Rule-Making Notices (Hearing Notices)

There is no existing or proposed federal regulation that is intended to address the activities to be regulated by the proposed rule.

Comparison with rules in adjacent states

Illinois is the only adjacent state that allows net business loss carryforwards to be shared among combined group members. Michigan and Minnesota have combined reporting laws but do not allow the sharing of net business loss carryforwards among other companies in the combined group.

Illinois has its own unique regulations relating to the net business loss carryforward statute, including: IL Regs. 100.2310, 100.2330, 100.2340, 100.2350, and 100.5270.

Summary of factual data and analytical methodologies

The department has created this proposed rule order to comply with the statutory requirement to administer the changes under 2011 Wisconsin Act 32 to the treatment of pre-2009 net business loss carryforwards under combined reporting. No other data was used in the preparation of this proposed rule order or this analysis.

Analysis and supporting documents used to determine effect on small business

As explained above, this proposed rule is created to administer changes in Wisconsin's income and franchise tax laws. As the rule itself does not impose any significant financial or other compliance burden, the department has determined that it does not have a significant effect on small business.

Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

This proposed rule order does not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small businesses.

Anticipated Costs Incurred by Private Sector

This proposed rule does not have a significant fiscal effect on the private sector.

Effect on Small Business

This proposed rule does not have a significant effect on small business.

Text of Rule

SECTION 1. Tax 2.60 (2) (Lm) is created to read:

Tax 2.60 (2) (Lm) “Pre-2009 net business loss carryforward" has the meaning given to "pre-2009 net business loss carry-forward" in s. 71.255 (6) (bm) 1., Stats.

SECTION 2. Tax 2.61 (9) (intro.), (a) (intro.) and 1., and (b) (intro.) are amended to read:

Tax 2.61 (9) (intro.) A combined group member may carry forward its net business loss as provided in ss. 71.26 (4) and 71.45 (4), Stats. A net business loss carryforward is an attribute of the separate corporation rather than of the combined group. However, s. 71.255 (6) (b) and (bm), Stats., provides that a combined group member may share all or a portion of its net business loss carryforward with the other members of its combined group if certain conditions are met. This subsection explains which net business loss carryforwards are sharable, how to compute the sharable amount, and how to apply the shared losses. The following rules apply:

(a) (intro.) A combined group member may share its net business loss carryforward incurred in a taxable year beginning on or after January 1, 2009 with other combined group members to the extent that all of the following conditions are met:

1. The net business loss originated in a taxable year beginning on or after January 1, 2009 and is attributable to combined unitary income included in a combined report.

(b) (intro.) A combined group member's net business loss carryforward incurred in a taxable year beginning on or after January 1, 2009 that cannot be shared with other combined group members includes amounts attributable to the following:

SECTION 3. Tax 2.61 (9) (b) 1. is repealed

SECTION 4. Tax 2.61 (9) (b) 2. and 3. are renumbered 2.61 (9) (b) 1. and 2.

SECTION 5. Tax 2.61 (9) (c) is repealed and recreated to read:

Tax 2.61 (9) (c) Order of carryforwards. A combined group member shall apply net business loss carryforwards in the following order:

1. Net business loss carryforwards incurred by that same member in taxable years beginning before January 1, 2009, in the order that the underlying net business losses were incurred.

2. Sharable and non-sharable net business loss carryforwards under par. (d) incurred in taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2009, in the order that the underlying net business losses were incurred. If the net business loss carryforward to be used consists of both a sharable amount and a non-sharable amount incurred in the same taxable year, the amount of sharable and non-sharable carryforward used shall be determined on a pro rata basis according to the amount of each type of carryforward available from that year.

3. For loss carryforwards shared in a taxable year that begins after December 31, 2011, pre-2009 net business loss carryforwards under par. (dm).

Example: Combined Group EFG consists of Member E, Member F, and Member G. E has the following loss carryforwards:

Year     Sharable   Non-sharable
Incurred   Carryforward   Carryforward

2008   ——     ($10,000)

2009   ($6,000)   ($2,000)

In 2010, E's share of combined unitary income plus its separate entity items equal $14,000. After using its carryforwards to offset this income, E has $4,000 of remaining net business loss carryforward (= ($10,000) + ($6,000) + ($2,000) + $14,000). Of this amount, a portion is a sharable carryforward that may be applied against F and G's shares of combined unitary income in the manner described in par. (d). Since loss carryforwards are applied in the order incurred, the $10,000 carryforward from 2008 is used in its entirety, and $4,000 of the 2009 carryforward is used. The portion of E's remaining carryforward from 2009 that is sharable is $3,000 (= $4,000 x [$6,000 / $8,000]) and the portion that is non-sharable is $1,000 (= $4,000 x [$2,000 / $8,000]).

In 2012, E has the following loss carryforwards:

Year     Sharable   Non-sharable
Incurred   Carryforward   Carryforward

2009   ($3,000)   ($1,000)

2010   ——   ——

2011   ($4,000)   ($6,000)

In addition, E has a pre-2009 net business loss carryforward of $3,000. E's share of combined unitary income plus its separate entity items for 2012 equal $16,000. After using its carryforwards to offset this income, E has $1,000 of remaining net business loss carryforward (= ($3,000) + ($3,000) + ($1,000) + ($4,000) + ($6,000) + $16,000). Since the loss carryforwards are first applied to the net business loss carryforwards incurred in 2009 and after, the $4,000 carryforward from 2009 and the $10,000 carryforward from 2011 are used in their entirety. The remaining $2,000 of loss carryforwards are applied to the pre-2009 net business loss carryforward. The remaining pre-2009 net business loss carryforward is $1,000.

SECTION 6. Tax 2.61 (9) (d) (intro.) is amended to read:

Tax 2.61 (9) (d) (intro.) Method of sharing. The amount of net business loss carryforward under par. (c) 2. eligible for sharing shall be computed and assigned as follows:

SECTION 7. Tax 2.61 (9) (dm) is created to read:

Tax 2.61 (9) (dm) Pre-2009 net business loss carryforwards. 1. For a combined group member's first taxable year beginning after December 31, 2011, the member may, after using the pre-2009 net business loss carryforward to offset its own income for the taxable year, and after using sharable losses to offset its own income for the taxable year, use 5% of the pre-2009 net business loss carryforward to offset the income of all other members of the combined group for the taxable year and for each of the 19 subsequent taxable years.

Example: Member A of Wisconsin Combined Group ABC has pre-2009 net business loss carryforwards of $100 million as of December 31, 2008. A's share of the combined group's income is $2 million in 2009, $3 million in 2010, and $5 million in 2011. A's one-time calculation of the annual 5% sharable amount is $4.5 million, computed as follows: [$100 million pre-2009 net business loss carryforward less the taxable income offset by the net business loss carryforward ($2 million in 2009, $3 million in 2010, and $5 million in 2011) multiplied by 5 percent].

In 2012 Member A's share of the combined group's Wisconsin income is $1 million. Member A first applies its pre-2009 net business loss carry-forward against its $1 million share of the combined group's Wisconsin income. The remaining members of the group may use the $4.5 million sharable loss to offset the remaining group income on a proportionate basis. Assuming the combined group has enough income in 2012 to fully use the entire $4.5 million in pre-2009 net business loss carryforward, the pre-2009 net business loss carryforward available in 2013 is $84.5 million ($90 million total sharable loss less $1 million of Member A's income offset by the net business loss carry-forward, less $4.5 million sharable loss utilized by the corporation in 2012). If Member A's share of the combined group's income is $0 for all the remaining years of the pre-2009 carry-forward, and the remaining members of the combined group were eligible to share the full $4.5 million net business loss carry-forward each year, the sharable pre-2009 net business loss available in 2031 will be $3.5 million ($4.5 million annual sharable loss computed in 2012 less $1 million loss used by Member A in 2012).

2. Except as provided in par. (g), relating to insurance companies, the sharable pre-2009 net business loss carryforward under subd. 1. shall be assigned to each combined group member in proportion to its share of combined unitary income as computed in subs. (6) to (8), net of any losses from separate entity items or loss carryforwards already applied. An amount may not be assigned to a combined group member whose share of combined unitary income is zero or less. Any remaining sharable amount becomes part of the combined group's pre-2009 net business loss carryforward that may be shared by all combined group members in subsequent years.

Example: Member D of Combined Group DEF has a pre-2009 net business loss carry-forward of $2 million as of January 1, 2012. The 5% sharable amount allowed to members E and F in each year for taxable years 2012 through 2031 is $100,000 ($2 million net business loss carryforward multiplied by 5%). Member E's proportional share of the $100,000 sharable net business loss in 2012 is $30,000. After using all other allowable losses, Member E has $20,000 in income remaining to offset against its share of the pre-2009 net business loss carryforward. The remaining $10,000 net business loss carryforward not used by Member E in 2012 becomes part of the combined group's pre-2009 net business loss carryforward that may be shared by all combined group members in 2013 and is in addition to the 5% net business loss carryforward previously computed. As a result, the net business loss carryforward available in 2013 is $110,000 ($100,000 combined group yearly sharable loss plus Member E's $10,000 proportional share of the $100,000 loss in 2012 that was not fully utilized by Member E in 2012).

3. Notwithstanding the provisions of ss. 71.26 (4) (a) and 71.45 (4) (a), Stats., under ss. 71.26 (4) (b) and 71.45 (4) (b), Stats., any unused pre-2009 net business loss carryforward under subd. 1. may be offset against the income of the members of the combined group for the 20 taxable years that begin after December 31, 2011.

Example: As of December 31, 2008, Member G of Combined Group GHI has a loss carryforward of $30,000 that is in the 14th year of the 15 year carryforward period under s. 71.26 (4) (a), Stats. Member G does not have any income to offset the $30,000 loss carryforward in its taxable years beginning in 2009, 2010, or 2011. For taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2012, Member G is allowed to use the $30,000 pre-2009 net business loss carryforward to offset any of its own income first, then offset its proportional share of Combined Group GHI's income, and finally, any remaining loss may be shared proportionately among the other members of Combined Group GHI. Under s. 71.26 (4) (b), Stats., Member G's pre-2009 net business loss carryforward of $30,000 begins a new carryforward period of 20 years from its taxable year beginning in 2012.

ADMINISTRATIVE RULES FISCAL ESTIMATE AND ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
Type of Estimate and Analysis
X Original Updated Corrected
Administrative Rule Chapter, Title and Number
Section Tax 2.60 - Definitions relating to combined reporting and Section Tax 2.61 - Combined reporting
Subject
Treatment of pre-2009 net business loss carryforwards under combined reporting
Fund Sources Affected			Chapter 20 , Stats. Appropriations Affected
GPR FED PRO PRS SEG SEG-S
Fiscal Effect of Implementing the Rule
X No Fiscal Effect Indeterminate	Increase Existing Revenues Decrease Existing Revenues		Increase Costs Could Absorb Within Agency's Budget Decrease Costs
The Rule Will Impact the Following (Check All That Apply)
State's Economy Local Government Units		Specific Businesses/Sectors Public Utility Rate Payers
Would Implementation and Compliance Costs Be Greater Than $20 million? Yes X No
Policy Problem Addressed by the Rule
The rule does not create or revise policy, other than to reflect a statutory change.
Summary of Rule's Economic and Fiscal Impact on Specific Businesses, Business Sectors, Public Utility Rate Payers, Local Governmental Units and the State's Economy as a Whole (Include Implementation and Compliance Costs Expected to be Incurred)
As indicated in the attached fiscal estimate, the fiscal effect of allowing commonly controlled groups to share losses generated before January 1, 2009, was included in the fiscal effect of 2011 Wisconsin Act 32. The rule itself does not create any further economic or fiscal impact or implementation and compliance costs beyond the statutes it interprets, except that, by providing clarifications and examples, may reduce the costs that businesses and individuals would otherwise incur to comply with the statutes. No comments concerning the economic effect of the rule were submitted in response to the department's solicitation.
Benefits of Implementing the Rule and Alternative(s) to Implementing the Rule
Clarifications and guidance provided by administrative rules may lower the compliance costs for businesses, local governmental units, and individuals. If the rule is not implemented, Chapter Tax 2 will be incomplete in that it will not reflect current law.
Long Range Implications of Implementing the Rule
No long-range implications are anticipated.
Compare With Approaches Being Used by Federal Government
N/A
Compare With Approaches Being Used by Neighboring States (Illinois, Iowa, Michigan and Minnesota)
Illinois has its own unique provisions concerning the treatment of net business loss carryforwards, which differ from Wisconsin's provisions substantively enough to prohibit consideration of the Illinois approach.

Assumptions used in arriving at fiscal estimate

The proposed rule prescribes the method that members of the same combined group must use to share net business losses with other members of the same commonly controlled group for net business losses incurred prior to January 1, 2009, and not fully used before January 1, 2012. It also provides clarity regarding the 15 year and 20 year net business loss carryforwards for purposes of ss. 71.26 (4) (a) and (b) and 71.45 (4) (a) and (b), Stats.

The fiscal effect of allowing commonly controlled groups to share losses generated before January 1, 2009 was included in the fiscal effect of 2011 Act 32. The rule only implements the provisions of Act 32 as it relates to the sharing of losses, it does not modify them. Therefore, the rule has no fiscal effect.

Agency Contact Person

Please contact Dale Kleven at [phone] or [e-mail], if you have any questions regarding this proposed rule.

Notice of Hearing

Safety and Professional Services

Safety, Buildings, and Environment,
General Part I Chs. SPS 301-319

rulemaking_notices CR 12-007 CR 12-007

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to sections 101.02 (1) and 227.10 (1), Stats., the Department of Safety and Professional Services will hold a public hearing on proposed rules under Chapter SPS 305, relating to thermal insulator credentials.

Hearing Information

The public hearing will be held as follows:

Date:   Monday, February 13, 2012

Time:   10:00 A.M.

Location:   Conference Room 121A
  125 South Webster St.
  Madison, WI 53703

This hearing is held in an accessible facility. If you have special needs or circumstances that may make communication or accessibility difficult at the hearing, please call [phone] or [phone] (TTY) at least 10 days before the hearing date. Accommodations such as interpreters, English translators, or materials in audio tape format will, to the fullest extent possible, be made available upon a request from a person with a disability.

Appearances at the Hearing and Submittal of Written Comments

Interested persons are invited to appear at the hearing and present comments on the proposed rules. Persons making oral presentations are requested to submit their comments in writing. Persons submitting comments will not receive individual responses. The hearing record on this proposed rulemaking will remain open until Monday, February 20, 2012, to permit submittal of written comments from persons who are unable to attend the hearing or who wish to supplement testimony offered at the hearing. Written comments should be submitted to James Quast, at the Department of Safety and Professional Services, P.O. Box 2689, Madison, WI 53701-2689, or Email at [e-mail].

The small business regulatory coordinator for the Department of Safety and Professional Services is Bill Wendle, who may be contacted at telephone [phone], or Email at [e-mail].

Copies of Proposed Rules

The proposed rules and an analysis of the proposed rules are available on the Internet at the Safety and Buildings Division Web site at http://dsps.wi.gov/sb/SB-HomePage.html. Paper copies may be obtained without cost from Norma McReynolds, at the Department of Safety and Professional Services, Board Services Division, P.O. Box 2689, Madison, WI 53701-2689, or Email [e-mail], or at telephone [phone] or TDD Relay dial 711 in Wisconsin or [phone]. Copies will also be available at the public hearing.

Statutes interpreted

Sections 101.02 (1) and 227.10 (1), Stats.

Statutory authority

Sections 101.02 (1) and 227.10 (1), Stats.

Related statute or rule

None.

Explanation of agency authority

Under 2009 Wisconsin Act 16, s. 101.136, Stats., on and after July 1, 2011, only individuals licensed as insulation mechanics or working under the supervision of licensed insulation mechanics may install or maintain thermal system insulation. Thermal insulation was statutorily defined as a product that is used in a heating, ventilating, cooling, plumbing or refrigeration system to insulate any hot or cold surface, including a pipe, duct, valve, boiler, flue, or tank, or equipment on or in a building. 2011 Wisconsin Act 32 repealed s. 101.136, Stats.

Summary of proposed rules

The proposed rules repeal the credentialing procedures established for thermal system insulators under s. 101.136, Stats., as mandated under 2009 Wisconsin Act 16.

Summary of and preliminary comparison with, existing or proposed federal regulations

An internet search on U.S. federal regulations and U.S. federal register yielded no results regarding the licensing of thermal insulators.

Comparison with rules in adjacent states

An Internet-based search of thermal insulation mechanic licenses in the states of Illinois, Iowa, Michigan and Minnesota found that none of the states have specific rules or programs regarding these types of licenses.

Summary of the factual data and analytical methodologies

The proposed rules were developed because of 2011 Wisconsin Act 32 which repealed s. 101.136, Stats.

Analysis and supporting documents used to determine effect on small businesses or in preparation of economic impact report

The proposed rule action follows the direction provided by 2011 Wisconsin Act 32.