Emergency rules now in effect
Under s. 227.24, Stats., state agencies may promulgate rules without complying with the usual rule-making procedures. Using this special procedure to issue emergency rules, an agency must find that either the preservation of the public peace, health, safety or welfare necessitates its action in bypassing normal rule-making procedures.
Emergency rules are published in the official state newspaper, which is currently the Wisconsin State Journal. Emergency rules are in effect for 150 days and can be extended up to an additional 120 days with no single extension to exceed 60 days.
Occasionally the Legislature grants emergency rule authority to an agency with a longer effective period than 150 days or allows an agency to adopt an emergency rule without requiring a finding of emergency.
Extension of the effective period of an emergency rule is granted at the discretion of the Joint Committee for Review of Administrative Rules under s. 227.24 (2), Stats.
Notice of all emergency rules which are in effect must be printed in the Wisconsin Administrative Register. This notice will contain a brief description of the emergency rule, the agency finding of emergency or a statement of exemption from a finding of emergency, date of publication, the effective and expiration dates, any extension of the effective period of the emergency rule and information regarding public hearings on the emergency rule.
Copies of emergency rule orders can be obtained from the promulgating agency. The text of current emergency rules can be viewed at www.legis.state.wi.us/rsb/code.
Agriculture, Trade & Consumer Protection
Rules adopted revising
chs. ATCP 10 and 11 relating to chronic wasting disease in cervids.
Finding of emergency
(1) Chronic wasting disease is a contagious disease known to affect several species of the cervid family, including elk, white-tailed deer, black-tailed deer, red deer and mule deer. The disease is always fatal. At the present time, there is no scientific evidence to suggest that chronic wasting disease is transmitted to non-cervids or to humans. But there is limited scientific knowledge about the disease, and this lack of knowledge has contributed to public concerns.
(2) The cause of chronic wasting disease is not fully understood. The disease appears to be related to aberrant protein molecules called prions. By an unknown mechanism, prions apparently cause other protein molecules in the cervid brain to take aberrant forms. The disease causes microscopic vacuoles (holes) in the brain. Diseased cervids become emaciated, display abnormal behavior patterns, and experience loss of bodily functions.
(3) Science does not understand how chronic wasting disease is spread. It is thought that infected cervids can transmit the disease to other cervids, either directly or by contaminating their environment. It appears that cervid-to-cervid contact facilitates the spread of the disease.
(4) On February 27, 2002, the national veterinary services laboratory informed Wisconsin that it had confirmed chronic wasting disease for the first time in this state. The laboratory confirmed the disease in test samples collected from 3 free-ranging white-tailed deer killed by hunters during the November 2001 gun deer season. The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (DNR) collected these samples as part of a statewide disease surveillance program. With the voluntary cooperation of hunters, DNR collected test samples from deer killed and registered by hunters at selected hunting registration sites around the state. DNR collected a total of 345 samples statewide, including 82 samples at the Mt. Horeb registration station. The 3 deer that tested positive for chronic wasting disease were all registered at the Mt. Horeb station. The 3 deer were shot in close proximity to each other in Vermont Township in Dane County. We do not know how the 3 deer were exposed to chronic wasting disease, nor do we know the extent of infection in the free-ranging herd.
(5) We do not know whether any captive cervids in Wisconsin are infected with chronic wasting disease (there are no findings to date). If captive cervids are infected, the close proximity of cervids within a captive herd may facilitate the spread of disease within the herd. The movement of infected cervids between herds may spread the disease to other herds. Contact between free-ranging and captive cervids may also spread the disease.
(6) Persons importing captive cervids to Wisconsin must obtain an import permit from the Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP). Importers must identify the herd of origin and the herd of destination. A veterinarian must certify that the cervids appear to be in good health, and that they have been tested for tuberculosis and brucellosis. There is no chronic wasting disease testing requirement, because there is no way to test live cervids for the disease.
(7) Since 1995, a total of 2,604 captive cervids have been legally imported into Wisconsin. This includes 2,020 elk, 191 whitetail deer, 12 mule deer and 387 other cervids. Chronic wasting disease has been found in free-ranging herds or in some captive herds in Colorado, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Kansas, Montana, South Dakota, and Wyoming. Since 1995, a total of 410 captive cervids have been legally imported to Wisconsin from these states. Most other states lack active chronic wasting disease surveillance programs, so the full extent of the disease is not known with certainty.
(8) DATCP currently registers captive cervid herds, other than white-tail deer herds. DNR currently licenses captive white-tail deer herds. Since 1998, DATCP has sponsored a voluntary program to monitor for chronic wasting disease among the captive herds that it registers. Approximately 50 herd owners currently participate in this program.
(9) Since chronic wasting disease was confirmed in this state, there has been widespread public concern about the disease. The public has expressed concern about the health of free-ranging deer and elk, and about potential threats to humans, livestock and deer-related businesses. Hunters and consumers have expressed food safety concerns. There is currently no scientific evidence to suggest that chronic wasting disease is transmissible to non-cervids or to humans. But there is limited scientific knowledge about the disease, and this lack of knowledge has contributed to public concerns.
(10) In order to protect the public peace, health, safety and welfare, it is necessary to take immediate steps to prevent and control the spread of chronic wasting disease in this state. Among other things, it is necessary to impose further controls on the import and movement of captive cervids and to implement a mandatory monitoring program. DATCP may adopt rules to implement these measures.
(11) Normal rulemaking procedures require up to a year or more to complete. A temporary emergency rule is needed to protect the public peace, health, safety and welfare, pending the adoption of longer-term rules. This emergency rule will implement essential prevention and control measures on an immediate, interim basis.
Publication Date:
April 9, 2002
Effective Date:
April 9, 2002
Expiration Date:
September 6, 2002
Hearing Date:
May 22, 2002
Extension Through:
May 31, 2003
Corrections
Rules adopted amending
ch. DOC 316, relating to medical, dental and nursing copayment charges.
Exemption from finding of emergency
The department of corrections adopts this emergency rule pursuant to the statutory requirements of
2001 Wis. Act 109. The Act provides, in relevant part:
“Using the procedure under section
227.24 of the statutes, the department of corrections shall promulgate the rules that are required under section
302.386 (4) (a) of the statutes relating to the deductible, coinsurance, copayment, or similar charge that must be imposed under section
302.386 (3) (b) of the statutes."
and,
“Notwithstanding section
302.386 (3) (b) of the statutes, the rules shall require the department to require that, subject to the exception and waiver provisions under section
302.386 (3) (c) of the statutes, each person to whom section
302.386 (1) of the statutes applies pay a deductible, coinsurance, copayment, or similar charge of at least $7.50 for each request that the person makes for medical or dental services."
Currently, the department's administrative rules provide for a $2.50 copayment under such circumstances as described above. This emergency rule raises the copayment to $7.50 as directed by
2001 Wis. Act 109.
In addition, pursuant to
2001 Wis. Act 109 the department makes no finding of emergency in promulgating this rule.
2001 Wis. Act 109 expressly exempts the department from the statutory requirements to do so.
Publication Date:
September 3, 2002
Effective Date:
September 3, 2002
Expiration Date:
January 31, 2003
Hearing Date:
November 18, 2002
Extension Through:
March 31, 2003
Employee Trust Funds
Finding of emergency
The Department of Employee Trust Funds, Employee Trust Fund Board, Teachers Retirement Board and Wisconsin Retirement Board find that an emergency exists and that an administrative rule is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public welfare. A statement of the facts constituting the emergency is:
Without emergency rule-making it will not be possible to avoid short-term harm to individual WRS annuitants who will already bear the effects of the market downturn though a zero percent fixed annuity dividend and a double-digit negative variable change.
The first annuity dividends actually affected by the 2002 rule-making (CR #02-049) are the dividends otherwise payable on March 1, 2003. Projections indicate that the fixed division dividend will likely be 0%, largely because of the effect of three years of market declines. The annual change to variable division annuities, which is more volatile because it reflects only the past year's market performance, will be negative and in the range of -26% to -30%. This means that the portion of an annuitant's annuity payable from the fixed division will not increase during 2003, while, if the annuitant receives a portion of his or her annuity from the variable annuity division, that portion of the annuity will be markedly reduced. Annuitants are concerned about the short-term effect of cuts to their annuities being made effective a month earlier this year than was the case in previous years.
The change from April 1 to March 1 was initiated with the best of intentions, primarily to get the additional money from dividend increases into the hands of annuitants as quickly as possible. In retrospect, the timing is unfortunate. When drafting of the rule began in early 2002, the year-end market earnings were unknown and a third consecutive year of market losses could not be predicted. The continued deterioration of investment returns in the latter part of 2002 has magnified the adverse, short-term effect of this change in the timing of dividends; that is, the size of the negative variable adjustment is larger.
Publication Date:
February 27, 2003
Effective Date:
February 28, 2003
Expiration Date:
July 28, 2003
Health and Family Services (2)
(Medical Assistance, Chs. HFS 100—)
1. Rules adopted creating
ch. HFS 109, relating to SeniorCare.
Finding of emergency
The Department of Health and Family Services finds that an emergency exists and that the rules are necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety or welfare. The facts constituting the emergency are as follows:
The high cost of prescription drugs in Wisconsin and nationwide are especially burdensome on the elderly, many of whom live on a fixed income. Through
2001 Act 16, Wisconsin has addressed the problem those increasingly high costs pose to the elderly by creating section
49.688 of the statutes. Section
49.688 directs the Department to develop and administer the program of prescription drug benefits for the elderly that has come to be known as “SeniorCare." The statute also directs the Department to develop administrative rules for implementing SeniorCare, which the Department has done by creating a new chapter of administrative rules, HFS 109. The rules address a variety of issues associated with operating the program in accordance with section
49.688, Stats., including specifying:
- what prescription drugs are covered;
- who is eligible for benefits and services;
- how the Department determines household income for the program's eligibility determination;
- how the Department monitors compliance by pharmacists and pharmacies; and
- mechanisms for preventing fraud and abuse.
The Department drafted these rules to parallel the prescription drug provisions of the existing Medicaid rules in chs.
HFS 101 to
108. The Department developed the program's administrative elements in consultation with an advisory committee composed of representatives of physicians, counties, seniors and pharmacies.
While the Department is currently in the process of promulgating ch.
HFS 109 as permanent rules, s.
49.688 (5) (a) and
(7) (a), Stats., mandate the initiation of some SeniorCare program elements beginning on September 1, 2002. To meet this deadline, the Department is issuing ch.
HFS 109 as emergency rules to preserve the public welfare.
Publication Date:
September 1, 2002
Effective Date:
September 1, 2002
Expiration Date:
January 29, 2003
Hearing Date:
October 10, 2002
Extension Through:
March 29, 2003
2.
Rules adopted revising
chs. HFS 101 to 107, relating to the Medicaid Family Planning Demonstration Project.
Finding of emergency
The Department of Health and Family Services finds that an emergency exists and that the rules are necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety or welfare. The facts constituting the emergency are as follows:
On June 25, 1999, the Department submitted a request for a waiver of federal law to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the agency within the United States Department of Health and Human Services that controls states? use of Medicaid funds. On June 14, 2002, the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare granted the waiver, effective January 1, 2003. The waiver allows the state to expand Medicaid services by providing coverage of family planning services for females of child-bearing age who would not otherwise be eligible for Medicaid coverage. Under the waiver, a woman of child-bearing age whose income does not exceed 185% of the federal poverty line will be eligible for most of the family planning services currently available under Medicaid, as described in s.
HFS 107.21. Through this expansion of coverage, the Department hopes to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies in Wisconsin.
Department rules for the operation of the Family Planning Demonstration Project must be in effect before the program begins. The program statute, section
49.45 (24r) of the statutes, became effective on October 14, 1997. It directed the Department to request a federal waiver of certain requirements of the federal Medicaid Program to permit the Department to implement the Family Planning Demonstration Project not later than July 1, 1998, or the effective date of the waiver, whichever date was later. After CMS granted the waiver, the Department determined that the Family Planning Demonstration Project could not be implemented prior to January 1, 2003, and CMS approved this starting date. Upon approval of the waiver, the Department began developing policies for the project and subsequently the rules, which are in this order. The Department is publishing the rules by emergency order so the rules take effect in February 2003, rather than at the later date required by promulgating permanent rules. In so doing, the Department can provide health care coverage already authorized by CMS as quickly as possible to women currently not receiving family planning services and unable to pay for them. The Department is also proceeding with promulgating these rule changes on a permanent basis through a proposed permanent rulemaking order.
Publication Date:
January 31, 2003
Effective Date:
January 31, 2003
Expiration Date:
June 30, 2003
Health and Family Services (2)
(Health, Chs. HFS 110—)
1.
Rules adopted amending
chs. HFS 110 to 113, relating to licensing of EMT's and certification of first responders, incorporating responding to acts of terrorism as a training component.
Finding of emergency
The Department of Health and Family Services finds that an emergency exists and that rules are necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety or welfare. The facts constituting the emergency are as follows:
2001 Wisconsin Act 109 amended section 146.50 (6) (a) 2., (b) 2. and (8) (b) 3. by adding the requirement that as of January 1, 2003, to receive an initial or renewed EMS license or first responder certification, the applicant must have received training in response to acts of terrorism. Section
146.50 (6) (b) 2. of the statutes specifically directs the Department, in conjunction with the technical college system board, to promulgate rules specifying training, education, or examination requirements for training in response to acts of terrorism. The training must be completed by all persons desiring to receive an initial or renewed license or certification after January 1, 2003. To enforce and administer this statutory requirement, the Department must revise the administrative rules associated with the licensing of Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) - Basic and EMTs- Basic IV (found in ch.
HFS 110), EMTs- Intermediate (found in ch.
HFS 111), EMTs - Paramedic (found in ch.
HFS 112) and First Responders (found in ch.
HFS 113.)
The required rule changes will remove any question of whether the department had the authority to require persons to receive training for acts of terrorism. Such training is needed to promote the public's health and safety and due to the statutory effective date of January 1, 2003, the department is promulgating these rule changes through an emergency order. The department is also proceeding with promulgating these rule changes on a permanent basis through a proposed permanent rulemaking order.
Publication Date:
December 31, 2002
Effective Date:
December 31, 2002
Expiration Date:
May 30, 2003
Hearing Date:
February 17, 2003
2.
Rules adopted revising
ch. HFS 163, relating to certification for the identification, removal and reduction of lead-based paint hazards.
Finding of emergency
The Department of Health and Family Services finds that an emergency exists and that rules are necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety or welfare. A statement of the facts constituting the emergency is as follows:
The presence of lead in paint and soil is believed to contribute to the level of lead found in the blood of persons, particularly children, living in the area. The federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) maintains regulations intended to reduce environmental lead hazards principally by:
• Specifying the thresholds for an environment to be considered as presenting a lead-based paint hazard; and
• Requiring training and certification of persons who perform lead hazard reduction activities or lead investigation activities so those persons are best able to prevent exposure of building occupants to hazardous levels of lead.
The federal government may authorize a state to administer its own lead training and certification program if the state has regulations governing certification of persons for the identification, removal and reduction of lead-based paint hazards that are as protective as those specified in the EPA regulations.
In Wisconsin, the Department of Health and Family Services administers the lead training and certification program. The Department has established administrative rules under chapter HFS 163 to guide its administration of the program. In 2000, the Department began work to extensively revise ch.
HFS 163 to implement
1999 Wisconsin Act 113, which established a program for registering lead-free and lead-safe properties. The proposed rule was released for public review and comment on December 12, 2000. On January 5, 2001, in volume 66, number 4 of the Federal Register (66 FR 1206-1239), the EPA published regulations that established standards for lead-based paint hazards under
40 CFR Part 745, Subparts D and L, and required states with authorized lead training and certification programs under
40 CFR Part 745, Subpart Q, to implement the regulations by February 5, 2003. Because the proposed rule had already been released for public review and comment and the EPA standards for lead-based paint hazards would affect the lead-safe property standards under ch.
HFS 163, the Department decided to educate the public about the new EPA standards for lead-based paint hazards before revising the rule to reflect the new EPA standards. If Wisconsin is to continue administering its program of training and certification of persons performing lead abatement and lead investigation activities (in lieu of a program operated by the EPA), the Department must revise ch.
HFS 163 by February 3, 2003 to comply with those most recent and final federal regulations at
40 CFR Part 745, Subparts D, L and Q.
If the Department does not make these changes to ch.
HFS 163, Wisconsin could lose some or all of its Federal lead grant funding and EPA's authorization for the Department's lead program. Since the federal regulation provides the first measurable definition of a lead-based paint hazard, the Department needs to adopt this definition in order to protect the state's citizens.
The most significant modification to the rules pertains to the permissible level of residual lead dust in window troughs. The current lead-safe property standards expressed under s.
HFS 163.42 allow a higher level of lead dust in window troughs than is permissible in corresponding EPA regulations and also do not require properties to be free of soil-lead hazards. Making the changes to s.
HFS 163.42 through this order will mean that persons removing lead-based paint hazards may need to clean window troughs more thoroughly to reduce the dust-lead levels and also may need to cover bare soil. Most lead investigation professionals in Wisconsin already perform lead investigation work in conformance with the more stringent lead levels specified in EPA's regulations to ensure a more protective environment for residents, especially when conducting clearance following abatement activities. Conformance with the more stringent EPA regulations is also currently required when lead hazard reduction work is performed using federal funds. Since most lead investigation professionals already use the more protective EPA standards, the rule changes should have little effect on persons conducting lead investigation or abatement activities.
Among the changes the Department is making through this order, the most significant are the following:
1. Prior to this order, section
HFS 163.14 (5) (c) 8. required that, following lead abatement, a window well or trough may contain no more than 800 micrograms of lead dust per square foot. The revised EPA regulations specify a maximum level of 400 micrograms per square foot. To comply with federal regulations, the Department is reducing the permissible threshold to 400 micrograms per square foot.
2. Prior to this order, section
HFS 163.15 (2) specified that a lead hazard is present in soil when the arithmetic mean for laboratory results for samples of bare soil is equal to or greater than 2,000 parts per million. The EPA revised regulations state that a lead hazard is present in soil when bare soil in a play area contains total lead content equal to or exceeding 400 parts per million or when bare soil in the rest of the yard contains an average of 1,200 parts per million of lead. To comply with the federal regulations, the Department is reducing the permissible threshold to that specified by the EPA.
3. The Department is adding standards, as section
HFS 163.15 (3), for determining when a lead-based paint hazard exists.
4. The Department is modifying section
HFS 163.42 (1) (b) and
(c) to require that all exterior painted components, regardless of their height above the ground, be free of deteriorated paint unless the paint is proved to be lead-free.
5. The Department is revising its standards for lead-safe property under s.
HFS 163.42 (1) (f) and
(j) to reflect these lower levels for lead in dust and soil.
6. Finally, the Department is revising section
HFS 163.42 (1) (j) to require that there be no soil-lead hazard on registered lead-safe property.
Publication Date:
January 3, 2003
Effective Date:
January 3, 2003
Expiration Date:
June 2, 2003
Hearing Date:
April 2, 2003
Insurance
Rules adopted amending
s. Ins 3.39, relating to Medicare Supplement insurance policies.
Finding of emergency
The commissioner of insurance (“Commissioner") finds that an emergency exists and that promulgation of this emergency rule is necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, safety and welfare. The facts constituting the emergency are as follows:
These changes clarify the persons eligible who have the right to have policies guaranteed issued. The changes track the recent revisions in the NAIC model act implementing the Medicare, Medicaid and SCHIP Benefits Improvement and Protection Act (“BIPA"), by January 1, 2003. In order to provide more certainty and provide guaranteed issue to the appropriate persons in Wisconsin, it is necessary that the changes be put into effect as soon as possible. In addition, since insurers are required to be in compliance with the Federal law, implementing this rule effective on the same date will allow insurers to modify their policies one time rather than two.
The Commissioner is sending contemporaneously with this Emergency Rule, the permanent rule, Clearinghouse No. 02-118, to the Legislature for review. A hearing on the permanent rule, pursuant to published notice thereof, was held on November 7, 2002. The Office has received comment and revised the rule as necessary to incorporate comments from the public and as contained within the Clearinghouse Report.
Publication Date:
December 16, 2002
Effective Date:
December 16, 2002
Expiration Date:
May 14, 2003
Natural Resources (5)
(Fish, Game, etc., Chs. NR 1-)
1.
Rules adopted revising
chs. NR 10 and 45, relating to the control and management of chronic wasting disease.
Finding of emergency
The emergency rule procedure, pursuant to s.
227.24, Stats., is necessary and justified in establishing rules to protect the public health, safety and welfare. The state legislature has delegated to the department rule-making authority in
2001 Wisconsin Act 108 to control the spread of Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) in Wisconsin. CWD poses a risk to the health of the state's deer herd and citizens and is a threat to the economic infrastructure of the department, the state, it citizens and businesses.
Publication Date:
July 3, 2002
Effective Date:
July 3, 2002
Expiration Date:
November 30, 2002
Hearing Date:
August 12, 2002
Extension Through:
April 1, 2003
2.
Rules adopted repealing and recreating
s. NR 20.20 (49) (d) and (61) (c), relating to the closure of carp fishing on Cedar Lake and connected waters in Polk and St. Croix counties.
Finding of emergency
The Department of Natural Resources finds that an emergency exists and that rules are necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety or welfare. A statement of facts constituting the emergency is:
Spring viremia of carp virus is of international animal health concern. The virus effects fishes in the minnow family in nature. Minnows are extremely important forage fish for many important sport fishes in Wisconsin and are also important to the bait and aquaculture industries. Assuring the health of minnow populations and preventing the spread to other waters is important in preserving the welfare of Wisconsin citizens by protecting popular and economically valuable sport and bait fisheries. Little is currently known about the extent of the virus and until we can increase our knowledge, this closure will limit the potential spread from transport of fish and/or their parts and fluids.
Publication Date:
October 3, 2002
Effective Date:
October 3, 2002
Expiration Date:
March 2, 2003
Hearing Date:
November 11, 2002
Extension Through:
April 30, 2003
Finding of emergency
The waters of Lake Superior were not part of the extensive off-reservation treaty rights litigation known as the Voigt case. The parties stipulated that the Lake Superior rights would be dealt with, to the extent possible, by agreement rather than litigation. This rule represents the implementation of the most recent negotiated amendments to the agreement between the State and the Red Cliff and Bad River Bands. These amendments incorporate the results of a new population estimate that was not available previously. In order to comply with the terms of the agreement, the State must change its quotas and commercial fishing regulations at the earliest possible date. Failure of the State to do so will not only deprive state fishers of increased harvest opportunities available under the agreement, but could also jeopardize the agreement, putting the entire Lake Superior fishery at risk of litigation.
Publication Date:
November 1, 2002
Effective Date:
November 1, 2002
Expiration Date:
March 31, 2003
Hearing Date:
December 13, 2002
4.
Rules adopted revising
chs. NR 16 and 19 and creating
ch. NR 14, relating to captive wildlife.
Finding of emergency
2001 Wis. Act 56 was not enacted until April of 2002. It required standards for captive animals held under licenses issued under ch.
169, Stats., to be in place by January 1, 2003, the effective date of the change from licensing under ch.
29, Stats., to ch.
169, Stats. As the use of the permanent rule process would not allow these standards to be in place by January 1, 2003, the Department had no choice but to use the emergency rule procedures. Failure to have standards in place would result in the lack of humane care standards for wild animals held in captivity and the lack of pen standards necessary to prevent the interactions between captive and wild animals.
Publication Date:
December 20, 2002
Effective Date:
January 1, 2003
Expiration Date:
May 31, 2003
Hearing Date:
January 16, 2003
5.
Rules adopted revising
ss. NR 10.07 (2), 12.06 and 19.60, relating to the control and management of chronic wasting disease.
Finding of emergency
The emergency rule procedure, pursuant to s.
227.24, Stats., is necessary and justified in establishing rules to protect the public health, safety and welfare. The state legislature has delegated to the department rule - making authority in
2001 Wisconsin Act 108 to control the spread of Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) in Wisconsin. CWD poses a risk to the health of the state's deer herd and citizens and is a threat to the economic infrastructure of the department, the state, it's citizens and businesses. This rule is needed to reduce the deer herd in the CWD eradication zone further than accomplished through the hunting seasons to help prevent the spread of CWD.
Initial Applicability. This emergency rule repeals and recreates portions of the original CWD emergency rule order (WM-32-02 (E)) which was adopted by the Natural Resources Board in June 2002. The effective period of this emergency rule will coincide with the effective period of the original CWD emergency rule order which has been extended by the Legislative Joint Committee on the Review of Administrative Rules until April 1, 2003, pursuant to 2001, Wisconsin Act 108.
Publication Date:
January 11, 2003
Effective Date:
January 11, 2003
Expiration Date:
April 1, 2003
Hearing Date:
February 11, 2003
Nursing
Rules adopted creating
s. N 4.10, relating to malpractice insurance coverage for nurse-midwives.
Exemption from finding of emergency
Under Section
13 of
2001 Wisconsin Act 52, the Board of Nursing is directed to use the procedure under s.
227.24, Stats., in promulgating the rules required under s.
441.15 (5) (b) of the statutes. Under that procedure, the Board of Nursing may promulgate this rule for the period before permanent rules become effective. The Board of Nursing need not provide evidence of the necessity of preservation of the public peace, health, safety, or welfare in promulgating this rule.
Analysis prepared by the Department of Regulation
2001 Wisconsin Act 52 makes a number of changes to the provisions affecting nurse-midwives, including that licensed nurse-midwives carry malpractice insurance in an amount determined by rules to be promulgated by the Board of Nursing. This rule establishes those requirements relating to malpractice coverage for nurse-midwives.
Using the procedure under s.
227.24, Stats., the Board of Nursing will promulgate the rules as created by
2001 Wisconsin Act 52, for the period before permanent rules become effective.
Publication Date:
November 5, 2002
Effective Date:
November 5, 2002
Expiration Date:
April 4, 2003
Hearing Date:
March 7, 2003
Veterans Affairs
Rules adopted amending
s. VA 12.02 (7) and (16), relating to the maximum loan amount under the personal loan program.
Finding of Emergency
The Department of Veterans Affairs finds that an emergency exists and that a rule is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety or welfare. A statement of the facts constituting the emergency is as follows:
The Department administers a personal loan program that may be used by veterans and their dependents for various statutory purposes. The purposes include debt consolidation, payment of delinquent child support, education expenses, and medical and funeral expenses, and the purchase of a mobile home or business property. The current maximum loan amount, set by the Department at sec. VA 12.02 (7), Wis. Adm. Code, is $10,000. The permissible statutory maximum loan amount may be $15,000, as set by the Department by administrative rule.
The Department proposes to raise the amount to the statutory maximum for several compelling reasons. Raising the maximum loan amount will help stimulate the economy by providing additional resources for veterans and their families. Due to the state of the economy, veterans and their families have a significant need for financial assistance in the form of below market interest rate loans. Additionally, the personal loan program is the primary source of revenue for the veterans trust fund. Immediate infusion of additional assets in the form of personal loans will provide significant financial support for the trust fund. It is expected that increasing the maximum loan amount will result in approximately $4,000,000 of new loan assets over the 8-month period in which it would take to promulgate this rule change using the regular promulgation procedure.
Publication Date:
August 5, 2002
Effective Date:
August 5, 2002
Expiration Date:
January 2, 2003
Hearing Date:
December 6, 2002
Extension Through:
May 1, 2003
Workforce Development
(Public Works Const. Contracts, Chs.
DWD 290-
294)
Rules adopted amending
s. DWD 290.155 (1), relating to the annual adjustment of thresholds for application of prevailing wage rates.
Finding of Emergency
The Department of Workforce Development finds that an emergency exists and that a rule is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety, or welfare. A statement of facts constituting the emergency is:
The Department of Workforce Development is acting under its statutory authority to annually adjust thresholds for the application of prevailing wage laws on public works projects. The thresholds are adjusted in accordance with any change in construction costs since the last adjustment. The last adjustment was initially by emergency rule in January 2002 based on changes in the construction cost index in 2001. The Department uses the construction cost index in the December issue of the Engineering News-Record, a national construction trade publication, to determine the change in construction costs over the previous year. The current construction cost index indicates a 2.7% increase in construction costs in 2002. This increase in construction costs results in an increase in the threshold for application of the prevailing wage laws from $36,000 to $37,000 for single-trade projects and from $175,000 to $180,000 for multi-trade projects.
If these new thresholds are not put into effect by emergency rule, the old thresholds will remain effective for approximately 7 months, until the conclusion of the permanent rule-making process. Between January 1, 2003, and August 1, 2003, a single-trade project with a minimum estimated project cost of more than $36,000 but less than $37,000 or a multi-trade project with an estimated cost of more than $175,000 but less than $180,000 would not be exempt from the prevailing wage laws, as they would be if the emergency rule were promulgated. The threshold adjustments for application of the prevailing wage laws are based on national construction cost statistics and are unlikely to be changed by the permanent rule-making process. The Department is proceeding with this emergency rule to avoid imposing an additional administrative burden on local governments and state agencies.
Publication Date:
December 27, 2002
Effective Date:
January 1, 2003
Expiration Date:
May 31, 2003
Hearing Date:
February 27, 2003
