Rule-Making Notices (Hearing Notices)

Wisconsin Administrative Register No. 615, 3/14/2007

Rule-making notices

Notice of Hearing

Commerce

(Financial Resources for Businesses and Communities)

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to 2005 Wisconsin Act 358, section 5 (1) (a), the Department of Commerce will hold a public hearing on emergency rules in chapter Comm 104 relating to a woman-owned business certification program.

The public hearing will be held as follows:

Date and Time: Friday, March 30, 2007 at 10:00 a.m.

Location: Thompson Commerce Ctr, Third Fl., Room 3B

201 West Washington Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin

Interested persons are invited to appear at the hearing and present comments on the emergency rules. Persons making oral presentations are requested to submit their comments in writing, via e-mail. Persons submitting comments will not receive individual responses. The hearing record on this rulemaking will remain open until April 10, 2007, to permit submittal of written comments from persons who are unable to attend the hearing or who wish to supplement testimony offered at the hearing. E-mail comments should be sent to [e-mail]. If e-mail submittal is not possible, written comments may be submitted to Sam Rockweiler, Department of Commerce, Division of Environmental and Regulatory Services, P.O. Box 14427, Madison, WI 53708-0427.

This hearing will be held in an accessible facility. If you have special needs or circumstances that may make communication or accessibility difficult at the hearing, please call Sam Rockweiler at [phone] or [phone] (TTY) at least 10 days prior to the hearing date. Accommodations such as interpreters, English translators, or materials in audio tape format will, to the fullest extent possible, be made available upon a request from a person with a disability.

Analysis Prepared by the Wisconsin Department of Commerce

1. Statutes Interpreted: Sections 560.035 (1) and 227.51.

2. Statutory Authority: Section 560.035 (1) (c) and section 5 (1) (a) in 2005 Wisconsin Act 358.

3. Explanation of Agency Authority: Section 560.035 (1) (c) of the Statutes, as created by 2005 Wisconsin Act 358, requires the Department to promulgate permanent rules for implementing a woman-owned business certification program under section 560.035 (1) of the Statutes. Under section 5 (1) (a) of the Act, the Department is required to promulgate these emergency rules for the period before the effective date of the permanent rules.

4. Related Statute or Rule: Chapter Comm 105 contains the requirements for the Department's Minority Business Certification Program. Although that program does not recognize women as minorities, many of the best practices which the Department has developed in that program are extrapolative to a program for certifying woman-owned businesses.

5. Plain Language Analysis: These emergency rules primarily specify (1) which businesses are eligible for becoming certified in this program; (2) how to apply for certification and recertification; (3) how the certifications will be issued, renewed, and rescinded; and (4) how to appeal a decision by the Department. Parameters are also included for recognizing equivalent certifications that are issued by other public agencies.

6. Summary of, and Comparison With, Existing or Proposed Federal Regulations: Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 26, Subpart D, addresses certification standards for disadvantaged business enterprises that participate in federal Department of Transportation (DOT) financial assistance programs. Those enterprises include businesses that are substantially owned by women having a personal net worth which does not exceed $750,000. Subpart E addresses the certification procedures, which include determination and issuance of the credential by corresponding State-level or multi-State Unified Certification Programs. The certification criteria in Subparts D and E are similar to these rules in chapter Comm 104, in addressing the application process; documentation of majority ownership and control; acceptance of certifications by the U.S. Small Business Administration; issuance or denial of the credential; appeals; notification duty if application information changes materially; recertification; and ineligibility of not-for-profit organizations.

Title 13 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 124, Subpart B, addresses the U.S. Small Business Administration's certification of small, disadvantaged businesses, for participation in federal procurements aimed at overcoming the effects of discrimination. Some woman-owned businesses in Wisconsin are expected to be eligible for this certification. The certification criteria in Subpart B are similar to these rules in Comm 104, in addressing the application process; documentation of ownership and control; issuance or denial of the credential; reconsideration; certification by other certifying entities, including the federal DOT; decertification; appeals; and recertification.

Wisconsin's statutory parameters for certifying woman-owned businesses, and these rules in Comm 104, do not specify a maximum business size or maximum net worth, beyond which women owners are ineligible for certification. These rules in Comm 104 also differ from the federal criteria by not accepting certifications from private-sector entities.

7. Comparison With Rules in Adjacent States: An Internet-based search of State-level rules in Minnesota, Iowa, Illinois, and Michigan revealed the following information relating to certification of woman- or female-owned businesses.

Minnesota

Minnesota offers a targeted-group procurement program to help remedy the effects of past discrimination against members of targeted groups. To be considered under the program, a business must be designated as a targeted business by the Minnesota Commissioner of Administration. As directed by section 16C.19 of the Minnesota Statutes, the criteria for these designations are promulgated as rules and are included in Minnesota Rules, Chapter 1230. This chapter addresses certification of small, targeted-group businesses that are at least 51 percent owned and operationally controlled on a day-to-day basis by either women or other socially disadvantaged persons. This chapter is also similar to these rules in Comm 104 in addressing the application process; documentation of majority ownership and control; issuance or denial of the credential; and use of a statutory, contested-case hearing process for appeals.

Iowa

Chapter 54 of the rules of the Iowa Department of Economic Development establishes a targeted, small business procurement program for promoting the growth, development, and diversification of Iowa businesses that are owned by minorities or women. Chapter 55 of the rules of that Department establishes a targeted, small business financial assistance program to assist women, minorities, persons with disabilities, and low-income individuals in establishing or expanding small business ventures in Iowa. Prior to participation in either of these two programs, a business must be certified as a targeted small business, in accordance with Chapter 25 of the rules of the Iowa Department of Inspections and Appeals. Under the definitions in that chapter, a targeted small business (1) is 51 percent or more owned, operated, and actively managed by minorities, women, or persons with disabilities; (2) has an annual gross income of less than $3 million; and (3) is operated for profit. The certification rules in the chapter are similar to these rules in Comm 104, in addressing the application process; documentation of majority ownership and control; issuance or denial of the credential; consideration of certification by another agency; decertification; recertification; and use of a statutory, contested-case hearing process for appeals. The rules in Comm 104 differ by not limiting annual sales to $3 million.

Illinois

Title 44, Part 10 of the Illinois Administrative Code implements the Business Enterprise for Minorities, Females, and Persons with Disabilities Act [30 ILCS 575]. This Act establishes a goal that at least 12 percent of contracts awarded by State agencies subject to the Act be awarded to businesses which are owned and controlled by minorities, females, or persons with disabilities. Of that 12 percent, 5 percent must be female-owned businesses; and these businesses cannot have annual gross sales of $27 million or more, including sales from any affiliates. The Act also authorizes development and use of a procedure to certify firms eligible for the benefits of the Act; allows for certain special treatment in contracting with certified businesses; and establishes a Council, Secretary, and, in the Department of Central Management Services, a program function to implement and oversee the Act. Section 10.30 of Part 10, Title 44, addresses the roles of the State agencies and the Council in achieving compliance with the contract-awarding goals. Under section 10.50, only certified businesses are eligible for the benefits of the Business Enterprise program, and State agencies can count only those expenditures with a certified vendor, or subcontractor, toward meeting the contract-awarding goals. The certification rules in sections 10.50 to 10.72 are similar to these rules in Comm 104, in addressing the application process; documentation of majority ownership and control; issuance or denial of the credential; consideration of certification by another entity; reconsideration; decertification; appeals; and recertification. The rules in Comm 104 differ by not limiting annual sales to $27 million, and by not accepting certifications from private-sector entities.

Several other rules in other portions of the Illinois Administrative Code require or encourage targeting of various opportunities to women-owned businesses, but do not link this targeting to certification.

Michigan

No information was found relating to certification of women- or female-owned businesses.

8. Summary of Factual Data and Analytical Methodologies: The data and methodology for developing these rules were derived from and consisted of incorporating the criteria in section 560.035 (1) of the Statutes; incorporating many of the best practices the Department has developed in its current, similar program for certifying minority-owned businesses; soliciting and utilizing input from representatives of the stakeholders who are expected to participate in this program; and reviewing Internet-based sources of related federal, state, and private-sector information.

9. Analysis and Supporting Documents Used to Determine Effect on Small Business or in Preparation of an Economic Impact Report: The primary document that was used to determine the effect of these rules on small business was 2005 Wisconsin Act 358. This Act requires the Department to implement a program for certifying woman-owned businesses, and requires the Department to promulgate rules for administering the program. However, this Act does not require these businesses to become certified, and does not create preferences in governmental procurement for these businesses. Consequently, these rules do not require this certification, and do not create procurement preferences.

10. Effect on Small Business: These rules are not expected to impose a negative effect on small business, because the rules only address applying for, receiving, and maintaining voluntary credentials. These rules do have the potential to enable woman-owned businesses to benefit from additional business opportunities. In recognizing this positive impact, the Department took steps to reduce possible barriers for woman-owned small businesses, as defined in section 227.114 (1) of the Statutes, by requesting external participation in the draft rule development. The Department organized and solicited comments from organizations that represent the interests of woman-owned small businesses, and from those who represented supplier-diversification programs. The rule advisory group included the following members and organizations:

Kathy Doyle – Advocap

Renee Walz – Western Dairyland Community Action

Jennifer Ring Mellberg – WI Women's Business Initiative Corporation

Bill Smith – National Federation of Independent Businesses

Mary Stoltz – Madison Chapter of National Association of Women Business Owners

Beth Nemecek – AmeriPrint Graphics, Inc.

Laurie Benson – Inacom, Inc.

Lisa Kleiner – Wood, McNally, Maloney & Peterson, S.C.

Jerry Fulmer – WE Energies

Mary Trimmier – U.S. Small Business Administration

Mildred Hyde Demoze – Milwaukee County Office of Community Business Development Partners

The rule-advisory group had the opportunity to review the rule drafts and provide input through two meetings held at the Department, on July 27 and August 16, 2006.

Small businesses' access to information about the woman-owned business enterprise (WBE) certification program will determine the level of participation by the woman-owned businesses that meet the small business definition contained in section 227.114 (1) of the Statutes. The Department plans to issue a statewide press release announcing the availability of the WBE certification, so that small businesses which are not members of associations or business-related organizations will be aware of the new WBE certification program. The Department also plans to promote the availability of the woman-owned business certification through the Department's network of entrepreneurial business-assistance partners, numerous business affiliations and industries, and Department-sponsored events that cater to small business. A user-friendly WBE fact sheet is expected to be available through a Department WBE certification Web site, and training sessions may be offered, to assist small businesses in understanding the requirements and the application process.

Copy of Rule

The emergency rules and an analysis of the rules are available on the Internet, by entering “Comm 104" in the search engine at the following Web site: http://adminrules.wisconsin.gov. Paper copies may be obtained without cost from Anne Thundercloud at the Department of Commerce, Bureau of Minority Business Development, P.O. Box 7970, Madison, WI 53707, or at [e-mail], or at telephone [phone] or [phone] (TTY). Copies will also be available at the public hearing.

Fiscal Estimate

The appropriation, as created by 2005 Wisconsin Act 358, will result in revenues that will offset the Department's costs in administering this new program.

The Department estimates that 1200 businesses will maintain the credential under this program, at an annual fee of $50.

The rules are not expected to impose any significant, mandated costs on the private sector, because the rules only address applying for, receiving, and maintaining voluntary credentials.

Contact Person

The small business regulatory coordinator for the Department of Commerce is Carol Dunn, who may be contacted at telephone [phone], or at [e-mail].

Notice of Hearing

Commerce

(Financial Resources for Businesses and Communities)

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to 2005 Wisconsin Act 479, section 17 (1) (d), the Department of Commerce will hold a public hearing on emergency rules in chapter Comm 135 relating to tax credits and exemptions for Internet equipment used in the broadband market

The public hearing will be held as follows:

Date and Time: Monday, March 26, 2007 at 2:00 p.m.

Location: Thompson Commerce Ctr. Third Floor, Rm. 3B

201 West Washington Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin

Interested persons are invited to appear at the hearing and present comments on the emergency rules. Persons making oral presentations are requested to submit their comments in writing, via e-mail. Persons submitting comments will not receive individual responses. The hearing record on this rulemaking will remain open until March 30, 2007, to permit submittal of written comments from persons who are unable to attend the hearing or who wish to supplement testimony offered at the hearing. E-mail comments should be sent to [e-mail]. If e-mail submittal is not possible, written comments may be submitted to Sam Rockweiler, Department of Commerce, Division of Environmental and Regulatory Services, P.O. Box 14427, Madison, WI 53708-0427.

This hearing will be held in an accessible facility. If you have special needs or circumstances that may make communication or accessibility difficult at the hearing, please call Sam Rockweiler at [phone] or [phone] (TTY) at least 10 days prior to the hearing date. Accommodations such as interpreters, English translators, or materials in audio tape format will, to the fullest extent possible, be made available upon a request from a person with a disability.

Analysis Prepared by the Wisconsin Department of Commerce

1. Statutes Interpreted: Section 17 (1) in 2005 Wisconsin Act 479

2. Statutory Authority: Section 17 (1) (d) in 2005 Wisconsin Act 479

3. Explanation of Agency Authority: Section 17 (1) (d) in 2005 Wisconsin Act 479 authorizes the Department to promulgate emergency rules for administering a program that will (1) certify businesses as temporarily eligible for tax credits and exemptions for Internet equipment used in the broadband market, and (2) allocate up to $7,500,000 to these businesses for these tax credits and exemptions.

4. Related Statute or Rule: Sections 71.05 (6) (a) 15., 71.07 (5e), 71.08 (1) (intro.), 71.10 (4) (gy), 71.21 (4), 71.26 (2) (a), 71.28 (5e), 71.30 (3) (es), 71.34 (1) (g), 71.45 (2) (a) 10., 71.47 (5e), 71.49 (1) (es), 77.51 (6m) and (10), 77.54 (48), and 77.92 (4) of the Statutes.

5. Summary of Rule: These rules establish the criteria for administering a program that will (1) certify businesses as temporarily eligible for tax credits and exemptions for Internet equipment used in the broadband market, and (2) allocate up to $7,500,000 to these businesses for these tax credits and exemptions.

The rules specify who is eligible for the income and franchise tax credits and the sales and use tax exemptions in this program, for Internet equipment used in the broadband market. Eligible equipment is also specified, along with how to apply for the certifications and allocations. Parameters for allocating the authorized total of $7,500,000 are likewise specified. These parameters emphasize (1) efficiently initiating broadband Internet service in areas of Wisconsin that otherwise are not expected to soon receive this service, and (2) encouraging economic or community development. The rule chapter also describes the time-specific legislative oversight that is established in 2005 Act 479 for these allocations, and describes the follow-up reports that the Act requires from every person who receives a sales or use tax exemption under this chapter.

6. Summary of, and Comparison With, Existing or Proposed Federal Regulations: An Internet-based search of the Code of Federal Regulations, for financial incentives in expanding the broadband market, found cost-sharing requirements for broadband personal communication services, in 47 CFR 24–Subpart E, but did not reveal any tax credits or tax exemptions for Internet equipment.

An Internet-based search of the 2006 and 2007 issues of the Federal Register found rules of the Federal Election Commission relating to financing of Internet communications by political committees, but did not reveal any proposed rules relating to tax credits or tax exemptions for Internet equipment.

7. Comparison With Rules in Adjacent States: An Internet-based search of rules in adjacent states only found rules in Iowa for Internet-based tax benefits. Under sections 18.20 (5) and 231.12 of chapters 18 and 231 of the rules of the Iowa Revenue Department, the sales price from charges paid to a provider for access to an on-line computer service is exempt from tax. An “on-line computer service" is one which provides for or enables multiple users to have computer access to the Internet. Also, the furnishing of any contracted on-line service is exempt from Iowa tax if the information is made available through a computer server. The exemption applies to all contracted on-line services, as long as they provide access to information through a computer server.

8. Summary of Factual Data and Analytical Methodologies: The data and methodology for developing these rules were derived from and consisted of incorporating the criteria in 2005 Wisconsin Act 479; incorporating applicable best practices the Department has developed in administering similar programs for economic development, business development, and tax-credit verification; soliciting and utilizing input from other state agencies, and from representatives of the stakeholders who are expected to participate in this program; and reviewing Internet-based sources of related federal, state, and private-sector information.

The Department particularly noted that Section 17 (1) (b) in Act 479 allows allocating the tax credits and exemptions only for areas of Wisconsin that are either not served by a broadband Internet service provider or are served by not more than one of these providers. In consultation with the Wisconsin Public Service Commission, the Department learned that the entire state currently has access to satellite-based broadband Internet service from two or more providers of that service. Consequently, the Department interprets Section 17 (1) (b) as excluding satellite-based service from the tax benefits in the Act, and the adopted rules contain that exclusion. However, cell phone or wireless equipment is not excluded.

9. Analysis and Supporting Documents Used to Determine Effect on Small Business or in Preparation of Economic Impact Report: The Department reviewed maps of current, land-based Internet service areas, and solicited input from the corresponding service providers as to their potential for expanding this service to underserved areas of Wisconsin. Particular emphasis was placed on input relating to minimizing any difficulties for small businesses.

10. Effect on Small Business: The rules are not expected to impose any significant costs on small businesses, because the rules only address applying for and allocation of tax credits and exemptions for increasing the availability of broadband Internet service in underserved areas of the State.

Copy of Rule

The emergency rules and an analysis of the rules are available on the Internet, by entering “Comm 135" in the search engine at the following Web site: http://adminrules.wisconsin.gov. Paper copies may be obtained without cost from Sam Rockweiler at the Department of Commerce, Division of Environmental and Regulatory Services, P.O. Box 14427, Madison, WI 53707, or at:
[e-mail], or at telephone [phone] or [phone] (TTY). Copies will also be available at the public hearing.

Fiscal Estimate

The rules will not impose any significant costs on the private sector, because the rules only address applying for and allocation of tax credits and exemptions for increasing the availability of broadband Internet service in underserved areas of the state.

Contact Person

The small business regulatory coordinator for the Department of Commerce is Carol Dunn, who may be contacted at telephone [phone], or at [e-mail].

Notice of Hearing

Public Service Commission

[CR 07-020]

The Public Service Commission of Wisconsin proposes an order to revise ch. PSC 133, relating to the construction, installation and placing in operation of natural gas facilities.

Hearing Date: Monday, March 26, 2007 at 1:00 p.m.

Hearing Location: Public Service Commission, 610 North Whitney Way, Madison, WI

This docket uses the Electronic Regulatory Filing system (ERF)

Comments Due: Monday, April 2, 2007 – Noon

FAX Due: Friday, March 30, 2007 – Noon

Address Comments To:

Sandra J. Paske, Secretary to the Commission

Public Service Commission

P.O. Box 7854

Madison, WI 53707-7854

FAX [phone]

Analysis Prepared by the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin

Statutory authority: Wis. Stats. ss. 196.02, 196.49 and 227.11.

Statute interpreted: Wis. Stats. s. 196.49

Objective of the rule.

A. This rulemaking will update Wis. Admin. Code ch. PSC 133. This chapter addresses the construction, installation and placing in operation of natural gas facilities and the authorization of natural gas service territories. The chapter sets out commission requirements for when a certificate of authority is required, the information that is to be included in a natural gas utility's application to the commission, and the procedures the commission follows in processing the application.

This chapter was last comprehensively reviewed and updated in 1959. It contains various thresholds that define when commission approval is required for gas utility projects. The proposal includes revisions of the defining thresholds based on agency experience with construction projects since 1959. For example, the chapter contains several provisions with monetary thresholds for requiring commission review and approval that are updated to reflect changes in industry procedures and economics. Wis. Admin. Code s. PSC 133.03 (1) (h), requires utilities to request a certificate of authority for gas line projects that cost $600,000 or four percent of a utility's gross gas operating revenues, whichever is less. If this amount were adjusted for inflation since the last time this specific rule was updated, this amount would now range from approximately $1,000,000 to $1,500,000. This range looks at the construction costs for transmission mains, steel and plastic distribution mains and measurement/regulation station equipment for city gate stations. The electric utility construction rules have adopted a mechanism that automatically adjusts to reflect inflation and other factors. In the attached proposed rules, the Commission has chosen to retain a set amount for the gas construction rules of $1,500,000, the upper range of the inflation adjusted costs.

A provision is added stating that prior commission authorization is not necessary when the relocation of existing pipelines and associated plant is needed to accommodate highway or airport construction.

Additionally, the proposal contains new rules for the filing, review and approval of territorial agreements and changes in utility boundaries because of annexations. These give the utilities clear directions regarding commission filing requirements and processes to be followed in these situations. For example, the proposed rules include definitions of annexation and territorial agreements, and establish what information must be provided to the commission regarding changes in service territory that result from territorial agreements and annexations.

Finally, changes were made in light of statutory changes that were adopted under 2003 Wisconsin Act 89. Rule language has been included that reflects the pre-application consultation that is required of construction applicants with the PSC and Department of Natural Resources. The filing requirements in the proposed rules have also been amended to reflect information that may be necessary to carry out the requirements of 2003 Wisconsin Act 89.

Statutory Authority to Promulgate the Proposed Rule

Wis. Stats. s. 196.49 authorizes the commission to issue rules about commission certification that public convenience and necessity require a gas project. Further, it states that utilities may not begin construction, installation or operation of any new plant, equipment, etc., unless it has complied with commission rules.

Comparison with Existing or Proposed Federal Regulations

The commission is not aware of any existing or proposed federal regulations in this area.

Comparison with Similar Rules in Adjacent States

Existing rule language requires authorization before building plant in certain limited circumstances, such as where the utility is not authorized to serve, where a facility is designed to materially change output, facilities for new types of gas, and, in certain situations, very large projects. The proposed rule clarifies when authorization must be obtained before constructing an intrastate pipeline to deliver to other gas suppliers, and includes an exclusion from the authorization requirement for construction needed due to highway or airport construction.

In Iowa, pipeline companies are required to get authorization to construct, maintain and operate a pipeline if that pipeline goes over or across public or private highways, grounds, waters and streams of any kind, if the pipeline operates at pressures over 150 pounds per square inch or is a transmission line. Illinois requires authorization before construction of any facilities that are not substitutions for existing facilities. Michigan requires construction authorization if a new Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity is needed, but not otherwise. Minnesota requires authorization for large liquefied or underground gas storage facilities and for pipelines transporting at pressures higher than 200 psi with more than 50 miles of their length in Minnesota. Minnesota requires plans to be filed for gas transmission lines operating at more than 125 psi, not including gas distribution or gas gathering lines and associated facilities.

The proposed rule includes requirements for commission approval of territorial agreements between utilities. Such agreements may be the result of situations such as those involving two utilities serving the same municipality and controversy over the area to be served by two or more utilities. Authorization is also required in certain annexation situations.

Illinois, Michigan and Minnesota each have similar rules requiring commission approval of territorial agreements and/or service provision in cases involving annexation or multiple utilities proving service to a municipality.

The rule contains many of the same requirements for what must be included in a construction application that adjacent states do, for example: maps showing routes, operating pressures, cost and financing information, alternatives, identification of utilities and municipalities affected, environmental information and conservation efforts. The proposed rule adds a requirement for identification of landowners from whom property or easements must be obtained and a statement as to which of these landowners have been notified of the project.

A copy of this entire notice and text of proposed rule may be accessed from the electronic regulatory filing portion of the Commission's Website (psc.wi.gov).

Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

This rulemaking will affect three small gas utilities. Each of these has revenues in excess of $5 million but has 25 or fewer employees. The impact on these businesses will be minimal as this rulemaking clarifies and codifies existing practice. It also decreases the number of circumstances when certain reports must be filed.

Fiscal Estimate

No fiscal effect is anticipated. Further, no substantial fiscal effect on the private sector is anticipated.

NOTICE IS GIVEN that pursuant to s. 227.16 (2) (b), Stats., the commission will hold a public hearing on these proposed rule changes in the Amnicon Falls Hearing Room at the Public Service Commission Building, 610 North Whitney Way, Madison, Wisconsin, on Monday, March 26, 2007, at 1:00 p.m. This building is accessible to people in wheelchairs through the Whitney Way (lobby) entrance. Handicapped parking is available on the south side of the building.

Written Comments

Any person may submit written comments on these proposed rules. The hearing record will be open for written comments from the public, effective immediately, and until Monday, April 2, 2007, at noon (March, April 30, 2007, at noon, if filed by fax). All written comments must include a reference on the filing to docket 1-AC-209. File by one mode only.

Industry: File comments using the Electronic Regulatory Filing system. This may be accessed from the commission's website (psc.wi.gov).

Members of the Public:

If filing electronically: Use the Public Comments system or the Electronic Regulatory Filing system. Both of these may be accessed from the commission's website (psc.wi.gov).

If filing by mail, courier, or hand delivery: Address as shown at beginning of this Notice.

If filing by fax: Send fax comments to [phone]. Fax filing cover sheet MUST state “Official Filing," the docket number 1-AC-209, and the number of pages (limited to 25 pages for fax comments).

Contact Person

Media questions should be directed to Linda Barth, Director of Governmental and Public Affairs at [phone]. Small business questions should be directed to Anne Vandervort at [phone] or [e-mail]. Other questions regarding this matter should be directed to docket coordinator Jeffrey P. Murley at [phone] or [e-mail]. Hearing or speech-impaired individuals may also use the commission's TTY number, if calling from Wisconsin [phone], if calling from outside Wisconsin [phone].

The commission does not discriminate on the basis of disability in the provision of programs, services, or employment. Any person with a disability who needs accommodations to participate in this proceeding or who needs to get this document in a different format should contact the docket coordinator, as indicated in the previous paragraph, as soon as possible.

Notice of Hearing

Public Service Commission

[CR 07-021]

The Commission proposes to repeal and recreation ch. PSC 114, Wis. Adm. Code, relating to rules concerning electric safety-Revision of Volume 1 of the Wisconsin State Electrical Code.

NOTICE IS GIVEN that a hearing will be held beginning on Friday, April 13, 2007, at 10:00 a.m. in the Amnicon Falls Room (1300) at the Public Service Commission Building, 610 North Whitney Way, Madison, Wisconsin, and continuing at times to be set by the presiding Administrative Law Judge. This building is accessible to people in wheelchairs through the Whitney Way first floor (lobby) entrance. Parking for people with disabilities is available on the south side of the building. Any person with a disability who needs additional accommodations should contact the docket coordinator listed below.

Hearing Date: Friday, April 13, 2007 at 10:00 a.m.

Hearing Location: Amnicon Falls Hearing Room (1300), Public Service Commission, 610 North Whitney Way, Madison, WI

Analysis Prepared by the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin

Statutory authority: ss. 196.74 and 227.11 (2)

Statute interpreted: s. 196.74

By letter dated August 17, 2006, the Commission appointed an advisory committee pursuant to s. 227.13, Stats., to review and submit recommendations for updating Volume 1 of the Wisconsin State Electrical Code. This part of the Code is administered by the Commission.

Volume 1 has been and is based on the National Electrical Safety Code (NESC), which is also known as American National Standards Institute (ANSI) C2. In 1979, 1982, 1985, 1988, 1991, 1994, 1997 and 2003, the Commission adopted the 1977, 1981, 1984, 1987, 1990, 1993, 1997 and 2002 editions of the NESC, respectively, with certain changes, deletions and additions.

The 2007 edition of the NESC was recently issued, and a corresponding revision of Volume 1 is now desired to reflect the latest national code, correct existing deficiencies, and make other changes, as necessary, to update and improve the state code. The rules in ch. PSC 114, Wis. Adm. Code deal with safety requirements for the installation, operation, and maintenance of primarily outdoor electric supply and communications lines and facilities used by utilities, including electric and telephone suppliers, railroads, and cable television providers.

A statement of scope on this rule was approved by the Commission on June 1, 2006, and was published in the Wisconsin Administrative Register on Mid-June 2006. Meetings of the Technical Advisory Committee were held on September 28, 2006, November 10, 2006, and December 8, 2006.

Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

Utilities and others subject to the proposed rules, including municipally-owned electric utilities that serve in rural areas, may experience modest increases in the cost of new rural distribution construction due to the proposed increased requirements for grounding rural lines. The proposed rules will have no effect on small business.

Fiscal Estimate

This rule has no fiscal impact.

The Commission does not discriminate on the basis of disability in the provision of programs, services, or employment. Any person with a disability who needs accommodations to participate in this proceeding or who needs to obtain this document in a different format should contact the docket coordinator listed below.

Questions regarding this matter may be directed to docket coordinator Mohammed Monawer at [phone]. Hearing or speech-impaired individuals may also use the Commission's TTY number: [phone].