Each group home, residential care center, and child-placing agency licensee shall submit to the department a proposed rate for services to be provided for each program that the licensee operates. In reviewing a proposed rate submitted by a licensee, the department shall consider whether the proposed rate exceeds the maximum rate determined by the department, the program's most recent cost and service report, the program's most recent audit report, whether the program's reported costs are within a range of similar costs reported by other programs for similar items and services, the program's rate in previous years, and the factors listed in s.
49.343 (2) (b), Stats. For rates effective July 1, 2011, a licensee's proposed rate shall be submitted no later than April 29. For rates effective January 1, 2012, and future years, a licensee's proposed rate shall be submitted no later than October 1 of the preceding year.
If the department determines that a licensee's proposed rate is appropriate based on the listed factors, the department shall approve the proposed rate. If the department determines that a licensee's proposed rate is not appropriate, the department shall negotiate with a licensee to determine an agreed to rate. The department's approved rate following negotiations shall be based on the listed factors and additional relevant information presented during negotiations. For rates effective July 1, 2011, the department will notify licensees of their approved rate no later than June 1. For future years, the department will notify licensees of their approved rate no later than November 1 of the preceding year. A licensee who does not agree to the department's approved rate may request mediation and a contested case hearing under ch.
227, Stats.
In addition to the rate established under the rate regulation process, a licensee may request that a county pay an extraordinary payment for a specific child in care. A request for a child-specific extraordinary payment may be approved by the county and shall be reviewed by the department. A licensee may request an extraordinary payment for a child who has service needs that are not accounted for in the maximum allowable rate determined by the department and not paid for by another source. The extraordinary payment may not be used to cover expenses that are a disallowable cost under federal regulations and cost circulars. A licensee may not appeal the denial of a request for an extraordinary payment.
The department shall convene the rate regulation advisory committee under s.
49.343 (5), Stats., at regular intervals to consult with the department on items in s.
49.343 (5) (a) to
(c), Stats.
Other Changes Affecting Residential Care Centers, Group Homes, and Child-Placing Agencies
Inspections, records, and requests for information. The rules provide that the department may visit and inspect a group home, child-placing agency, or residential care center. During this inspection, a licensee shall provide any documentation of operations requested by the department and any resident records requested by the department. A licensee shall respond promptly to requests for information from the department or any other governmental agency with statutory authority to see the information and shall ensure that information that the licensee or staff submits or shares is current and accurate. For group home and residential care center licensees, this provision also applies to requests and information submitted to or shared with a placing agency.
A group home, residential care center, or child-placing agency licensee shall maintain staff payroll records and retain the records for 5 years. A group home or residential care center licensee shall also maintain and retain written schedules of staff coverage that document the specific staff that worked each shift to meet the applicable staff-to-resident ratios.
A group home shall have written policies and procedures that indicate for each shift of resident care staff how all of the following will be documented:
•Staff arrival and departure times.
•Number and location of residents.
•Summary of each resident's behavior and program participation during the shift.
Financial records and audits. A group home, residential care center, or child-placing agency licensee shall arrange for an annual audit report by a certified public accountant. The licensee shall also establish and maintain an accounting system that accurately identifies income and disbursements for each resident or child by the cost categories that must be reported to the department for determination of rates.
Department memos. A licensee of a group home, residential care center, or child-placing agency shall register to receive department memos on child welfare licensing and child welfare policy by electronic mail.
Non-discrimination. A licensee of a group home, residential care center, or child-placing agency shall ensure that the group home, residential care center, or child-placing agency does not discriminate against a resident or child based on the resident's race or cultural identification, sex, sexual orientation, age, color, creed, ancestry, national origin, disability, political affiliations, or religious beliefs.
Other Changes Affecting Residential Care Centers and Group Homes
•
Supervision of residents. Language on supervision of residents has been rewritten to emphasize supervision to ensure the safety and well-being of residents in addition to complying with minimal staff-to-resident ratios.
•
Prohibited physical restraint. The rules incorporate the provisions of DSP Memo Series 2009-05 that was jointly issued by the Department of Health Services and the Department of Children and Families. It provides that resident care staff may not use any type of physical restraint on a resident unless the resident's behavior presents an imminent danger of harm to self or others and physical restraint is necessary to contain the risk and keep the resident and others safe. If physical restraint is necessary, the rules provide certain prohibited practices.
•
Disaster plan. Each licensee shall file a disaster plan with the department and placing agency that would allow the department or placing agency to identify, locate, and ensure continuity of services to children under the placement and care responsibility or supervision of the placing agency who are displaced or adversely affected by a disaster. Disaster plans are required by the federal Child and Family Act of 2006.
•
Child safety restraint systems. The rules incorporate the requirements of s.
347.48 (4), Stats.
•
Carbon monoxide detectors. The rules incorporate the requirements in ss.
101.647 and
101.149, Stats., regarding carbon monoxide detectors. Effective February 1, 2011, s.
101.647, Stats., requires that a one- or two-unit building have a functional carbon monoxide detector installed in the basement and on each floor level, except the attic, garage, or storage area of each unit.
•
Training in use of automated external defibrillator. The rules incorporate the requirements of s.
48.67 (3) (b) and
(d), Stats.
Summary of factual data and analytical methodologies
The department developed this rule in conjunction with an advisory committee consisting of representatives of purchasers, county departments, the Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare, tribes, providers, consumers, and the Wisconsin Association of Family and Children's Agencies.
From fall 2009 to fall 2010, the department and the advisory committee were developing a policy to implement rate regulation effective January 1, 2011, with levels of care for group homes, residential care centers, and child-placing agencies that provide services for foster homes with a Level 3 to 5 certification. Each level of care would have an established rate and specific requirements regarding provision of care. In fall 2010, the department determined that we did not have sufficient information to implement that type of system. Implementation of rate regulation was delayed until July 1, 2011, and a simpler approach to rate regulation was developed without levels of care for providers.
Summary of related federal requirements
•
48 CFR Part 31 provides contract cost principles and procedures under the federal acquisition regulation. Allowability of costs incurred by commercial organizations is determined in accordance with this provision.
•
Allowability of costs incurred by nonprofit organizations is determined in accordance with OMB Circular A-122, Cost Principles for Nonprofit Organizations.
•
Allowability of costs incurred by state, local, or federally-recognized tribal governments is determined in accordance with OMB Circular No. A-87, Cost Principles for State and Local Governments.
•
45 CFR Part 74 provides uniform administrative requirements for awards and subawards from the federal Department of Health and Human Services to institutions of higher education, hospitals, other nonprofit organizations, and commercial organizations.
•
45 CFR Part 92 provides uniform administrative requirements for grants and cooperative agreements from the federal Department of Health and Human Services to state, local, and tribal governments.
The Legislative Audit Bureau has confirmed that the department is responsible for monitoring compliance with federal regulations and cost circulars by anyone to whom the department passes federal funds.
Comparison with similar rules in adjacent states
Illinois:
Illinois has a levels of care system group homes and residential care centers. Most residential care is subject to a hybrid rate-setting system. The rules provide that the state reimburses providers through payment made according to standard reimbursement levels that are negotiated through contract. For performance residential programs, the state sets staffing ratios and agrees upon salaries for various types of employees with the provider. Food and laundry, building, and administrative costs are based on median historical costs and are capped. This calculation of reimbursable costs provides the provider with an amount of money that the provider has discretion to use.
Iowa:
Iowa has established a weighted average rate for services providers offer. The weighted average rate was established in 1997. In 1998, existing providers had a one-time opportunity to negotiate their rates. The rates may only be changed if there is an across-the-board increase or decrease in rates. The Department of Human Services negotiates rates with a new provider or an existing provider adding an new service.
Minnesota:
Rates for residential facilities are set by a negotiation process between the facility and the county where the facility is located. Once a rate is negotiated, the facility and the county enter into a contract and the facility send the contract paperwork to the state. Facilities are also required to submit cost information each year. When the reimbursement rate is calculated, the facilities are allocated a percentage of the rate for room and board, and a percentage of the rate for administration.
Michigan:
Counties negotiate contracts with providers and the state approves the contracts.
Analysis used to determine effect on small business
The rule provides procedures to implement rate regulation that is directed by s.
49.343, Stats.
Effect on Small Business
The rule will affect small businesses, but will not have a significant economic effect on a substantial number of small businesses.
Small business regulatory coordinator
Fiscal Estimate
State fiscal effect
Indeterminate.
Local fiscal effect
Indeterminate.
Assumptions used in arriving at fiscal estimate
2009 Wisconsin Act 28 directed the Department to implement rate regulation effective January 1, 2011. Prior to the passage of Act 28, the rates charged by Group Home and Residential Care Centers (RCCs) varied widely. Group Homes and RCCs were able to set their own rates and to charge those rates to the Department and County Child Welfare agencies. From 1998 to 2009, the cost of a Group Home placement grew an average of 5.8% annually and the cost of a RCC placement grew an average of 6.1% annually. At the same time, the Consumer Price Index grew an average of 2.4% annually. The current system lacks transparency, predictability and consistency across counties. In addition, the cost of a placement is not related to the complexity or quality of care provided to a child.
By regulating rates, the Department expects to achieve cost containment, transparency, and consistency across counties. In addition, the rate regulation initiative will enable the Department to align rates with the complexity and quality of care provided to a child. The fiscal impact to the Department and county child welfare agencies cannot be determined because individual provider rates have not been certified.
Agency Contact Person
Ron Hermes, Director, Bureau of Permanence and Out-of-Home Care, Division of Safety and Permanence, (608) 267-3832,
ron.hermes@wisconsin.gov.
Notice of Hearing
Regulation and Licensing —
Veterinary Examining Board
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to the authority vested in the Veterinary Examining Board, the board will hold a public hearing at the time and place indicated below to consider an emergency order and an order adopting permanent rules to amend sections
VE 2.01 (2);
3.03 (intro.) and
(5), relating to the requirements for the initial licensure of veterinarians, specifically, the procedures for, and the types of examinations required.
Hearing Information
Date and Time Location
May 25, 2011 Room 121A
Wednesday 1400 E. Washington Avenue
at 9:30 A.M. Madison, WI 53703
Appearances at the Hearing
Interested persons are invited to present information at the hearing. Even if appearing at the hearing in person, you are urged to submit facts, opinions and argument in writing as well. Facts, opinions and argument may also be submitted in writing without a personal appearance by mail addressed to the Veterinary Examining Board at the Department of Regulation and Licensing, Division of Board Services, P.O. Box 8935, Madison, Wisconsin 53708.
Submittal of Written Comments
Comments may be submitted to Kris Anderson, Paralegal, Department of Regulation and Licensing, Division of Board Services, 1400 East Washington Avenue, Room 151, P.O. Box 8935, Madison, WI 53708-8935, or by email to
kristine1.anderson@wisconsin.gov. Written comments must be received on or before the date and time of the hearing to be included in the record of rule-making proceedings.
Copies of Proposed Rule
Copies of this proposed rule are available upon request to Kris Anderson, Paralegal, Department of Regulation and Licensing, Division of Board Services, 1400 East Washington Avenue, P.O. Box 8935, Madison, Wisconsin 53708, or by email at
Kristine1.Anderson@wisconsin.gov.
Analysis Prepared by the Department of Regulation and Licensing
Statute(s) interpreted
Statutory authority
Related statute or rule
Emergency Rule 1103, containing the same provisions as those proposed for this permanent rule, was published on March 28, 2011. There are no related statutes or rules other than the emergency rule and those indicated above.
Explanation of agency authority
The veterinary examining board is authorized under Wis. Stat. sections 453.03 and 453.06 (1) to promulgate rules relating to licensure qualifications, including determining the qualifications licensure candidates must meet to sit for the licensing examination, as well as establishing procedures for taking the examination.
Plain language analysis
This proposed rule-making first clarifies the date by which a Wisconsin veterinary licensure candidate who has not yet graduated from veterinary school must graduate to be eligible to take the North American Veterinary Licensing Examination (NAVLE). It also makes the deadline for submitting NAVLE applications to the board earlier to comply with the National Board of Veterinary Medical Examiner's (NVBME) requirements and to allow adequate time for departmental processing prior to the board's notification of approved examination applicants to the NBVME.
The NAVLE is offered twice per year, during a four-week “testing window" in November-December and a two-week window in April. The precise dates of the testing windows vary from one year to the next. Section
VE 2.01 (2), Wis. Admin. Code, currently provides that to be eligible to sit for the NAVLE, a licensure applicant who has not already graduated from veterinary college must expect to graduate in not more than 8 months. However, Rule VE 2.01 (2) does not specify the date an applicant should use for calculating the 8-month deadline. The proposed amendment to the rule clarifies that the 8-month period begins on the last day of the applicable testing window.
Next, per NBVME procedures, all NAVLE examination applicants must file two applications, one directly to NAVLE, and one through the applicant's state or regional licensing agency. In Wisconsin, NAVLE applicants submit their state applications to the veterinary examining board. The board's agreement with the NBVME calls for the board to provide the NVBME with a list of eligible examination applicants either by August 11 for the November-December testing window or by January 13 for the April window. The current version of Wis. Admin. Code s.
VE 3.03 (intro.) specifies deadlines for applicants' examination applications to the board that do not allow the board to comply with the terms of its NBVME agreement. The proposed amendment to the introductory section of
VE 3.03 resolves the conflict between the rule and the agreement.
Finally, this proposed rule-making implements the legislation enacted by
2009 Wis. Act 396, which became effective on June 2, 2010. Act 396 affords licensure candidates who are graduating from a foreign veterinary college or one not approved by the Wisconsin veterinary examining board, the option of showing successful completion of the program for the Assessment of Veterinary Education Equivalence (PAVE) as an alternative to the requirement of having successfully completed the American Veterinary Medical Association (AMVA) Education Commission for Foreign Veterinary Graduates Certification (ECFVGC) program. The amendment to Wis. Admin. Code s.
VE 3.03 (5) provides that alternative.
SECTION 1 requires that a Wisconsin veterinary licensure candidate who has not yet graduated from veterinary school must have an expected graduation date no later than eight months after the last day of the applicable NAVLE testing window.
SECTION 2 requires that veterinary licensure candidates file their state NAVLE applications with the veterinary examining board at least 140 days before the first day of the applicable testing window.
This section further allows a licensure candidate who has graduated from a foreign veterinary college or one not approved by the board to present evidence of successful completion of either the ECFVGC program or PAVE. This section additionally requires that if a licensure candidate has not yet graduated from veterinary college, the dean of his or her school must provide evidence directly to the board that the applicant has an expected graduation date no later than eight months after the last day of the applicable NAVLE testing window.
Summary of related federal requirements
There are no existing or proposed federal regulations addressing the deadlines for state veterinary licensure candidates to submit applications to take the NAVLE or regarding a state's acceptance of successful completion of PAVE as an alternative to the ECFVGC requirement for graduates of foreign veterinary colleges.
Comparison with similar rules in adjacent states
