Submission of Written Comments
Comments on the proposed rule must be received on or before April 24, 2009. Written comments may be submitted by mail, fax, E-mail, or through the Internet and will have the same weight and effect as oral statements presented at the public hearing. Written comments and any questions on the proposed rules should be submitted to:
Joseph Brehm
Department of Natural Resources
Bureau of Air Management (AM/7)
101 S Webster St, Madison, WI 53703
Phone:   608-267-7541
Fax:   608-267-0560
Internet:   Use the Administrative Rules System Web site accessible through the link provided on the Proposed Air Pollution Control Rules Calendar at http://www.dnr.state.wi.us/air/rules/calendar.htm
Analysis Prepared by the Department of Natural Resources
Statutes interpreted
Sections 227.11 (2) (a), 285.11 (1) and (6), Stats.
Statutory authority
Sections 227.11 (2) (a), 285.11 (1) and (16), 285.60 (6), and 285.67, Stats.
Explanation of agency authority
Section 227.11 (2) (a), Stats., gives state agencies general rulemaking authority. Section 285.11 (1), Stats., gives the Department authority to promulgate rules consistent with ch. 285, Stats. Section 285.11 (6), Stats., gives the Department the authority to develop a state implementation plan for the control of air pollution. Section 285.11 (16), Stats., requires the Department to promulgate rules, consistent with but no more restrictive than the federal clean air act, that specify the amounts of emissions that result in a stationary source being classified as a major source. Section 285.60 (6) Stats., allows the Department to promulgate rules to exempt types of stationary sources from the requirement to get a construction permit, if the potential emissions from the sources do not present a significant hazard to public health, safety, welfare or to the environment. Section 285.67, Stats., requires the Department to promulgate rules establishing criteria and procedures for revising air pollution control permits.
Related statute or rule
These rules relate directly to the permitting of activities that result in air emissions. The consent of the Attorney General will be requested for the incorporation by reference of an ASTM test method, in ch. NR 484.
Plain language analysis
The main objective of the proposed rule is to update permit language in chs. NR 406 and 407 regarding federal Generally Available Control Technology (GACT) rules for hazardous air pollutants. The current state rules do not exempt certain source categories from the need to obtain a construction or operation permit as is done on the federal level. Sources in Wisconsin potentially affected by this rule are bulk gasoline terminals, bulk gasoline plants, gasoline dispensing facilities (gas stations), pipeline facilities and wood preserving facilities.
Rules are also proposed that add biodiesel fuel, by definition, as an alternative clean fuel. Currently a permit modification for existing sources, or a construction permit for new sources, is required in order to burn it.
This proposal would also amend the time frame for submittal of operation permit renewal applications. Current rules require the application be submitted 12-18 months prior to the expiration of the operation permit. The Department proposes to change this deadline to no later than six months prior to the expiration of the operation permit to reflect updated statutory requirements in s. 285.66(3)(a), Stats.
Currently only selected portions of our rules require submittal of two copies of permit applications and related materials. The proposed rule would correct this inconsistency so that two copies are required in all cases. Additionally, language will be added to allow for electronic copies. Two copies are required as one is retained by the central office and one copy is sent to the appropriate regional office.
Other non-substantive changes are being proposed for consistency, to update outdated rule language and to provide clarification where needed.
Comparison with federal regulations
The changes to chs. NR 406 and 407, Wis. Adm. Code, are incorporating updates from federal rules, as referenced in Section 5. Chapter NR 407 is being changed as a result of a statutory change on the timeframe for the submittal of an operation permit renewal application. Other changes, to chs. 406, 407, 419 and 439 provide consistency within the rules by updating outdated language and providing clarification where appropriate. Chapter 484 is being amended to add an ASTM method for the testing of bio-diesel fuels
Comparison with similar rules in adjacent states
All the states (Illinois, Iowa, Michigan and Minnesota) manage an air construction and operation permit program. Comparisons between programs are difficult due to the varying ways sources may be exempt and how programs are funded.
The federal rules are effective nation-wide and the rules being proposed by the Department are essentially identical to the federal rules so the portions of the proposed rules dealing with the GACT standard should be similar or identical to rules in effect in adjacent states that have similar programs.
Summary of factual data and analytical methodologies
Since the Department is proposing rules consistent with federal regulations, and making consistency and clarification changes, the Department did not, with one exception, make use of any factual data or analytical methodologies in the rule development. That exception is the proposed amendment to ch. NR 484.
The only exception is the adding of biodiesel as a clean fuel. Based on emission information developed by EPA in “A Comprehensive Analysis of Biodiesel Impacts on Exhaust Emissions" (October 2002, http://www.epa.gov/OMS/ models/biodsl.htm), emissions from the burning of biodiesel are less than those of distillate fuels, except for Nitrogen Oxides (NOx). NOx emissions are approximately, 10% higher for a 20% blend of biodiesel and distillate fuels. Normally, biodiesel is not burned independently from other fuel types. By blending the fuels, existing burner design and fuel feed systems do not need to be altered. Emissions of hydrocarbons (21.1), particulate matter (10.1) and carbon monoxide (11.0) were all reduced with a 20% by the amounts shown in the parentheses. Carbon dioxide remained approximately the same.
Analysis and supporting documents used to determine the effect on small business
An analysis of the effect of the proposed rules on small business was not performed since most of the changes are identical requirements that are already in effect at a federal level, and the Department is required by statute to adopt federal regulations or to develop similar standards. Preparation of an economic impact report has not been requested. The proposed changes not based on federal regulations, were clarification in nature or updating of old or outdated language in the rules.
Small Business Impact
Because the proposed GACT rule changes for permitting sources of hazardous air pollutants may result in a limited number of sources becoming subject to federal operation permit requirements, some small businesses may be required to report their compliance status semi-annually instead of annually.
The proposed rule is not expected to have a significant economic impact on small businesses nor have a significant economic effect on any entity.
Fiscal Estimate
Summary
It is assumed there will be no direct fiscal effect with these rule changes. The proposed changes are intended to clarify the current rules and update permit requirements for hazardous air pollutants. These changes will result in clarifications and some permit exemptions, but not in substantial dollar savings or expenditures.
The DNR does not believe the proposed rule changes will have a significant effect on the private sector or on state and local governments. Minor savings may result from a proposed reduction in reporting requirements from semi-annual to annual, affecting both private and government owned facilities. In addition, minor savings could result from a proposed change to consider a switch to burning bio-fuels as a permit revision, and not a permit modification. Where the DNR charges a fee for a permit modification, there are no fees associated with a permit revision.
State fiscal effect
None
Local government fiscal effect
None
Long-range fiscal implications
NA
Environmental Impact
The DNR has made a preliminary determination that adoption of the proposed rules would not involve significant adverse environmental effects and would not need an environmental analysis under ch. NR 150, Wis. Adm. Code. However, based on the comments received, the DNR may prepare an environmental analysis before proceeding. This analysis would summarize the DNR's consideration of the impacts of the proposal and any reasonable alternatives.
Agency Contact Person
Robert Eckdale, Bureau of Air Management
P.O. Box 7921
Madison, WI 53707
Phone:   (608) 266-2856.
Notice of Hearing
Regulation and Licensing
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to authority vested in the Department of Regulation and Licensing in s. 227.11 (2), Stats., and s. 460.04 (2), Stats., 2007 Wisconsin Act 104, the Department of Regulation and Licensing will hold a public hearing on an order adopting emergency rules to create section RL 91.01 (3) (k), relating to training and proficiency in the use of automated external defibrillators for certification as a massage therapist or bodyworker.
Hearing Information
Date:   April 13, 2009
Time:   9:00 A.M.
Location:   1400 East Washington Avenue
  (Enter at 55 North Dickinson Street)
  Room 121A
  Madison, Wisconsin
Appearances at the Hearing and Submission of Written Comments
Interested persons are invited to present information at the hearing. Persons appearing may make an oral presentation but are urged to submit facts, opinions and argument in writing as well. Facts, opinions and argument may also be submitted in writing without a personal appearance by mail addressed to Pamela Haack, Paralegal, Department of Regulation and Licensing, Office of Legal Counsel, P.O. Box 8935, Madison, Wisconsin 53708-8935, or by email to pamela.haack@drl.state.wi.us. Written comments must be received by April 13, 2009, to be included in the record of rule-making proceedings.
Analysis Prepared by the Department of Regulation and Licensing
Statutes interpreted
Section 460.04 (2), Stats.
Statutory authority
Section 227.11 (2), Stats., and s. 460.04 (2), Stats., 2007 Wisconsin Act 104.
Explanation of agency authority
2007 Wisconsin Act 104 amends ch. 460, Stats., which regulates the profession of massage therapy and bodywork. The effect of the Act requires the Department of Regulation and Licensing to amend administrative rules for application for certification as a massage therapist or bodyworker. As required by 2007 Wisconsin Act 104, the rule creates the requirement for applicants to be proficient in the use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) through the completion of an approved instruction program prior to initial certification.
Related statutes or rules
Section RL 91.01, Wis. Adm. Code.
Plain language analysis
The massage therapy and bodywork statutes and administrative rules regarding application for certification, reciprocal certification and renewal do not have a requirement for training and proficiency in the use of an AED. This rule implements a provision of 2007 Wisconsin Act 104, requiring applicants for a credential to be proficient in the use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) through the completion of an approved instruction program prior to initial certification.
SECTION 1 creates a requirement for applicants for a credential to be proficient in the use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) through the completion of an approved instruction program prior to initial certification.
Comparison with federal regulations
There is no existing or proposed federal regulation that is intended to address the activities to be regulated by the rule.
Comparison with rules in adjacent states
Minnesota:
Minnesota does not have regulations or state requirements for massage therapy.
Michigan:
Michigan does not have regulations or state requirements for massage therapy.
Iowa:
Laws and rules for Iowa do not require automated external defibrillator (AED) training. One of the requirements for Iowa licensure is proof of current CPR and First Aid cards, Chapter 131, 131.2(6) states: The applicant shall submit proof of completion of a cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) course and a first-aid course that were certified by the American Red Cross, by the American Heart Association, or by the National Safety Council. One of the following shall be required:
a. Official transcript documenting completion of a CPR class and a first-aid class within one year prior to submitting the application for licensure; or
b. Copy of the current certification card(s) or renewal card(s).
Loading...
Loading...
Links to Admin. Code and Statutes in this Register are to current versions, which may not be the version that was referred to in the original published document.