States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance." The U.S. Department of Education has issued guidance through Dear Colleague Letters or other informal guidance over the years which established the federal agency's expectations for institutions of higher education that receive federal funding. The new federal regulations are the first to interpret this law with respect to addressing allegations of sexual misconduct and override any guidance provided in the previous Dear Colleague Letters or other informal guidance. Please see the Plain Language Analysis for further information related to the specific provisions under the new federal regulations.
Comparison with rules in adjacent states:
The new federal regulations require all universities that receive federal funding to comply with the regulations or risk losing federal funding. All universities that receive federal funding are required to revise policies and procedures to comply with the federal regulations.
Illinois
110 Ill. Comp. Stat. § 155 requires all higher education institutions in the state to “adopt a comprehensive policy concerning sexual violence, domestic violence, dating violence, and stalking consistent with governing federal and State law. The specific policy changes to comply with the new federal regulations were implemented at the university or university system level. For example, see § 1-111 of the University of Illinois Student Code and Sexual Misconduct policy of the University of Illinois Campus Administrative Manual.
Iowa
2.1(4)(M)(i) of the Board of Regents Policy Manual requires all regent institutions in the state to implement policies to address sexual harassment. The specific policy changes to comply with the new federal regulations were implemented at the university level. For example, see Interim Policy on Sexual Harassment and Sexual Misconduct in the University of Iowa Operations Manual.
Michigan
Michigan has implemented the policy changes to comply with the new federal regulations at the university system or university level. For example, see The University of Michigan Interim Policy on Sexual and Gender-Based Misconduct.
Minnesota
Minn. Stat. § 135A.15 requires all higher education institutions in the state to implement sexual harassment policies. The specific policy changes to comply with the new federal regulations were implemented at the university level. For example, see Sexual Harassment, Sexual Assault, Stalking and Relationship Violence and Conflict Resolution for Faculty, P&A, Civil Service, and Student Workers in the University of Minnesota Administrative Policies.
Summary of factual data and analytical methodologies:
Consulting with UW System and UW System institutions to determine how many Title IX cases are anticipated for this year, as well as the cost of advisors and hearing officers.
Analysis and supporting documents used to determine effect on small business:
UW System posted its Economic Impact Analysis and Fiscal Estimate on its website to make it available for comment. UW System also informed the UW System institutions that it had posted these documents. The documents remained posted on the website for 14 days from October 12, 2020 through October 26, 2020. No comments on the economic impact or fiscal estimate were received.
Fiscal Estimate:
See attached Economic Impact Analysis and Fiscal Estimate.
Effect on small business:
The new rule will not have an economic impact on small businesses. The new rule applies specifically to University of Wisconsin System institutions only.
Agency contact person:
Sarah Harebo
Title IX and Clery Administrator
University of Wisconsin System Administration
1848 Van Hise Hall, 1220 Linden Drive, Madison, Wisconsin 53706;
Telephone 608-262-6497;
email address: sharebo@uwsa.edu.
Public Comments:
The Board of Regents held a public hearing on November 30, 2020 preceded by a public comment period related to the final rule. During the comment periods, comments could be submitted to the agency in any of the following ways: (1) on the web at https://www.wisconsin.edu/regents/public-comment-form/ or adminrules.wisconsin.gov; (2) by email to compliance@uwsa.edu; (3) at the public hearing; or (4) by mail to Jess Lathrop, Executive Director, Office of the Board of Regents, 1860 Van Hise Hall, 1220 Linden Drive, Madison, Wisconsin.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TEXT OF RULE
Section 1. Chapter UWS 4(title) is amended to read:
UWS 4
PROCEDURES FOR FACULTY DISMISSAL AND FOR DISMISSAL AND DISCIPLINE IN TITLE IX CASES
Section 2. Subchapter I – General of Chapter UWS 4 [precedes UWS 4.01] is created to read:
UWS 4
SUBCHAPTER I
GENERAL
Section 3. UWS 4.01(1) is amended to read:
UWS 4.01Dismissal for cause.
(1)Any faculty member having tenure may be dismissed only by the board and only for just cause and only after due notice and hearing. Any faculty member having a probationary appointment may be dismissed prior to the end his/her the faculty member’s term of appointment only by the board and only for just cause and only after due notice and hearing. A decision not to renew a probationary appointment or not to grant tenure does not constitute a dismissal.
Section 4. UWS 4.01(3) is created to read:
(3) Faculty dismissal for cause and lesser discipline based on allegations of Title IX misconduct, as defined in s. UWS 4.11, shall be governed by ss. UWS 4.11 to UWS 4.24.
Section 5. UWS 4.015(intro.), (2), (3), and (4) are repealed and recreated to read:
UWS 4.015Definitions. In this chapter:
(2)“Complaint" means an allegation against a faculty member reported to an appropriate university official.
(3) “Consent” means words or overt actions by a person who is competent to give informed consent, indicating a freely given agreement to engage in sexual activity or other activity referenced in the definitions of sexual assault and sexual exploitation in this section. A person is unable to give consent if the person is in a state of incapacitation because of drugs, alcohol, physical or intellectual disability, or unconsciousness.
(4)“Consult" or “consulting" means thoroughly reviewing and discussing the relevant facts and discretionary issues.
Section 6. UWS 4.015(5) and (6) are amended to read:
(5)“Dating violence" means violence committed by an employee against another person with whom they are in a “dating relationship” as defined in s. 813.12 (1) (ag), Stats. a person who is or has been in a social relationship of a romantic or intimate nature with the complainant; and where the existence of such a relationship shall be determined based on a consideration of the following factors: the length of the relationship, the type of relationship, the frequency of interaction between the persons involved in the relationship.
(6)“Domestic violence" means conduct defined as “domestic abuse” in ss. 813.12 (1) (am) and 968.075, Stats. felony or misdemeanor crimes of violence committed by a current or former spouse or intimate partner of the complainant, by a person with whom the complainant shares a child in common, by a person who is cohabitating with or has cohabitated with the complainant as a spouse or intimate partner, by a person similarly situated to a spouse of the complainant under the domestic or family violence laws of Wisconsin, or by any other person against an adult or youth complainant who is protected from that person’s acts under the domestic or family violence laws of Wisconsin as per ss. 813.12(1)(am) and 968.075, Stats.
Section 7. UWS 4.015(6m) created to read:
(6m) “Incapacitation” means the state of being unable to physically or mentally make informed rational judgments and effectively communicate, and may include unconsciousness, sleep, or blackouts, and may result from the use of alcohol or other drugs. Where alcohol or other drugs are involved, evaluation of incapacitation requires an assessment of how the consumption of alcohol or drugs affects a person’s decision-making ability; awareness of consequences; ability to make informed, rational judgments; capacity to appreciate the nature and quality of the act; or level of consciousness. The assessment is based on objectively and reasonably apparent indications of incapacitation when viewed from the perspective of a sober, reasonable person.
Section 8. UWS 4.015(8) is repealed.
Loading...
Loading...
Links to Admin. Code and Statutes in this Register are to current versions, which may not be the version that was referred to in the original published document.