STATE OF WISCONSIN
OCCUPATIONAL THERAPISTS
AFFILIATED CREDENTIALING BOARD
IN THE MATTER OF RULEMAKING   :   ORDER OF THE
PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE     :   OCCUPATIONAL THERAPISTS
OCCUPATIONAL THERAPISTS     :   AFFILIATED CREDENTIALING
AFFILIATED CREDENTIALING     :   BOARD
BOARD           :   ADOPTING RULES
            : (CLEARINGHOUSE RULE 21-033)
ORDER
An order of the Occupational Therapists Affiliated Credentialing Board to amend OT 4.05 (1) and (2) and create ch. OT 6, relating to telehealth.
Analysis prepared by the Department of Safety and Professional Services.
ANALYSIS
Statutes interpreted: Section 448.965 (1) (c) and (2), Stats.
Statutory authority: Sections 15.085 (5) (b) and 448.965 (1) (c) and (2), Stats.
Explanation of agency authority:
Section 15.085 (5) (b), Stats., provides that an affiliated credentialing board, such as the Occupational Therapists Affiliated Credentialing Board, “[s]hall promulgate rules for its own guidance and for the guidance of the trade or profession to which it pertains, and define and enforce professional conduct and unethical practices not inconsistent with the law relating to the particular trade or profession.”
Section 448.965 (1) (c), Stats., provides the Occupational Therapists Affiliated Credentialing Board may promulgate rules that establish “[s]tandards of practice for occupational therapy, including a code of ethics and criteria for referral.”
Section 448.965 (2), Stats., provides “[t]he affiliated credentialing board may promulgate rules that define the scope of practice of occupational therapy or the scope of assisting in the practice of occupational therapy.”
Related statute or rule:
Chapter OT 5 establishes the standards of conduct for occupational therapists and occupational therapy assistants. As provided in the proposed rule, these standards of conduct apply regardless of whether occupational therapy services are provided utilizing a telehealth visit or an in-person visit.
2021 Wisconsin Act 121 added a definition to the statute for “Telehealth” and a requirement that if the Board is going to make rules on this subject, they must use the new definition from the statute.
Plain language analysis:
Current administrative rules of the Occupational Therapists Affiliated Credentialing Board do not address telehealth practice. The proposed rule updates s. OT 4.05 and creates a new chapter, ch. OT 6, to establish standards of practice, care, and conduct for providing occupational therapy services using a telehealth visit.
Summary of, and comparison with, existing or proposed federal regulation:
The Code of Federal Regulations administers Medicare, including coverage of telehealth services by Medicare Part B (42 CFR § 410.78). Although generally not covered by Medicare Part B, in April of 2020 the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services announced it was using its waiver authority to allow occupational therapists and occupational therapy assistants to perform telehealth services for Medicare beneficiaries. The waiver is retroactive to March 1, 2020, and will remain in effect for the remainder of the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency. The federal Medicare regulations do not restrict the Board’s authority to establish standards for the provision of occupational therapy services using telehealth.
Federal regulations also administer the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA). Specifically, the HIPAA Security Rule establishes national standards to protect individuals’ electronic personal health information that is created, received, used, or maintained by a covered entity. The Security Rule requires appropriate administrative, physical, and technical safeguards to ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and security of electronic protected health information. The Security Rule is located at 45 CFR Part 160 and Subparts A and C of Part 164. The proposed rule requires an occupational therapist or occupational therapy assistant who provides occupational therapy services using a telehealth visit to utilize technology that is secure and HIPAA-compliant. 
Summary of public comments received on statement of scope and a description of how and to what extent those comments and feedback were taken into account in drafting the proposed rule: N/A
Comparison with rules in adjacent states:
Illinois: The Illinois Statutes define “occupational therapy” to include occupational therapy services provided via technology or telecommunication methods, also known as telehealth, and provide that the standard of care is required to be the same whether a patient is seen in person, through telehealth, or other method of electronically enabled health care. (225 ILCS 75/2)
Iowa: Rules of the Professional Licensure Division of the Iowa Public Health Department provide the requirements for utilizing a telehealth visit to provide occupational therapy services. “Telehealth visit” is defined as the provision of occupational therapy services by a licensee to a patient using technology where the licensee and the patient are not at the same physical location for the occupational therapy session. (645 IAC 208.3)
Michigan: Michigan statutes and rules do not specifically address the provision of occupational therapy services using telehealth.
Minnesota: Minnesota statutes and rules do not specifically address the provision of occupational therapy services using telehealth.
Summary of factual data and analytical methodologies:
The proposed rules were developed by using the occupational therapy telehealth rules of the Professional Licensure Division of the Iowa Public Health Department (645 IAC 208.3) as a model and obtaining input and feedback from the Occupational Therapists Affiliated Credentialing Board.
Analysis and supporting documents used to determine effect on small business or in preparation of economic impact report:
The proposed rules were posted for a period of 14 days to solicit public comment on economic impact, including how the proposed rules may affect businesses, local government units, and individuals. No comments were received.
Fiscal Estimate and Economic Impact Analysis:
The Fiscal Estimate and Economic Impact Analysis is attached.
Effect on small business:
These proposed rules do not have an economic impact on small businesses, as defined in s. 227.114 (1), Stats. The Department’s Regulatory Review Coordinator may be contacted by email at Jennifer.Garrett@wisconsin.gov, or by calling (608) 266-6795.
Loading...
Loading...
Links to Admin. Code and Statutes in this Register are to current versions, which may not be the version that was referred to in the original published document.