Read a second time.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate Bill 494?
Adopted.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 2 to Senate Bill 494?
Adopted.
Senate amendment 1 to Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 494 offered by Senators Wineke, Darling, Huelsman, Petak, Welch, Drzewiecki, C. Potter, Grobschmidt, Shibilski and Burke.
Senate amendment 2 to Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 494 offered by Senators Wineke, Darling, Burke, Huelsman, Petak, Welch, Drzewiecki, Shibilski, C. Potter and Grobschmidt.
Senate amendment 3 to Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 494 offered by Senator Adelman.
Senate amendment 4 to Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 494 offered by Senators Darling, Petak, Welch, Drzewiecki, Shibilski, Burke, Wineke, C. Potter and Grobschmidt.
Senate amendment 5 to Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 494 offered by Senators Darling, Burke, Huelsman, Petak, Welch, Drzewiecki, Shibilski, Wineke, C. Potter and Grobschmidt.
Senate amendment 6 to Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 494 offered by Senators Darling, Huelsman, Petak, Welch, Drzewiecki, Wineke, C. Potter, Grobschmidt, Shibilski and Burke.
Senator Darling, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate amendment 6 to Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 494 be withdrawn and returned to author.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 494?
Adopted.
Senator Darling, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate amendment 5 to Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 494 be withdrawn and returned to author.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 2 to Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 494?
Adopted.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 3 to Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 494?
Senator Darling moved rejection of Senate amendment 3 to Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 494.
The question was: Rejection of Senate amendment 3 to Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 494?
Rejected.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 4 to Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 494?
Adopted.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 494?
Adopted.
Senate amendment 4 to Senate Bill 494 offered by Senator Adelman.
Senate amendment 5 to Senate Bill 494 offered by Senator Adelman.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 4 to Senate Bill 494?
Senator Darling moved rejection of Senate amendment 4 to Senate Bill 494.
S628
The question was: Rejection of Senate amendment 4 to
Senate Bill 494?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 19; noes, 14; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Andrea, Breske, Buettner, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Grobschmidt, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Petak, Rosenzweig, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 19.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Jauch, Moen, Moore, C. Potter, Risser, Rude, Shibilski and Wineke - 14.
Absent or not voting - None.
Rejected.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 5 to Senate Bill 494?
Senator Darling moved rejection of Senate amendment 5 to Senate Bill 494.
__________________
Senator Moen, with unanimous consent, asked that the Senate recess until 2:32 P.M..
2:21 P.M.
__________________
2:32 P.M.
The Senate reconvened.
Senator Rude in the chair.
The question was: Rejection of Senate amendment 5 to Senate Bill 494?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 20; noes, 13; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Breske, Buettner, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, George, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Petak, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Shibilski, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 20.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Andrea, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, Grobschmidt, Jauch, Moen, Moore, C. Potter, Risser and Wineke - 13.
Absent or not voting - None.
Rejected.
Senate amendment 6 to Senate Bill 494 offered by Senators Darling, Burke, Huelsman, Petak, Welch, Drzewiecki, Shibilski, Wineke, C. Potter and Grobschmidt.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 6 to Senate Bill 494?
Adopted.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Weeden, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Senate Bill 494
Read a third time.
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 32; noes, 1; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Adelman, Andrea, Breske, Buettner, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Cowles, Darling, Decker, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, George, Grobschmidt, Huelsman, Jauch, A. Lasee, Moen, Moore, Panzer, Petak, C. Potter, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Shibilski, Weeden, Welch, Wineke and Zien - 32.
Noes - Senator Risser - 1.
Absent or not voting - None.
Passed.
Senate Bill 402
Relating to: legislative oversight of the investment board, structure and composition of the investment board, regulation of certain investments by the investment board, granting rule-making authority and making an appropriation.
Read.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 1 to Senate Bill 402 be concurred in?
Senator Chvala moved nonconcurrence in Assembly amendment 1 to Senate Bill 402.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 1 to Senate Bill 402 be nonconcurred in?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 16; noes, 17; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Adelman, Andrea, Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Grobschmidt, Jauch, Moen, Moore, C. Potter, Risser, Shibilski and Wineke - 16.
Noes - Senators Buettner, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Petak, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 17.
Absent or not voting - None.
Nonconcurrence refused.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 1 to Senate Bill 402 be concurred in?
Concurred in.
Senate amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 2 to Senate Bill 402 offered by Senator Wineke.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 2 to Senate Bill 402?
Senator Rosenzweig raised the point of order that Senate amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 2 to Senate Bill 402 is not germane.
The Chair ruled the point well taken.
Senator Wineke moved nonconcurrence in Assembly amendment 2 to Senate Bill 402.
__________________
3:30 P.M.
Senator Huelsmand in the chair.
The question was: Shall Assembly amendment 2 to Senate Bill 402 be nonconcurred in?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 15; noes, 18; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Adelman, Andrea, Breske, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, Grobschmidt, Jauch, Moen, Moore, C. Potter, Risser, Shibilski and Wineke - 15.
Noes - Senators Buettner, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, George, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Petak, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 18.
