115.40(5)(b)
(b) A collaborative service program may also be designed to do one or more of the following:
115.40(5)(b)1.
1. Improve communication and the sharing of information between the school district and other local agencies.
115.40(5)(b)2.
2. Design, implement and evaluate unified procedures to determine eligibility for various services.
115.40(5)(b)4.
4. Provide pupils and their families with a variety of services at one location.
115.40(6)
(6) The department shall include in the department's biennial report under
s. 15.04 (1) (d) information on the programs funded under this section.
Effective date note
NOTE: Sub. (6) is shown as amended eff. 1-1-96 by
1995 Wis. Act 27. The treatment by Act 27 was held unconstitutional and declared void by the Supreme Court in Thompson v. Craney, case no.
95-2168-OA. Prior to Act 27 it read:
Effective date text
(6) The state superintendent shall include in the department's biennial report under s. 15.04 (1) (d) information on the programs funded under this section.
115.40(7)
(7) No grant may be awarded under this section after June 30, 1996.
115.41
115.41
Teacher improvement program. The department shall operate a program to provide prospective teachers with one-semester internships under the supervision of licensed teachers. The program may also fund in-service activities and professional staff development research projects. The department shall charge school districts fees for participation in the program. Program costs shall be paid from the appropriation under
s. 20.255 (1) (hg).
Effective date note
NOTE: This section is shown as amended eff. 1-1-96 by
1995 Wis. Act 27. The treatment by Act 27 was held unconstitutional and declared void by the Supreme Court in Thompson v. Craney, case no.
95-2168-OA. Prior to Act 27 it read:
Effective date text
115.41 Teacher improvement program. The state superintendent shall operate a program to provide prospective teachers with one-semester internships under the supervision of licensed teachers. The program may also fund in-service activities and professional staff development research projects. The state superintendent shall charge school districts fees for participation in the program. Program costs shall be paid from the appropriation under s. 20.255 (1) (hg).
115.41 History
History: 1987 a. 27;
1995 a. 27 s.
9145 (1).
115.43
115.43
Minority group pupil scholarships. 115.43(1)
(1)
Definition. In this section, "minority group pupil" means a pupil who is a Black American, an American Indian, a Spanish-surnamed American or an Oriental American.
115.43(2)
(2) Scholarships. The department shall:
Effective date note
NOTE: Sub. (2) (intro.) is shown as amended eff. 1-1-96 by
1995 Wis. Act 27, s.
9145 (1). The treatment by Act 27, s. 9145 (1), changing "state superintendent" to "department" was held unconstitutional and declared void by the Supreme Court in Thompson v. Craney, case no.
95-2168-OA. Prior to Act 27 it read:
Effective date text
(2) Scholarships. The state superintendent shall:
115.43(2)(a)
(a) Annually set goals relating to increasing the percentages of minority group pupils who graduate from high school and are prepared for postsecondary school education.
115.43(2)(b)
(b) From the appropriation under
s. 20.255 (3) (fz), award precollege scholarships, on a competitive basis, to minority group pupils who enroll in a technical college or in college or university classes or programs designed to improve academic skills that are essential for success in postsecondary school education. The department shall give preference to minority group pupils who are inadequately represented in the technical college and university of Wisconsin systems.
Effective date note
NOTE: Par. (b) is shown as amended eff. 1-1-96 by
1995 Wis. Act 27, ss.
3885 and
9145 (1). The treatment by Act 27, s. 9145 (1), changing "state superintendent" to "department" was held unconstitutional and declared void by the Supreme Court in Thompson v. Craney, case no.
95-2168-OA. The treatment by Act 27, s. 3885 changing the cross-reference to "s. 20.255 (3) (fz)" to "s. 20.255 (1) (fz)" is not affected by the Thompson v. Craney ruling. Prior to Act 27 it read:
Effective date text
(b) From the appropriation under s. 20.255 (3) (fz), award precollege scholarships, on a competitive basis, to minority group pupils who enroll in a technical college or in college or university classes or programs designed to improve academic skills that are essential for success in postsecondary school education. The state superintendent shall give preference to minority group pupils who are inadequately represented in the technical college and university of Wisconsin systems.
115.43(2)(c)
(c) In consultation with postsecondary educational institutions, promulgate rules establishing criteria for the review and approval of applications for scholarships under
par. (b).
115.44
115.44
Early identification program. 115.44(1)
(1) The department shall establish an early identification program as part of the Wisconsin educational opportunity program under
s. 115.28 (23). Early identification program costs shall be paid from the appropriation under
s. 20.255 (1) (a). The early identification program shall assist minority and economically disadvantaged pupils in grades 8 to 12 in pursuing higher educational opportunities by providing direction toward attainment of career goals.
Effective date note
NOTE: Sub. (1) is shown as amended eff. 1-1-96 by
1995 Wis. Act 27. The treatment by Act 27 was held unconstitutional and declared void by the Supreme Court in Thompson v. Craney, case no.
95-2168-OA. Prior to Act 27 it read:
Effective date text
(1) The state superintendent shall establish an early identification program as part of the Wisconsin educational opportunity program under s. 115.28 (23). Early identification program costs shall be paid from the appropriation under s. 20.255 (1) (a). The early identification program shall assist minority and economically disadvantaged pupils in grades 8 to 12 in pursuing higher educational opportunities by providing direction toward attainment of career goals.
115.44(2)
(2) Biennially, the department shall provide the governor and any appropriate standing committee of the legislature information on the performance of the early identification program and the postsecondary educational progress of the pupils who were enrolled in the program. The information shall include the number and ethnic backgrounds of the pupils who were enrolled in the program and college acceptance, retention and graduation rates of the pupils.
Effective date note
NOTE: Sub. (2) is shown as amended eff. 1-1-96 by
1995 Wis. Act 27. The treatment by Act 27 was held unconstitutional and declared void by the Supreme Court in Thompson v. Craney, case no.
95-2168-OA. Prior to Act 27 it read:
Effective date text
(2) Biennially, the state superintendent shall provide the governor and any appropriate standing committee of the legislature information on the performance of the early identification program and the postsecondary educational progress of the pupils who were enrolled in the program. The information shall include the number and ethnic backgrounds of the pupils who were enrolled in the program and college acceptance, retention and graduation rates of the pupils.
115.45
115.45
Grants for preschool to grade 5 programs. 115.45(2)(a)(a) Annually by September 15, the school board, on its own initiative or upon receipt of an application from the principal of an elementary school located in the school district, may apply to the department for a grant under this section. The application shall include a plan specifying how the school board intends to meet the requirements under
sub. (4), explaining the school board's selection process for individual schools and private service providers and identifying the schools in the school district, or the private service providers certified by the school board as providing the services under
sub. (4) (b), to which the grant funds will be applied.
Effective date note
NOTE: Par. (a) is shown as amended eff. 1-1-96 by
1995 Wis. Act 27. The treatment by Act 27 was held unconstitutional and declared void by the Supreme Court in Thompson v. Craney, case no.
95-2168-OA. Prior to Act 27 it read:
Effective date text
(a) Annually by September 15, the school board, on its own initiative or upon receipt of an application from the principal of an elementary school located in the school district, may apply to the state superintendent for a grant under this section. The application shall include a plan specifying how the school board intends to meet the requirements under sub. (4), explaining the school board's selection process for individual schools and private service providers and identifying the schools in the school district, or the private service providers certified by the school board as providing the services under sub. (4) (b), to which the grant funds will be applied.
115.45(2)(b)
(b) The council for Milwaukee public schools grant programs under
s. 115.28 (20) shall review the applications submitted under
par. (a) and make recommendations to the secretary regarding the schools to be selected and amounts of the grants to be awarded. The council's recommendations shall be based upon and include information regarding the degree to which the proposed projects will effectively meet the requirements under
sub. (4).
Effective date note
NOTE: Par. (b) is shown as amended eff. 1-1-96 by
1995 Wis. Act 27. The treatment by Act 27 was held unconstitutional and declared void by the Supreme Court in Thompson v. Craney, case no.
95-2168-OA. Prior to Act 27 it read:
Effective date text
(b) The council for Milwaukee public schools grant programs under s. 115.28 (20) shall review the applications submitted under par. (a) and make recommendations to the state superintendent regarding the schools to be selected and amounts of the grants to be awarded. The council's recommendations shall be based upon and include information regarding the degree to which the proposed projects will effectively meet the requirements under sub. (4).
115.45(3)
(3) The department shall determine the amount of the grant, if any, to be awarded a school board submitting an application under
sub. (2) (a). Amounts awarded shall be paid from the appropriation under
s. 20.255 (2) (do). Amounts awarded shall be used by the school board to supplement existing elementary school programs and not to supplant or replace funds otherwise available for such programs.
Effective date note
NOTE: Sub. (3) is shown as amended eff. 1-1-96 by
1995 Wis. Act 27. The treatment by Act 27 was held unconstitutional and declared void by the Supreme Court in Thompson v. Craney, case no.
95-2168-OA. Prior to Act 27 it read:
Effective date text
(3) The state superintendent shall determine the amount of the grant, if any, to be awarded a school board submitting an application under sub. (2) (a). Amounts awarded shall be paid from the appropriation under s. 20.255 (2) (do). Amounts awarded shall be used by the school board to supplement existing elementary school programs and not to supplant or replace funds otherwise available for such programs.
115.45(3m)(a)2.
2. "Low-income pupil" means a pupil for whom aid to families with dependent children is being received under
s. 49.19 or a pupil who is a member of a Wisconsin works group, as defined in
s. 49.141 (1) (s), with a member who is participating in Wisconsin works under
s. 49.147 (3) to
(5).
115.45(3m)(b)
(b) The department shall give priority in awarding grants under this section to all of the following programs:
Effective date note
NOTE: Par. (b) (intro.) is shown as amended eff. 1-1-96 by
1995 Wis. Act 27. The treatment by Act 27 was held unconstitutional and declared void by the Supreme Court in Thompson v. Craney, case no.
95-2168-OA. Prior to Act 27 it read:
Effective date text
(b) The state superintendent shall give priority in awarding grants under this section to all of the following programs:
115.45(3m)(b)1.
1. Programs in existence on August 9, 1989, that have proven successful.
115.45(3m)(b)2.
2. Programs established in school districts with a high number of dropouts and low-income pupils.
115.45(4)
(4) The school board receiving an award under this section shall ensure that the schools or private service providers identified under
sub. (2) (a) comply with all of the following requirements:
115.45(4)(a)
(a) Each identified school or private service provider shall provide structured educational experiences for 4-year-old pupils. The structured educational experiences shall focus on the needs of low-income pupils and shall include activities that encourage early skill development.
115.45(4)(b)
(b) Each identified school or private service provider shall annually test the pupils enrolled in grades 1 to 5 in reading, language arts and mathematics using tests approved by the department.
115.45(4)(c)
(c) Each identified school or private service provider shall implement a multidisciplinary team approach to the identification and remediation of problems of pupils with significant needs.
115.45(4)(d)
(d) Each identified school or private service provider shall restrict class size in all grades below the 6th grade to no more than 25 pupils for each teacher.
115.45(4)(e)
(e) The principal of each identified school and the administrator of each identified private service provider shall annually prepare a written performance evaluation of each staff member providing services under this subsection.
115.45(4)(f)
(f) All administrative and instructional staff in the elementary grades of each identified school or private service provider shall participate in in-service training that focuses on educational practices and policies identified by the department as effective in improving pupil achievement.
115.45(4)(g)1.
1. Establish a council composed of teachers, parents of pupils enrolled in the school district, school board members and community leaders to monitor and make recommendations to the school board concerning the school's educational programs.
115.45(4)(g)2.
2. Develop plans to encourage and increase parental involvement in efforts to improve the quality of education.
115.45(4)(h)
(h) Annually, each identified school or private service provider shall report to the department all of the following:
Effective date note
NOTE: Par. (h) (intro.) is shown as amended eff. 1-1-96 by
1995 Wis. Act 27. The treatment by Act 27 was held unconstitutional and declared void by the Supreme Court in Thompson v. Craney, case no.
95-2168-OA. Prior to Act 27 it read:
Effective date text
(h) Annually, each identified school or private service provider shall report to the state superintendent all of the following:
115.45(4)(h)2.
2. The number and content of in-service training activities under
par. (f).
115.45(4)(h)3.
3. The number and content of parental involvement activities and the number of parents attending each activity.
115.45(5)
(5) Beginning in the 1987-88 school year, amounts awarded under this section should be awarded on the basis of improvements in academic performance.
Effective date note
NOTE: Sub. (6) (intro.) is shown as amended eff. 1-1-96 by
1995 Wis. Act 27. The treatment by Act 27 was held unconstitutional and declared void by the Supreme Court in Thompson v. Craney, case no.
95-2168-OA. Prior to Act 27 it read:
Effective date text
(6) The state superintendent shall:
115.45(6)(a)
(a) Establish criteria for measuring and evaluating improvements in academic performance for the purpose of
sub. (5).
115.45(6)(b)
(b) By March 1, 1986, and annually thereafter, submit to the joint committee on finance and the chief clerk of each house of the legislature, for distribution to the appropriate standing committees under
s. 13.172 (3), a budget report detailing the grants the department intends to award under this section in the next fiscal year. The report shall provide summary data on the results of the annual testing required under
sub. (4) (b) and include a description of the guidelines used to determine the individual schools and private service providers that will receive funds under this section and the types of expenditures eligible for such funds.
Effective date note
NOTE: Par. (b) is shown as amended eff. 1-1-96 by
1995 Wis. Act 27. The treatment by Act 27 was held unconstitutional and declared void by the Supreme Court in Thompson v. Craney, case no.
95-2168-OA. Prior to Act 27 it read:
Effective date text
(b) By March 1, 1986, and annually thereafter, submit to the joint committee on finance and the chief clerk of each house of the legislature, for distribution to the appropriate standing committees under s. 13.172 (3), a budget report detailing the grants he or she intends to award under this section in the next fiscal year. The report shall provide summary data on the results of the annual testing required under sub. (4) (b) and include a description of the guidelines used to determine the individual schools and private service providers that will receive funds under this section and the types of expenditures eligible for such funds.
115.45(6)(c)
(c) Annually submit to the legislature under
s. 13.172 (2) a report on the academic progress made by pupils enrolled in preschool to grade 5 programs under this section.
115.45(7)
(7) The joint committee on finance may review the budget report.
115.45(9)(a)(a) If a pupil attending a school receiving a grant under this section moves from the attendance area for that school to another attendance area after the 3rd Friday in September during any school term, the school board may offer the pupil the opportunity to continue to attend school for the remainder of the school term at the school he or she was originally attending.
115.45(9)(b)
(b) The department may authorize a school district to use up to 8% of a grant to pay the costs of transporting pupils under
par. (a).
Effective date note
NOTE: Par. (b) is shown as amended eff. 1-1-96 by
1995 Wis. Act 27. The treatment by Act 27 was held unconstitutional and declared void by the Supreme Court in Thompson v. Craney, case no.
95-2168-OA. Prior to Act 27 it read:
Effective date text
(b) The state superintendent may authorize a school district to use up to 8% of a grant to pay the costs of transporting pupils under par. (a).
115.45(9)(c)
(c) The school districts receiving funds under
par. (b) shall give first priority under
par. (a) to first grade students.
115.45(10)
(10) Grants under this section shall be awarded for a 3-year period. The department and the grant recipient shall jointly establish performance objectives for each proposed project and criteria for evaluating whether the project meets the objectives. At the end of the 3-year period, the department shall determine whether the project met its objectives. A grant may not be renewed unless the department determines that the project met its objectives.
Effective date note
NOTE: Sub. (10) is shown as amended eff. 1-1-96 by
1995 Wis. Act 27. The treatment by Act 27 was held unconstitutional and declared void by the Supreme Court in Thompson v. Craney, case no.
95-2168-OA. Prior to Act 27 it read:
Effective date text
(10) Grants under this section shall be awarded for a 3-year period. The state superintendent and the grant recipient shall jointly establish performance objectives for each proposed project and criteria for evaluating whether the project meets the objectives. At the end of the 3-year period, the state superintendent shall determine whether the project met its objectives. A grant may not be renewed unless the state superintendent determines that the project met its objectives.
