Rule-Making Notices (Hearing Notices)

Summary of, and comparison with, existing or proposed federal statutes and regulations

None.

Comparison to rules in adjacent states

Illinois:

Illinois does not require continuing education in the use, handling, distribution and disposal of pesticides.

Iowa:

Iowa does not require continuing education in the use, handling, distribution and disposal of pesticides.

Michigan:

Michigan does not require any continuing education for veterinarians or veterinary technicians.

Minnesota:

Minnesota does not require continuing education in the use, handling, distribution and disposal of pesticides.

Summary of factual data and analytical methodologies

Veterinary Examining Board ensured the accuracy, integrity, objectivity and consistency of data were used in preparing the proposed rule and related analysis.

Analysis and Supporting Documents Used to Determine Effect on Small Business or in Preparation of Economic Impact Analysis

Per 2009 Act 139, the Board may not require training or continuing education concerning pesticides and this rule will repeal the requirements currently in place. This rule was posted for public comment on the economic impact of the proposed rule, including how this proposed rule may affect businesses, local government units and individuals, for a period of 14 days. No comments were received relating to the economic impact of the rule.

Fiscal estimate and economic impact analysis

The Fiscal Estimate and Economic Impact Analysis is attached.

Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis or Summary

There is no effect on small businesses.

Agency Contact Person

Shancethea Leatherwood, Paralegal, Department of Safety and Professional Services, Division of Policy Development, 1400 East Washington Avenue, Room 151, P.O. Box 8935, Madison, Wisconsin 53708; telephone [phone]; email at [e-mail].

Text of Rule

SECTION 1. VE 7.06 (22) is amended to read:

VE 7.06 (22) Falsely certifying to the board under s. VE 10.02 (6) or 10.04 (1) that the veterinarian:

SECTION 2. VE 7.06 (22) (c), (d), (e), and Note are repealed.

SECTION 3. VE 9.05 (12) is amended to read:

VE 9.05 (12) Falsely certifying to the board under s. VE 10.02 (6) or 10.04 (1) that the veterinary technician:

SECTION 4. VE 9.05 (12) (c), (d), (e) and Note are repealed.

SECTION 5. VE 10.02 (1) (a) 1.and 10.02 (2) (a) 1. are repealed.

SECTION 6. VE 10.04 is repealed

STATE OF WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION DOA 2049 (R 07/2011) ADMINISTRATIVE RULES FISCAL ESTIMATE AND ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
Type of Estimate and Analysis
X Original ⍽ Updated ⍽ Corrected
Administrative Rule Chapter, Title and Number
VE 7, 9, 10
Subject
Continuing education and training in the use of pesticides
Fund Sources Affected			Chapter 20 , Stats. Appropriations Affected
⍽ GPR ⍽ FED ⍽ PRO ⍽ PRS ⍽ SEG ⍽ SEG-S
Fiscal Effect of Implementing the Rule
X No Fiscal Effect ⍽ Indeterminate	⍽ Increase Existing Revenues ⍽ Decrease Existing Revenues		⍽ Increase Costs ⍽ Could Absorb Within Agency's Budget ⍽ Decrease Costs
The Rule Will Impact the Following (Check All That Apply)
⍽ State's Economy ⍽ Local Government Units		⍽ Specific Businesses/Sectors ⍽ Public Utility Rate Payers
Would Implementation and Compliance Costs Be Greater Than $20 million? ⍽ Yes X No
Policy Problem Addressed by the Rule
Per 2009 Act 139, the Board may not require training or continuing education concerning the use, handling, distribution, and disposal of pesticides other than for disciplinary purposes. This rule will repeal the requirements currently in place requiring continuing education in this area.
Summary of Rule's Economic and Fiscal Impact on Specific Businesses, Business Sectors, Public Utility Rate Payers, Local Governmental Units and the State's Economy as a Whole (Include Implementation and Compliance Costs Expected to be Incurred)
No economic or fiscal impact to business, organization or the economy as a whole.
Benefits of Implementing the Rule and Alternative(s) to Implementing the Rule
The benefit is the rule will be in line with the statutory authority regarding continuing education.
Long Range Implications of Implementing the Rule
N/A
Compare With Approaches Being Used by Federal Government
None
Compare With Approaches Being Used by Neighboring States (Illinois, Iowa, Michigan and Minnesota)
Our neighboring states do not require continuing education in the use, handling, distribution and disposal of pesticides.
Name and Phone Number of Contact Person
Sharon Henes [phone]