AB859: Bill Text

LRB-3994/1

EVM:amn&wlj

2017 - 2018 LEGISLATURE

2017 Assembly BILL 859

January 19, 2018 - Introduced by Representatives Crowley, Zamarripa, Fields, Kessler, Considine, Novak, Tusler, Sinicki, Rodriguez, Kitchens, Tranel and Goyke, cosponsored by Senators Johnson and Carpenter. Referred to Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety.

AB859,1,4 An Act to amend 346.01 (2); and to create 346.575, 346.60 (6) and 349.107 of the statutes; relating to: the use of automated speed enforcement systems and traffic control photographic systems in the city of Milwaukee and providing a penalty.

Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill allows law enforcement agencies in the city of Milwaukee to use an automated speed enforcement system (ASES) to identify speed limit violations and allows the common council of the City of Milwaukee to enact an ordinance that permits the use of a traffic control photographic system (TCPS) on highways under the jurisdiction of the city to identify traffic signal violations.

Under current law, law enforcement officers may not use any radar device combined with photographic identification of a vehicle to determine compliance with motor vehicle speed limits. Under this bill, local law enforcement agencies in the city of Milwaukee may use an ASES to determine compliance with speed limits. With exceptions, the vehicle owner is subject to a forfeiture for a speed limit violation detected by an ASES. However, no traffic citation may be issued for a speed limit violation for which the ASES indicated a speed of less than 20 miles per hour above the speed limit alleged to be violated. The owner is subject to the same forfeiture that would be applicable to the vehicle operator for the violation. The bill also imposes a number of administrative requirements on a law enforcement agency that uses an ASES to determine compliance with speed limits. The authorization of the use of ASES to determine compliance with speed limits expires five years after this bill takes effect.

This bill also authorizes the common council of the City of Milwaukee to enact an ordinance that permits the use of a TCPS on highways under the jurisdiction of the city to detect motor vehicles that fail to properly stop at red traffic signals at intersections. A TCPS is an electronic system that automatically produces photographs of motor vehicles traveling through an intersection. With exceptions, the vehicle owner may be subject to a forfeiture for a traffic signal violation detected by a TCPS of not more than the amount provided for a traffic signal violation under current law, currently between $40 to $100. The authorization of the use of a TCPS to detect traffic signal violations expires five years after this bill takes effect.

Forfeitures collected under either of these authorizations must be appropriated to the agency providing police service in the political subdivision that collected the forfeiture.

For further information see the state and local fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.

The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:

AB859,1 Section 1. 346.01 (2) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB859,2,6 346.01 (2) In this chapter, notwithstanding s. 340.01 (42), “owner" means, with respect to a vehicle that is registered, or is required to be registered, by a lessee of the vehicle under ch. 341, the lessee of the vehicle for purposes of vehicle owner liability under ss. 346.175, 346.195, 346.205, 346.452, 346.457, 346.465, 346.485, 346.505 (3), 346.575, 346.675, and 346.945.

AB859,2 Section 2. 346.575 of the statutes is created to read:

AB859,2,12 346.575 Owner's liability for speed restriction violations detected by an automated speed enforcement system. (1) In this section, “automated speed enforcement system” or “system” means an electronic device that uses automated equipment to detect a vehicle's speed and that is designed to obtain a clear visual image of a vehicle's license plate.

AB859,3,7 (2) Notwithstanding s. 349.02 (3) (b) and subject to sub. (6), a local law enforcement agency with jurisdiction over traffic violations may use an automated speed enforcement system to determine compliance with a speed restriction established under s. 346.57 or 349.11 on highways under its jurisdiction. Subject to sub. (5) (b), the owner of a vehicle involved in a violation of s. 346.57, or a local ordinance in conformity with s. 346.57, that is determined by a system shall be liable for the violation as provided in this section.

AB859,3,17 (3) If a traffic officer prepares a uniform traffic citation under s. 345.11 for a violation of this section, the officer shall serve the owner of the vehicle with the citation by mailing the citation by certified mail addressed to the owner's last-known address within 5 business days after the violation. A traffic officer shall send with the citation a duplicate of a visual image, taken by the automated speed enforcement system, of the rear license plate of the vehicle involved in the violation, the system location, and the date and time when the violation occurred. No traffic citation may be issued for a violation under this section for which the system indicated a speed of less than 20 miles per hour above the speed restriction established under s. 346.57 or 349.11.

AB859,3,20 (4) Any forfeiture collected under this section shall be appropriated to the agency providing police services in the collecting city, village, town, or county for public safety purposes.

AB859,3,22 (5) (a) Except as provided in par. (b), it is not a defense to a violation of this section that the owner was not operating the vehicle at the time of the violation.

AB859,3,23 (b) All of the following are defenses to a violation of this section:

AB859,4,3 1. That a report that the vehicle was stolen was made by the owner to a law enforcement agency before the violation occurred or within a reasonable time after the violation occurred.

AB859,4,8 2. That the owner of the vehicle provided a traffic officer with the name and address of the person operating the vehicle at the time of the violation and the person so named admits operating the vehicle at the time of the violation. In that case, the person operating the vehicle may be charged with a violation of s. 346.57 or a local ordinance in conformity with s. 346.57.

AB859,4,13 3. That the vehicle is owned by a lessor of vehicles and is registered in the name of the lessor, that at the time of the violation the vehicle was in the possession of a lessee, and that the lessor provided a traffic officer with the information required under s. 343.46 (3). In that case, the lessee may be charged with a violation of s. 346.57 or a local ordinance in conformity with s. 346.57.

AB859,4,20 4. That the vehicle is owned by a dealer, as defined in s. 340.01 (11) (intro.), but including the persons specified in s. 340.01 (11) (a) to (d), that at the time of the violation the vehicle was being operated by a person on a trial run, and that the dealer provided a traffic officer with the name, address, and operator's license number of the person operating the vehicle. In that case, the person operating the vehicle may be charged with a violation of s. 346.57 or a local ordinance in conformity with s. 346.57.

AB859,4,22 (6) (a) If a local law enforcement agency uses an automated speed enforcement system, the local law enforcement agency shall do all of the following:

AB859,5,2 1. Clearly identify the presence of a system by signs stating “Photo Enforced,” along with the posted speed limit. The signs shall be visible to traffic traveling on the highway from the direction of travel for which the system is used, and shall be posted at all locations the department determines are necessary to provide adequate notice of the presence of a system.

AB859,5,7 2. Identify the streets or portions of streets for which the use of a system has been approved and the hours of enforcement on the local law enforcement agency's website. The information under this paragraph shall be updated whenever the local law enforcement agency changes locations that are enforced with a system or hours of enforcement.

AB859,5,10 3. a. Use law enforcement officers or other trained designated employees to oversee the operation of systems and maintain control over all enforcement activities, including the determination of when a citation should be issued.

AB859,5,14 b. Law enforcement officers and other designated employees shall be properly trained in the use of a system, including, the operation, set-up, and testing of a system deployed by the law enforcement agency and the enforcement of traffic and speeding laws.

AB859,5,18 c. The local law enforcement agency shall retain documentation demonstrating the successful completion of required training by a law enforcement officer or designated employee who oversees the operation of a system and enforcement activities.

AB859,5,25 4. Ensure that the system is regularly inspected and certify that the system is installed and operating properly. The local law enforcement agency shall calibrate each camera unit in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions, and shall ensure that, at least once a year, each camera unit is calibrated by an independent calibration laboratory. The local law enforcement agency shall retain documentation of the regular inspection, operation, and calibration of a system until the date on which the system has been permanently removed from use.

AB859,6,2 5. Use a system that provides real-time notification when violations are detected.

AB859,6,4 (b) Before using an automated speed enforcement system under this section, a law enforcement agency shall do all of the following:

AB859,6,8 1. Administer a public information campaign for at least 30 days before the commencement of use of a system. The campaign shall include public announcements in major media outlets and press releases. The campaign shall include the following information:

AB859,6,9 a. The system use policy under par. (c).

AB859,6,10 b. The system impact report under par. (d).

AB859,6,11 c. The date on which use of systems will begin.

AB859,6,12 d. The highways on which systems will be used.

AB859,6,13 e. The law enforcement agency's website.

AB859,6,18 2. Issue warning notices rather than citations for violations detected by a system during the first 90 days during which a system is used under this section. Whenever a system is first used on a highway, the local law enforcement agency shall issue warning notices rather than citations for violations detected by the systems during the first 30 calendar days of enforcement.

AB859,7,5 (c) A local law enforcement agency shall prepare and adopt a system use policy before entering into an agreement regarding a system, purchasing or leasing equipment for a system, or implementing this section. The system use policy shall include the specific purpose for the system, the uses that are authorized, the rules and processes required before that use, and the uses that are prohibited. The policy shall specify the information that may be collected by a system, the individuals who may access and use the collected information, and the procedure for accessing and using the information. The policy shall include provisions for protecting data from unauthorized access, data retention, public access, 3rd-party data sharing, training, auditing, and oversight. The system use policy shall be made available for public review, including by posting it on the local law enforcement agency's website, at least 30 calendar days before adoption.

AB859,7,8 (d) A local law enforcement agency shall prepare and adopt a system impact report and make the report available for public review at least 30 days before approval. The system impact report shall include all of the following:

AB859,7,9 1. A description of the systems to be used and how they work.

AB859,7,10 2. The proposed purpose of a system.

AB859,7,12 3. The locations in which a system may be deployed and traffic data for these locations.

AB859,7,14 4. An assessment of the potential impact of the system on civil liberties and civil rights and any plans to safeguard those public rights.

AB859,7,17 5. If potential deployment locations of systems are predominantly in low-income neighborhoods, a determination as to why these locations experience high fatality and injury collisions due to unsafe speed.

AB859,7,19 6. The fiscal costs of a system, including establishment costs, ongoing costs, and program funding.

AB859,7,21 (e) A local law enforcement agency shall develop uniform guidelines for all of the following:

AB859,7,22 1. The screening and issuing of citations under this section.

AB859,7,24 2. The processing and storage of confidential information under this section and procedures to ensure compliance with confidentiality requirements.

AB859,8,12 (f) A contract between a local law enforcement agency and a manufacturer or supplier of an automated speed enforcement system shall allow the agency to purchase materials, lease equipment, and contract for processing services from the manufacturer or supplier based on the services rendered on a monthly schedule or another schedule agreed upon by the agency and contractor. The contract may not include provisions for payment or compensation based on the number of citations issued under this section, or as a percentage of revenue generated, from the use of the system. The contract shall include a provision that all data collected from a system is confidential, and shall prohibit the manufacturer or supplier of a system from sharing, repurposing, or monetizing collected data. The local law enforcement agency shall oversee and maintain control over all enforcement activities, including the determination of when a citation should be issued.

AB859,8,17 (g) Two years after implementation of an automated speed enforcement program and 5 years after the effective date of this paragraph .... [LRB inserts date], a local law enforcement agency shall prepare and submit to the standing committees of the legislature with jurisdiction over transportation matters a system report that includes all of the following information:

AB859,8,18 1. A description of how systems were used.

AB859,8,21 2. Whether and how often system data was shared with outside entities, the name of any recipient entity, the type or types of data disclosed, and the legal reason for the disclosure.

AB859,8,23 3. A summary of any community complaints or concerns about the use of systems.

AB859,8,25 4. Results of any internal audits, information about any violations of the system use policy, and any actions taken in response.

AB859,9,2 5. Information regarding the impact that the use of systems has had on the highways where the systems were deployed.

AB859,9,3 6. A summary of any public records requests related to systems.

AB859,9,11 (h) Not later than March 1 of the 5th year beginning after the effective date of this paragraph .... [LRB inserts date], a local law enforcement agency shall prepare and submit to the standing committees of the legislature with jurisdiction over transportation matters an evaluation of the use of automated speed enforcement systems in its jurisdiction, including an assessment of the system's impact on highway safety and the system's economic impact on the communities where the system is used. The report shall be made available on the website of the local law enforcement agency and shall include all of the following information:

AB859,9,17 1. Before and after data on the number and proportion of vehicles speeding between 10 to 19 miles per hour over the legal speed limit, 20 to 29 miles per hour over the legal speed limit, 30 to 39 miles per hour over the legal speed limit, and every additional 10 miles per hour increment thereafter on a highway on which a system is used to enforce speed limits. To the extent feasible, the data should be collected at the same time of day, day of week, and location.

AB859,9,20 2. The number of citations issued under this section by month and year and the corridors or locations where violations occurred and, to the extent feasible, the day of the week and time the violation occurred.

AB859,9,23 3. Before and after data on the number of traffic collisions, categorized by injury severity that occurred where systems are used relative to jurisdiction-wide data and the mode of transportation of the parties involved.

AB859,9,24 4. The number of citations paid and dismissed.

AB859,10,2 5. The costs associated with implementation and operation of the systems, and revenues collected by each jurisdiction.

AB859,10,5 6. The uses of revenues collected by use of systems in the jurisdiction, including information on roadway traffic safety projects, traffic safety education, and law enforcement activities and programs that were implemented.

AB859,10,7 7. Before and after data on the number of law enforcement officers, including the number of officers dedicated to traffic enforcement.

AB859,10,10 8. An evaluation of whether use of systems has resulted in traffic impacts on highways that may be susceptible to traffic diversion, in the vicinity of corridors with installed systems.

AB859,10,12 9. The results of surveys and outreach to low-income and predominantly minority communities where systems were deployed.

AB859,10,14 (7) A visual image made by an automated speed enforcement system is not subject to the right of inspection and copying under s. 19.35 (1).

AB859,10,15 (8) This section applies only in the city of Milwaukee.

AB859,10,17 (9) This section does not apply 5 years after the effective date of this subsection .... [LRB inserts date].