STATE OF WISCONSIN
DENTISTRY EXAMINING BOARD
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IN THE MATTER OF RULEMAKING   :   PROPOSED ORDER OF THE
PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE     :   DENTISTRY EXAMINING BOARD
DENTISTRY EXAMINING BOARD   :   ADOPTING RULES
            :   (CLEARINGHOUSE RULE )
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED ORDER
An order of the Dentistry Examining Board to amend DE 11.02 (3m) and (6g), relating to definitions.
Analysis prepared by the Department of Safety and Professional Services.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANALYSIS
Statutes interpreted: s. 447.02 (2) (b), Stats.
Statutory authority: ss. 15.08 (5) (b) and 447.02 (2) (b), Stats.
Explanation of agency authority:
15.08(5)(b): “Each Examining Board shall promulgate rules for its own guidance and for the guidance of the trade or profession to which it pertains, and define and enforce professional conduct and unethical practices not inconsistent with the law relating to the particular trade or profession.
447.02 (2) (b): “The Examining Board shall promulgate rules specifying the standards, conditions and any educational requirements that are in addition to the requirements specified in s. 447.04 (1) that must be met by a dentist to be permitted to induce general anesthesia or conscious sedation in connection with the practice of dentistry.
Related statute or rule: s. 447.04 (1), Stats.
Plain language analysis:
The Dentistry Examining Board has determined a need to modify the definition of “enteral”. The Board will also clarify other definitions as necessary to be consistent with American Dental Association guidelines and review other rule provisions to ensure clarity.
Summary of, and comparison with, existing or proposed federal regulation: None
Summary of public comments received on statement of scope and a description of how and to what extent those comments and feedback were taken into account in drafting the proposed rule: N/A
Comparison with rules in adjacent states:
Illinois: The Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation is responsible for the licensure and regulation of Dentists in Illinois, with input from the Illinois Board of Dentistry. The Illinois Board is also responsible for the promulgation of rules to implement certain sections of the Illinois Dental Practice Act. This Act contains requirements for dental practice, including dentistry done under anesthesia or sedation. [225 Illinois Complied Statutes ch. 25]
Iowa: The Iowa Dentistry Board is responsible for the licensure and regulation of Dentists in Iowa. Listed in the Iowa Administrative Code are the requirements for dental practice, including dentistry done under anesthesia or sedation. [650 Iowa Administrative Code ch. 29]
Michigan: The Michigan Board of Dentistry is responsible for the licensure and regulation of Dentists in Michigan. Act 368 Article 15 of the Michigan Compiled Laws includes the regulations for dentistry in Michigan, among several other occupations. These regulations include requirements for anesthesia and sedation dentistry. [Michigan Compiled Laws s. 333.166]
Minnesota: The Minnesota Board of Dentistry is responsible for the licensure and regulation of Dentists in Minnesota. Part 3100 of the Minnesota Administrative Code includes the regulations for dentistry in Minnesota, including the requirements for anesthesia and sedation dentistry. [Minnesota Administrative Rules part 3100.3600]
Summary of factual data and analytical methodologies:
The Board reviewed Wisconsin Administrative Code DE 11 and made updates to align section 11.02 with definitions for clinical terms provided by the American Dental Association.
Analysis and supporting documents used to determine effect on small business or in preparation of economic impact analysis:
The proposed rules were posted for a period of 14 days to solicit public comment on economic impact, including how the proposed rules may affect businesses, local government units, and individuals. No comments were received.
Fiscal Estimate and Economic Impact Analysis:
The Fiscal Estimate and Economic Impact Analysis is attached.
Effect on small business:
These proposed rules do not have an economic impact on small businesses, as defined in s. 227.114 (1), Stats. The Department’s Regulatory Review Coordinator may be contacted by email at Daniel.Hereth@wisconsin.gov, or by calling (608) 267-2435.
Loading...
Loading...
Links to Admin. Code and Statutes in this Register are to current versions, which may not be the version that was referred to in the original published document.