Explanation of agency authority:
Section 15.08 (5) (b), Stats., provides examining boards, “shall promulgate rules for its own guidance and for the guidance of the trade or profession to which it pertains. . .”
Section 227.11 (2) (a), Stats., sets forth the parameters of an agency’s rule-making authority, stating an agency, “may promulgate rules interpreting provisions of any statute enforced or administered by the agency. . .but a rule is not valid if the rule exceeds the bounds of correct interpretation.”
Section 448.05 (2) (c), Stats., provides “[t]he board may promulgate rules specifying circumstances in which the board, in cases of hardship or in cases in which the applicant possesses a medical license issued by another jurisdiction, may grant a waiver from any requirement under par. (a) or (b). The board may grant such a waiver only in accordance with those rules.”
Section 448.40 (1), Stats., provides “[t]he board may promulgate rules to carry out the purposes of this subchapter, including rules requiring the completion of continuing education, professional development, and maintenance of certification or performance improvement or continuing medical education programs for renewal of a license to practice medicine and surgery.”
Related statute or rule:
None.
Plain language analysis:
The proposed rules update chs. Med 1 and 14 relating to licenses to practice medicine and surgery and biennial registration. The proposed rules better align with statute, reflect current practices, and provide a clearer regulatory landscape for applicants.
Current rules contain provisions relating to an open-book examination on statutes and rules governing the practice of medicine and surgery in Wisconsin. As the Board no longer requires an applicant for licensure to practice medicine and surgery to take the statutes and rules examination, the proposed rules remove all references to it.
2015 Wisconsin Act 269 removed a requirement that examinations for licensure to practice medicine and surgery be limited to those administered by national organizations. As a result, the Board is conducting an oral examination in lieu of the oral interview referenced in current rules. The proposed rules replace references to the oral interview with the oral examination, specify how the oral examination is administered, and update the criteria the Board may use to determine if an applicant is required to take the oral examination.
Current rules do not address the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination, commonly known as the COMLEX-USA. The proposed rules specify the Board requirements for the COMLEX-USA examination.
The proposed rules update the list of board-recognized accrediting agencies to include prominent accrediting agencies not listed in the current rules.
The proposed rules more explicitly refer to section 448.05 (2) (c) of the Wisconsin Statutes as the Board’s authority to grant waivers from the required 24 months of postgraduate training in programs accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education or the American Osteopathic Association in cases of hardship and for applicants who demonstrate substantially equivalent education and training.
Current rules indicate the Board administers and determines eligibility for the USMLE Step 3, which does not reflect current practices. In addition, the USMLE Step 2 is administered in 2 parts, which is not reflected in current rules. The proposed rules make revisions to reflect current practices.
The renewal date currently specified in ch. Med 14 does not match the statutory renewal date for a doctor of osteopathy. The proposed rules align the renewal dates for licensees with the dates provided by statute.
Summary of, and comparison with, existing or proposed federal regulation:
None.
Comparison with rules in adjacent states:
Illinois:
Rules of the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation address medical licensing, renewal, and restoration procedure (68 Ill. Adm. Code 1285.20 to 1285.140). The rules include provisions concerning licensure by examination (68 Ill. Adm. Code 1285.70), licensure by endorsement (68 Ill. Adm. Code 1285.80), and renewals (68 Ill. Adm. Code 1285.80).
Iowa:
Rules of the Iowa Board of Medicine address permanent physician licensure (653 IAC 9.1 to 9.20). The rules include provisions concerning licensure by examination (653 IAC 9.4), licensure by endorsement (653 IAC 9.5), and renewal of a permanent license (653 IAC 9.13).
Michigan:
Rules of the Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs address medical licensure (Mich Admin Code, R 338.2313 to R 338.2319). The rules include provisions concerning licensure by examination (Mich Admin Code, R 338.2316 and R 338.2317) and licensure by endorsement (Mich Admin Code, R 338.2318 and R 338.2319).
Minnesota:
Rules of the Minnesota Board of Medical Practice address licensure to practice medicine and surgery (Minnesota Rules, chapter 5600). The rules include provisions concerning license by examination (Minnesota Rules, Part 5600.0300 to 5600.0500), license by endorsement (Minnesota Rules, Part 5600.0700) and license renewal procedures (Minnesota Rules, Part 5600.0605).
Summary of factual data and analytical methodologies:
The proposed rules were developed by reviewing applicable statutory provisions in conjunction with current rules and obtaining input and feedback from the Medical Examining Board.
Analysis and supporting documents used to determine effect on small business or in preparation of economic impact analysis:
The proposed rules were posted for a period of 14 days to solicit public comment on economic impact, including how the proposed rules may affect businesses, local government units, and individuals. No comments were received.
Fiscal Estimate and Economic Impact Analysis:
The Fiscal Estimate and Economic Impact Analysis document is attached.
Effect on small business:
These proposed rules do not have an economic impact on small businesses, as defined in s. 227.114 (1), Stats. The Department’s Regulatory Review Coordinator may be contacted by email at Jeffrey.Weigand@wisconsin.gov, or by calling (608) 267-2435.
Agency contact person:
Dale Kleven, Administrative Rules Coordinator, Department of Safety and Professional Services, Division of Policy Development, 1400 East Washington Avenue, Room 151, P.O. Box 8366, Madison, Wisconsin 53708; telephone 608-261-4472; email at Dale2.Kleven@wisconsin.gov.
Place where comments are to be submitted and deadline for submission:
Comments may be submitted to Dale Kleven, Administrative Rules Coordinator, Department of Safety and Professional Services, Division of Policy Development, 1400 East Washington Avenue, Room 151, P.O. Box 8366, Madison, WI 53708-8935, or by email to Dale2.Kleven@wisconsin.gov. Comments must be received by 8:00 a.m. on October 19, 2016 to be included in the record of rule-making proceedings.
TEXT OF RULE
Section 1.   Med 1.01 is amended to read:
  Med 1.01 Authority and purpose. The rules in this chapter are adopted by the medical examining board pursuant to the authority delegated by ss. 15.08 (5), 227.11, 448.05 (2) (c), and 448.40, Stats., and govern application and examination for license to practice medicine and surgery under s. 448.04 (1) (a), Stats., (hereinafter “regular license”).
Section 2.   Med 1.015 (2m) is created to read:
  Med 1.015 (2m) “Regular license” means a license to practice medicine and surgery under s. 448.04 (1) (a), Stats.
Section 3.   Med 1.02 (2) and (3) (a), (b), and (c) are amended to read:
  Med 1.02 (2) Verified documentary evidence of graduation from a medical or osteopathic school approved by the board. The board recognizes as approved those medical or osteopathic schools recognized and approved accredited at the time of the applicant's graduation therefrom by the American osteopathic association Osteopathic Association, or the liaison committee on medical education Liaison Committee on Medical Education, or their successors. If an applicant is not a graduate of a medical school approved by the board, but is a graduate of a medical school recognized and listed as such by the world health organization of the united nations World Directory of Medical Schools or its predecessor the International Medical Education Directory, such applicant shall submit verified documentary evidence of graduation from such school and also verified documentary evidence of having passed the examinations conducted required by the educational council for foreign medical graduates Educational Council for Foreign Medical Graduates or successors, and shall also present for the board's inspection the originals thereof, and if such medical school requires either social service or internship or both of its graduates, and if the applicant has not completed either such required social service or internship or both, such applicant shall also submit verified documentary evidence of having completed a 12 month supervised clinical training program under the direction of a medical school approved by the board.
  (3) (a) Verification of satisfactory completion by the applicant of 24 months of postgraduate training in one or more programs accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, the American Osteopathic Association, or a successor organization; or documentary evidence that the applicant is currently enrolled in a postgraduate training program accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, or the American Osteopathic Association, or the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, or a successor organization and has received credit for 12 consecutive months of postgraduate training in that program and an unrestricted endorsement from the postgraduate training director that the applicant is expected to complete at least 24 months of postgraduate training.
  (b) If an applicant is a graduate of a foreign allopathic or osteopathic medical school, then the applicant must provide a verified certificate showing satisfactory completion of 24 months of postgraduate training in one or more programs accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, the American Osteopathic Association, the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, or a successor organization; or documentary evidence that the applicant is currently enrolled in a postgraduate training program accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, the American Osteopathic Association, the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, or a successor organization and has received credit for 12 consecutive months of postgraduate training in that program and an unrestricted endorsement from the postgraduate training director that the applicant is expected to complete at least 24 months of postgraduate training.
  (c) If the applicant is a graduate of a foreign allopathic or osteopathic medical school possesses a medical license issued by another jurisdiction and has not completed 24 months of postgraduate training approved by the board and is not currently enrolled in a postgraduate training program but the applicant has other professional experience which the applicant believes has given that applicant the education and training substantially equivalent to 24 months of postgraduate training, then the applicant may submit the documented education and training demonstrating substantially equivalent education and training. The board will review the documented education and training and may make further inquiry, including a personal interview of the applicant, as the board deems necessary to determine whether substantial equivalence in fact exists. The burden of proof of such equivalence shall lie upon the applicant. If the board finds that the documented education and training is substantially equivalent to the required training and experience the board may accept the experience in lieu of requiring the applicant to have completed 24 months of postgraduate training in a program approved by the board grant a waiver of the requirements under par. (a) or (b).
Loading...
Loading...
Links to Admin. Code and Statutes in this Register are to current versions, which may not be the version that was referred to in the original published document.