169.07   Exhibition of live wild animals.
169.08   Propagation of wild animals.
169.10   Sale and purchase of live wild animals.
169.11   Harmful wild animals.
169.36   Record–keeping and reporting requirements.
182.017   Transmission lines; privileges; damages.
  [utility weed control along transmission lines]
281.17 (2) [DNR to supervise chemical treatment of waters
  for the suppression of nuisance–producing
  organisms that are not regulated by the program
  established under s. 23.24 (2).]
237.10   Rapide Croche lock [Fox river lamprey barrier]
Plain language analysis
The proposed rule makes several “housekeeping" changes to ch. NR 40 relating to the identification, classification and control of invasive species.
SECTION 1. of the proposed Order creates a definition for the term “aquatic invasive species." The definition is needed for clarification of an existing rule that authorizes the department to remove detrimental fish and other aquatic invasive species from waters of the state.
SECTION 2. revises the current definitions of “established" and “propagules," to clarify that they apply to organisms other than plants, such as disease-causing microorganisms. It also modifies the definition of “wild animal" to clarify that crayfish as well as fish are excluded from that term, consistent with the regulatory approach taken in the rest of ch. NR 40 regarding invasive fish and crayfish species.
SECTIONS 3. and 8. of this proposed Order revise the descriptions of the boundary lines for 6 split-listed invasive plant species (i.e., plants that are listed both as “prohibited" in one part of the state and as “restricted" in another part of the state). In order to be consistent with other split-listed invasive plant species described in ch. NR 40, the prohibited and restricted area descriptions for these 6 plants are changed from areas marked by boundary lines consisting of highways to areas that are defined by named counties. SECTIONS 3. and 8. also revise the “prohibited" and “restricted" invasive plant species listings for Conium maculatum (Poison hemlock). The plant currently is listed as “prohibited" in all counties except Iowa and Grant counties, where it is listed as “restricted." The plant's status in Crawford, Dane, Green, Lafayette, Rock, Richland and Sauk counties is changed from “prohibited" to the reduced regulatory status of “restricted" due to its recently discovered relative abundance in those counties. The revisions also correct the order of the county names to be alphabetical.
SECTION 4. corrects the scientific name of snakehead fish, corrects inconsistencies in the use of Italic font for species scientific names, corrects the revised list of prohibited fish species to be in alphabetical order, specifically lists or names the snakehead fish species that are considered viable in Wisconsin waters, and adds an informational Note that identifies nonnative fish species that the department has determined are not viable.
SECTIONS 5., 6., 7., 9., 10., 11., 12., 13. and 15. create or amend informational Notes to various provisions of ch. NR 40. The Notes are created or revised to reflect changes made by 2009 Wisconsin Act 55 or changes made elsewhere in this proposed rule, or to correct staff position titles, email addresses or Internet links or other similar information.
SECTION 14. revises the current bans in ch. NR 40 on the highway transport or launching of any vehicle, boat, boat trailer or other equipment that has an aquatic plant or aquatic animal attached. The revisions remove code language made largely redundant by the adoption of s. 30.07, Stats., as created by 2009 Wisconsin Act 55, effective November 12, 2009. Section 30.07, Stats., includes a ban on the placement or operation in navigable waters of any vehicle, watercraft or equipment with aquatic plants or aquatic animals attached to the exterior. As a compliment to s. 30.07, Stats., the proposed rule retains and revises language in ch. NR 40 banning the placement or operation in wetlands or non-navigable waters of any vehicle, watercraft or equipment with aquatic plants or aquatic animals attached to the exterior. The proposed rule exempts native duckweed and wild rice like s. 30.07, Stats., but unlike the statute, the proposed rule retains an exemption for vehicles, watercraft and equipment engaged in fire suppression.
SECTION 16. of the proposed rule removes an unnecessary regulatory permit requirement that duplicated an existing statutory requirement relating to the introduction of nonnative aquatic plants. References to nonnative aquatic plants are removed from s. NR 40.07 (7) and the remaining rule is revised, for consistency, to require a ch. NR 40 permit instead of a “written exemption" to introduce nonnative algae and cyanobacteria to waters of the state. A Note is added referring to the existing statutory permit requirement under s. 23.24, Stats., for introduction of nonnative aquatic plants.
Comparison with federal regulations
There are no directly comparable federal regulations.
Comparison with rules in adjacent states
Because the proposed rule consists only of unique “housekeeping" revisions to existing administrative rules, no comparison is possible.
Factual data and analytical methodologies
Department staff and members of the public identified drafting errors and potential problems in ch. NR 40 after it was adopted effective September 1, 2009. In addition, a review of ch. NR 40 was conducted after the enactment of 2009 Wisconsin Act 55 (effective November 12, 2009) to identify how ch. NR 40 should be revised to conform to the Act.
Analysis and supporting documents used to determine the effect on small businesses
The proposed rule is intended to correct drafting errors, clarify existing code language, harmonize the existing code with new statutory provisions by eliminating redundancies, and accomplish other, similar “housekeeping" changes. It does not establish any new requirements.
Small Business Impact
The proposed rule is not expected to have a significant adverse effect on a substantial number of small businesses and may have favorable effects on a number of businesses by correcting and clarifying existing rules and by adding informational Notes to ch. NR 40.
Interested parties may include the plant nursery industry, seed and agriculture industries, fish farmers, bait dealers, aquarium and ornamental fish dealers, land owners and managers, commercial fishers, anglers, gardeners, county and municipal governments, lake districts, government agencies, environmental and conservation organizations, and the Wisconsin Invasive Species Council.
Enforcement of ch. NR 40 will not change as a result of the proposed rule. Enforcement will vary depending on the species being regulated and the applicability of other rules and statutes. For forest or plant pests and aquaculture, the department and DATCP share regulatory responsibility. The department has (or will develop) memoranda of agreement with DATCP to clarify what aspects of ch. NR 40 and related rules will be enforced by each agency.
The department will normally follow an informal, stepped enforcement process in order to obtain compliance with the revised invasive species rules. This involves informal discussions between department staff and the landowner or company, notifying the person of potential violations and providing guidance on how to comply with the rules. Notices of non-compliance may follow if necessary. If formal enforcement is necessary, these revised rules and permits issued under the revised rules will be enforced by department conservation wardens, county district attorneys, and circuit courts through the use of citations and civil or criminal complaints. Civil and criminal enforcement may also be carried out by department referral of violations to the Wisconsin Attorney General, with prosecution and abatement actions in the circuit courts. Criminal enforcement will be limited to intentional violations. Finally, violations of the permits issued under revised ch. NR 40 also may be enforced by administrative permit revocation proceedings.
Initial regulatory flexibility analysis
Pursuant to s. 227.114, Stats., the proposed rule may have an impact on small businesses but is not expected to have a significant adverse effect on a substantial number of small businesses and may have favorable effects on a number of businesses by correcting and clarifying existing rules and by adding informational Notes to ch. NR 40. The department's initial regulatory flexibility analysis is as follows:
Type of small business that will be affected by the rule.
Small businesses that may be affected by the proposed rule include the plant nursery industry, seed and agriculture industries, fish farmers, bait dealers, aquarium and ornamental fish dealers, businesses that own or manage land, and commercial fishers.
Reporting, bookkeeping and other procedures required for compliance with the rule.
No new reporting, bookkeeping or other procedures are created by the proposed rule.
Type of professional skills necessary for compliance with the rule.
No new professional skills are needed to comply with the proposed rule.
Small business regulatory coordinator
The department's Small Business Regulatory Coordinator may be contacted by calling (608) 266-1959 or by email at Linda.Haddix@wisconsin.gov.
Environmental Analysis
The department has made a preliminary determination that this action does not involve significant adverse environmental effects and does not need an environmental analysis under ch. NR 150, Wis. Adm. Code. However, based on the comments received, the department may prepare an environmental analysis before proceeding with the proposal. This environmental review document would summarize the department's consideration of the impacts of the proposal and reasonable alternatives.
Fiscal Estimate
State fiscal effect
None anticipated.
Local government fiscal effect
None.
Agency Contact Person
Kelly Kearns
Bureau of Endangered Resources
Department of Natural Resources
PO Box 7921
Madison, WI 53707-7921
Telephone: (608) 267-5066
Notice of Hearings
Natural Resources
Fish, Game, etc., Chs. NR 1
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to ss. 23.09 (2) (b), 29.014, 29.053 (3), 29.059, 29.089, 29.192 and 29.193, Stats., the Department of Natural Resources will hold public hearings on revisions to Chapters NR 10, 11, 12 and 19, Wis. Adm. Code, relating to hunting, trapping, closed areas and game refuges (CR 10-020).
The proposed rules will:
1.   Establish a definition and allow the use of atlatls for small game hunting.
2.   Allow the use of colony traps for muskrats and establish size standards and regulations.
3.   Eliminate the Burnett County and Rock Prairie Canada Goose Management Subzones.
4.   Establish and clarify definitions of a normal “agricultural or gardening practice" and “manipulation" for the purposes of enforcing existing prohibitions of baiting and feeding wild animals.
5.   Allow participation in the youth turkey hunting season by 16 and 17 year olds.
6.   Establish turkey hunting seasons and zones at Hartman Creek, Straight Lake, and the Glacial Heritage Area State Parks.
7.   Establish a single, consistent raccoon season opener for residents and non-residents.
8.   Allow firearm deer hunting at Nelson Dewey state park during the traditional season in November.
9.   Allow deer hunting on newly acquired lands at Buckhorn state park during all normal firearm deer hunting seasons.
10.   Allow muzzleloader deer hunting at Big Bay state park during the normal statewide muzzleloader season that follows the traditional November firearm season.
11.   Establish firearm and archery deer hunting seasons at proposed Glacial Heritage Area state parks that are consistent with other CWD Management Zone state park hunting seasons.
12.   Allow participation in the youth deer hunting season by 16 and 17 year olds.
13.   Establish a single, consistent statewide opening date for fox hunting and trapping and coyote trapping.
14.   Eliminate the 2:00 p.m. pheasant hunting closure at Scuppernong River Habitat Management Area in Waukesha County and allows pheasant hunting all day.
15.   Allow the use of scopes on muzzleloading firearms during the muzzleloader-only deer hunting season.
16.   Provide that all deer hunting licenses which are issued to 10 year-olds to 17 year-olds will include a carcass tag that is valid for an antlerless deer in any unit statewide.
17.   Allow the transportation of whole deer carcasses from the CWD zone to other areas if the whole carcass is taken directly to a licensed meat processor or taxidermist.
18.   Allow dividing a deer into five parts prior to registration in order to facilitate removal from the field. These sections also repeal, recreate and amend provisions which allow quartering bear and elk so that they may be divided into five parts in order to more easily facilitate removal from the field.
19.   Increase the penalty for violation animal damage abatement program requirements by clarifying that program participation can be denied for the following program year in addition to the current year.
20.   Clarify the definition of “novice participant" for learn to hunt programs.
NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN that pursuant to ss. 29.014 (1), 29.039, 29.041, 29.053, 29.531 and 29.533, Stats., the Department of Natural Resources will hold public hearings on revisions to Chapters NR 20, 21 and 26, Wis. Adm. Code, relating to fishing on the inland, outlying, and boundary waters of Wisconsin (CR 10-025).
The proposed rules will:
1.   Permit motor trolling in Ashland, Iron, Price and Sawyer counties.
2.   Eliminate the minimum size restriction for largemouth and smallmouth bass in Bear, Horsehead, and Upper and Lower Turtle lakes (Barron county).
3.   Increase the minimum size restriction for walleye in Bear, Horseshoe (T36N, R14E, S3, 115 ac.), and Upper and Lower Turtle lakes (Barron county) from 15 to 18 inches and decreases the daily bag limit for walleye from 5 fish to 3 fish.
4.   Eliminate the minimum size restriction for largemouth and smallmouth bass in Lake Owen (Bayfield county).
5.   Increase the minimum size restriction for walleye in Lake Owen (Bayfield County) from 15 to 18 inches and decreases the daily bag limit for walleye from 5 fish to 3 fish.
6.   Eliminate the minimum size restriction for largemouth and smallmouth bass in Big McKenzie lake (Burnett/ Washburn counties).
Loading...
Loading...
Links to Admin. Code and Statutes in this Register are to current versions, which may not be the version that was referred to in the original published document.