Bobcat
No economic impacts are anticipated. The hunting season frameworks proposed in this rule will be similar in scope to those in place during the previous seasons. While this proposal would result in increased hunting and trapping opportunities, the number of harvest permits issued will continue to be low relative to other hunting seasons like deer, bear, or turkey. The positive impacts of increased hunting related expenditures will likely not be noticeable. These rules are applicable to individual hunters and impose no compliance or reporting requirements for small business, nor are any design or operational standards contained in the rule.
Elk
The positive impacts of elk-related tourism will be noticeable in local communities. The Cable Chamber of Commerce estimates that 1,200 people visiting the Clam Lake area annually to view elk and contribute approximately $175/day totaling approximately $210,000 annually to the area. While difficult to predict in the Black River Falls area of Jackson County, elk-related tourism is expected to be higher due to the ease of accessing this area via the Interstate corridor between southern Wisconsin and the Twin Cities. The Black River Falls Bureau of Tourism has been a supporter of establishing a herd there and is optimistic that they will see high levels of elk viewing interest. Local and state interest in elk is high, as evidenced by continually large numbers of requests for information about the elk reintroduction, and statewide support from a variety of partners including the Ojibwe tribes and Ho-Chunk Nation, government partners such as the U.S. Forest Service and county administration boards, and non-profit groups like the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation and Safari Club International. Hunting will become part of elk management in Wisconsin when a harvestable surplus develops. The Clam Lake herd is nearing that level with a hunt anticipated in 2013. Harvest permit levels will be limited, but local economies would receive some economic gains from elk hunting. Hunters would be expected to spend money on food, lodging, fuel, and hunting equipment. However, the greatest impact will be from general tourism activities as people travel simply to view elk, primarily during the fall rutting season. Michigan sees as many as 53,000 visitors per year who spend over $3,000,000.
These rules direct the department's management activities and may be applicable to individual hunters, but they impose no compliance or reporting requirements for small business, nor are any design or operational standards contained in the rule.
Contact Person
Natural Resources
Fish, Game, etc., Chs.
NR 1—
This statement of scope was approved by the governor on February 18, 2013.
Rule No.
Relating to
Establishing the 2013 migratory bird season framework.
Rule Type
These will be emergency rules.
Finding/Nature of Emergency (Emergency Rule Only)
The emergency rule procedure, pursuant to s.
227.24, Stats., is necessary and justified in establishing rules to protect the public welfare. The federal government and state legislature have delegated to the appropriate agencies rule-making authority to control the hunting of migratory birds. The State of Wisconsin must comply with federal regulations in the establishment of migratory bird hunting seasons and conditions. Federal regulations are not made available to this state until late July of each year. This order is designed to bring the state hunting regulations into conformity with the federal regulations. Normal rule-making procedures will not allow the establishment of these changes by September 1. Failure to modify our rules will result in the failure to provide hunting opportunity and continuation of rules which conflict with federal regulations.
Detailed Description of the Objective of the Proposed Rule
This emergency rule order will establish the 2013 migratory bird hunting seasons.
Description of Existing Policies Relevant to the Rule and of New Policies Proposed to be Included in the Rule and an Analysis of Policy Alternatives; the History, Background and Justification for the Proposed Rule
This is an annual rule that will be consistent with a federal framework and is not a change from past policies. Migratory game bird hunting is regulated by the United States Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS), in
50 CFR part 20, who will offer a final season framework to Wisconsin on approximately August 1, 2012. The State of Wisconsin's season proposal will be based on the federal framework and local conditions. Wisconsin will also not be more restrictive than the federal bag limit framework except that we will propose one less hen mallard in the bag limit if the federal framework allows two or more, consistent with existing Wisconsin rules. This rule may relax the prohibition on hunting waterfowl in open water for holders of permits for hunters with disabilities and lift a sunset of special migratory bird hunting regulations at the Mead and Zeloski Marsh Wildlife Management Areas.
The department will also recommend ways to simplify Canada goose hunting regulations. Current rules require tagging geese that are harvested in the Horicon Zone but a simpler process of recording harvest may be possible. Additionally, the department will consider eliminating the permit application deadline for Horicon zone hunters and simply issue harvest permits while recognizing the flyway management and federal protections against overharvest of the Mississippi Valley Population. The department will also consider reducing the size of the Horicon zone which would result in expanded hunting opportunities in areas no longer in that zone.
Through this rulemaking, the department may suggest revisions to the existing prohibition and exceptions for open-water hunting. Most waterfowl hunters are required to be partially or entirely concealed in emergent vegetation while hunting from a boat, blind or similar device on state water. This requirement preserves open water areas as safe resting areas for migrating waterfowl. This rule would establish an exception for disabled permit holders and their assistants.
The department will consider other simplifications to migratory bird hunting regulations that may be identified during this rulemaking process.
Detailed Explanation of Statutory Authority for the Rule (Including the Statutory Citation and Language)
The chapter on wild animals and plants, in s.
29.014, Stats., “rule making for this chapter", establishes that the department shall maintain open and closed seasons for fish and game and any limits, rest days, and conditions for taking fish and game. This grant of rule-making authority allows the department to promulgate rules related to migratory game bird hunting.
Special regulations on the taking of certain wild animals are authorized under s.
29.192, Stats., including specific language that authorizes rules related to Canada goose hunting.
The establishment of migratory game bird refuges is authorized in s.
23.09 (2) (b), Stats., relating to the department's ability to designate locations reasonably necessary for the purpose of providing safe retreats in which birds may rest and replenish adjacent hunting grounds.
Wisconsin's boundary waters with other states are popular waterfowl hunting locations. Specific authority to regulate hunting in and on all interstate boundary waters and outlying waters is established in s.
29.041, Stats.
Sections
23.11 and
29.014, Stats., allow for the protection of natural resources on state lands such as migratory bird refuges, establish general department powers, and authority to establish hunting and trapping regulations on department managed lands.
Estimate of the Amount of Time that State Employees Will Spend to Develop the Rule and of Other Resources Necessary to Develop the Rule
Approximately 640 hours will be needed by the department prior to and following the hearings.
Description of all Entities that may be Impacted by the Rule
These rules will impact migratory game bird hunters and those who enjoy viewing waterfowl in Wisconsin.
Summary and Preliminary Comparison of any Existing or Proposed Federal Regulation that Is Intended to Address the Activities to be Regulated by the Rule
Migratory game bird hunting is regulated by the United States Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS), in
50 CFR part 20. Under international treaty and Federal law, migratory game bird seasons are closed unless opened annually through the USFWS regulations process. As part of the federal rule process, the service annually evaluates migratory game bird populations and breeding habitat in cooperation with state provincial agencies and the Canadian Wildlife Service. After considering recommendations from the flyway councils of states and the guidance of cooperatively developed harvest strategies, the USFWS establishes annual frameworks within flyway or bird populations regions. States can then establish hunting seasons within the sideboards for each species and region. As a result, the hunting seasons of neighboring states are similar to Wisconsin migratory game bird hunting regulations because they are subject to the same federal frameworks.
Locally produced giant Canada geese are now a considerable portion of the harvest in states that also harvest Mississippi Valley Population geese that nest in Northern Ontario. The Mississippi Flyway Council has tested the use of a standard season framework for 5 years, ending in 2011. Season lengths and bag limits for each MVP harvest state remained unchanged. In 2012, the MFC conducted an evaluation of harvest impacts of these stable regulations and established a framework for future seasons. It was agreed within the MFC that states harvesting MVP Canada geese could take small steps toward liberalization while impacts are cooperatively monitored.
Anticipated Economic Impact of Implementing the Rule (Note if the Rule is Likely to Have a Significant Economic Impact on Small Businesses)
No economic impacts are anticipated. The hunting season frameworks proposed in this rule will be comparable to those in place during the previous season. These rules are applicable to individual hunters and impose no compliance or reporting requirements for small business, nor are any design or operational standards contained in the rule.
Contact Person
Scott Loomans, 101 S Webster St., Madison, WI 53707, (608) 267-2452,
scott.loomans@wisconsin.gov or Kent Van Horn, Migratory Birds Specialist, 101 South Webster Street, PO Box 7921, Madison, WI 53707-7921, (608) 266-8841,
kent.vanhorn@wisconsin.gov.
Natural Resources
Fish, Game, etc., Chs.
NR 1—
This statement of scope was approved by the governor on February 20, 2013.
Rule No.
WM-09-13(E) and WM-08-13, ch.
NR 45.
Relating to
Firearms use on department land in Columbia County.
Rule Type
Permanent and emergency.
Finding/Nature of Emergency (Emergency Rule Only)
This rule is necessary to protect public safety and welfare due to the popularity of target shooting at properties which are undeveloped, have not been designated by the department, and are in locations which jeopardize the safety of neighbors and property users.
Detailed Description of the Objective of the Proposed Rule
The objective of these rules will be to prohibit firearms discharge for target shooting purposes on all department managed lands in Columbia County in areas where target shooting is not authorized. Firearm discharge for hunting, trapping, and dog training purposes and at established ranges would continue to be allowed.
This rule will prevent potentially unsafe target shooting activities on department managed lands where concentrated housing developments are located downrange and where property user safety is a concern.
Description of the Existing policies Relevant to the Rule, New Policies Proposed to be Included in the Rule, and an Analysis of Policy Alternatives
The department currently possesses the ability to prohibit firearms discharge by posting lands that it owns or manages. However, the department believes that hunting, trapping, and dog training can still safely occur on department managed lands in Columbia County. Prohibiting target shooting, but still allowing hunting, trapping, and dog training, requires rule making.
Policies relevant to this rule are consistent with existing rules and this proposal will not establish new statewide policies. Under this proposal, portions or all department managed lands in Columbia County will be added to an existing rule that already prohibits target shooting on some individual properties and all department properties in the counties of: Dane, Dodge, Fond du Lac, Jefferson, Juneau, Kenosha, La Crosse, Manitowoc, Milwaukee, Outagamie, Ozaukee, Racine, Sauk, Sheboygan, Walworth, Washington, Waukesha and Winnebago.
Detailed Explanation of Statutory Authority for the Rule (Including the Statutory Citation and Language)
The department is generally charged with the care, protection, and supervision of state lands by s.
23.11 Stats.
Under s.
23.09 (2) (d) related to conservation, the department is directed to provide an adequate and flexible system for the use of outdoor resources in this state and may promulgate such rules as are necessary. These rules are necessary to preserve public opportunities to hunt with firearms on lands that have been acquired as areas where any citizen may hunt or trap.
Pursuant to s.
227.24 (1) (a) Stats., the department finds that putting this rule into effect prior to the time it would take effect using the permanent rule process is necessary to protect the public safety and welfare.
Estimate of Amount of Time that State Employees Will Spend Developing the Rule and of Other Resources Necessary to Develop the Rule
80 hours.
List with Description of all Entities that may be Affected by the Proposed Rule
Target shooting is an enjoyable and normally safe activity that is enjoyed by many people in the Columbia County area. A subset of target shooters who are using department wildlife properties instead of gun clubs or private lands will be impacted by this rule. Under the proposal, it would remain possible for the department to authorize target shooting in a designated location without additional rulemaking. Safe locations and facilities for public target shooting are being considered in the area and, if they can be developed, would minimize any impact to target shooters. A number of residential property owners that live nearby or adjacent to areas currently used for target shooting will also be impacted by an improvement in safety conditions. Improved safety conditions will also benefit people who are using the properties for hunting, trapping and other purposes. In one location, people have reported having difficulty being able to safely return to their vehicle at a popular target shooting location which is also a main parking lot.
Summary and Preliminary Comparison with any Existing or Proposed Federal Regulation that is Intended to Address the Activities to be Regulated by the Proposed Rule
Pittman-Robertson funding has been used to acquire and manage wildlife areas to sustain wildlife and allow hunting, trapping and other outdoors activities in Columbia County. Through these rules, the department hopes to preserve the use of firearms for hunting, consistent with federal guidelines for properties where Pittman-Robertson funding has been invested.
The United States Fish & Wildlife Service owns and manages a number of waterfowl production areas in Columbia County. The topography and management of those properties is similar to that of department managed lands in the county. The service does not allow recreational target shooting on its properties but does allow hunting.
Anticipated Economic impact of Implementing the Rule (Note if the Rule is Likely to Have a Significant Economic Impact on Small Businesses)
While target shooting is an activity that many people in the Columbia County area enjoy, the department estimates that a minority of target shooters are using department managed public lands. The department is not aware of any economic impacts of this regulation in the 18 other counties where it is currently in effect. The department does not anticipate any economic impact as a result of extending this regulation to Columbia County.
Contact Person
Safety and Professional Services
This statement of scope was approved by the governor on January 4, 2013.
Rule No.
Chapters
SPS 303,
307,
308,
310,
314,
316,
318,
320,
326,
330,
332,
333,
334,
340,
341,
343,
345,
347,
360,
361,
382,
383,
384,
385,
386,
387,
390 and
391.
Relating to
Administrative processes and procedures utilized by the industry services division.
Rule Type
Permanent.
Finding/Nature of Emergency (Emergency Rule Only)
Not applicable.
Detailed Description of the Objective of the Proposed Rule
