STATE OF WISCONSIN
DEPARTMENT OF MILITARY AFFAIRS
Elimination of Disaster or Emergency Declaration Requirement Disaster Fund Rule Chapter WEM 7 The Wisconsin Department of Military Affairs proposes to delete current section WEM 7.03 (1) (b) regarding eligibility criteria for disaster fund grants and renumber section WEM 7.03 (1) (c)-(f) to (b)-(e). Analysis Prepared by the Department of Military Affairs
1. Statute Interpreted:
2. Statutory Authority:
3. Explanation of Agency Authority:
Section 323.31, Stats., provides as follows: State disaster assistance. From the appropriations under s. 20.465 (3) (b) and (s), the adjutant general shall make payments to retail electric cooperatives, as defined in s. 16.957 (1) (t), to local governmental units, as defined in s. 19.42 (7u), and to federally recognized American Indian tribes and bands in this state for the damages and costs incurred as the result of a disaster if federal disaster assistance is not available for that disaster because the governor's request that the president declare the disaster a major disaster under 42 USC 5170 has been denied or because the disaster, as determined by the department of military affairs, does not meet the statewide or countywide per capita impact indicator under the public assistance program that is issued by the federal emergency management agency. To be eligible for a payment under this section, the retail electric cooperative, local governmental unit, or tribe or band shall pay 30 percent of the amount of the damages and costs resulting from the disaster. The department of military affairs shall promulgate rules establishing the application process and the criteria for determining eligibility for payments under this section. Section 227.11(2)(a), Stats., provides as follows: (2)
Rule-making authority is expressly conferred on an agency as follows;(a)
Each agency may promulgate rules interpreting the provisions of any statute enforced or administered by the agency, if the agency considers it necessary to effectuate the purpose of the statute, but a rule is not valid if the rule exceeds the bounds of correct interpretation. All of the following apply to the promulgation of a rule interpreting the provisions of a statute enforced or administered by the agency:4. Related Statutes or Rules:
None.
5. Plain Language Analysis:
Section 323.31 requires DMA to provide state disaster assistance payments to local governmental units when federal disaster assistance is not available, directing DMA to promulgate rules establishing the application process and the criteria for determining eligibility for payments under the statute. Section WEM 7.03(1) establishes disaster assistance funds eligibility criteria. One of the current criteria specifies that a local governmental unit must have declared a disaster or emergency within the period of the disaster, referred to as an “incident period.” That criterium is not required by s. 323.31 and, based on feedback from local governmental units, often cannot be met because the local governmental unit is busy during the period of the disaster responding to the disaster, working to save lives and preserve property. The proposed revisions to section WEM 7.03(1) remove from the eligibility criteria the requirement that a disaster or emergency be declared during the incident period and renumbers the remaining subparagraphs in section WEM 7.03(1) accordingly. 6. Summary of, and Comparison with, Existing or Proposed Federal Statutes and Regulations:
There are no existing or proposed federal regulations intended to address the activities to be regulated by the elimination of WEM 7.03(1)(b). 7. If Held, Summary of Comments Received During Preliminary Comment Period and at a Public Hearing on the Statement of Scope:
No such hearing was held.
8. Comparison with Similar Rules in Adjacent States:
While there are no existing or proposed federal regulations intended to address the specific activities to regulated by the elimination of WEM 7.09(1)(b), to be eligible for federal disaster funds under the Stafford Act, 42 U.S.C. ch. 68, the governor must "find" that a disaster has occurred before he/she can ask the president for a disaster declaration that would trigger availability of federal disaster relief funds. The request to the president must be made within 30 days of the incident. Illinois -
WEM did not find any administrative rules regarding state-funded disaster assistance programs for local governments that were tied to a local governmental unit disaster or emergency declaration.
Iowa -
Iowa does have an administrative rule that addresses general “financial assistance for disaster recovery” to local governments and others, but the rule addresses assistance tied to the issuance of a presidential disaster declaration. No rule governing state financial assistance to local governmental units upon a state or local disaster declaration was found.
Michigan -
Under Michigan’s administrative rules, local governments applying for disaster funds have to declare an emergency in a “timely manner.” Mich. Admin. Code R 30.53. No definition of “timely manner” and no other provision requiring that a disaster declaration be made during the duration of the disaster were found in the rules.
Minnesota -
WEM did not find any administrative rules regarding state-funded disaster assistance programs for local governments that were tied to a local governmental unit disaster or emergency declaration.
9. Summary of Factual Data and Analytical Methodologies Used and How Any Related Findings Support the Regulatory Approach Chosen:
When WEM reminded local jurisdictions that WEM 7.03(1)(b) requires the issuance of a disaster declaration within the incident period, it received numerous communications about the impact of the current requirement. The comments indicated that, when disaster strikes, local jurisdictions spend their time in the immediate response phase, assisting their citizens and protecting life and property from further damage. Many leaders of local jurisdictions wear multiple “hats” that require them to try to manage a disaster, while responding at the same time. Comments also indicated that incidents that are wind/tornadic related or “quick hitting” happen so fast that it is impossible for jurisdictions to declare an emergency within the incident period. This is especially true in small towns and rural areas of the state where an incident can cut off communications and infrastructure to making the timely declaration. This is also true if the incident occurs during the night hours, when the overall impact of the incident doesn’t become apparent until the daylight hours the next day, leaving the jurisdiction ineligible for disaster fund assistance if it was unable to declare a disaster during the incident timeframe.
10. Analysis and Supporting Documents Used to Determine the Effect on Small Business or in Preparation of an Economic Impact Report:
The proposed rule is not anticipated to have any effect on small business. Please see the accompanying Fiscal Estimate and Economic Impact Analysis.
11. Effect on Small Business (initial regulatory flexibility analysis):
The department expects no economic impact on small businesses directly related to these proposed rules. The proposed rule does not impose any compliance, service standards, or reporting requirements on small businesses.
