Rule-Making Notices
Notice of Hearing
Commerce
Financial Resources for Businesses and Communities, Chs.
Comm 104—
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to section
560.205 (3) (d) of the Statutes, the Department of Commerce will hold a public hearing on proposed rules revising Chapter
Comm 129, relating to tax credits for angel investments and early stage seed investments, and affecting small businesses.
Hearing Information
The public hearing will be held as follows:
Date and Time:
|
Location:
|
October 27, 2009
Tuesday
At 10:00 A.M.
|
Thompson Commerce Center
Third Floor, Room 3B201 West Washington Avenue
Madison, Wisconsin
|
This hearing will be held in an accessible facility. If you have special needs or circumstances that may make communication or accessibility difficult at the hearing, please call Sam Rockweiler at (608) 266-0797 or at Contact Through Relay at least 10 days prior to the hearing date. Accommodations such as interpreters, English translators, or materials in audio tape format will, to the fullest extent possible, be made available upon a request from a person with a disability.
Appearance at Hearing and Submission of Written Comments
Interested persons are invited to appear at the hearing and present comments on the proposed rules. Persons making oral presentations are requested to submit their comments in writing, via e-mail. Persons submitting comments will not receive individual responses. The hearing record on this rulemaking will remain open until October 30, 2009, to permit submittal of written comments from persons who are unable to attend the hearing or who wish to supplement testimony offered at the hearing. E-mail comments should be sent to
sam.rockweiler@wi.gov. If e-mail submittal is not possible, written comments may be submitted to Sam Rockweiler, Department of Commerce, Division of Environmental and Regulatory Services, P.O. Box 14427, Madison, WI 53708-0427.
Copies of Proposed Rules
The proposed rules and an analysis of the rules are available on the Internet by entering “Comm 129" in the search engine at the following Web site:
http://adminrules.wisconsin.gov. Paper copies may be obtained without cost from Sam Rockweiler at the Department of Commerce, Division of Environmental and Regulatory Services, P.O. Box 14427, Madison, WI 53707, or at
sam.rockweiler@wi.gov, or telephone (608) 266-0797, or at Contact Through Relay. Copies will also be available at the public hearing.
Analysis Prepared by Department of Commerce
Statutes interpreted
Statutory authority
Explanation of agency authority
Section
227.11 (2) (a) of the Statutes authorizes the Department to promulgate rules interpreting the provisions of any Statute administered by the Department. Section
560.205 (3) (d) directs the Department to promulgate rules for administering the corresponding statutory requirements for angel investment tax credits and early stage seed investment tax credits.
Related statute or rule
Several statutes and other departmental rules address tax incentives for business development in Wisconsin. For example, (1) Sections
560.70 to
560.7995 of the Statutes and Chapters
Comm 100,
107,
112 and
118 address statewide tax-credit programs for job creation, capital investment, employee training and corporate headquarters; and (2) several other sections of Chapter
560 and other Comm chapters address more-narrowly targeted business development incentives, such as for film productions, dairy manufacturing facilities, and fuel and electricity used in manufacturing.
Plain language analysis
The rules in this order would (1) revise the eligibility requirements for these tax credits, (2) newly enable insurers to apply for these tax credits, (3) substantially increase the aggregate amount of investment in a qualified new business venture that may qualify for the tax credits, (4) substantially increase the aggregate amount of tax credits that may be claimed, (5) newly require investments to be maintained for at least 3 years, (6) newly enable transferring the credits to another person, (7) newly enable carrying forward the early stage tax credits, and (8) newly enable the Department to require a grant or loan origination fee.
Comparison with federal regulations
Neither the Department nor the Department of Revenue is aware of any existing or proposed federal regulation that applies these tax credits.
Comparison with rules in adjacent states
Minnesota
Minnesota offers various tax credit programs, but none that are similar to the Early Stage Business Investment program in Wisconsin. Minnesota has no rules addressing loan and grant origination fees for its economic development programs.
Iowa
Iowa offers a University-Based Research Utilization Program to provide tax credits to businesses and university employees to promote the adoption of new technology developed at the state universities. Businesses must be utilizing technology based on patents awarded to Iowa State University, the University of Iowa, or the University of Northern Iowa and be less than 1 year old. Researchers who developed the intellectual property utilized by the business are also eligible for up to 10 percent of the businesses tax liability in individual income tax credits. Administrative rules for this program are available in the Iowa Administrative Code, 261-Chapter
63. Further information is available through the Iowa Department of Economic Development Web site at
www.iowalifechanging.com. Iowa has no rules addressing loan and grant origination fees for its economic development programs.
Illinois
Illinois offers various tax credit programs, but none that are similar to the Early Stage Business Investment program in Wisconsin. Illinois has no rules addressing loan and grant origination fees for its economic development programs.
Michigan
Michigan offers a High-Tech and High Wage MEGA Tax Credit program that provides tax credits to promote the development of high-tech businesses in traditional and emerging industries. A business is eligible for tax credits to offset their Michigan business tax liability. Tax credit amounts are based on job creation. There are no rules for the program, however guidelines can be found through the Michigan Economic Development Corporation's Web site at
www.themedc.org. Michigan has no rules addressing loan and grant origination fees for its economic development programs.
Summary of factual data and analytical methodologies
The data and methodology for developing these rules were derived from and consisted of (1) incorporating the criteria in
2007 Wisconsin Act 20 and
2009 Wisconsin Acts 2 and
28; (2) incorporating applicable best practices the Department has developed in administering similar programs for business development and tax-credit verification; and (3) reviewing Internet-based sources of related federal, state, and private-sector information.
Analysis and supporting documents used to determine effect on small business
The primary documents that were used to determine the effect of the rules on small business were
2007 Wisconsin Act 20 and
2009 Wisconsin Acts 2 and
28. These Acts apply their private-sector requirements only to businesses and individuals for which a corresponding tax credit is desired.
Small Business Impact
The rules are not expected to impose significant costs or other adverse impacts on small businesses because the rules address submittal of documentation, and other activities, only by applicants that choose to pursue tax credits for angel investments and early stage seed investments.
Small business regulatory coordinator
Any inquiries for the small business regulatory coordinator for the Department of Commerce can be directed to Sam Rockweiler, as listed above.
Initial regulatory flexibility analysis
Types of small businesses that will be affected by the rules.
Reporting, bookkeeping and other procedures required for compliance with the rules.
A certified fund manager who authorizes a fund member to sell or otherwise transfer a credit to another person would need to report the transfer to the Department.
Types of professional skills necessary for compliance with the rules.
No new professional skills are necessary for compliance with the rules.
Rules have a significant economic impact on small businesses?
No.
Environmental Impact
The Department has considered the environmental impact of the proposed rules. In accordance with chapter Comm 1, the proposed rules are a Type III action. A Type III action normally does not have the potential to cause significant environmental effects and normally does not involve unresolved conflicts in the use of available resources. The Department has reviewed these rules and finds no reason to believe that any unusual conditions exist. At this time, the Department has issued this notice to serve as a finding of no significant impact. -
See PDF for diagram 
Fiscal Estimate
Assumptions used in arriving at fiscal estimate
The applicant information and Departmental review thereof that are addressed in the rules are substantially similar to the currently required information and review — and therefore are not expected to have any significant fiscal effect on the Department.
The rules are not expected to impose any significant costs on local governments or the private sector, because preparation of the submittal information that is addressed in the rules is not expected to have a significant new cost.
State fiscal effect
None.
Local government fiscal effect
None.
Long-range fiscal implications
None known.
Agency Contact Person
Chris Schiffner
Wisconsin Department of Commerce
Division of Business Development
201 West Washington Avenue
Madison, WI 53703
telephone: (608) 267-2425
Amended Notice of Hearings
Natural Resources
Fish, Game, etc., Chs.
NR 1—
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to ss.
29.014,
29.063,
29.177 and
227.11, Stats., the Department of Natural Resources will hold public hearings on revisions to Chapter
NR 10, Wis. Adm. Code, relating to the seasons for hunting deer.
Hearing Information
The public hearings will begin at 6:30 p.m. with an informational presentation and overview of the proposed rule. Public comments and statements will be accepted beginning at 7:00 p.m.:
October 14, 2009 Crivitz Village Hall
800 Henriette Ave, PO 727
Crivitz
October 15, 2009 Onalaska High School Field House
700 Hilltopper Place
Onalaska, WI 54650
October 21, 2009 Lussier Family Heritage Center —
Main Level, 3101 Lake Farm Road
Madison
October 21, 2009 James Williams Middle School
915 Acacia Lane
Rhinelander
October 21, 2009 Ashland AmericInn Conf. Center,
3009 Lakeshore Drive E.
Ashland
October 26, 2009 Fox Valley Technical College,
Appleton Campus, Room C190
1825 North Bluemound Drive
Appleton
October 26, 2009 Chippewa Valley Technical College
Auditorium, Room M103
620 W. Clairemont Ave.
Eau Claire
October 28, 2009 Waukesha County Technical College
Room C051/C057
800 Main Street
Pewaukee
October 28, 2009 Spooner High School Auditorium
801 County A
Spooner
November 3, 2009 Portage County Courthouse Annex
Conf. Room 1, 1462 Strongs Ave.
Stevens Point
NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN That an additional public meeting/hearing will begin at 6:30 p.m. with an informational presentation and overview of the proposed rule. Public comments and statements will be accepted beginning at 7:00 p.m. at the following location and time:
October 27, 2009 Sturtevant Natural Resources
Office Building
9531 Rayne Road, Suite 4
Sturtevant
Pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act, reasonable accommodations, including the provision of informational material in an alternative format, will be provided for qualified individuals with disabilities upon request. Please call Scott Loomans at (608) 267-2452 with specific information on your request at least 10 days before the date of the scheduled hearing.
Submission of Written Comments and Copies of Proposed Rule
The proposed rule and fiscal estimate may be reviewed and comments electronically submitted at the following Internet sites:
http://adminrules.wisconsin.gov or
http://dnr.wi.gov/. Written comments on the proposed rule may be submitted via U.S. mail to Mr. Keith Warnke, Bureau of Wildlife Management, P.O. Box 7921, Madison, WI 53707. Comments may be submitted until November 3, 2009. Written comments whether submitted electronically or by U.S. mail will have the same weight and effect as oral statements presented at the public hearings. A personal copy of the proposed rule and fiscal estimate may be obtained from Mr. Warnke.
Analysis Prepared by Department of Natural Resources
Statutes interpreted
Statutory authority
Plain language analysis
These proposed rules establish the deer season framework for hunting with archery gear, firearms and muzzleloaders.
November firearm
season
|
Statewide 16-day season beginning two
Saturdays prior to the Thanksgiving holiday. CWD zone would use the same dates.
Season would be the normal bucks plus
variable quota system
|
Archery
seasons
|
Opens statewide on the Saturday closest to September 15 and continues through the Thursday immediately prior to November firearm season. Statewide season reopens on 1st day of the November gun season
and continuing through the 2nd Sunday in January.
In herd-control units, the archery season would continue through January 31. Bonus buck incentive for all hunters beginning December 26 through January 31 in herd control units. CWD zone would use the same dates.
|
Youth season
|
Statewide 5-day, either-sex season beginning the 2nd Saturday in October. Saturday through Wednesday.
|
Early
muzzleloader season
|
Statewide 5-day, antlerless-only by permit beginning the 2nd Saturday in October.
Saturday through Wednesday.
|
October herd control firearm seasons
|
Herd control units only. 5-day, antlerless-only season beginning the 2nd Saturday in October. CWD October season would use same dates. Saturday through Wednesday. When October herd control seasons are held on lands that are part of the Kettle Moraine State Forest, the five-day season will begin on the Thursday nearest October 27.
|
Late
muzzleloader season
|
Statewide 7-day season beginning the Monday immediately following the
November firearm season (Bucks plus quota). CWD zone would use the same dates.
|
December firearm
season
|
Central Forest & Farmland zones.
4-day, antlerless-only season beginning the Thursday immediately following the late muzzleloader season. Appropriate antlerless permit required. CWD zone would use the same dates.
|
Holiday herd control firearm season
|
Central Forest & Farmland zones. Herd control units only, 10-day antlerless-only season beginning December 26th. CWD zone would use same dates
|
Bonus buck incentive
|
Hunters harvesting an antlerless deer in herd control units beginning on December 26 with this incentive are eligible for a bonus buck tag valid through the end of all deer seasons.
|
Public/private land tags
|
Herd control units only and only outside of the CWD Management Zone. Herd control tags will be specific to public or private lands. Public land tags will be issued based on the percentage of public land within herd control units.
|
Related rule or statute
One administrative rule that is currently under promulgation,
CR 09-024, the annual wildlife management housekeeping rule, would amend language in section 2. of this board order. This board order reflects that proposed change.
Comparison with rules in adjacent states
All of Wisconsin's surrounding states use hunting seasons to provide hunting opportunities and to manage white-tailed deer herds. All of the surrounding states utilize a range of hunting seasons and allow the use of archery equipment, firearms and muzzleloading firearms at certain times. The seasons proposed in this rule order do not vary significantly from the hunting opportunities that are available in other states.
Illinois
The Illinois archery season in most of the state runs from October 1-January 17 except that it is closed during the firearm deer season. Illinois has two periods for firearm deer hunting. The first firearm season in 2009 is November 20, 21, 22 and the second season is December 3, 4, 5, 6. The Illinois muzzleloader only season will be December 11, 12, 13 in 2009.
Iowa
There are two archery hunting periods, the first is October 1-Dec. 4 and the second is December 21-January 10, 2010. Iowa also has two periods for firearm hunting, December 5-9 and December 12–20. Iowa's two muzzleloader only hunting periods are October 17–25 and December 21-January 10.
Michigan
Michigan has two archery hunting periods, the first beginning on October 1 and continuing through November 14 and the second running December 1–January 1. The Michigan firearm season begins on November 15 and continues through November 30. Michigan's muzzleloader- only seasons vary in three zones, all occurring in December and vary from 10 to 17 days in length.
Minnesota
Minnesota's archery season runs from September 19 to December 31. Minnesota's firearm season begins on November 7 and continues to November 15 or 22 depending on the zone. The muzzleloader-only season runs from November 28 to December 13.
Comparison with federal regulations
These state rules and statutes do not relieve individuals from the restrictions, requirements and conditions of federal statutes and regulations. Regulating the hunting and trapping of native species has been delegated to state fish and wildlife agencies.
Summary of factual data and analytical methodologies
Deer affect nearly every Wisconsin citizen's life in some way. Many of these effects are significant from a recreational, economic, and/or social perspective. There are over 650,000 gun deer hunters and 250,000 bow hunters in Wisconsin. Regulations which require the harvest of an antlerless deer before a buck, called earn-a-buck, have been implemented where necessary to reduce deer populations since 2004. In May of 2009 the department, general public, and members of a committee created by the Natural Resources Board were charged with working together to recommend a deer hunting season structure that could be an effective alternative to earn-a-buck regulations. Acceptable alternatives must be shown to be effective for deer population management and supported by hunters and landowners and able to be evaluated through established benchmarks. The committee's recommended season structures are the basis for construction of this rule proposal.
The committee arrived at its recommendations after evaluating the expected effectiveness of each season component using conservation warden and biologist/wildlife manager input on enforceability and effectiveness, while also taking into consideration the acceptable level of hunter and landowner support needed to ensure participation in herd control seasons. Effectiveness was defined as the ability of a season or incentive to maintain herd populations at or near goal. This includes requiring the ability to allow targeted herd control to reduce over population while also allowing the flexibility to protect from over harvest in units that are at or below goal.
The guidelines for deer management in Wisconsin are established by administrative rule and require consideration of the following criteria; 1) carrying capacity relative to habitat and winter severity, 2) hunter success and public deer viewing opportunities, 3) ecological and economic impacts of deer browsing, 4) disease transmission. 5) concern for deer-vehicle collisions 6) Chippewa treaty harvest, 7) hunter access, 8) ability to keep the herd in a unit at goal, 9) tolerable levels of crop damage.
Small Business Impact
These rules are applicable to individual sportspersons and impose no compliance or reporting requirements for small businesses, and no design or operational standards are contained in the rule.
Pursuant to s.
227.114, Stats., it is not anticipated that the proposed rules will have a significant economic impact on small businesses.
Environmental Impact
The Department has made a preliminary determination that this action does not involve significant adverse environmental effects and does not need an environmental analysis under ch.
NR 150, Wis. Adm. Code. However, based on the comments received, the Department may prepare an environmental analysis before proceeding with the proposal. This environmental review document would summarize the Department's consideration of the impacts of the proposal and reasonable alternatives.
Fiscal Estimate
Summary
The proposed new season framework is a significant modification to the existing structure. The Department already administers hunting seasons for firearm, archery, and muzzleloader hunters, therefore, it is anticipated that the amount of effort and expense that the Department incurs while administering the deer seasons will be similar for the proposed new season framework.
State fiscal effect
None.
Local government fiscal effect
None.
Long-range fiscal implications
None.
Agency Contact Person
Keith Warnke
101 South Webster St. — PO Box 7921
Madison, WI 53707-7921
Phone: (608) 264-6023
Notice of Hearing
Natural Resources
Fish, Game, etc., Chs.
NR 1—
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to ss.
29.014,
29.041,
29.197 and
227.11 (2) (a), Stats., the Department of Natural Resources will hold a public hearing on emergency rules to revise Chapter
NR 10, Wis. Adm. Code, relating to the 2009 migratory game bird seasons and waterfowl hunting zones. This emergency order took effect on September 1, 2009.
Hearing Information
Date and Time:
|
Location:
|
November 4, 2009
Wednesday
At 1:00 P.M.
|
Room 608, DNR Central Office
101 South Webster Street
Madison
|
Pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act, reasonable accommodations, including the provision of informational material in an alternative format, will be provided for qualified individuals with disabilities upon request. Please call Kent Van Horn at (608) 266-8841 with specific information on your request at least 10 days before the date of the scheduled hearing.
Copies of Emergency Rule and Submission of Written Comments
The emergency rule and fiscal estimate may be reviewed and comments electronically submitted at the following Internet site:
http://adminrules.wisconsin.gov. Written comments on the proposed rule may be submitted via U.S. mail to Mr. Kent Van Horn, Bureau of Wildlife Management, P.O. Box 7921, Madison, WI 53707 or by email to
kent.vanhorn@ wisconsin.gov. Comments may be submitted until November 5, 2009. Written comments whether submitted electronically or by U.S. mail will have the same weight and effect as oral statements presented at the public hearings. A personal copy of the proposed rule and fiscal estimate may be obtained from Mr. Van Horn.
Analysis Prepared by Department of Natural Resources
Statutes interpreted
Statutory authority
Plain language analysis
This rule order establishes the season length and bag limits for the 2009 Wisconsin migratory game bird seasons and updates administrative code related to the waterfowl and other youth hunting seasons to be consistent with the provisions of 2009 ACT 39. For ducks, the state is divided into two zones each with 60-day seasons. The season begins at 9:00 a.m. September 26 and continues for 60 consecutive days in the north, closing on November 24. In the South the season begins at 9:00 a.m. on October 3 and continues through October 11, followed by a 5-day split, and then reopens on October 17 and continues through December 6. The daily bag limit is 6 ducks including no more than: 4 mallards, of which only 1 may be a hen, 1 black duck, 1 pintail, 1 canvasback, 3 wood ducks, 2 scaup and 2 redheads.
For Canada geese, the state is apportioned into 3 goose hunting zones: Horicon, Collins and Exterior. Other special goose management subzones within the Exterior Zone include Brown County, Burnett County, Rock Prairie and the Mississippi River. Season lengths are: Collins Zone — 66 days (three hunting periods, September 16–October 4, October 5–25, October 26–November 20); Horicon Zone — 92 days (2 hunting periods, first period beginning September 16 and the second on November 2); Exterior Zone in the northern duck zone — 85 days (Sept. 19–Dec. 12); Exterior Zone in the southern duck zone — 85 days (Sept. 19–Oct. 11 and Oct. 17–Dec. 17) and Mississippi River subzone — 85 days (Oct. 3–Oct. 11 and Oct. 17–Dec. 31). The Burnett County subzone is closed to Canada goose hunting. The statewide daily bag limit for Canada geese in all zones is 2 birds per day during the open seasons within the zones.
The youth waterfowl hunting season dates are established and the proposal revises the youth waterfowl, turkey, and youth deer hunting season's regulations to be consistent with the provisions of
2009 Wis. Act 39. The bill and this rule allow participation by people who are age 10 or 11. Hunters who are age 10 or 11 or who have not completed a hunter safety course of instruction must hunt with a mentor who is at least 18 years of age and be within arms reach of the mentor at all times. A mentor may supervise only one hunter who is age 10 or 11 or who has not completed a hunter safety course of instruction and the hunter and mentor together may possess only one firearm or bow. This rule order clarifies that the definition of the term “accompanied by", which currently applies to 12 and 13 year old hunters at all times, also applies to all youth hunt participants who are not hunting under the more restrictive hunting mentorship program requirements.
This rule establishes that a Class A bear permit may be issued to a person who reaches the age of 10 during the bear hunting season to be consistent with the provisions of 2009 ACT 39.
Finally, this rule updates road names in the migratory game bird hunting zone map following the completion of new highway construction. The location of the boundary is not changed.
Comparison with federal regulations
Under international treaty and Federal law, migratory game bird seasons are closed unless opened annually via the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) regulations process. As part of the Federal rule process, the FWS proposes a duck harvest-management objective that balances hunting opportunities with the desire to achieve waterfowl population goals identified in the North American Waterfowl Management Plan (NAWMP). Under this harvest- management objective, the relative importance of hunting opportunity increases as duck populations approach the goals in the NAWMP. Thus, hunting opportunity would be maximized when the population is at or above goals. Additionally, while FWS believes that the NAWMP's population goals would tend to exert a conservative influence on overall duck harvest-management. Other factors, such as habitat, are to be considered.
In the past, the regular Canada goose season was based on the allowable Mississippi Valley Population (MVP) harvest which was determined based on the spring breeding population estimate obtained from an aerial survey of the MVP breeding range as prescribed by the Mississippi Flyway MVP management plan. However, because locally produced giant Canada geese now constitute a considerable portion of the harvest in all states that also harvest Mississippi Valley Population birds, the Mississippi Flyway Council is testing the use of a standard season framework for 5 years. Beginning in the fall of 2007 and continuing through 2011, season lengths and bag limits for each MVP harvest state will remain unchanged. Each state retains the flexibility to schedule the timing of their Canada goose season. In addition, if the MVP spring population numbers dropped to a predetermined low level during the 5-year period, the stable season framework would be adjusted.
All proposed modifications included in this rule order are consistent with these parameters and guidelines which are annually established by the Fish and Wildlife Service in
50 CFR 20.
Comparison with rules in adjacent states
Since migratory bird species are managed under international treaty, each region of the country is organized in a specific geographic flyway which represents an individual migratory population of migratory game birds. Wisconsin along with Minnesota, Michigan, Illinois and Iowa are members of the Mississippi Flyway. Each year the states included in the flyways meet to discuss regulations and guidelines offered to the flyways by the FWS. The FWS regulations and guidelines apply to all states within the Flyway and therefore the regulations in the adjoining states closely resemble the rules established in this rule order, and only differ slightly based on hunter desires, habitat and population management goals. However, these variations fall within guidelines and sideboards established by the FWS.
Summary of factual data and analytical methodologies
For the regular duck season, a data based process called Adaptive Harvest Management is used annually by the USFWS and the Flyways to determine which of 3 framework alternatives best matches the current year's data on populations and habitat (data from the spring pond and duck survey). The option of a closed season is also possible if survey conditions indicated that this is necessary for the management of duck populations. The determination of which alternative is selected is based in part on the spring wetland conditions on the breeding grounds and the Mid-Continent Mallard population. These data come from the May Pond and Breeding Waterfowl Population Surveys conducted by the USFWS and Canadian Wildlife Service on traditional survey areas as well as surveys from select states, including Wisconsin.
Wisconsin's regular Canada goose season harvest consists of close to a 50:50 ratio between resident giant and MVP population Canada geese. As a result, the parameters of Wisconsin's regular goose seasons are guided by the Mississippi Flyway management plans for the MVP and giant Canada goose populations and approved by the Mississippi Flyway Council and the USFWS. The health of these populations was measured with spring breeding population surveys, survival data and harvest rates obtained from banding and production studies. The surveys and studies are conducted annually and are supported by the State of Wisconsin as part of the MFC. The result of this work is reviewed annually by the MFC committee and the USFWS to measure the impact of the stable season framework trial period.
The primary elements of Wisconsin's waterfowl regulatory process include conducting spring waterfowl surveys, participation in MFC meetings, commenting on federal proposals, and soliciting input from the public. The state process begins with Flyway meetings in February and March each year where staff provide input to the development of federal framework alternatives and requests related to the early seasons. In May and June, breeding waterfowl surveys and banding are conducted in support of the regulatory process.
In early July, staff conducted a public meeting to solicit input from interest groups, including representatives of the Conservation Congress Migratory Committee. At this meeting staff provided the attendees with breeding status information and asked for any items that they wish the department to pursue at the MFC meeting in mid July. Department staff then attended the MFC Technical and Council meetings. At this meeting staff were provided status information and the proposed framework alternative from the USFWS. Department staff then worked with the other states in our Flyway to discuss and develop proposals and recommendations that were voted upon by the MFC. Proposals that passed at the MFC meeting were forwarded to the USFWS for consideration by the Service Regulations Committee (SRC) at their meeting. The USFWS announced its final waterfowl season framework recommendation on July 31. Department staff summarized waterfowl status and regulation information for Wisconsin citizens and presented this information to the Migratory Committee of the Conservation Congress and at a public meeting (Post-Flyway Meeting) of interest groups and individuals on August 1. Staff gathered public input at these meetings regarding citizen suggestions for the development of Wisconsin's waterfowl regulations given the federal framework. Public hearings were held from August 3–6 around the state to solicit additional input on the proposed annual waterfowl rule.
Analysis and supporting documents used to determine effect on small business
These rules, and the legislation which grants the department rule making authority, do not have a significant fiscal effect on the private sector or small businesses. Additionally, no significant costs are associated with compliance to these rules.
Small Business Impact
Pursuant to s.
227.114, Stats., it is not anticipated that the proposed rule will have an economic impact on small businesses. The Department's Small Business Regulatory Coordinator may be contacted at
SmallBusiness@dnr. state.wi.us or by calling (608) 266-1959.
Environmental Impact
The Department has made a preliminary determination that this action does not involve significant adverse environmental effects and does not need an environmental analysis under ch.
NR 150, Wis. Adm. Code. However, based on the comments received, the Department may prepare an environmental analysis before proceeding with the proposal. This environmental review document would summarize the Department's consideration of the impacts of the proposal and reasonable alternatives.
Notice of Hearing
Natural Resources
Fish, Game, etc., Chs.
NR 1—
Hearing Information
The hearing will be held on:
October 26, 2009 Jane Greene Room
Monday Door County Public Library
at 5:00 P.M. 107 S. Fourth Avenue
Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin
Pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act, reasonable accommodations, including the provision of informational material in an alternative format, will be provided for qualified individuals with disabilities upon request. Please call William Horns at (608) 266-8782 with specific information on your request at least 10 days before the date of the scheduled hearing.
Copies of Proposed Rule and Submission of Written Comments
The rule and fiscal estimate may be reviewed and comments electronically submitted at the following Internet site:
http://adminrules.wisconsin.gov. Written comments on the rule may be submitted via U.S. mail to Mr. William Horns, Bureau of Fisheries Management and Habitat Protection, P.O. Box 7921, Madison, WI 53707-7921. Comments may be submitted until October 31, 2009. Written comments whether submitted electronically or by U.S. mail will have the same weight and effect as oral statements presented at the public hearings. A personal copy of the rule and fiscal estimate may be obtained from Mr. Horns.
Analysis Prepared by Department of Natural Resources
Statutes interpreted
Statutory authority
Rule summary
The proposal would amend section
NR 25.06 (2) (e) 2., of the Wisconsin Administrative Code to increase the total allowable annual commercial harvest of lake whitefish from each of the three fishing zones in the Wisconsin waters of Lake Michigan. All three harvest limits, and therefore all individual licensee whitefish catch quotas, would be increased by 16.6 %. The overall total allowable commercial harvest for the entire lake would be increased by 410,000 pounds, or from 2,470,000 pounds to 2,880,000 pounds. For the three zones, the increases are as follows: Zone 1 — 225,518 to 262,952 pounds, Zone 2 — 2,029,662 to 2,366,569 pounds, and Zone 3 — 214,820 to 250,479 pounds. The increases for each zone are allocated according to the same proportions as the current zone allocations of the lake-wide harvest limit.
Comparison with federal regulations
Federal regulations do not apply; the State of Wisconsin has exclusive authority to regulate commercial fishing in Wisconsin waters of the Great Lakes.
Comparison of similar rules in adjacent states
Of these states the only meaningful comparison is harvest limits established for lake whitefish from Michigan waters of Lake Michigan. The Department adopted the methods employed by the State of Michigan and the Chippewa/Ottawa Resource Authority under terms of a negotiated Consent Decree issued by a United States District Court in Michigan. Iowa has no Great Lakes waters. The harvest of lake whitefish from Minnesota waters of Lake Superior is not regulated by harvest limits. There is no commercial harvest of lake whitefish from Illinois waters of Lake Michigan.
Summary of factual data and analytical methodologies
This rule was based on modern conventional methods for assessing fish populations and for setting harvest limits. Fish stocks were assessed using standard data from commercial harvests employing statistical-catch-at-age modeling. Harvest limits were set based on the estimated population using standards and methods also used for state and tribal whitefish fisheries in the State of Michigan.
Analysis and supporting documents used to determine effect on small business
Businesses engaged in commercial fishing and wholesale fish dealing may be affected by the rule. However, the Department currently has no basis for quantifying the economic impacts of the rule.
Small Business Impact
This rule is of interest to commercial fishers and was initiated in response to their expressed concerns. The rule will be enforced by Department Conservation Wardens under the authority of chapters 23 and 29, Stats., through routine patrols, record audits of wholesale fish dealers and commercial fishers and follow up investigations of citizen complaints.
Pursuant to s.
227.114, Stats., the proposed rule may have an impact on small businesses. The initial regulatory flexibility analysis is as follows:
Initial regulatory flexibility analysis
Type of small business that will be affected by the rule.
Commercial fishing businesses will be affected.
Reporting, bookkeeping and other procedures required for compliance with the rule.
None.
Professional skills necessary for compliance with the rule.
None.
Small business regulatory coordinator
The Department's Small Business Regulatory Coordinator for this rule may be contacted at Peter.Flaherty@ Wisconsin.gov or by calling (608) 266-8254.
Environmental Impact
The Department has made a preliminary determination that this action does not involve significant adverse environmental effects and does not need an environmental analysis under ch.
NR 150, Wis. Adm. Code. However, based on the comments received, the Department may prepare an environmental analysis before proceeding with the proposal. This environmental review document would summarize the Department's consideration of the impacts of the proposal and reasonable alternatives.
Fiscal Estimate
Summary
The proposed rule changes harvest limits for lake whitefish from three commercial fishing zones in Lake Michigan. These changes will have no fiscal impact at either the state or local level.
State fiscal effect
None.
Local government fiscal effect
None.
