NR 153.15 Note
Note: This section governs what pollution sources are eligible for cost sharing under ch.
NR 153. It does not address requirements for compliance with performance standards, nor does it address cost-share funding as a precondition for compliance. Compliance requirements, including when cost-share funding must be made available as a precondition of compliance, are set forth in ss.
NR 151.09 and
151.095.
NR 153.15(2)
(2) Ineligible costs. All of the following practices, sources or activities are ineligible for cost sharing under this chapter unless approved by the department as part of a demonstration project in accordance with
sub. (4):
NR 153.15(2)(ag)
(ag) Best management practices to address pollution from a livestock facility or cropland practice that was previously in compliance with standards and prohibitions on or after the date the standard or prohibition became effective under
ch. NR 151, regardless of cost share history. The department may make an exception and provide cost sharing to replace practices or practice components previously cost shared by the department that are ineffective during the operation and maintenance period due to unforeseen design problems.
NR 153.15 Note
Note: If a source loses its compliance status because of changes to the standard, cost sharing may be offered for management measures needed to bring the source into compliance with the new standard.
NR 153.15(2)(ar)
(ar) Best management practices to address a pollution source for which the department included a previous offer of cost sharing as part of a notice issued pursuant to
ch. NR 151 and the management practices were not installed within the required compliance period.
NR 153.15(2)(b)
(b) Routine operation and maintenance of best management practices. The department may provide cost sharing one time to re-establish an agricultural best management practice cost shared after October 1, 2002, that is damaged within the cost-share operation and maintenance period by natural causes beyond the control of the landowner or land operator.
NR 153.15(2)(d)
(d) Significant expansions of livestock operations are not eligible for cost sharing. The department shall use the criteria in this paragraph for determining whether an increase in the size of the livestock population constitutes a significant expansion and is ineligible for cost sharing. In this paragraph, “livestock population size" means the size of the livestock population, in animal units. In this paragraph, “base livestock population size" means the livestock population size determined when the department or governmental unit, including a county land conservation committee, documents the size of the livestock population. In this paragraph, “animal unit" has the meaning given it in
ch. NR 243.
NR 153.15(2)(d)1.
1. If the base livestock population size is less than or equal to 250 animal units, that portion of the expansion that results in a livestock population size exceeding 300 animal units is considered to be significant and ineligible for cost sharing under this chapter.
NR 153.15(2)(d)2.
2. If the base livestock population size is greater than 250 animal units but less than that required to apply for a WPDES permit under
s. NR 243.12 (1) (a) or
(b), and the expanded livestock population size will be less than that required to apply for a WPDES permit under
s. NR 243.12 (1) (a) or
(b), that portion of the expansion that is greater than 20% of the base livestock population size is considered to be significant and ineligible for cost sharing under this chapter.
NR 153.15(2)(d)3.
3. Any expansion to a base livestock population size that results in a livestock population size required to apply for a WPDES permit under
s. NR 243.12 (1) (a) or
(b) is considered to be significant and ineligible for cost sharing under this chapter, and shall also render the base livestock population component ineligible for cost sharing in accordance with
par. (f) 2.
NR 153.15 Note
Note: The department may not provide cost sharing under this chapter for activities requiring coverage under a WPDES permit for livestock operations.
NR 153.15(2)(e)
(e) Best management practice installation activities conducted prior to the signing of the runoff management grant agreement and the cost-share agreement. This paragraph does not preclude the department from providing reimbursement for structural best management practice design work commenced or completed prior to signing the runoff management grant agreement and the cost-share agreement, provided that practice construction commences after the grant agreement is signed by all parties.
NR 153.15(2)(f)
(f) Activities requiring coverage under a WPDES permit including any of the following:
NR 153.15(2)(f)1.
1. Activities requiring WPDES permit coverage at livestock operations with less than 1,000 animal units that have been issued a WPDES permit by the department under
ch. 283, Stats. In this paragraph, “livestock operation" has the meaning given in s.
281.16 (1) (c), Stats. In this paragraph, “animal unit" has the meaning given in
ch. NR 243.
NR 153.15(2)(f)2.
2. Activities requiring WPDES permit coverage at livestock operations that have, or will have within 12 months, at least 1,000 animal units and are required to apply for a WPDES permit under
s. NR 243.12 (1) (a) or
(b).
NR 153.15(2)(f)3.
3. All other activities requiring coverage under a WPDES permit issued under
chs. NR 200 to
240 and
245 to
299 except for activities required of the city of Racine to comply with municipal storm water permit requirements under
ch. NR 216.
NR 153.15 Note
Note: A municipality required to comply with storm water permitting requirements under ch.
NR 216 may apply for grant funding under ch.
NR 155.
NR 153.15(2)(g)
(g) Activities required as part of or as a condition of a license for a solid waste management site.
NR 153.15(2)(h)
(h) Activities funded through state or federal grants for wastewater treatment plants.
NR 153.15(2)(j)
(j) Urban best management practices associated with new construction or new development, including the following:
NR 153.15(2)(j)1.
1. Construction site erosion control measures subject to the requirements of
s. NR 151.11, except those required by this chapter to control erosion during construction of a best management practice.
NR 153.15(2)(j)3.
3. The department may consider redevelopment of an existing development and in-fill to be either existing development or new development for purposes of this paragraph. In making its determination, the department shall consider the type of land cover within and adjacent to the development and the areal extent of the development.
NR 153.15(2)(j)4.
4. In this paragraph, “
existing development" has the meaning given it in
s. NR 151.002 (14g), “in-fill" has the meaning given it in
s. NR 151.002 (18), and “new development" means development resulting from the conversion of previously undeveloped land or agricultural land uses initiated after October 1, 2004, or development for which a notice of intent was received by the department or the department of safety and professional services after October 1, 2004.
NR 153.15(2)(k)
(k) Pollutant control measures needed during construction of highways and bridges.
NR 153.15(2)(m)
(m) Installing, operating or repairing a small-scale on-site human domestic waste facility.
NR 153.15(2)(o)
(o) Installing dams, pipes, conveyance systems and urban best management practices, including storm sewer rerouting and land acquisition, when intended solely for flood control. In this paragraph, “dam" means any artificial barrier in or across a waterway, which has the primary purpose of impounding or diverting water. A dam includes all appurtenant works, such as a dike, canal or powerhouse.
NR 153.15(2)(p)
(p) Practices other than those in
ch. NR 154 that are normally and routinely used in growing crops and required for the growing of crops or the feeding of livestock.
NR 153.15(2)(q)
(q) Practices whose purpose is to accelerate or increase the drainage of land or wetlands, except where drainage is required as a component of a best management practice.
NR 153.15(2)(r)
(r) Practices to control spills from commercial bulk storage of pesticides, fertilizers, petroleum and similar materials required by
ch. ATCP 33 or other administrative rules.
NR 153.15(2)(t)
(t) Practices previously installed and necessary to support cost-shared practices.
NR 153.15(2)(w)
(w) Changes in location of unconfined manure stacks involving no capital cost.
NR 153.15(2)(y)
(y) Best management practices to correct overtopping caused by mismanagement of a manure storage facility.
NR 153.15(2)(za)
(za) Installing or modifying an agricultural facility or practice which is required pursuant to a court order or court-ordered stipulation.
NR 153.15(2)(zb)
(zb) Best management practices that do not meet the eligibility criteria under
sub. (1).
NR 153.15(2)(zd)
(zd) Other practices which the department determines are not necessary to achieve the objectives of the project.
NR 153.15(3)
(3) Interim best management practices and alternative design criteria. NR 153.15(3)(a)(a)
Purpose. The purpose of this subsection is to provide for the use of best management practices, management measures, design criteria or standards and specifications that are not included in subch.
VIII of ch. ATCP 50 or
ch. NR 154 but that will contribute to achieving water quality goals.
NR 153.15(3)(b)
(b)
Requirements. The department may approve cost sharing for best management practices, management measures, design criteria or standards and specifications other than those included in subch.
VIII of ch. ATCP 50 or
ch. NR 154 provided that all of the conditions in this paragraph are met.
NR 153.15(3)(b)1.
1. The practices, design criteria, standards or specifications developed under this subsection may not be applied for the purpose of meeting an agricultural or urban performance standard identified in
ch. NR 151 unless the department determines that existing practices, design criteria or technical standards contained in
ch. NR 154 or
ATCP 50 cannot cost effectively meet the performance standards or, in the absence of a performance standard, the project water quality goals.
NR 153.15 Note
Note: The department of agriculture, trade and consumer protection is the lead agency responsible for developing practices, design criteria, standards and specifications to meet agricultural performance standards.
NR 153.15(3)(b)2.a.
a. That the practices, design criteria, standards or specifications are necessary to meet the water quality objectives of the project.
NR 153.15(3)(b)2.b.
b. That the practice is a cost-effective means of preventing or reducing pollutants generated from nonpoint sources.
NR 153.15(3)(b)2.c.
c. That the practice does not have an adverse impact on fish and wildlife habitat.
NR 153.15(3)(b)3.
3. The department shall consult with DATCP if the best management practice, design criteria, standards or specifications are agricultural.
NR 153.15(3)(b)4.
4. The department shall identify the best management practice, design criteria, standards, specifications, operation and maintenance period, cost-share rates and cost-share conditions in the runoff management grant agreement.
NR 153.15(3)(c)
(c)
Time period. Approvals by the department under
par. (b) shall be for a limited period of time, which the department shall specify. After the specified time period has expired, the department will either discontinue the approved use of the interim measures or adopt the measures in
ch. NR 154.
NR 153.15(4)(a)(a) The department may allow cost sharing for items identified under
sub. (2) if necessary to implement a demonstration project. The department shall require demonstration projects to meet the all of the following criteria to be considered eligible for cost sharing under this subsection:
NR 153.15(4)(a)2.
2. The project shall be determined by the department to have statewide or regional significance and shall be designed to provide results that are transferable to other locations within the state. This includes projects that demonstrate traditional or innovative management measures or best management practices in order to increase acceptance, use and understanding of cost-effectiveness, including pollutant control capability.
NR 153.15(4)(a)3.
3. The project shall have a strategy approved by the department for developing and disseminating information and education materials explaining the project and its management implications.
NR 153.15(4)(b)
(b) The department may consult with the university of Wisconsin-extension or its agent in considering demonstration project proposals.
NR 153.15(5)
(5) Cost-share rates and cost-share conditions. Cost-share rates and cost-share conditions, including provisions for economic hardship, identified in
ch. NR 154 shall be used for best management practices funded under this chapter.
NR 153.15(6)(b)
(b) The state cost-sharing amount shall be determined by multiplying the eligible installation cost by the cost-share rate, unless otherwise provided for in this chapter or in
ch. NR 154. Where 2 or more practices are equally cost-effective in reducing pollutants consistent with
par. (a), the amount of cost sharing shall be based on the least cost practice.
NR 153.15 History
History: CR 00-025: cr.
Register September 2002 No. 561, eff. 10-1-02; corrections in (2) (f) 3. made under s. 13.93 (2m) (b) 7., Stats.,
Register September 2002 No. 561;
CR 09-112: am. (1) (a), (c) (intro.), 4., (g), (2) (b), (d) (intro.), (e), (y), (3) (b) 1., (4) (a) 3., (6) (b), r. (2) (c), r. and recr. (2) (a), (j), cr. (2) (ag), (ar)
Register December 2010 No. 660, eff. 1-1-11; correction in (2) (r) made under s. 13.92 (4) (b) 7., Stats.,
Register December 2010 No. 660; correction in (2) (j) 4. made under s. 13.92 (4) (b) 6., Stats.,
Register December 2011 No. 672.
NR 153.16
NR 153.16 Aids for local assistance activities. NR 153.16(1)(a)(a) The department may provide cost sharing under
s. NR 153.26 for local assistance activities conducted during the grant period in large-scale TMDL implementation projects and large-scale non-TMDL control projects.
NR 153.16 Note
Note: Small-scale TMDL projects, small-scale non-TMDL control projects, and notice of discharge projects are not eligible for local assistance grants. However, design and construction services costs in small-scale and notice of discharge projects may be included in the cost of construction for reimbursement purposes.
NR 153.16(1)(b)
(b) The cost-share rate for local assistance activities may not exceed 70 percent of the eligible costs identified in this section.
NR 153.16(1)(c)
(c) The following activities are eligible for local assistance funding when conducted in the project area:
NR 153.16(1)(c)1.
1. Identifying high priority nonpoint pollution sources for control.
NR 153.16(1)(c)2.
2. Contacting and informing landowners and land operators of conservation program opportunities and requirements, including those relating to state performance standards and prohibitions.
NR 153.16(1)(c)3.
3. Determining and documenting compliance of cropland practices and livestock facilities with performance standards and prohibitions.
NR 153.16(1)(c)4.
4. Identifying site-specific best management practices needed to achieve compliance with performance standards and prohibitions or to otherwise control nonpoint pollution sources.
NR 153.16(1)(c)5.
5. Developing and reviewing cost-share agreements with the cost-share recipient.
NR 153.16(1)(c)6.
6. Providing assistance to the department in developing and issuing notices under
ss. NR 151.09 and
151.095 and developing and issuing comparable notices under local ordinances.
NR 153.16(1)(c)7.
7. Best management practice construction services, including construction management and verification of best management practices installation.
NR 153.16(1)(c)8.
8. Reviewing best management practice operation and maintenance during the grant period.
NR 153.16(1)(c)9.
9. Developing and transmitting to the department information that identifies landowners and operators that do not comply with performance standards or prohibitions.
NR 153.16(1)(c)12.
12. Development of informational materials, including videos or brochures.
NR 153.16(1)(c)13.
13. Project evaluation activities identified in the project application and required by the runoff management grant agreement, including monitoring.
