Natural Resources
Subject
Revise Wisconsin Administrative Code ch. NR 345, relating to dredging in navigable waterways to create a general permit for dredging, including operation of a motor vehicle, on the beds of the Great Lakes to remove algae, mussels, dead fish and similar large public nuisance deposits.
Policy Analysis
From 1965 to 1997, water levels in the Great Lakes were at or above their long-term average. However, from 1998-2000 water levels dropped significantly to around 3 feet below their long-term average. While no longer dropping as sharply as they did from 1998-2000, water levels have continued to stay below their long-term averages. Presently 2006 water levels are below water levels of the year 2005 and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) long-range forecast for 2007 indicates more of the same. Specifically for the Great Lakes that border Wisconsin, Lake Michigan is 17 inches below its long-term average and Lake Superior is within 2 inches of its all time low.
In addition to low water levels, increased populations of invasive species such as Zebra mussels, Quagga mussels, and blooms of the nuisance algae Cladophora, have continued to plague the Great Lakes. Lower water levels contribute to a greater exposed beach area, and, as a result, mussel shells and large floating mats of algae often get deposited by wave action in large quantities along the lakeshore. The beached algal mats mixed with decaying zebra mussels and other invertebrates and fish result in unsightly, malodorous conditions. Piles of decaying Cladophora may affect tourism and recreation and owner property values, have been linked to taste and odor problems in drinking water, and may exacerbate levels of E. coli and bacteria in beach sand and swimming waters, thus raising questions about beach safety. In Wisconsin, these nuisance conditions have been reported at many sites ranging from northeastern Green Bay and the tip of Door County to Kenosha. (UW Sea Grant 2005)
The biomass of Cladophora that washes ashore varies between years and locations. Mats of stranded algae two feet thick may collect in some areas– often embayments where waters are calmer and materials tend to collect (Whitman et al. 2003). In 2004, twenty five tons of Cladophora were removed from Milwaukee's lakeshore alone (Stauffer 2004). In other areas, accumulations are less where the decaying algae may remain offshore or confined to the swash zone (Harris 2004).
Waterfront property owners desire to remove these cathodic protection tester periodically inspect all cathodic protection systems for these tanks and piping. Section 12 of 40CFR280 establishes definitions for corrosion expert and cathodic protection tester. Those definitions require corrosion experts to be accredited professionals, and require cathodic protection testers to meet specified criteria for education and experience. The proposed rules are expected to incorporate these requirements and definitions into chapter Comm 5.
The mechanical removal of large algal accumulations has been accomplished with front-end loaders, backhoes or beach grooming equipment. However, monitoring of indicator bacteria in beach sand has shown that heavy equipment may grind decaying algae into moist sand creating conditions that promote higher bacterial growth (Harris 2004). In addition, precautions must be taken to avoid damaging sensitive beach vegetation and near shore habitat for fish and wildlife. There are currently no state guidelines for Cladophora removal. By promulgating a General Permit with standards for mechanized removal that include location standards (where on the shoreline can the activity take place), substrate restrictions (limits on the volume of sand vs. cobble that can be removed incidentally), area standards (how much material can be removed), types of mechanized methods allowed, and guidance on what to do with the removed material, among other things, we will be able to ensure that sensitive beach vegetation and near shore habitat impacts are avoided and that these activities are not inadvertently promoting bacterial growth.
The operation of motor vehicles and the removal or disturbance of materials on the beds of navigable waterways (also know as dredging) is regulated by Wis. Stats. Chapter 30 and Wisconsin Administrative Code Chapter NR 345. The statutes and current rule allows lakefront property owners to apply for an individual permit to use mechanized methods to remove “public nuisance deposits." However, individual permits require a $500 application fee and a 30 day public comment period before the permit can be issued.
Considering the changing lakeshore due to decreased water levels and the abundance of invasive species, the Department proposes to revise ch. NR 345 to create a general permit. The general permit would permit lakefront property owners to remove public nuisance deposits (Cladophora, Zebra mussels, dead fish, etc.) on the beds of "outlying" navigable waters (as defined in s. 29.001 (63), Stats.) more efficiently while complying with general permit conditions created to protect the public interest in the lakebed. The general permit has a $50 application fee and is processed in 30 days. A permanent rule will be developed.
References
Harris, Vicki. 2004. “Cladophora Confounds Coastal Communities –Public Perceptions and Management Dilemmas" in Cladophora Research and Management in the Great Lakes Proceedings of a Workshop Held at the Great Lakes WATER Institute, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, December 8, 2004
This rule change will allow the department to issue turkey tags remaining after the initial drawing in accordance with state statute, which is first-come, first-served. Additionally, this rule updates code language to accurately describe how permits are currently issued (by zone and by time period) and establishes that no person may obtain more than one turkey carcass tag per day.
UW Sea Grant. 2005. “Nuisance Algae on Lake Michigan Shores"
Whitman, Richard L, Dawn A. Shively, Heather Pawlik, Meredith B. Nevers, and Muruleedhara N. Byappanahalli. 2003. “Occurrence of Escherichia coli and Enterococci in Cladophora (Chlorophyta) in Nearshore Water and Beach Sand of Lake Michigan". Applied and Environmental Microbiology 69(8): 4714–4719
Statutory Authority
Section 30.20, Stats.
Staff Time Required
Department staff will need approximately 200 hours for this rule revision, including both the emergency order and permanent rule process.
Comparison with Federal Regulations
There are no federal regulations on this issue.
Entities Affected by the Rule
Affected parties include riparian owners along the shores of “outlying waters" (as defined in s. 29.001 (63), Stats.), aquatic invasive species managers, NRCS and other agencies or contractors who remove invasive and unwanted aquatic plants and dead animals from shoreline areas.
Summary and Preliminary Comparison with Existing or Proposed Federal Regulations
There are no federal regulations on this issue.
Name, Address, Telephone Number and E-Mail Address of Agency Contact
Martin (Martye) Griffin
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
101 S. Webster Street, WT/4
Madison, WI 53707
ph. 608.266.2997
fax. 608.266.2244
Transportation
Subject
Objective of the rule. Ch. Trans 117, Stats., administratively interprets and explains the Department's occupational licensing program. Section Trans 117.025 explains the procedure by which occupational licensing decisions are made. Section Trans 117.03 explains the various tests used by the Department in determining eligibility for occupational licensing and grounds for restricting occupational licenses.
Policy Analysis
A recent Waukesha County case involving a repeat drunk driver who sought an occupational license during the minimum mandatory waiting period for a license specified in s. 343.30 (1q) (a) 4. made the Department aware of the fact that the administrative rule does not discuss statutory minimum waiting periods for licensing. The proceeding illustrated a need to explain the Department's procedures with regard to application of the minimum waits for occupational licensing in the administrative rule.
Comparison with Federal Regulations
No federal regulation applies to this case.
Entities Affected by the Rule
This proposed rule making would not change any law or procedure of the Department of Transportation. It would essentially repeat the statutory provisions that require drivers wait minimum periods of time before being eligible for occupational licensing, and clarify that the Department applies those statutory requirements in making occupational license decisions.
Statutory Authority
Section 343.10, Stats.
Staff Time Required
4 hours.
Loading...
Loading...
Links to Admin. Code and Statutes in this Register are to current versions, which may not be the version that was referred to in the original published document.