Sections 66.0615, 77.982 (2), 77.991, and 77.9951, Stats., apply the marketplace provisions in ch. 77, subchs. III and V, to the local exposition district taxes and state vehicle rental fees administered by the Department of Revenue. 4. Estimate of amount of time that state employees will spend developing the rule and of other resources necessary to develop the rule:
The department estimates it will take 40 hours to develop the rule.
5. List with description of all entities that may be affected by the proposed rule:
Entities that may be affected by the rule are:
Marketplace providers that have developed online sales platforms to efficiently manage sales, payments, and collection of sales tax on behalf of small businesses
Marketplace sellers, which are often small businesses, that use marketplace providers to facilitate their sales
Consignment shops and antique dealers that often sell used merchandise on behalf of others
Property managers that rent properties on behalf of property owners for periods of less than thirty days
Boat, recreational vehicle, and other property brokers that generally connect sellers with persons who are looking to buy the property6. Summary and preliminary comparison with any existing or proposed federal regulation that is intended to address the activities to be regulated by the proposed rule:
The following federal bills of the 116th Congress would in various ways pre-empt state taxation on remote sellers, including marketplaces, if enacted:
US H.R. 379 (2019): This measure would prohibit localities from imposing collection responsibilities on remote sellers and would place conditions on states before they could do so as well. Specifically, states would need to establish a uniform sales tax rate and centralized collections and could not require sellers to provide information on purchasers beyond ZIP codes and the amount of taxes collected from ZIP codes. It would also delay the ability of states to impose sales tax collection obligations on remote sellers until Jan. 1, 2020.
US S. 128 (2019): The Stop Taxing Our Potential Act is a recently reintroduced version of a failed measure in 2018 (SB 3180) which would undo the Wayfair decision by re-establishing a physical presence nexus requirement for state sales tax collection responsibilities. It goes on to define what does and does not constitute “physical presence.”7. Anticipated economic impact of implementing the rule (note if the rule is likely to have a significant economic impact on small businesses):
There is no anticipated economic impact as current law supersedes the current guidance provided in s. Tax 11.55. Contact Person: Jen Chadwick (608) 266-8253
Department Head Signature
Date Submitted
