NR 207.01 History
History: Cr.
Register, February, 1989, No. 398, eff. 3-1-89; am. (1),
Register, August, 1997, No. 500, eff. 9-1-97;
CR 17-002: am.
Register April 2018 No. 748, eff. 5-1-18.
NR 207.02
NR 207.02 Definitions. In addition to the definitions in
ch. NR 205, the following definitions apply to this chapter:
NR 207.02(1)
(1) “Assimilative capacity" means the difference between the water quality criterion for a substance identified in
ch. NR 102 or
105 and the existing level of that substance in a surface water.
NR 207.02(2)
(2) “Bioaccumulation factor" means the ratio of the concentration of a substance in an aquatic organism to the concentration of the substance in water to which the organism is exposed regardless of whether the concentration in the organism results solely from body contact with the water or from body contact plus ingestion of food contaminated with the substance, as determined under
ch. NR 105 and associated technical support documents.
NR 207.02(3)
(3) “Exceptional resource waters" means any surface water, or portion thereof, in
s. NR 102.11.
NR 207.02(4)
(4) “Fish and aquatic life water" means any surface water, or portion thereof, in
s. NR 102.13.
NR 207.02(6)(a)(a) “Increased discharge" means any change in concentration, level or loading of a substance which would exceed an effluent limitation specified in a current WPDES permit.
NR 207.02(6)(b)
(b) Except as provided in
par. (c), increased discharge does not include the initial imposition of effluent limitations for substances which were in a previous discharge but which had not been limited in a prior or the current permit unless the initial imposition of effluent limitations occurs due to a changed discharge location, other than a change in location necessary to accommodate a mixing zone as provided for in
ch. NR 106.
NR 207.02(6)(c)
(c) For discharges of bioaccumulative chemicals of concern (BCCs), defined in
s. NR 105.03 (9), to the Great Lakes system, increased discharge means:
NR 207.02(6)(c)2.
2. The initial imposition of an effluent limitation for a BCC that occurs due to an actual or expected increase in loading of the BCC; and
NR 207.02(6)(c)3.
3. Any actual or expected increase in loading of a BCC which is caused by or will be caused by a facility expansion, a process modification, or the connection to an existing public or private wastewater treatment system of a substantial source of untreated or pretreated effluent containing BCCs, and which requires notification to the department pursuant to
s. NR 205.07 (2) (a) or
(3) (c) or
(d). Under this subdivision, increased discharge does not include any increase in the loading of BCCs that is caused by normal operational variability, changes in intake pollutants or increasing the rate or hours of production within the existing production capacity. Normal operational variability includes, for POTWs, any additional wastewater volume within the existing capacity of the POTW from commercial, industrial or residential growth which do not normally contribute substantial quantities of BCCs to the POTW's wastewater flow.
NR 207.02(7)
(7) “Loading" means the concentration of a substance within a discharge multiplied by the flow of that discharge.
NR 207.02(8)
(8) “New discharge" means any point source which has not received a WPDES permit from the department prior to March 1, 1989.
NR 207.02(9)
(9) “Outstanding resource waters" means any surface water, or portion thereof, in
s. NR 102.10.
NR 207.02(10)
(10) “Receiving water" means the portion of a surface water which will be affected by a proposed new or increased discharge.
NR 207.02(11)
(11) “Significant lowering of water quality" means a lowering of water quality determined to be significant under
s. NR 207.05.
NR 207.02(12)
(12) “Surface water" means all waters of the state, as designated in s.
281.01 (18), Stats., except groundwater.
NR 207.02(13)
(13) “Water quality based effluent limitations" means effluent limitations established by the department pursuant to s.
283.13 (5), Stats.
NR 207.02 History
History: Cr.
Register, February, 1989, No. 398, eff. 3-1-89;
correction in (13) made under s. 13.93 (2m) (b) 7., Stats.,
Register, March, 1997, No. 495; am. (5), (6) (b) and (12), cr. (6) (c),
Register, August, 1997, No. 500, eff. 9-1-97; correction in (12) made under s. 35.17, Stats., Register Aril 2018 No. 748.
NR 207.03
NR 207.03 Antidegradation evaluation procedure. NR 207.03(1)(1)
General. When the department promulgates a less stringent criterion for a non-BCC pursuant to
s. NR 105.02 (2) or revises a secondary value for a non-BCC due to an updated scientific database, any subsequent requests for increased permit limitations based on the revised criterion or secondary value will not be subject to the requirements of this chapter if the following occur:
NR 207.03(1)(a)
(a) The department determines that the increased limitations based on the changed criterion or secondary values will still maintain and protect the existing designated uses, and
NR 207.03(1)(b)
(b) The receiving water is not an outstanding resource water, an exceptional resource water subject to the requirements of
sub. (4) (b), or a water for which
sub. (7) (c) applies.
NR 207.03(2)
(2) Dissolved-based metal limitations. If a person requests an increased limitation based on a dissolved metals criterion pursuant to
s. NR 106.07 (7) (b), the request for an increased limitation will not be subject to the requirements of this chapter if the following occur:
NR 207.03(2)(a)
(a) The department determines that the increase limitations based on the changed criterion or secondary value will still maintain and protect the existing designated uses, and
NR 207.03(2)(b)
(b) The receiving water is not an outstanding resource water, an exceptional resource water subject to the requirements of
sub. (4) (b), or a water for which
sub. (7) (c) applies.
NR 207.03(3)
(3) Outstanding resource waters. If the department determines that a WPDES permit application proposes a new or increased discharge to outstanding resource waters, effluent limitations for substances in the new or increased portion of the discharge will be set equal to the background levels of these substances, upstream of, or adjacent to, the discharge site unless it is determined that for Great Lakes system waters, such limitations would result in significant lowering of water quality under
s. NR 207.05 (4) (b). Effluent limitations for those substances shall be determined in accordance with
s. NR 207.04.
NR 207.03(4)
(4) Exceptional resource waters. If the department determines that a WPDES permit application proposes a new or increased discharge to exceptional resource waters, it shall review the application as follows:
NR 207.03(4)(a)
(a) For a proposed new discharge which is needed to prevent or correct either an existing surface or groundwater contamination situation, or a public health problem, water quality based effluent limitations shall be determined in accordance with
sub. (6).
NR 207.03(4)(b)
(b) For a proposed new discharge which is not needed to prevent or correct either an existing surface or groundwater contamination situation, or a public health problem, water quality based effluent limitations shall be set equal to the existing levels of these substances upstream of, or adjacent to, the discharge site.
NR 207.03(4)(c)
(c) For a proposed increased discharge, water quality based effluent limitations for the increased portion of the discharge shall be determined in accordance with
sub. (6).
NR 207.03(4)(d)
(d) Whenever effluent limitations determined in accordance with
pars. (a) to
(c) would result in any substance in the proposed new or increased discharge causing significant lowering of water quality as determined under
s. NR 207.05 (4) (b), effluent limitations shall be determined in accordance with
s. NR 207.04.
NR 207.03(5)
(5) Great lakes system. If the department determines that a WPDES permit applicant proposes a new or increased discharge to the Great Lakes system, it shall establish effluent limitations using the procedures in
ss. NR 207.04 and
207.05; except for proposed new or increased discharges of the pollutants identified in
s. NR 102.12 (3) to waters of the Lake Superior basin. No new or increased discharge of those pollutants identified in
s. NR 102.12 (3) may be permitted unless the applicant certifies at time of application that the proposed new or increased discharge is necessary after utilizing best technology in process or control using commercially available techniques with demonstrated performance levels for similar applications.
NR 207.03(6)
(6) Fish and aquatic life waters. If the department determines that a WPDES permit application proposes a new or increased discharge to fish and aquatic life waters, it shall establish effluent limitations using the procedures in
ss. NR 207.04 and
207.05.
NR 207.03(7)
(7) Waters listed in tables 3 through 8 in ss. NR 104.05 to 104.10. If the department determines that a WPDES permit application proposes a new or increased discharge to waters listed in tables 3 through 8 in
ss. NR 104.05 to
104.10, the following procedure shall apply:
NR 207.03(7)(a)
(a) The person proposing a new or increased discharge shall demonstrate to the department whether or not the discharge will result in:
NR 207.03(7)(a)1.
1. Significant lowering of water quality in downstream fish and aquatic life or Great Lakes system waters as determined under
s. NR 207.05;
NR 207.03(7)(a)2.
2. Lowering of water quality of downstream outstanding resource waters;
NR 207.03(7)(a)3.
3. Lowering of water quality of downstream exceptional resource waters, except for a proposed increased discharge or a proposed new discharge necessary to correct or prevent an existing surface or groundwater contamination situation or a public health problem.
NR 207.03(7)(b)1.
1. A proposed increased discharge would result in significant lowering of water quality of downstream fish and aquatic life waters, exceptional resource waters, or Great Lakes system waters; or
NR 207.03(7)(b)2.
2. A proposed new discharge which is necessary to correct or prevent an existing surface or groundwater contamination situation or a public health problem and would result in a significant lowering of downstream exceptional resource waters.
NR 207.03(7)(c)
(c) Effluent limitations shall be set to prevent a lowering of water quality under the following circumstances:
NR 207.03(7)(c)1.
1. The proposed new or increased discharge would result in a lowering of water quality to downstream outstanding resource waters; or
NR 207.03(7)(c)2.
2. A proposed new discharge not subject to
par. (b) 2. would result in a lowering of water quality to downstream exceptional resource waters.
NR 207.03(7)(d)
(d) The remaining provisions of this chapter do not apply to situations relating to proposed new or increased discharges to waters listed in tables 3 through 8 in
ss. NR 104.05 to
104.10 not covered by
pars. (a) to
(c).
NR 207.03(8)
(8) Noncontact cooling water. The requirements of
subs. (1) and
(2) apply to new or increased discharges of noncontact cooling water. The requirements of
subs. (3) to
(5) do not apply to new or increased discharges of noncontact cooling water which meet the following criteria:
NR 207.03(8)(a)
(a) The discharge contains no additives other than those necessary to provide a safe drinking water supply or those similar in type and amount to substances typically added to a public drinking water supply.
NR 207.03(8)(c)
(c) The department has determined that the discharge does not contain concentrations of substances other than additives specified in
par. (a) which will result in violations of water quality criteria established under
ch. NR 105 or if the department has determined that the existing concentration of a toxic substance in the receiving water is greater than the water quality criterion in
ch. NR 105 that the source of the water supply for the discharge is the same receiving water.
NR 207.03(8)(d)
(d) The discharge does not contain groundwater which is withdrawn from a location because of noncompliance with the standards in
ch. NR 140.
NR 207.03(9)
(9) Permit conditions and reporting requirements. All WPDES permit applications for new or increased discharges reviewed under the procedures established in this chapter shall be subject to the permit conditions and reporting requirements in
chs. NR 200 to
297.
NR 207.03 History
History: Cr.
Register, February, 1989, No. 398, eff. 3-1-89; renum. (1) to (7) to be (3) to (9) and am. (3), (4) (a) and (c), cr. (1) and (2),
Register, August, 1997, No. 500, eff. 9-1-97;
CR 05-089: am. (5)
Register July 2006 No. 607, eff. 8-1-06.
NR 207.04
NR 207.04 Fish and aquatic life waters. NR 207.04(1)
(1)
Application information. Persons proposing a new or increased discharge to fish and aquatic life waters shall provide documentation for the following:
NR 207.04(1)(a)
(a) An assessment of existing treatment capability which demonstrates:
NR 207.04(1)(a)1.a.
a. The permittee's discharge equals or exceeds 85% of any mass permit limitation.
NR 207.04(1)(a)1.b.
b. The permittee's monthly average discharge equals or exceeds 85% of a monthly average effluent limitation established in a permit for 3 consecutive months;
NR 207.04(1)(a)1.c.
c. The permittee's weekly average discharge equals or exceeds 85% of a weekly average effluent limitation established in a permit for 4 consecutive weeks.
NR 207.04(1)(a)1.d.
d. The permittee's daily discharge equals or exceeds 85% of a daily maximum effluent limitation established in a permit 5 or more times during a calendar year;
NR 207.04(1)(a)1.e.
e. There are exceedances of any daily maximum, weekly average or monthly average effluent limitation for a parameter in a permit; or
NR 207.04(1)(a)1.f.
f. A municipal permittee's compliance maintenance annual report point total, as required in
ch. NR 208, is
70 or greater;
NR 207.04(1)(a)3.
3. The treatment facilities were operated and maintained as efficiently as possible; and
NR 207.04(1)(b)
(b) Effluent quality data and background water quality data for indicator parameters so a determination will be made on whether or not a significant lowering of water quality will occur under
s. NR 207.05.
NR 207.04(1)(c)
(c) If the proposed new or increased discharge is found to result in any lowering of water quality or if the person proposing the new or increased discharge has waived the procedure in
s. NR 207.05 (2) (a) to
(d), the permit applicant shall demonstrate the following:
NR 207.04(1)(c)1.
1. The proposed new or increased discharge will accommodate important economic or social development in any of the following ways:
NR 207.04(1)(c)1.e.
e. There will be industrial, commercial or residential growth in the community.
NR 207.04(1)(c)1.f.
f. The discharger will be providing economic or social benefit to the community.
NR 207.04(1)(c)1.g.
g. The discharger will be correcting an environmental or public health problem.
NR 207.04(1)(d)
(d) If the new or increased discharge is found to result in a significant lowering of water quality or if the person proposing the new or increased discharge has waived the procedure in
s. NR 207.05 (2) (a) to
(d), the permit applicant shall demonstrate the following:
NR 207.04(1)(d)1.
1. The proposed significant lowering of water quality cannot be prevented in a cost effective manner by the following types of pollution control alternatives:
NR 207.04(1)(d)1.c.
c. Use of other applicable wastewater treatment process or operational changes.
NR 207.04(1)(d)2.
2. For proposals involving the expansion of a wastewater treatment plant, whether or not there are alternative wastewater treatment technologies which:
NR 207.04(1)(d)2.b.
b. Have capital costs less than 110% of the capital costs (or present worth less than 115% of the related total present worth value) for alternatives achieving the water quality based effluent limitations or the effluent limitations determined pursuant to
chs. NR 200 to
297, as appropriate, and
