Senator Weeden, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate Bill 467 be referred to the Joint Committee on Finance.
Senate Bill 478
Relating to: limitation of civil liability related to equine activities.
Read a second time.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate Bill 478?
Adopted.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 2 to Senate Bill 478?
Adopted.
Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 478 offered by Senator Adelman.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 478?
Senator Zien moved rejection of Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 478.
The question was: Rejection of Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 478?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 22; noes, 11; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Andrea, Breske, Buettner, Clausing, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, Jauch, A. Lasee, Panzer, Petak, C. Potter, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 22.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Burke, Chvala, Decker, George, Grobschmidt, Moen, Moore, Risser, Shibilski and Wineke - 11.
Absent or not voting - None.
Rejected.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Ellis, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Senator Ellis asked that he be excused from voting under Senate Rule 73.
Senate Bill 478
Read a third time.
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 22; noes, 10; absent or not voting, 1; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Andrea, Breske, Buettner, Clausing, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Huelsman, Jauch, A. Lasee, Panzer, Petak, C. Potter, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Shibilski, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 22.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Burke, Chvala, Decker, George, Grobschmidt, Moen, Moore, Risser and Wineke - 10.
Absent or not voting - Senator Ellis - 1.
Passed.
Senate Bill 494
Relating to: state banking law, the definition of public depository, residential and variable interest rate loans, granting rule-making authority and providing a penalty.
Read a second time.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate Bill 494?
Adopted.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 2 to Senate Bill 494?
Adopted.
Senate amendment 1 to Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 494 offered by Senators Wineke, Darling, Huelsman, Petak, Welch, Drzewiecki, C. Potter, Grobschmidt, Shibilski and Burke.
Senate amendment 2 to Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 494 offered by Senators Wineke, Darling, Burke, Huelsman, Petak, Welch, Drzewiecki, Shibilski, C. Potter and Grobschmidt.
Senate amendment 3 to Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 494 offered by Senator Adelman.
Senate amendment 4 to Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 494 offered by Senators Darling, Petak, Welch, Drzewiecki, Shibilski, Burke, Wineke, C. Potter and Grobschmidt.
Senate amendment 5 to Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 494 offered by Senators Darling, Burke, Huelsman, Petak, Welch, Drzewiecki, Shibilski, Wineke, C. Potter and Grobschmidt.
Senate amendment 6 to Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 494 offered by Senators Darling, Huelsman, Petak, Welch, Drzewiecki, Wineke, C. Potter, Grobschmidt, Shibilski and Burke.
Senator Darling, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate amendment 6 to Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 494 be withdrawn and returned to author.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 1 to Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 494?
Adopted.
Senator Darling, with unanimous consent, asked that Senate amendment 5 to Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 494 be withdrawn and returned to author.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 2 to Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 494?
Adopted.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 3 to Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 494?
Senator Darling moved rejection of Senate amendment 3 to Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 494.
The question was: Rejection of Senate amendment 3 to Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 494?
Rejected.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 4 to Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 494?
Adopted.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 3 to Senate Bill 494?
Adopted.
Senate amendment 4 to Senate Bill 494 offered by Senator Adelman.
Senate amendment 5 to Senate Bill 494 offered by Senator Adelman.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 4 to Senate Bill 494?
Senator Darling moved rejection of Senate amendment 4 to Senate Bill 494.
S628 The question was: Rejection of Senate amendment 4 to Senate Bill 494?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 19; noes, 14; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Andrea, Breske, Buettner, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, Grobschmidt, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Petak, Rosenzweig, Schultz, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 19.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, George, Jauch, Moen, Moore, C. Potter, Risser, Rude, Shibilski and Wineke - 14.
Absent or not voting - None.
Rejected.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 5 to Senate Bill 494?
Senator Darling moved rejection of Senate amendment 5 to Senate Bill 494.
__________________
Senator Moen, with unanimous consent, asked that the Senate recess until 2:32 P.M..
2:21 P.M.
__________________
RECESS
2:32 P.M.
The Senate reconvened.
Senator Rude in the chair.
The question was: Rejection of Senate amendment 5 to Senate Bill 494?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 20; noes, 13; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Breske, Buettner, Cowles, Darling, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, George, Huelsman, A. Lasee, Panzer, Petak, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Shibilski, Weeden, Welch and Zien - 20.
Noes - Senators Adelman, Andrea, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Decker, Grobschmidt, Jauch, Moen, Moore, C. Potter, Risser and Wineke - 13.
Absent or not voting - None.
Rejected.
Senate amendment 6 to Senate Bill 494 offered by Senators Darling, Burke, Huelsman, Petak, Welch, Drzewiecki, Shibilski, Wineke, C. Potter and Grobschmidt.
The question was: Adoption of Senate amendment 6 to Senate Bill 494?
Adopted.
Ordered to a third reading.
Senator Weeden, with unanimous consent, asked that the bill be considered for final action at this time.
Senate Bill 494
Read a third time.
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: ayes, 32; noes, 1; absent or not voting, 0; as follows:
Ayes - Senators Adelman, Andrea, Breske, Buettner, Burke, Chvala, Clausing, Cowles, Darling, Decker, Drzewiecki, Ellis, Farrow, Fitzgerald, George, Grobschmidt, Huelsman, Jauch, A. Lasee, Moen, Moore, Panzer, Petak, C. Potter, Rosenzweig, Rude, Schultz, Shibilski, Weeden, Welch, Wineke and Zien - 32.
Loading...
Loading...