Notice to Herd Owner
Whenever the department classifies a herd based on an annual herd test, the department must promptly provide the herd owner with all of the following information in writing:
• The individual test results for each animal included in the herd test. Test results will be identified with each animal's official individual identification.
• The herd classification including the effective date and expiration date of the classification. A herd classification takes effect on the effective date and immediately supersedes any prior classification.
Test Procedure
The person conducting an annual herd test must be an accredited veterinarian, or an employee of the department or USDA-APHIS. The person must select the test group, determine the type of test to be performed, collect an appropriate sample from each test animal, identify each sample with the animal's official individual identification and sample collection date, and transmit the samples to the testing laboratory.
Annual herd test samples must be tested by the department, the federal bureau, or a laboratory approved by the department or the federal bureau. The laboratory must use one of the following tests:
• The enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), except that the ELISA test may not be used for goats.
• The fecal culture test.
• Another test approved by the department.
Test Results
A laboratory performing tests on annual herd test samples must report the test results to the department within 10 days. The department will not use the test results to classify a herd unless the herd owner asks the department to do so. If the herd owner asks the department to classify the herd based on the test results (and the test procedure complies with this rule), the department will classify the herd within 30 days.
Johne's Disease Reactors
Under this rule, an animal is a Johne's disease reactor if any of the following applies:
• It tests positive on the enzyme linked inimunosorbent assay (ELISA), unless it subsequently tests negative on the fecal culture test. (The ELISA test applies only to cattle, not goats.)
• It tests positive on the fecal culture test.
• It tests positive on any other test which the department approves and deems conclusive.
Current rules prohibit the sale of Johne's disease reactors (except to slaughter). This rule permits the sale of Johne's disease reactors if all of the following apply:
• The seller discloses to the prospective buyer in writing, prior to sale, that the animals are reactors.
• The animals are permanently identified as reactors.
Under this rule, an accredited veterinarian must permanently identify a confirmed Johne's disease reactor, even if the animal is sold to slaughter or is not sold at all. The veterinarian must identify the animal within 30 days after the animal tests positive on an ELISA or fecal culture test. If the herd owner wishes to confirm a positive ELISA test with a fecal culture, the veterinarian must collect the fecal sample within 30 days. If the fecal culture also tests positive, the veterinarian must then identify the animal as a Johne's disease reactor within 30 days.
Herd Vaccination
Under this rule, no person may vaccinate cattle for Johne's disease except under a herd agreement with the department. The department may not authorize vaccination in any herd in which the percentage of reactors in the last whole herd test or split herd test was less than 7%, unless special circumstances warrant vaccination in that herd.
Misrepresenting Herd Classification
Under this rule, no person may misrepresent the classification of the herd from which cattle or goats are being sold. A seller who misrepresents a herd classification is not exempt from the implied warranty under s. 95.195, Stats., and is subject to possible penalties under s. 95.99, Stats. The department may investigate alleged misrepresentations.
Department Disclosure of Herd Classification
Under this rule, the department may disclose a herd classification to a 3rd party with the written authorization of the herd owner. Under s. 95.232, Stats., information that identifies herds infected, or suspected of being infected, with Johne's disease is not open to inspection under the Public Records Law unless the department determines that disclosure is necessary to protect the public health, safety or welfare.
Summary of Comments from Legislative Committees:
On July 1, 1999, this department transmitted the above rule for legislative review. On July 6 the rule was referred to the Senate Agriculture & Environmental Resources & Campaign Finance Reform Committee. On July 8, 1999, the rule was referred to the Assembly Agriculture Committee. Neither committee took any action during the review period.
Chir Code - Definitions, applications, examinations, temporary permits and renewal.
Summary of Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis:
These proposed rules will have no significant economic impact on small businesses, as defined in s. 227.114 (1) (a), Stats.
Summary of Comments:
No comments were reported.
Ch. Comm 1 - Environmental analysis and review procedures for department actions.
Summary of Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis:
The proposed rules create a new commerce chapter for the environmental analysis and review procedures for department actions, Wisconsin Environmental Policy Act (WEPA).
The proposed rules of Clearinghouse Rule No. 97-117, address the Department's responsibilities for analyzing environmental impacts for the department actions with regard for the need for an environmental impact statement, including a classification of those actions identified by department activity and associated jurisdiction. The rule also establishes the processes and procedures for creating environmental documents and the opportunity for public input. The rules follow the guidelines issued by the U.S. Council on Environmental Quality.
Summary of Comments of Legislative Standing Committees:
The rules were reviewed by the Assembly Committee, Committee on the Environment and the Senate Committee on Business, Economic Development and Urban Affairs Committee. No comments were received.
Chs. Comm 16 and 17 - Electrical Construction and Inspection.
Summary of Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis:
Sections 101.63(1), 101.73(1) and 101 .82(1), Stats., direct the Department to promulgate rules for the construction and inspection of electrical construction in dwellings, public buildings and places of employment. The proposed rules of Clearinghouse Rule No. 99-050 are minimum requirements to meet the directives of the Statutes, and any exceptions from compliance for small businesses would be contrary to the Statutory objectives which are the basis for the rules.
Summary of Comments of Legislative Standing Committees:
The rules were reviewed by the Assembly Committee on Labor and Employment and the Senate Committee on Economic Development, Housing and Government Operations. No comments were received.
Ch. HFS 90 - Early intervention services for children with developmental needs in the age group from birth up to age 3.
Summary of Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis:
The rules will not directly affect small businesses as “small business” is defined in s. 227.114(1) (a), Stats. They apply to the Department and to county agencies administering the Birth to 3 Program.
Summary of Comments:
No comments were reported.
Ch. Ins 17 - Annual patients compensation fund and mediation fund fees, open records law applicable to fund records and late fee.
Summary of Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis:
The Office of the Commissioner of Insurance has determined that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small businesses and therefore a final regulatory flexibility analysis is not required.
Summary of Comments of Legislative Standing Committees:
The legislative standing committees had no comments on this rule.
Ch. NR 10 - Hunting and trapping.
Summary of Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis:
The proposed rules relate to hunting, trapping and shooting preserves. The rules are applicable to individual sportspersons. Therefore, a final regulatory flexibility analysis is not required.
Summary of Comments by Legislative Review Committees:
The rules were reviewed by the Assembly Committee on Natural Resources and the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Environmental Resources and Campaign Finance Reform. On July 9, 1999, the Assembly Committee on Natural Resources extended the review period. No comments or recommendations were made during this period.
Ch. NR 10 - Hunting and trapping.
Summary of Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis:
The proposed rules relate to hunting. The rules are applicable to individual sportspersons. Therefore, a final regulatory flexibility analysis is not required.
Summary of Comments by Legislative Review Committees:
The rules were reviewed by the Assembly Committee on Natural Resources and the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Environmental Resources and Campaign Finance Reform. On August 4, 1999, the Assembly Committee on Natural Resources held a public hearing. No comments or recommendations were made as a result of this hearing.
Ch. NR 25 - Commercial fishing for smelt on Lake Michigan and Green Bay.
Summary of Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis:
The proposed rule would directly affect commercial fishing businesses engaged in trawling. Reductions in the total allowable commercial harvest would not immediately affect commercial fishing businesses because the proposed harvest limits exceed recently reported harvests.
Summary of Comments by Legislative Review Committees:
The rules were reviewed by the Assembly Committee on Natural Resources and the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Environmental Resources and Campaign Finance Reform. On March 16, 1999, the Assembly Committee on Natural Resources held a public hearing. The Assembly Committee on Natural Resources requested that the harvest limit be lowered to 1 ,000,000 pounds rather than 713,340 pounds. The Natural Resources Board adopted the revised harvest limit.
S. Tax 1.12 - Electronic funds transfer.
Summary of Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis:
This rule order does not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small businesses.
Summary of Comments:
No comments were reported.
