The substitute amendment creates an Academic Accountability Council in DPI
to make recommendations to DPI on:
1. Whether a school that has been determined to be failing but demonstrates
high-value added growth, as determined by the University of Wisconsin-Madison
Value-Added Research Center, should be sanctioned.
2. How a school's and school district's grade should be affected whenever a pupil
is excused from taking a statewide assessment.
3. Policies that address accommodations on statewide assessments for certain
pupils attending a private school participating in a PCP that are similar to
accommodations made for such pupils attending public schools.
4. Further clarifying the data that DPI may use for each measure used to
determine a school's or school district's performance.
5. The methodology for calculating the performance of schools and school
districts.
6. The weight to be given each measure used.
7. The qualifying score for each grade.
8. A list of nationally recognized, norm-referenced tests that a choice school
may use as described above.
9. Modifying the sanctions imposed on schools for poor performance.
The substitute amendment directs the Legislative Audit Bureau annually to
study DPI's methodology for calculating the performance of schools and school
districts and report its findings each January to the Joint Legislative Audit
Committee.
Low-performing schools and school districts; interventions
Current law requires a school board and DPI to take certain steps if a school or
school district is in need of improvement or among the lowest performing, as follows:
1. If DPI determines that a school district has been in need of improvement for
four consecutive school years, the school board must:
a. Employ a standard, consistent, research-based curriculum that is aligned
with the state's model academic standards;
b. Use pupil academic performance data to differentiate instruction to meet
individual needs;
c. Implement a system of academic and behavioral supports and early
intervention for pupils; and
d. Provide additional learning time to address the academic needs of pupils who
are struggling academically.
2. If DPI determines that a particular public school has been in the lowest
performing 5 percent of all public schools in the state in the previous school year and
is located in a school district that has been in need of improvement for four
consecutive school years, the school board must do the following in the school:
a. Use rigorous and equitable performance evaluation systems for teachers and
principals.
b. Adopt a policy establishing criteria for evaluating whether the distribution
of teachers and principals within the affected schools relative to the distribution of
teachers and principals throughout the school district, based on their qualifications
and effectiveness, is equitable. If the school board determines that the distribution
is inequitable, the school board must eliminate those policies and constraints that
prevent low-performing schools from recruiting, placing, and retaining effective
teachers and principals, and provide additional support to teachers and principals.
c. Establish teacher and principal improvement programs.
d. Adopt placement criteria for principals that include performance
evaluations and measures of pupil academic achievement.
3. If DPI determines that a school district has been in need of improvement for
four consecutive school years, DPI may direct the school board to do one or more of
the following in the school district:
a. Implement or modify activities enumerated for low-performing school
districts above.
b. Implement a new or modified instructional design.
c. Implement professional development programs.
d. Implement changes in administrative and personnel structures.
e. Adopt accountability measures to monitor the school district's finances or to
monitor other interventions.
4. If DPI determines that a public school is located in a school district that has
been in need of improvement for four consecutive school years, and that the school
has been in need of improvement for five consecutive school years or was among the
lowest performing 5 percent of all public schools in the state in the previous school
year, DPI may direct the school board to do one or both of the following in the school:
a. Implement a new or modified instructional design.
b. Create a school improvement council to make recommendations to DPI
regarding improving the school.
This substitute amendment eliminates all of the above provisions (except those
applicable to low-performing school districts), effective at the end of the 2018-19
school year, and substitutes the following:
Public schools
If DPI determines that a public school, other than a charter school, has received
a grade of "fails to meet expectations" for three consecutive school years, or has
received a grade of "fails to meet expectations" in three of five consecutive school
years and a grade no higher than "meets few expectations" in the other two school
years, the school board must permanently close the school or contract with a person
to operate the school as a charter school.
If a school board determines to contract with a person to operate the school as
a charter school, the operator of the charter school must do all of the following in the
school:
1. Replace the school's principal.
2. Implement a rigorous staff evaluation and development system.
3. Reward staff who increase pupil academic achievement or high school
graduation rates.
4. Institute comprehensive instructional reform.
5. Increase the time provided for pupil instruction.
6. Apply community-oriented school strategies.
7. Provide greater operational flexibility and support for the school.
All teachers who have been assigned to the school must reapply in order to be
reassigned to the school. Any teacher who scores in the lowest category of teacher
effectiveness may not be reassigned to the school, but may be assigned to another
school in the school district. The school board must pay the charter school operator,
for each full-time equivalent pupil attending the school, at least 90 percent of the
average per-pupil cost for the school district.
The requirement to close a public school or contract with a person to operate the
school as a charter school does not apply if DPI determines, based on information
provided by the University of Wisconsin-Madison Value-Added Research Center,
that the school demonstrates high-value added growth. In addition, a newly
constructed school may not be sanctioned based on the grades received during its
first two school years of operation.
These sanctions (and the sanctions described below for charter schools and
choice schools) take effect in the school year following the school year in which the
accountability report for the third (or fifth) school year is issued by DPI.
Accountability reports are expected to be issued in September.
Charter schools
The substitute amendment provides that if DPI determines that a charter
school has received a grade of "fails to meet expectations" for three consecutive school
years, or has received a grade of "fails to meet expectations" in three of five
consecutive school years and a grade no higher than "meets few expectations" in the
other two school years, the school board or entity that contracted for the
establishment of the charter school must revoke the contract. If the charter school
reopens as a private school, it may not participate in a PCP.
The substitute amendment provides, however, that a charter school's contract
may not be revoked on the basis of grades received during the school's initial two
school years. The substitute amendment also provides that a charter school's
contract may not be revoked if DPI determines, based on information provided by the
University of Wisconsin-Madison Value-Added Research Center, that the school
demonstrates high-value added growth.
Choice schools
If DPI determines that a private school participating in a PCP has received a
grade of "fails to meet expectations" for three consecutive school years, or has
received a grade of "fails to meet expectations" in three of five consecutive school
years and a grade no higher than "meets few expectations" in the other two school
years, DPI must issue an order permanently barring the private school from
accepting any new pupils under the PCP. This requirement does not apply, however,
if DPI determines, based on information provided by the University of
Wisconsin-Madison Value-Added Research Center, that the school demonstrates
high-value added growth. A private school barred from accepting new pupils may
not reopen as a charter school. In addition, a choice school may not be sanctioned
based on grades received during the school's first two years of participating in a PCP.
Applicability of sanctions
The substitute amendment provides that none of the sanctions described above
for failing public schools, charter schools, and choice schools apply unless another
state law requires that they be imposed.
Charter schools; contracts
Under current law, an entity authorized to establish an independent charter
school may do so itself or by contracting with a third party. This substitute
amendment allows charter schools to be established by contract only.
Currently, a contract with a charter school may be for any term not exceeding
five school years and may be renewed for one or more terms not exceeding five school
years. This bill provides that the initial contract with a charter school must be for
a term of five years if the charter school requests it.
Transfer of pupil records
Currently, school districts and private schools participating in a PCP are
subject to various requirements relating to the transfer of a pupil's records when the
pupil transfers to another school. This substitute amendment subjects all charter
schools to the same requirements.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do
enact as follows:
AB379-ASA2,1
1Section
1. 15.377 (5) of the statutes is created to read:
AB379-ASA2,7,52
15.377
(5) Academic accountability council. (a) There is created in the
3department of public instruction an academic accountability council consisting of the
4state superintendent of public instruction or his or her designee and the following
5members appointed for 3-year terms:
AB379-ASA2,7,66
1. Three persons appointed by the majority leader of the senate.
AB379-ASA2,7,77
2. One person appointed by the minority leader of the senate.
AB379-ASA2,7,88
3. Three persons appointed by the speaker of the assembly.
AB379-ASA2,7,99
4. One person appointed by the minority leader of the assembly.
AB379-ASA2,7,1010
5. Two persons appointed by the state superintendent of public instruction.
AB379-ASA2,7,1111
6. Two persons appointed by the governor.
AB379-ASA2,7,1312
(b) The members appointed under par. (a) 1. to 6. shall have experience in an
13academic field. They may not be legislators.
AB379-ASA2,7,1614
(c) The state superintendent of public instruction or his or her designee shall
15serve as chairperson of the academic accountability council. Beginning in 2015, the
16council shall meet at least twice each year.
AB379-ASA2,2
1Section
2. 20.005 (3) (schedule) of the statutes: at the appropriate place, insert
2the following amounts for the purposes indicated:
-
See PDF for table ![PDF](http://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/assets/image/file_acrobat.gif)
AB379-ASA2,8,75
20.255
(1) (e)
Student information system. As a continuing appropriation, the
6amounts in the schedule for the student information system under s.
115.28 (12) 7115.383.
AB379-ASA2,8,1210
20.255
(1) (he)
Student information system; fees. All moneys received from fees
11charged as authorized under s.
115.28 (12) (b) 115.383 (3) (c) to be used for the student
12information system established under s.
115.28 (12) (a) 115.383 (1).
AB379-ASA2,5
13Section
5. 20.255 (3) (fm) of the statutes is created to read:
AB379-ASA2,8,1714
20.255
(3) (fm)
Value-Added Research Center. The amounts in the schedule to
15pay the costs of the University of Wisconsin-Madison Value-Added Research Center
16under ss. 115.39 (4m) (b), 118.40 (5) (b) 4., 118.425 (4) (d) 1., 118.60 (9m) (a) 4., and
17119.23 (9m) (a) 4.
AB379-ASA2,6
18Section
6. 115.001 (1) of the statutes is amended to read: