LRBa2405/1
MGG:med:jf
2011 - 2012 LEGISLATURE
ASSEMBLY AMENDMENT 2,
TO 2011 SENATE BILL 368
February 21, 2012 - Offered by Representatives Danou, Barca, Molepske Jr,
Bernard Schaber and
Clark.
SB368-AA2,1,8
64. Page 24, line 13: after "wetland." insert "As part of the preapplication
7meeting, the department shall identify and establish the scope of the analysis of
8practicable alternatives that will be required.".
SB368-AA2,2,2
18. Page 24 line 20: after "consequences." insert "The application shall also
2include a description of the proposed mitigation method as required under sub. (3r)".
SB368-AA2,2,15
39. Page 27, line 17: after "sub. (3m) (b)." insert "The department shall limit the
4scope of the practicable alternatives that will be considered and shall determine
5which possible alternatives are practicable in a manner that is consistent with the
6memorandum of understanding entered into between the U.S. environmental
7protection agency and the U.S. army corps of engineers relating to the level of
8analysis required for evaluating compliance with
1333 USC 1344b that is in effect
9on the effective date of this paragraph .... [LRB inserts date]. In order for an
10alternative that would be implemented at a site that is not owned by the applicant
11at the time the application is submitted and that would be located more than
12one-half mile from the discharge to be considered practicable, the applicant must be
13reasonably able to acquire, expand into, or otherwise manage the site in a manner
14that will fulfill the basic purpose of the proposed discharge or the proposed project
15of which the proposed discharge would be a part.".
SB368-AA2,3,2
22"(am)
Standards for issuing permits. The department shall make a finding that
23a proposed project causing a discharge is in compliance with water quality standards
1and that a wetland individual permit may be issued if the department determines
2that all of the following requirements are met:
SB368-AA2,3,53
1. The proposed project represents the least environmentally damaging
4practicable alternative taking into consideration practicable alternatives that avoid
5wetland impacts.
SB368-AA2,3,76
2. All practicable measures to minimize the adverse impacts to wetland
7functional values will be taken.
SB368-AA2,3,108
3. The proposed project will not result in significant adverse impact to wetland
9functional values, in significant adverse impact to water quality, or in other
10significant adverse environmental consequences.".
SB368-AA2,3,13
12"(b)
Factors to be used. In making a determination that the requirement under
13par. (am) 3. is met, the department shall consider all of the following factors:".
SB368-AA2,3,17
15"4m. The impact that any mitigation required under sub. (3r) will cause to the
16functional values of the wetlands that are located in the watershed in which the
17discharge will occur.
SB368-AA2,3,1918
5m. The net positive or negative environmental impact of the proposed project
19on the watershed in which the discharge will occur.".
SB368-AA2,3,24
2118. Page 31, line 18: after "discharge." insert "The ratios shall include
22incentives for mitigation that will be located in the same watershed in which the
23discharge will occur or that will replace the wetland types and functions that are
24most needed in the watershed in which the discharge will occur.".
SB368-AA2,4,3
2"
Section 140m. 281.37 (5) (title) of the statutes is renumbered 281.36 (14)
3(title).".
SB368-AA2,4,8
8"
Section 141m. 281.36 (14) (b) and (c) of the statutes are created to read:
SB368-AA2,4,99
281.36
(14) (b) The report under par. (a) shall include all of the following:
SB368-AA2,4,1110
1. The number of preapplication meetings held during the previous 2-year
11period and a report on the results of these meetings.
SB368-AA2,4,1412
2. A summary of the types of discharges that were approved during the
13previous 2-year period. The summary shall specify the locations of the discharges
14and the types of projects involved.
SB368-AA2,4,1715
3. A summary of the mitigation performed during the previous 2-year period.
16The summary shall include a description of mitigation projects approved,
17accomplished, and monitored during the 2-year period.
SB368-AA2,4,1918
4. The number of wetland individual permits denied in the previous 2-year
19period and a summary of the reasons for the denials.
SB368-AA2,4,2220
5. An accounting covering the previous 2-year period showing the amounts
21credited to, the amounts appropriated from, and the balance in the appropriation
22under s. 20.370 (4) (bm).
SB368-AA2,5,2
1(c) The information under par. (b) 1. to 5. will be required beginning with the
2report that is due no later than January 31, 2015.".