Expiration Date:
February 26, 2007
Hearing Date: December 11, 2006
Natural Resources
(Environmental Protection - Hazardous Waste, Chs.
NR 600—)
Rules adopted revising
chs. NR 660 to 665, relating to hazardous waste management.
Exemption from Finding of emergency
The Department of Natural Resources finds that an emergency exists and the foregoing rules are necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety or welfare. A statement of facts constituting the emergency is:
In 2001, EPA proposed regulations to change the hazardous waste manifest requirements under the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) to eliminate all state-specific manifest requirements and to require electronic submittal of the manifests. The EPA's final rule was published March 4, 2005, with correcting amendments published on June 16, 2005, and the effective date is September 5, 2006. The new regulations require the use of standardized manifest forms in all states and require certification from EPA in order to print the manifest forms. (Final action on the e-manifest was postponed.) Unlike most RCRA rules, this federal regulation will take effect, nation-wide, on the effective date. The new federal requirements will apply in all states, including Wisconsin, but will not override or supersede Wisconsin's state-specific hazardous waste manifest requirements. Accordingly, the potential exists for conflicting or additional state manifest requirements to exist beginning on that date, and the advantages of a single, uniform nationwide rule will be lost.
The normal administrative rulemaking process cannot be completed in time to conform Wisconsin's hazardous waste manifest requirements to the new EPA manifest regulations by their September 5, 2006 effective date. However, failure to adopt the new federal requirements as state rules by this date may cause legal uncertainty and potential confusion among hazardous waste generators, transporters and treatment, storage and disposal facility operators, as well as state regulatory program staff. This could interfere with interstate commerce and the orderly functioning of government, imposing unnecessary regulatory costs on Wisconsin individuals and businesses and out-of-state companies doing business in Wisconsin, to the detriment of the public welfare. More importantly, the potential confusion caused by different state and federal manifest requirements could lead to improper transportation and management of hazardous wastes, resulting in a threat to public health or safety and the environment.
Publication Date:
September 2, 2006
Effective Date:
September 5, 2006
Expiration Date:
February 2, 2007
Hearing Date: September 26, 2006
Optometry Examining Board
A rule Was adopted creating
ch. Opt 8, relating to continuing education.
Exemption from finding of emergency
“(3) Continuing education rules. (b)
…Notwithstanding section
227.24 (1) (a),
(2) (b), and
(3) of the statutes, the optometry examining board is not required to provide evidence that promulgating a rule under this paragraph as an emergency rule is necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, safety, or welfare and is not required to provide a finding of emergency for a rule promulgated under this paragraph."
Plain language analysis
Chapter
Opt 8 is being created to incorporate the continuing education requirements that optometrists must complete in order to renew their registrations. As a result of the changes made to ch.
449, Stats., by
2005 Wisconsin Act 297, all optometrist will now be required to complete 30 hours of continuing education. Previously, only optometrists who were certified to use diagnostic pharmaceutical agents (DPA) and therapeutic pharmaceutical agents (TPA) were required to complete continuing education course work.
Publication Date:
November 8, 2006
Effective Date:
November 8, 2006
Expiration Date:
April 7, 2007
Hearing Date: December 7, 2006
Regulation and Licensing
Rules adopted creating
chs. RL 160 to 168, relating to substance abuse professionals.
Exemption from finding of emergency
Section
9140 (1q) of
2005 Wisconsin Act 25 states in part: “Notwithstanding section
227.24 (1) (a),
(2) (b), and
(3) of the statutes, the department is not required to provide evidence that promulgating a rule under this subsection as an emergency rule is necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, safety, or welfare and is not required to provide a finding of emergency for a rule promulgated under this subsection."
Plain language analysis
2005 Wisconsin Act 25 created Subchapter VII of chapter 440, Stats., Substance Abuse Counselors, Clinical Supervisors, and Prevention Specialists. This Act transferred the certification and regulation of Alcohol and other Drug Abuse (AODA) counselors from the Department of Health and Family Services to the Department of Regulation and Licensing, effective 2006. This proposed rule-making order creates rules relating to definitions, requirements for certification, supervised practice, scope of practice, education approval and professional liability insurance for substance abuse professionals.
Publication Date:
November 27, 2006
Effective Date:
December 1, 2006
Expiration Date:
April 30, 2007
Transportation (2)
1.
Rules adopted creating
ch. Trans 515, relating to contractual service procurement.
Exemption from finding of emergency
The Legislature, by Section
8 of
2005 Wis. Act 89, provides an exemption from a finding of emergency for the adoption of the rule.
Analysis Prepared by the Department of Transportation
The proposed rule requires a cost benefit analysis before procuring engineering or other specialized services under s.
84.01 (13), Stats., in excess of $25,000 when those services are normally performed by state employees. The required analysis includes a comparison between the costs of contracting out and performing the services with state employees. The analysis also considers other subjective factors such as timeliness, quality and technical expertise.
Publication Date:
July 1, 2006
Effective Date:
July 1, 2006
Hearing Date: August 8, 2006
2.
Rules adopted revising
ch. Trans 276, relating to allowing the operation of certain 2-vehicle combinations on certain highways without a permit.
Exemption from finding of emergency
The Legislature, by Section
7 of
2005 Wis. Act 363, provides an exemption from a finding of emergency for the adoption of the rule.
Plain language analysis
Section
348.07 (1), Stats., historically has limited vehicle lengths on Wisconsin highways to 65 feet. Section
348.07(2), Stats., allowed vehicles meeting the specifications of that subsection to operate without permits despite exceeding the 65-foot limit of subsection (1).
2005 Wis. Act 363 amended s.
348.07, Stats., and essentially made 75 feet the default permitted length on the state trunk highway system. Wisconsin's old default 65-foot overall length limit still applies on all local roads but only applies to state trunk highways that are designated as 65-foot restricted routes by the Department. This emergency rule making establishes a preliminary list of such “65-foot restricted routes."
Prior to Act 363, s.
348.07 (4), Stats., permitted the Department to designate “long truck routes" upon which no overall length limits apply. The Department designates the state's long truck routes in s.
Trans 276.07. This rule making does not affect those longstanding designations.
The new “default" 75-foot overall length limit applies on state highways that are neither designated as 65-foot restricted routes under this rule making nor long truck routes under s.
Trans 276.07.
Definitions have been added to the rule to make it easier to identify the nature of designations made by the Department in Ch.
Trans 276.
In drafting this rule the Department noticed several items that it believes may be of special interest to the legislature and which, in the Department's view, deserve special legislative attention. First, Act 363 did not grant any authority for 75-foot vehicles using the new 75-foot routes to leave those routes to reach fuel, food, maintenance, repair, rest, staging, terminal or vehicle assembly facilities or points of loading or unloading. The Department does not believe this oversight was intentional and, on an emergency basis, has designated the intersection of each 75-foot route and any other highway as a long truck route under its authority in s.
348.07 (4), Stats. This will permit trucks to exceed the 65-foot default length limit on local roads to access such facilities and make deliveries. The Department encourages the legislature to consider statutorily establishing access rights for vehicles using 75-foot restricted routes.
The second consequence of Act 363 the Department has discovered in drafting this emergency rule is that one statute that formerly restricted double-bottom tractor-trailer combinations to the state's long-truck network was repealed by the deletion of the reference to s. 348.07 (2) (gm), Stats., by the Act's amendment of s.
348.07 (4), Stats. Under the amended statute, as revised by Act 363, it might appear to a reader that double bottom trucks of unlimited length may operate upon any highway in the state, including local roads and streets, without permits. Section
348.08 (1) (e), Stats., however, continues to provide that double-bottom trucks be restricted to highways designated by the department under s.
348.07 (4). WisDOT believes this provision continues to limit double-bottom operation to long truck routes designated by the Department under s.
348.07 (4), Stats. WisDOT would suggest the deleted reference to (2) (gm) in 348.07 (4), Stats., be re-inserted into the statute to avoid confusion.
Finally, the Department notes that s.
348.07, Stats., is becoming difficult to decipher from a legal standpoint because of the many amendments that have been made to it over the years. It may be that recodifying the statute for the purpose of clarification of the length limitations of Wisconsin law would be helpful to truck and long vehicle operators in this state.
Publication Date:
September 15, 2006
Effective Date:
September 15, 2006
Expiration Date:
See section 7 (2) of 2005 Wis.
Act 363
Hearing Date: October 4, 2006
Workforce Development
Rules adopted amending
s. DWD 290.155 (1), relating to the adjustment of thresholds for application of prevailing wage rates.
Finding of Emergency
The Department of Workforce Development finds that an emergency exists and that the rule is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety, or welfare. A statement of facts constituting the emergency is:
Adjusting the thresholds for application of the prevailing wage rate requirements by emergency rule ensures that the adjustments are effective on a date certain that is prior to the time of year that project requests are generally submitted to the Department and applicability of the prevailing wage law is determined. The adjustment avoids imposing an additional administrative burden on local governments and state agencies caused by an effective decrease of the thresholds due solely to inflation in the construction industry. If these new thresholds are not put into effect by emergency rule, the old thresholds will remain effective for approximately six to seven months, until the conclusion of the permanent rule-making process. The thresholds are based on national construction cost statistics and are unlikely to be changed by the permanent rule-making process.
Publication Date:
December 28, 2006
Effective Date:
January 1, 2007
Expiration Date:
May 31, 2007
