410.202(2)(a)2.
2. The bank proves that it accepted the payment order in good faith and in compliance with the security procedure and any written agreement or instruction of the customer restricting acceptance of payment orders issued in the name of the customer.
410.202(2)(b)
(b) The bank is not required to follow an instruction that violates a written agreement with the customer or notice of which is not received at a time and in a manner affording the bank a reasonable opportunity to act on it before the payment order is accepted.
410.202(3)
(3) Commercial reasonableness of a security procedure is a question of law to be determined by considering the wishes of the customer that are expressed to the bank, the circumstances of the customer known to the bank, including the size, type, and frequency of payment orders normally issued by the customer to the bank, alternative security procedures offered to the customer, and security procedures in general use by customers and receiving banks similarly situated. A security procedure is considered to be commercially reasonable if all of the following apply:
410.202(3)(a)
(a) The security procedure was chosen by the customer after the bank offered, and the customer refused, a security procedure that was commercially reasonable for that customer.
410.202(3)(b)
(b) The customer expressly agreed in writing to be bound by any payment order, whether or not authorized, issued in the customer's name and accepted by the bank in compliance with the security procedure chosen by the customer.
410.202(4)
(4) In this chapter, "sender" includes the customer in whose name a payment order is issued if the order is the authorized order of the customer under
sub. (1), or it is effective as the order of the customer under
sub. (2).
410.202(5)
(5) This section applies to amendments and cancellations of payment orders to the same extent that it applies to payment orders.
410.202(6)
(6) Except as provided in this section and in
s. 410.203 (1) (a), rights and obligations arising under this section or
s. 410.203 may not be varied by agreement.
410.202 History
History: 1991 a. 304.
410.203
410.203
Unenforceability of certain verified payment orders. 410.203(1)(1) If an accepted payment order is not, under
s. 410.202 (1), an authorized order of a customer identified as sender, but is effective as an order of the customer pursuant to
s. 410.202 (2), the following rules apply:
410.203(1)(a)
(a) By express written agreement, the receiving bank may limit the extent to which it is entitled to enforce or retain payment of the payment order.
410.203(1)(b)
(b) The receiving bank is not entitled to enforce or retain payment of the payment order if the customer proves that the order was not caused, directly or indirectly, by any of the following:
410.203(1)(b)1.
1. A person entrusted at any time with duties to act for the customer with respect to payment orders or the security procedure.
410.203(1)(b)2.
2. A person who obtained access to transmitting facilities of the customer or who obtained, from a source controlled by the customer and without authority of the receiving bank, information facilitating breach of the security procedure, regardless of how the information was obtained or whether the customer was at fault. Information includes any access device, computer software, or the like.
410.203(2)
(2) This section applies to amendments of payment orders to the same extent that it applies to payment orders.
410.203 History
History: 1991 a. 304.
410.203 Annotation
A bank which received an electronic transfer of funds with incomplete instructions and deposited the funds in an account in which the account owner had granted a security interest to a creditor who had a rightful claim to the transferred funds and which subsequently transferred the funds to another account of the account owner who absconded with the funds was liable to the secured creditor for the amount of the transfer. General Electric Capital Corp. v. Central Bank, 49 F 3d 280 (1995).
410.204
410.204
Refund of payment and duty of customer to report with respect to unauthorized payment order. 410.204(1)(1) If a receiving bank accepts a payment order issued in the name of its customer as sender that is not authorized and not effective as the order of the customer under
s. 410.202, or that is not enforceable, in whole or in part, against the customer under
s. 410.203, the bank shall refund any payment of the payment order received from the customer to the extent the bank is not entitled to enforce payment and shall pay interest on the refundable amount calculated from the date the bank received payment to the date of the refund. However, the customer is not entitled to interest from the bank on the amount to be refunded if the customer fails to exercise ordinary care to determine that the order was not authorized by the customer and to notify the bank of the relevant facts within a reasonable time not exceeding 90 days after the date the customer received notification from the bank that the order was accepted or that the customer's account was debited with respect to the order. The bank is not entitled to any recovery from the customer on account of a failure by the customer to give notification as stated in this section.
410.204(2)
(2) Reasonable time under
sub. (1) may be fixed by agreement as stated in
s. 401.204 (1), but the obligation of a receiving bank to refund payment as stated in
sub. (1) may not otherwise be varied by agreement.
410.204 History
History: 1991 a. 304.
410.205
410.205
Erroneous payment orders. 410.205(1)(a)(a) The rules in
pars. (am) to
(c) apply if an accepted payment order was transmitted pursuant to a security procedure for the detection of error and any of the following occurs:
410.205(1)(a)1.
1. The payment order erroneously instructed payment to a beneficiary not intended by the sender.
410.205(1)(a)2.
2. The payment order erroneously instructed payment in an amount greater than the amount intended by the sender.
410.205(1)(a)3.
3. The payment order was an erroneously transmitted duplicate of a payment order previously sent by the sender.
410.205(1)(am)
(am) If the sender proves that the sender or a person acting on behalf of the sender pursuant to
s. 410.206 complied with the security procedure and that the error would have been detected if the receiving bank had also complied, the sender is not obliged to pay the order to the extent stated in
pars. (b) and
(c).
410.205(1)(b)
(b) If the funds transfer is completed on the basis of an erroneous payment order described in
par. (a) 1. or
3., the sender is not obliged to pay the order and the receiving bank is entitled to recover from the beneficiary any amount paid to the beneficiary to the extent allowed by the law governing mistake and restitution.
410.205(1)(c)
(c) If the funds transfer is completed on the basis of a payment order described in
par. (a) 2., the sender is not obliged to pay the order to the extent the amount received by the beneficiary is greater than the amount intended by the sender. In that case, the receiving bank is entitled to recover from the beneficiary the excess amount received to the extent allowed by the law governing mistake and restitution.
410.205(2)
(2) If the sender of an erroneous payment order described in
sub. (1) (a) is not obliged to pay all or part of the order and the sender receives notification from the receiving bank that the order was accepted by the bank or that the sender's account was debited with respect to the order, the sender has a duty to exercise ordinary care, on the basis of information available to the sender, to discover the error with respect to the order and to advise the bank of the relevant facts within a reasonable time, not exceeding 90 days, after the bank's notification was received by the sender. If the bank proves that the sender failed to perform that duty, the sender is liable to the bank for the loss the bank proves it incurred as a result of the failure, but the liability of the sender may not exceed the amount of the sender's order.
410.205(3)
(3) This section applies to amendments to payment orders to the same extent that it applies to payment orders.
410.205 History
History: 1991 a. 304.
410.206
410.206
Transmission of payment order through funds-transfer or other communication system. 410.206(1)
(1) If a payment order addressed to a receiving bank is transmitted to a funds-transfer system or other 3rd-party communication system for transmittal to the bank, the system is considered to be an agent of the sender for the purpose of transmitting the payment order to the bank. If there is a discrepancy between the terms of the payment order transmitted to the system and the terms of the payment order transmitted by the system to the bank, the terms of the payment order of the sender are those transmitted by the system. This section does not apply to a funds-transfer system of the federal reserve banks.
410.206(2)
(2) This section applies to cancellations and amendments of payment orders to the same extent that it applies to payment orders.
410.206 History
History: 1991 a. 304.
410.207
410.207
Misdescription of beneficiary. 410.207(1)
(1) Subject to
sub. (2), if, in a payment order received by the beneficiary's bank, the name, bank account number, or other identification of the beneficiary refers to a nonexistent or unidentifiable person or account, no person has rights as a beneficiary of the order and acceptance of the order cannot occur.
410.207(2)
(2) If a payment order received by the beneficiary's bank identifies the beneficiary both by name and by an identifying or bank account number and the name and number identify different persons, the following rules apply:
410.207(2)(a)
(a) Except as otherwise provided in
sub. (3), if the beneficiary's bank does not know that the name and number refer to different persons, it may rely on the number as the proper identification of the beneficiary of the order. The beneficiary's bank need not determine whether the name and number refer to the same person.
410.207(2)(b)
(b) If the beneficiary's bank pays the person identified by name or knows that the name and number identify different persons, no person has rights as beneficiary except the person paid by the beneficiary's bank if that person was entitled to receive payment from the originator of the funds transfer. If no person has rights as beneficiary, acceptance of the order cannot occur.
410.207(3)
(3) If a payment order described in
sub. (2) (intro.) is accepted, the originator's payment order described the beneficiary inconsistently by name and number and the beneficiary's bank pays the person identified by number as permitted under
sub. (2) (a), the following rules apply:
410.207(3)(a)
(a) If the originator is a bank, the originator is obliged to pay its order.
410.207(3)(b)
(b) If the originator is not a bank and proves that the person identified by number was not entitled to receive payment from the originator, the originator is not obliged to pay its order unless the originator's bank proves that the originator, before acceptance of the originator's order, had notice that payment of a payment order issued by the originator might be made by the beneficiary's bank on the basis of an identifying or bank account number even if it identifies a person different from the named beneficiary. Proof of notice may be made by any admissible evidence. The originator's bank satisfies the burden of proof if it proves that the originator, before the payment order was accepted, signed a writing stating the information to which the notice relates.
410.207(4)
(4) In a case governed by
sub. (2) (a), if the beneficiary's bank rightfully pays the person identified by number and that person was not entitled to receive payment from the originator, the amount paid may be recovered from that person to the extent allowed by the law governing mistake and restitution as follows:
410.207(4)(a)
(a) If the originator is obliged to pay its payment order as stated in
sub. (3), the originator has the right to recover.
410.207(4)(b)
(b) If the originator is not a bank and is not obliged to pay its payment order, the originator's bank has the right to recover.
410.207 History
History: 1991 a. 304.
410.208
410.208
Misdescription of intermediary bank or beneficiary's bank. 410.208(1)(a)(a) This subsection applies to a payment order identifying an intermediary bank or the beneficiary's bank only by an identifying number.
410.208(1)(am)
(am) The receiving bank may rely on the number as the proper identification of the intermediary bank or the beneficiary's bank and need not determine whether the number identifies a bank.
410.208(1)(b)
(b) The sender is obliged to compensate the receiving bank for any loss and expenses incurred by the receiving bank as a result of its reliance on the number in executing or attempting to execute the order.
410.208(2)(a)(a) This subsection applies to a payment order identifying an intermediary bank or the beneficiary's bank both by name and an identifying number if the name and number identify different persons.
410.208(2)(am)
(am) If the sender is a bank, the receiving bank may rely on the number as the proper identification of the intermediary bank or the beneficiary's bank if the receiving bank, when it executes the sender's order, does not know that the name and number identify different persons. The receiving bank need not determine whether the name and number refer to the same person or whether the number refers to a bank. The sender is obliged to compensate the receiving bank for any loss and expenses incurred by the receiving bank as a result of its reliance on the number in executing or attempting to execute the order.
410.208(2)(b)
(b) If the sender is not a bank and the receiving bank proves that the sender, before the payment order was accepted, had notice that the receiving bank might rely on the number as the proper identification of the intermediary bank or the beneficiary's bank even if it identifies a person different from the bank identified by name, the rights and obligations of the sender and the receiving bank are governed by
sub. (2) (am), as though the sender were a bank. Proof of notice may be made by any admissible evidence. The receiving bank satisfies the burden of proof if it proves that the sender, before the payment order was accepted, signed a writing stating the information to which the notice relates.
410.208(2)(c)
(c) Regardless of whether the sender is a bank, the receiving bank may rely on the name as the proper identification of the intermediary bank or the beneficiary's bank if the receiving bank, at the time it executes the sender's order, does not know that the name and number identify different persons. The receiving bank need not determine whether the name and number refer to the same person.
410.208(2)(d)
(d) If the receiving bank knows that the name and number identify different persons, reliance on either the name or the number in executing the sender's payment order is a breach of the obligation stated in
s. 410.302 (1) (a).
410.208 History
History: 1991 a. 304.
410.209
410.209
Acceptance of payment order. 410.209(1)
(1) Subject to
sub. (4), a receiving bank other than the beneficiary's bank accepts a payment order when it executes the order.
410.209(2)
(2) Subject to
subs. (3) and
(4), a beneficiary's bank accepts a payment order at the earliest of the following times:
410.209(2)(a)
(a) When the bank pays the beneficiary as stated in
s. 410.405 (1) or
(2) or notifies the beneficiary of receipt of the order or that the account of the beneficiary has been credited with respect to the order unless the notice indicates that the bank is rejecting the order or that funds with respect to the order may not be withdrawn or used until receipt of payment from the sender of the order.
410.209(2)(c)
(c) The opening of the next funds-transfer business day of the bank following the payment date of the order if, at that time, the amount of the sender's order is fully covered by a withdrawable credit balance in an authorized account of the sender or the bank has otherwise received full payment from the sender, unless the order was rejected before that time or is rejected within one hour after that time, or within one hour after the opening of the next business day of the sender following the payment date if that time is later. If notice of rejection is received by the sender after the payment date and the authorized account of the sender does not bear interest, the bank is obliged to pay interest to the sender on the amount of the order for the number of days elapsing after the payment date to the day the sender receives notice or learns that the order was not accepted, counting that day as an elapsed day. If the withdrawable credit balance during that period falls below the amount of the order, the amount of interest payable is reduced accordingly.
410.209(3)
(3) Acceptance of a payment order cannot occur before the order is received by the receiving bank. Acceptance does not occur under
sub. (2) (b) or
(c) if the beneficiary of the payment order does not have an account with the receiving bank, the account has been closed, or the receiving bank is not permitted by law to receive credits for the beneficiary's account.
410.209(4)
(4) A payment order issued to the originator's bank cannot be accepted until the payment date if the bank is the beneficiary's bank, or the execution date if the bank is not the beneficiary's bank. If the originator's bank executes the originator's payment order before the execution date or pays the beneficiary of the originator's payment order before the payment date and the payment order is subsequently canceled pursuant to
s. 410.211 (2), the bank may recover from the beneficiary any payment received to the extent allowed by the law governing mistake and restitution.
410.209 History
History: 1991 a. 304.
410.210
410.210
Rejection of payment order. 410.210(1)
(1) A payment order is rejected by the receiving bank by a notice of rejection transmitted to the sender orally, electronically, or in writing. A notice of rejection need not use any particular words and is sufficient if it indicates that the receiving bank is rejecting the order or will not execute or pay the order. Rejection is effective when the notice is given if transmission is by a means that is reasonable in the circumstances. If notice of rejection is given by a means that is not reasonable, rejection is effective when the notice is received. If an agreement of the sender and receiving bank establishes the means to be used to reject a payment order, any means complying with the agreement is reasonable and any means not complying is not reasonable unless no significant delay in receipt of the notice resulted from the use of the noncomplying means.
410.210(2)
(2) This subsection applies if a receiving bank other than the beneficiary's bank fails to execute a payment order despite the existence on the execution date of a withdrawable credit balance in an authorized account of the sender sufficient to cover the order. If the sender does not receive notice of rejection of the order on the execution date and the authorized account of the sender does not bear interest, the bank is obliged to pay interest to the sender on the amount of the order for the number of days elapsing after the execution date to the earlier of the day the order is canceled pursuant to
s. 410.211 (4) or the day the sender receives notice or learns that the order was not executed, counting the final day of the period as an elapsed day. If the withdrawable credit balance during that period falls below the amount of the order, the amount of interest is reduced accordingly.
410.210(3)
(3) If a receiving bank suspends payments, all unaccepted payment orders issued to it are considered rejected at the time the bank suspends payments.
410.210(4)
(4) Acceptance of a payment order precludes a later rejection of the order. Rejection of a payment order precludes a later acceptance of the order.
410.210 History
History: 1991 a. 304.
410.211
410.211
Cancellation and amendment of payment order. 410.211(1)(1) A communication of the sender of a payment order canceling or amending the order may be transmitted to the receiving bank orally, electronically, or in writing. If a security procedure is in effect between the sender and the receiving bank, the communication is not effective to cancel or amend the order unless the communication is verified pursuant to the security procedure or the bank agrees to the cancellation or amendment.
410.211(2)
(2) Subject to
sub. (1), a communication by the sender canceling or amending a payment order is effective to cancel or amend the order if notice of the communication is received at a time and in a manner affording the receiving bank a reasonable opportunity to act on the communication before the bank accepts the payment order.
410.211(3)(a)(a) After a payment order has been accepted, cancellation or amendment of the order is not effective unless the receiving bank agrees or a funds-transfer system rule allows cancellation or amendment without agreement of the bank.
410.211(3)(am)
(am) With respect to a payment order accepted by a receiving bank other than the beneficiary's bank, cancellation or amendment is not effective unless a conforming cancellation or amendment of the payment order issued by the receiving bank is also made.
410.211(3)(b)1.1. With respect to a payment order accepted by the beneficiary's bank, cancellation or amendment is not effective unless the order was issued in execution of an unauthorized payment order, or because of a mistake by a sender in the funds transfer which resulted in the issuance of a payment order that does any of the following:
410.211(3)(b)1.b.
b. Orders payment to a beneficiary not entitled to receive payment from the originator.
410.211(3)(b)1.c.
c. Orders payment in an amount greater than the amount the beneficiary was entitled to receive from the originator.
410.211(3)(b)2.
2. If the payment order is canceled or amended, the beneficiary's bank is entitled to recover from the beneficiary any amount paid to the beneficiary to the extent allowed by the law governing mistake and restitution.
