2017 - 2018 LEGISLATURE
May 17, 2017 - Introduced by Senators Harsdorf, Craig,
Kapenga and Stroebel,
cosponsored by Representatives
Kremer, Vos, Murphy, Allen, Brandtjen, R.
Brooks, Duchow, Horlacher, Hutton, Katsma, Kleefisch, Knodl,
Kooyenga, Kuglitsch, Kulp, Mursau, Petersen, Quinn, Rohrkaste,
Sanfelippo, Skowronski, Spiros, Tauchen, Thiesfeldt, Tittl, Tusler,
Vorpagel and Wichgers. Referred to Committee on Universities and
1An Act to amend
36.35 (1); and
36.02 and 227.01 (13) (Lo) of the 2
statutes; relating to: free expression within the University of Wisconsin
3System, providing an exemption from rule-making procedures, and granting
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill requires the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
to adopt a policy on free expression that applies at the four-year and two-year
institutions of the system and supersedes and nullifies any prior Board of Regents
or institution policies or rules restricting free expression. The bill allows the Board
of Regents to adopt the policy without promulgating rules and requires the policy to
be adopted no later than 120 days after the bill's effective date. The policy must
contain statements regarding the following: 1) that the primary function of an
institution is the discovery, improvement, transmission, and dissemination of
knowledge; 2) that it is not the proper role of an institution to shield individuals from
speech protected by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution; 3) that students
and faculty have the freedom to discuss any problem as permitted by the First
Amendment and within specified limits; 4) that any person lawfully present on
campus may protest or demonstrate, but that protests and demonstrations that
interfere with the expressive rights of others are subject to sanction; 5) that
campuses are open to invited speakers; 6) that public areas are public forums and
open on the same terms to any speaker; and 7) that institutions must remain neutral
on public policy controversies.
The policy must include a range of disciplinary sanctions for anyone under an
institution's jurisdiction who engages in violent, abusive, indecent, profane,
boisterous, obscene, unreasonably loud, or other disorderly conduct that interferes
with the free expression of others. In addition, the policy must provide that in
disciplinary cases involving expressive conduct, students are entitled to a
disciplinary hearing under published procedures that include specified rights. Also,
the second time that a student is found responsible for interfering with the
expressive rights of others, the policy must require the student to be suspended for
a minimum of one semester or expelled.
The bill also provides that institutions may restrict student expression only for
expressive activity that is not protected by the First Amendment, including state or
federal law violations, defamation, specified types of harassment and threats,
certain invasions of privacy or confidentiality, and violations of reasonable time,
place, or manner restrictions on expressive activities.
The bill also requires the Board of Regents to appoint a council on free
expression to make annual reports to the Board of Regents, legislature, and governor
that describe institutional neutrality, free expression barriers and disruptions, and
administrative handling and discipline relating to those barriers and disruptions.
The council must consist of 13 members who represent each four-year university and
the chairpersons of the assembly and senate standing committees with jurisdiction
The bill also does the following:
1. Allows a person whose expressive rights are violated by a violation of the
bill's requirements to bring an action to enjoin a violation.
2. Sets forth legislative findings regarding free expression at the institutions
of the UW system.
3. Requires institutions to describe free expression policies and rules in
freshman orientation programs.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do
enact as follows:
36.02 of the statutes is created to read:
236.02 Campus Free Speech Act.
(1) Legislative findings.
The legislature 3
finds all of the following:
(a) Article I, section 3, of the Wisconsin Constitution recognizes the right to 5
speak freely and prohibits laws abridging the liberty of speech.
(b) The system has historically embraced a commitment to freedom of 7
expression in policy.
(c) In recent years, institutions have abdicated their responsibility to uphold 2
free speech principles and these failures make it appropriate for the system to restate 3
and confirm its commitment in this regard.
(d) In 1974, the Committee on Free Expression at Yale issued a statement 5
known as the Woodward Report that stands as a classic defense of free expression 6
on campuses; in 2015, the Committee on Freedom of Expression at the University 7
of Chicago issued a similar and widely respected report; and in 1967, the Kalven 8
Committee Report of the University of Chicago articulated the principle of 9
institutional neutrality regarding political and social issues and the essential role of 10
such neutrality in protecting freedom of thought and expression at universities. The 11
principles affirmed by these 3 highly regarded reports are inspiring articulations of 12
the critical importance of free expression in higher education.
(e) The legislature views freedom of expression as being of critical importance 14
and requires that each institution ensure free, robust, and uninhibited debate and 15
deliberation by students whether on or off campus.
(f) The legislature has determined that it is a matter of statewide concern that 17
all institutions officially recognize freedom of speech as a fundamental right.
18(2) Short title.
This section shall be known as the “Campus Free Speech Act.”
In this section:
(a) “Institution” means a college campus or university.
(b) “Peer-on-peer harassment” means conduct directed by one student 22
towards another individual student, on the basis of that other student's race, color, 23
creed, religion, political views, sex, national origin, disability, ancestry, age, sexual 24
orientation, gender identity, pregnancy, marital status, parental status, or military 25
status, that is so severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive that it effectively
deprives the victim of access to the educational opportunities or benefits provided by 2
(c) “Quid pro quo sexual harassment” means explicitly or implicitly 4
conditioning a student's participation in an education program or activity or basing 5
an educational decision on the student's submission to unwelcome sexual advances, 6
requests for sexual favors, or other verbal, nonverbal, or physical conduct of a sexual 7
(d) “True threat” means a statement that a speaker would reasonably foresee 9
that a listener would reasonably interpret as a serious expression of a purpose to 10
inflict harm, as distinguished from hyperbole, jest, innocuous talk, expressions of 11
political views, or other speech that is similarly protected under the First 12
Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, regardless of whether the speaker has the 13
ability to carry out the threat.
14(4) Free expression policy.
No later than 120 days after the 15
effective date of this paragraph .... [LRB inserts date], the Board of Regents shall 16
develop and adopt a policy on free expression that contains statements of at least all 17
1. That the primary function of an institution is the discovery, improvement, 19
transmission, and dissemination of knowledge by means of research, teaching, 20
discussion, and debate. This statement shall provide that, to fulfill this function, an 21
institution must strive to ensure the fullest degree of intellectual freedom and free 22
2. That it is not the proper role of an institution to shield individuals from 24
speech protected by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, including ideas 25
and opinions they find unwelcome, disagreeable, or even deeply offensive.
3. That students and faculty have the freedom to discuss any problem that 2
presents itself, as the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution permits and within 3
the limits of reasonable viewpoint-neutral and content-neutral restrictions on time, 4
place, and manner of expression that are consistent with this section and that are 5
necessary to achieve a significant institutional interest, provided that these 6
restrictions are clear, published, and provide ample alternative means of expression. 7
Students and faculty shall be permitted to assemble and engage in spontaneous 8
expressive activity as long as such activity is not unlawful and does not materially 9
and substantially disrupt the functioning of an institution, subject to the 10
requirements of this section.
4. That any person lawfully present on campus may protest or demonstrate 12
there. This statement shall make clear that protests and demonstrations that 13
interfere with the rights of others to engage in or listen to expressive activity shall 14
not be permitted and shall be subject to sanction. This statement shall not prohibit 15
professors or other instructors from maintaining order in the classroom.
5. That the campuses of the institution are open to any speaker whom students, 17
student groups, or members of the faculty have invited.
6. That the public areas of institutions are public forums and open on the same 19
terms to any speaker.
7. That each institution shall strive to remain neutral, as an institution, on the 21
public policy controversies of the day, and may not take action, as an institution, on 22
the public policy controversies of the day in such a way as to require students or 23
faculty to publicly express a given view of social policy.
The policy required under par. (a) shall satisfy all of the 25
1. Include a range of disciplinary sanctions for anyone under the jurisdiction 2
of the institution who engages in violent, abusive, indecent, profane, boisterous, 3
obscene, unreasonably loud, or other disorderly conduct that interferes with the free 4
expression of others.
2. Provide that in all disciplinary cases involving expressive conduct, students 6
are entitled to a disciplinary hearing under published procedures, including, at least 7
all of the following:
a. The right to receive advanced written notice of the charges.
b. The right to review the evidence in support of the charges.
c. The right to confront witnesses against them.
d. The right to present a defense.
e. The right to call witnesses.
f. A decision by an impartial arbiter or panel.
g. The right of appeal.
h. The right to active assistance of counsel, if suspension for longer than 9 days 16
or expulsion are potential penalties.