ARTICLE IX.
eminent domain and property of the state.
Section
ARTICLE X.
education.
Section
ARTICLE XI.
corporations.
Section
ARTICLE XII.
amendments.
Section
ARTICLE XIII.
miscellaneous provisions.
Section
ARTICLE XIV.
schedule.
Section
PREAMBLE
We, the people of Wisconsin, grateful to Almighty God for our freedom, in order to secure its blessings, form a more perfect government, insure domestic tranquility and promote the general welfare, do establish this constitution.
The Making of the Wisconsin Constitution. Rainey. Wis. Law. Sept. 1992.
Interpreting the Wisconsin Constitution. Suhr. 97 MLR 93 (No. 1 2013)
declaration of rights
I,1
Equality; inherent rights. Section 1. [
As amended Nov. 1982 and April 1986] All people are born equally free and independent, and have certain inherent rights; among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness; to secure these rights, governments are instituted, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. [
1979 J.R. 36, 1981 J.R. 29, vote Nov. 1982; 1983 J.R. 40, 1985 J.R. 21, vote April 1986]
EQUAL PROTECTION
The fact that there is no mandatory release date for persons convicted of 1st degree murder as there is for other crimes does not amount to denial of equal protection. Bies v. State,
53 Wis. 2d 322,
193 N.W.2d 46 (1972).
Legislative classifications violate equal protection only if they are irrational or arbitrary. Any reasonable basis for the classification validates the statute. There is a five point test to determine reasonableness. Omernik v. State,
64 Wis. 2d 6,
218 N.W.2d 734 (1974).
There is a meaningful distinction between governmental employees and nongovernmental employees. The statutory strike ban imposed on public employees is based upon a valid classification and the legislation creating it is not unconstitutional as a denial of equal protection. Hortonville Education Association v. Joint School District No. 1,
66 Wis. 2d 469,
225 N.W.2d 658 (1975). Reversed on other grounds, Hortonville Joint School Dist. No. 1 v. Hortonville Education Association,
426 U.S. 482,
96 S. Ct. 2308,
49 L. Ed. 2d 1 (1976).
The statutory distinction between parolees out of state under s. 57.13 [now s. 304.13] and absconding parolees, denying extradition to the former but not the latter, is a constitutionally valid classification. State ex rel. Niederer v. Cady,
72 Wis. 2d 311,
240 N.W.2d 626 (1976).
In order for a female prostitute to avoid prosecution upon equal protection grounds, it must be shown that the failure to prosecute male patrons was selective, persistent, discriminatory, and without justifiable prosecutorial discretion. State v. Johnson,
74 Wis. 2d 169,
246 N.W.2d 503 (1980).
Equal protection does not require symmetry in probation and parole systems. State v. Aderhold,
91 Wis. 2d 306,
284 N.W.2d 108 (Ct. App. 1979).
A gender-based rule must serve important governmental objectives and the means employed must be substantially related to the achievement of those objectives. The common law doctrine of necessaries does not deny equal protection. Marshfield Clinic v. Discher,
105 Wis. 2d 506,
314 N.W.2d 326 (1982).
It does not violate equal protection to classify employees according to retirement date for purposes of pension benefits. Bence v. Milwaukee,
107 Wis. 2d 469,
320 N.W.2d 199 (1982).
A grandfather clause granting a perpetual exception from police power regulation for certain persons for purely economic reasons denied equal protection. Wisconsin Wine & Spirit Institute v. Ley,
141 Wis. 2d 958,
416 N.W.2d 914 (Ct. App. 1987).