• Clarify Rule. Amend the example following s.
Tax 11.68 (3) (b), to remove “hot" from “hot water heater" in the example.
• Clarify Rule. Amend s.
Tax 11.68 (6) (d), to include “underground wiring" to the list of items in the rule to make it clear that the underground wiring becomes part of the realty.
• Clarify Rule. Amend s.
Tax 11.68 (7) (a) 2, by removing “satellite dishes" from items listed. Create additional item number to be inserted in between s.
Tax 11.68 (7) (a) 6. &
7. that clarifies tax treatment for both satellite dishes mounted to concrete foundation and the compact roof mounted satellite dishes that are installed in a residence or a business. Renumber remaining items accordingly.
• Clarify Rule. Amend s.
Tax 11.68 (11) (c), to clarify that the items listed only retain their character as tangible personal property for repair, service, alteration, fitting, cleaning, painting, coating, towing, inspection, and maintenance.
f. Correct Error. Amend s.
Tax 11.945 (2) (intro.), to remove "telecommunications message services" from the list, since "telecommunications message services" are sourced under the general sourcing hierarchy.
g. Fertilizer Blending, Feed Milling, and Grain Drying Machinery and Equipment. Reflect
2013 Wisconsin Act 324, which creates exemptions in s.
77.54 (6) (am) 4. and
5., Stats., for equipment used in a fertilizer blending, feed milling, or grain drying operation and building materials used in constructing or repairing certain holding structures used in a fertilizer blending, feed milling, or grain drying operation. This requires the creation of s.
Tax 11.68 (4) (h). It will also be useful to (1) create a new section to explain the exemption, and (2) add examples to s.
Tax 11.68 (6) and
(7).
h. Grocers' Guidelist.
• Clarify Rule. Amend s.
Tax 11.51 (2) (a), to include potato chips that are chocolate covered in the taxable list, unless they contain flour.
• Clarify Rule. Amend s.
Tax 11.51 (2) (b), to clarify “chips, potato, corn and similar items" and “potato chips" are exempt unless they are chocolate covered and do not contain flour as provided in par. (a).
• Clarify Rule. Amend s.
Tax 11.51 (2) (b), to clarify “ice cream in cones" is exempt only when prepackaged by someone other than the retailer.
j. Radio and Television Broadcasting Equipment. Reflect
2013 Wisconsin Act 346, which creates an exemption in s.
77.54 (23n), Stats., for property used by certain commercial radio and television stations. This requires an update to s.
Tax 11.63.
3. Description of Existing Policies Relevant to the Rule, New Policies Proposed to be Included in the Rule, and an Analysis of Policy Alternatives
Existing policies are as set forth in ch.
Tax 11. New policy is being proposed to reflect the law changes described above. If the rules are not changed, they will not correctly and clearly reflect current law or current department policy.
4. Detailed Explanation of Statutory Authority for the Rule (Including the Statutory Citation and Language)
Section
77.65 (3), Stats., provides “t]he department may promulgate rules to administer this section
…"
Section
227.11 (2) (a), Stats., provides “[e]ach agency may promulgate rules interpreting the provisions of any statute enforced or administered by the agency, if the agency considers it necessary to effectuate the purpose of the statute..."
5. Estimate of Amount of Time that State Employees Will Spend Developing the Rule and of Other Resources Necessary to Develop the Rule
The department estimates it will take approximately 100 hours to develop the rule.
6. List with Description of all Entities that may be Affected by the Proposed Rule
Purchasers and sellers of the products described above.
7. Summary and Preliminary Comparison with any Existing or Proposed Federal Regulation that is Intended to Address the Activities to be Regulated by the Proposed Rule
There is no existing or proposed federal regulation that is intended to address the activities to be regulated by the rule.
8. Anticipated Economic Impact of Implementing the Rule (Note if the Rule is Likely to Have a Significant Economic Impact on Small Businesses)
No economic impact is anticipated.
9. Contact Person
Dale Kleven, (608) 266-8253.
Safety and Professional Services —
Examining Board of Architects, Landscape Architects, Professional Engineers, Designers and Land Surveyors
The scope statement was approved by the Governor on July 23, 2014.
Rule No.
Relating to
Requirements for entrance to examinations.
Rule Type
Permanent.
1. Finding/Nature of Emergency (Emergency Rule Only)
None
2. Detailed Description of the Objective of the Proposed Rule
The objective of the proposed rule is to bring pertinent Wisconsin Administrative Code in line with recently passed legislation,
2013 Wisconsin Act 114.
3. Description of the Existing Policies Relevant to the Rule, New Policies Proposed to be Included in the Rule, and an Analysis of Policy Alternatives
Prior to
2013 Wisconsin Act 114, architects, landscape architects, professional engineers, and land surveyors required a combination of experience and post-secondary education before taking the corresponding professional exam for either a license or a permit.
2013 Wisconsin Act 114 ushered in a change requiring the Department of Safety and Professional Services and its attached boards to refrain from making a person complete any postsecondary education before being eligible to take an examination for a credential. The proposed rule will reflect that change in policy by amending Wis. Admin. Code chs.
A-E 3,
4,
6, and
9 and allowing applicants for an architect, landscape architect, professional engineer, or land surveyor credential to take the exam for licensure or permit before completing their postsecondary education.
4. Detailed Explanation of Statutory Authority for the Rule (Including the Statutory Citation and Language)
Section
15.08 (5) (b), Stats., provides examining boards, “shall promulgate rules for its own guidance and for the guidance of the trade or profession to which is pertains. . ." The proposed rule seeks to provide guidance to applicants regarding examination requirements for the Architect, landscape architect, professional engineer, and land surveyor professions.
Section
227.11 (2) (a), Stats., discusses the parameters of an agency's rule-making authority, stating an agency, “may promulgate rules interpreting provisions of statute, but a rule is not valid if it exceeds the bounds of correct interpretation. . . ." This section allows an agency to promulgate administrative rules which interpret the statutes it enforces or administers as long as the proposed rule does not exceed proper interpretation of the statute.
The proposed rule interprets s.
443.09 (4m), Stats., which provides, “[n]o person may be registered as a landscape architect under this chapter unless he or she passes a written examination or written and oral examinations conducted or approved by the landscape architect section of the examining board under sub. (5)."
The proposed rule also interprets s.
443.06 (1) (a), Stats., which provides, “. . .[t]he land surveyor section may require applicants to pass written or oral examinations or both." The proposed rule will set forth the examination requirements for applicants for land surveyor credentials.
5. Estimate of Amount of Time that State Employees Will Spend Developing the Rule and of Other Resources Necessary to Develop the Rule
State employees will spend approximately 50 hours developing the proposed rule.
6. List with Description of all Entities that may be Affected by the Proposed Rule
Persons who will be affected by the rule include applicants for architect, landscape architect professional engineer, and land surveyor credentials.
7. Summary and Preliminary Comparison with any Existing or Proposed Federal Regulation that is Intended to Address the Activities to be Regulated by the Proposed Rule
None.
8. Anticipated Economic Impact of Implementing the Rule (Note if the Rule is Likely to Have a Significant Economic Impact on Small Businesses)
This rule is not likely to have a significant impact on small businesses.
Contact Person
Shawn Leatherwood
608-261-4438
Safety and Professional Services —
Chiropractic Examining Board
The scope statement was approved by the Governor on July 16, 2014.
Rule No.
Relating to
Duty to inform patients of treatment options.
Rule Type
Permanent.
1. Finding/Nature of Emergency (Emergency Rule Only)
None.
2. Detailed Description of the Objective of the Proposed Rule
The proposed rule will bring current Wisconsin Administrative Code into compliance with new legislation,
2013 Wisconsin Act 345.
3. Description of the Existing Policies Relevant to the Rule, New Policies Proposed to be Included in the Rule, and an Analysis of Policy Alternatives
2013 Wisconsin Act 345, changed the manner in which chiropractors discuss treatment options and obtain informed consent from their patients. Under current case law, chiropractors have a duty to inform patients of reasonable alternative modes of treatment and their risks and benefits in such a manner that a reasonable patient would be able to make an intelligent choice with regard to treatment. Chiropractors are also required to document a patient's informed consent in their patient's record pursuant to Wis. Admin. Code s.
Chir 11.02 (5).
2013 Wisconsin Act 345 created Wis. Stats. s.
446.08. This new statute codifies the chiropractor's duty to inform their patients of reasonable alternate modes of treatment and the benefits and risks of treatment. The Act also institutes the reasonable chiropractor standard, instead of the reasonable patient standard, as the standard for informing patients regarding their treatment options. The reasonable chiropractor standard requires disclosure only of information that a reasonable chiropractor would know and disclose under the circumstances. The proposed rule will incorporate the new standard into the current rules governing chiropractic practice and make any additional changes that would make the rules consistent with the statute.
4. Detailed Explanation of Statutory Authority for the Rule (Including the Statutory Citation and Language)
Section
15.08 (5) (b), Stats., provides examining boards, such as the Chiropractic Examining Board, “shall promulgate rules for its own guidance and for guidance of the trade or profession to which it pertains. . ." The proposed rule will provide guidance within the profession as to how chiropractors are to inform patients of their treatment options.
Section
227.11 (2) (a), Stats., states that an agency, “may promulgate rules interpreting the provisions of any statute enforced or administered by an agency, if the agency considers it necessary to effectuate the purpose of the statute, but a rule is not valid if it exceeds the bounds of correct interpretation." The proposed rule will interpret s.
446.02 (7d) (a),
(b), and
(c) as it relates to a chiropractor's duty to inform patients of treatment options.
Section
446.02 (7d) (a),
(b), and
(c), Stats., provides that chiropractors shall determine whether a patient has a condition that is treatable by the practice of chiropractic. If the patient does not have a condition that is treatable by chiropractic the chiropractor shall discontinue the practice of chiropractic on a patient, except that the chiropractor may provide maintenance, support and wellness care to a patient. Chiropractors that discontinue practice of chiropractic on a patient must inform the patient of the reason for discontinuing the practice of chiropractic.
5. Estimate of Amount of Time that State Employees Will Spend Developing the Rule and of Other Resources Necessary to Develop the Rule
State employees will spend approximately 60 hours developing the proposed rule.
6. List with Description of all Entities that may be Affected by the Proposed Rule
The proposed rule will impact licensed chiropractors and their patients.
7. Summary and Preliminary Comparison with any Existing or Proposed Federal Regulation that is Intended to Address the Activities to be Regulated by the Proposed Rule
None.
8. Anticipated Economic Impact of Implementing the Rule (Note if the Rule is Likely to Have a Significant Economic Impact on Small Businesses)
The proposed rule is not likely to have a significant economic impact on small businesses.
9. Contact Person
Shawn Leatherwood
