The state of Wisconsin department of agriculture, trade and consumer protection (DATCP) finds that an emergency exists and that an emergency rule is necessary for economic reasons to protect the public welfare of the citizens of Wisconsin. The facts constituting the emergency are as follows:
(1) DATCP has adopted standards for grades of cheese manufactured and sold in Wisconsin under s. 97.177, Stats., and ch. ATCP 81, Wis. Adm. Code. Any cheese which carries a state grade mark must conform to the standards and characteristics of the labeled grade.
(2) Under current rules, colby and monterey (jack) cheese must contain numerous mechanical openings in order to be labeled or sold as Wisconsin certified premium grade AA or Wisconsin grade A (Wisconsin state brand).
(3) Changes in cheese manufacturing technology, packaging and equipment have made it extremely difficult for many processors and packagers to achieve the numerous mechanical openings or open body character required by these top two grade categories. A majority of today's wholesale buyers and packagers prefer a closed body cheese for a variety of reasons, including ease of shredding and the ability to package “exact-weight” pieces with minimal variation and waste.
(4) Currently, a closed body cheese may be labeled or sold as Wisconsin grade B or “not graded.” It cannot be labeled or sold as Wisconsin certified premium grade AA or Wisconsin grade A (Wisconsin state brand), nor can it command the premium price associated with these top two grade categories.
(5) Wisconsin is the only state with its own grade standards for colby and monterey (jack) cheese. The United States Department of Agriculture modified its grade standards for colby and monterey jack cheese in 1995 and 1996, respectively, in response to industry requests to allow an open or closed body. Buyers who cannot obtain the desired graded product in Wisconsin will likely switch to suppliers from other states. Once customers are lost they are difficult to regain.
(6) Wisconsin's dairy industry plays a major role in our state's economy. Approximately $3 billion or 90% of Wisconsin's milk production goes into the manufacture of cheese. Lost business revenues harm the dairy industry, cause increased unemployment, and have a negative impact on the state's economy.
(7) Pending the adoption of rules according to the normal administrative rulemaking procedures, it is necessary to adopt emergency rules under s. 227.24, Stats. to protect the public welfare based on an economic emergency for the state's dairy industry and the subsequent impact on the general economy and citizens of this state.
Publication Date:
August 8, 1998
Effective Date:
August 8, 1998
Expiration Date:
January 4, 1999
Hearing Date:
September 14, 1998
EMERGENCY RULES NOW IN EFFECT
Commerce
(Petroleum Environmental Cleanup Fund,
Ch. ILHR 47)
Rules adopted revising ch. ILHR 47, relating to the petroleum environmental cleanup fund.
Finding of Emergency and Rule Analysis
The Department of Commerce finds that an emergency exists and that adoption of a rule is necessary for the immediate preservation of public health, safety and welfare.
The facts constituting the emergency are as follows. Under ss. 101.143 and 101.144, Stats., the Department protects public health, safety, and welfare by promulgating rules for and administering the Petroleum Environmental Cleanup Fund (PECFA fund). The purpose of the fund is to reimburse property owners for eligible costs incurred because of a petroleum product discharge from a storage system or home oil tank system. Claims made against the PECFA fund are currently averaging over $15,000,000 per month. Approximately $7,500,000 per month is allotted to the fund for the payment of claims. The fund currently has a backlog of $250,000,000 representing almost a 30-month backlog of payments to be made to claimants. Immediate cost saving measures must be implemented to mitigate this problem.
The rules make the following changes to manage and reduce remediation costs:
Administrative Elements.
These changes include updating the scope and coverage of the rules to match current statutes, clarifying decision making for remedial action approvals and providing new direction to owners, operators and consulting firms.
Progress Payments.
Progress payments are proposed to be reduced for some owners and sites. The criteria that trigger payments will now also be based on outcomes. The timing of payments from the fund is designed to benefit those that get sites successfully remediated and to create incentives for the use of the flexible closure tools and natural attenuation tools that were created by the Department of Natural Resources. Applications submitted before the effective date of the new rules would still be subject to the current rules.
Remedial Alternative Selection.
These provisions would create two different paths for funding for sites. Through the use of a group of environmental factors, the risk of a site will be determined. Active treatment systems that use mechanical, engineered or chemical approaches would not be approved for a site without one or more environmental factor present. Approved treatments for sites without environmental factors would be limited to non-active approaches, excavation, remediation by natural attenuation and monitoring of the contamination. The five environmental factors are:
· A documented expansion of plume margin;
· A verified contaminant concentration in a private or public potable well that exceeds the preventive action limit established under ch. 160;
· Soil contamination within bedrock or within 1 meter of bedrock;
· Petroleum product, that is not in the dissolved phase, present with a thickness of .01 feet or more, and verified by more than one sampling event; and
· Documented contamination discharges to a surface water or wetland.
Reimbursement Provisions.
Several incentives are added to encourage owners and consultants to reduce costs whenever possible. Provisions are added for the bundling of services at multiple sites to achieve economy of scale and for using a public bidding process to reduce costs. In addition, owners are encouraged to conduct focused remediations that utilize all possible closure tools. To encourage this approach, if a site can be investigated and remedied to the point of closure for $80,000 or less, the consultant can complete the action without remedial alternative approvals or the risk of the site being bundled or put out for bidding. The consultant is provided additional freedom under the structure of the fund in order to facilitate remediation success. Special priority processing of these cost-effective remediations would also be provided.
Review of Existing Sites.
These changes give the Department more ability to redirect actions and impose cost saving measures for sites that are already undergoing remedial actions. Reevaluations including, the setting of cost caps would be done on sites chosen by the Department.
Pursuant to section 227.24, Stats., this rule is adopted as an emergency rule to take effect upon publication in the official state newspaper and filing with the Secretary of State and Revisor of Statutes.
Publication Date:
April 21, 1998
Effective Date:
April 21, 1998
Expiration Date:
September 18, 1998
Hearing Date:
May 29, 1998
EMERGENCY RULES NOW IN EFFECT (2)
Department of Commerce
(Building & Heating, etc., Chs. Comm/ILHR 50-64)
(Uniform Multifamily Dwellings, Ch. ILHR 66)
1. Rules adopted revising chs. Comm 51, ILHR 57 and 66, relating to commercial buildings and multifamily dwellings.
Finding of Emergency and Rule Analysis
The Department of Commerce finds that an emergency exists and that adoption of the rule is necessary for the immediate preservation of public health, safety, and welfare.
The facts constituting the emergency are as follows. Under ss. 101.02 (15), 101.12, and 101.971 to 101.978, Stats., the Department protects public health, safety, and welfare by promulgating construction requirements for commercial and public buildings, including multifamily dwellings. Present requirements include methods for stopping fire in one area of a building from spreading to another area through service openings in walls, floors, and ceilings, such as penetrations for plumbing and electrical components. The methods that were specified have been shown to fail under fire testing conditions.
The proposed rule impacts all public buildings, which includes multifamily dwellings, and replaces the failed firestopping methods with techniques, materials, and methods that have been tested and nationally recognized. The rule essentially mandates use of tested and listed fire-stop systems for nearly all penetrations of every wall, floor, and ceiling that is required to provide area-separation protection consisting of either a fire-protective membrane or fire-resistive rated construction. The rule also clarifies some problematic, technical provisions that have resulted in confusion and unnecessary costs. Without the proposed rule revisions, firestopping methods that have been proven to be ineffective would still be allowed to be utilized, thereby putting public safety and health at risk.
Pursuant to s. 227.24, Stats., this rule is adopted as an emergency rule to take effect upon publication in the official state newspaper and filing with the Secretary of State and Revisor of Statutes.
Publication Date:
January 28, 1998
Effective Date:
January 28, 1998
Expiration Date:
June 27, 1998
Hearing Date:
March 11, 1998
Extension Through:
October 24, 1998
2. Rule adopted revising ch. ILHR 57, relating to an exemption of multilevel multifamily dwelling units with separate exterior entrances in buildings without elevators from the accessibility laws.
Finding of Emergency and Rule Analysis
The Department of Commerce finds that an emergency exists and that the adoption of a rule is necessary for the immediate preservation of public peace, health, safety and welfare. The facts constituting the emergency are as follows:
Chapter ILHR 57, subchapter II, Wis. Adm. Code, establishes design and construction requirements for accessibility in covered multifamily housing as defined in s. 101.132 (1) , Stats., formerly s. 106.04 (2r) (a) 4., Stats. The design and construction requirements in ch. ILHR 57, subchapter II, are based on the multifamily accessibility law in s. 101.132,Stats. The state law on accessibility in covered multifamily housing is substantially equivalent to the federal Fair Housing law of 1988. The proposed changes in ch. ILHR 57, subchapter II, are in response to 1997 Wis. Act 237 that exempts multilevel multifamily dwelling units without elevators from the multifamily accessibility law. This state law change does not conflict with the federal Fair Housing law since the federal Fair Housing law does not cover multilevel multifamily dwelling units with separate exterior entrances in buildings without elevators.
The proposed rule eliminates only those sections requiring access to and accessible features within multilevel multifamily dwelling units with separate exterior entrances in buildings without elevators. If the rules are not revised an inconsistency between the statutes and the administrative rules would result. This inconsistency may cause confusion in application and enforcement within the construction industry and may result in construction delays, which may be costly.
Publication Date:
June 17, 1998
Effective Date:
June 17, 1998
Expiration Date:
November 14, 1998
EMERGENCY RULES NOW IN EFFECT
Commerce
(Rental Unit Energy Efficiency, Ch. Comm 67)
Rules were adopted revising ch. Comm 67, relating to rental unit energy efficiency.
Finding of Emergency
The Department of Commerce finds that an emergency exists and that adoption of a rule is necessary for the immediate preservation of public health, safety, and welfare.
The facts constituting the emergency are as follows. Under s. 101.122, Stats., Department protects public health, safety, and welfare by promulgating energy efficiency requirements for rental units. 1997 Wis. Act 288 amends s. 101.122, Stats., to change the scope of the rules that the Department develops under that law. Those portions of the Act were effective the day after publication, and the rules adopted by the Department under the authority of that law are hereby amended to be consistent with 1997 Wis. Act 288.
This emergency rule excludes the following buildings from the rental unit energy efficiency
· Buildings of one or two rental units that were constructed after December 1, 1978.
· Buildings of three or more rental units that were constructed after April 15, 1976.
· Condominium buildings of three or more dwelling units.
This rule also limits the application of rental unit energy efficiency requirements to the following items:
· Attics
· Furnaces and boilers
· Storm windows and doors, with an option to meet an air infiltration performance standard for the thermal envelope of the building
· Sill boxes
· Heating and plumbing supply in unheated crawlspaces
· Shower heads
This rule also eliminates the expiration of the certificate of code compliance after 5 years.
Publication Date:
June 30, 1998
Effective Date:
June 30,1998
Expiration Date:
November 27,1998
Hearing Date:
August 14, 1998
EMERGENCY RULES NOW IN EFFECT
Commerce
(Barrier-Free Design, Ch. Comm 69)
