908.01(4)(b)5.
5. A statement by a coconspirator of a party during the course and in furtherance of the conspiracy.
908.01 History
History: Sup. Ct. Order, 59 W (2d) R1, R220 (1973);
1991 a. 31.
908.01 Annotation
Witness' claimed nonrecollection of prior statement may constitute inconsistent testimony under (4) (a) 1. State v. Lenarchick, 74 W (2d) 425, 247 NW (2d) 80.
908.01 Annotation
Admissibility under (4) (a) 2 and 3 of prior consistent statements discussed. Green v. State, 75 W (2d) 631, 250 NW (2d) 305.
908.01 Annotation
Where defendant implied that plaintiff recently fabricated professed belief that contract did not exist, financial statement which showed plaintiff's nonbelief in existence of contract was admissible under (4) (a) 2. Gerner v. Vasby, 75 W (2d) 660, 250 NW (2d) 319.
908.01 Annotation
Under (4) (b) 4, there is no requirement that the statement be authorized by the employer or principal. Mercurdo v. County of Milwaukee, 82 W (2d) 781, 264 NW (2d) 258.
908.01 Annotation
Under (4) (b) 1, any prior out-of-court statements by a party, whether or not they are "against interest", are not hearsay. State v. Benoit, 83 W (2d) 389, 265 NW (2d) 298 (1978).
908.01 Annotation
Sub. (4) (a) 3. applies to statements of identification made soon after perceiving the suspect or his likeness in the identification process. State v. Williamson, 84 W (2d) 370, 267 NW (2d) 337 (1978).
908.01 Annotation
Statements under (4) (b) 5 discussed. Bergeron v. State, 85 W (2d) 595, 271 NW (2d) 386 (1978).
908.01 Annotation
Robber's representation that bottle contained nitroglycerine was admissible under (4) (b) 1 to prove that robber was armed with dangerous weapon. Beamon v. State, 93 W (2d) 215, 286 NW (2d) 592 (1980).
908.01 Annotation
Prior inconsistent statement by a witness at a criminal trial is admissible under (4) (a) 1. as substantive evidence. Vogel v. State, 96 W (2d) 372, 291 NW (2d) 850 (1980).
908.01 Annotation
See note to art. I, sec. 7, citing State v. Dorcey, 103 W (2d) 152, 307 NW (2d) 612 (1981).
908.01 Annotation
Testimony as to conversation in which defendant was accused of murder and did not deny it was admissible under adoptive admissions exception under (4) (b) 2. State v. Marshall, 113 W (2d) 643, 335 NW (2d) 612 (1983).
908.01 Annotation
See note to Art I, sec. 7, citing State v. Webster, 156 W (2d) 510, 458 NW (2d) 373 (Ct. App. 1990).
908.01 Annotation
Confession made in Spanish to detective who took notes and reported in English is admissible under (4) (b). State v. Arroyo, 166 W (2d) 74, 479 NW (2d) 549 (Ct. App. 1991).
908.01 Annotation
Rule 901.04 (1) permits an out-of-court declaration by a party's alleged co-conspirator to be considered by the trial court in determining whether there was a conspiracy under (4) (b) 5. State v. Whitaker, 167 W (2d) 247, 481 NW (2d) 649 (Ct. App. 1992).
908.01 Annotation
When a person relies on a translator for communication the statements of the translator are regraded as the speaker's for hearsay purposes. State v. Patino, 177 W (2d) 348, 502 NW (2d) 601 (Ct. App. 1993).
908.01 Annotation
Admissibility of one inconsistent sentence under sub. (4) (a) 1. does not bring the declarant's entire statement within the scope of that rule. Wikrent v. Toys "R" Us, 179 W (2d) 297, 507 NW (2d) 130 (Ct. App. 1993).
908.01 Annotation
While polygraph tests are inadmissible, post-polygraph interviews found distinct both as to time and content from the examination which precedes them and the statements made therein are admissible. State v. Johnson, 193 W (2d) 382, 535 W (2d) 441 (Ct. App. 1995).
908.01 Annotation
There must be facts that support a reasonable conclusion that a defendant has "embraced the truth" of someone else's statement as a condition precedent to finding an adoptive admission under sub. (4) (b) 2. State v. Rogers, 199 W (2d) 817, 539 NW (2d) 897 (Ct. App. 1995).
908.01 Annotation
Existence of conspiracy under (4) (b) 5 must be shown by preponderance of evidence by party offering statement. Bourjaily v. United States, 483 US 171 (1987).
908.01 Annotation
Under (4) (b) 4, a party introducing a statement of an agent as the admission of a principal need not show that the agent had authority to speak for the principal. The rule only requires that the agent's statement concern "a matter within the scope of his agency or employment." Perzinski v. Chevron Chemical Co. 503 F (2d) 654.
908.01 Annotation
Bourjaily v. United States: New rule for admitting coconspirator hearsay statements. 1988 WLR 577 (1988).
908.02
908.02
Hearsay rule. Hearsay is not admissible except as provided by these rules or by other rules adopted by the supreme court or by statute.
908.02 History
History: Sup. Ct. Order, 59 W (2d) R1, R248 (1973).
908.02 Annotation
The rule of completeness requires a statement, including otherwise inadmissible evidence including hearsay, be admitted in its entirety when necessary to explain an admissible portion of the statement. The rule is not restricted to writings or recorded statements. State v. Sharp, 180 W (2d) 640, 511 NW (2d) 316 (Ct. App. 1993).
908.03
908.03
Hearsay exceptions; availability of declarant immaterial. The following are not excluded by the hearsay rule, even though the declarant is available as a witness:
908.03(1)
(1) Present sense impression. A statement describing or explaining an event or condition made while the declarant was perceiving the event or condition, or immediately thereafter.
908.03(2)
(2) Excited utterance. A statement relating to a startling event or condition made while the declarant was under the stress of excitement caused by the event or condition.
908.03(3)
(3) Then existing mental, emotional, or physical condition. A statement of the declarant's then existing state of mind, emotion, sensation, or physical condition (such as intent, plan, motive, design, mental feeling, pain, and bodily health), but not including a statement of memory or belief to prove the fact remembered or believed unless it relates to the execution, revocation, identification, or terms of declarant's will.
908.03(4)
(4) Statements for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment. Statements made for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment and describing medical history, or past or present symptoms, pain or sensations, or the inception or general character of the cause or external source thereof insofar as reasonably pertinent to diagnosis or treatment.
908.03(5)
(5) Recorded recollection. A memorandum or record concerning a matter about which a witness once had knowledge but now has insufficient recollection to enable the witness to testify fully and accurately, shown to have been made when the matter was fresh in the witness's memory and to reflect that knowledge correctly.
908.03(6)
(6) Records of regularly conducted activity. A memorandum, report, record, or data compilation, in any form, of acts, events, conditions, opinions, or diagnoses, made at or near the time by, or from information transmitted by, a person with knowledge, all in the course of a regularly conducted activity, as shown by the testimony of the custodian or other qualified witness, unless the sources of information or other circumstances indicate lack of trustworthiness.
908.03(6m)(a)(a)
Definition. In this subsection, "health care provider" means a chiropractor licensed under
ch. 446, a dentist licensed under
ch. 447, a physician assistant certified under
ch. 448 or a health care provider as defined in
s. 655.001 (8).
908.03(6m)(b)
(b)
Authentication witness unnecessary. A custodian or other qualified witness required by
sub. (6) is unnecessary if the party who intends to offer health care provider records into evidence at a trial or hearing does one of the following at least 40 days before the trial or hearing:
908.03(6m)(b)1.
1. Serves upon all appearing parties an accurate, legible and complete duplicate of the health care provider records for a stated period certified by the record custodian.
908.03(6m)(b)2.
2. Notifies all appearing parties that an accurate, legible and complete duplicate of the health care provider records for a stated period certified by the record custodian is available for inspection and copying during reasonable business hours at a specified location within the county in which the trial or hearing will be held.
908.03(6m)(c)
(c)
Subpoena limitations. Health care provider records are subject to subpoena only if one of the following conditions exists:
908.03(6m)(c)2.
2. The subpoena is authorized by an ex parte order of a judge for cause shown and upon terms.
908.03(6m)(c)3.
3. If upon a properly authorized request of an attorney, the health care provider refuses, fails or neglects to supply within 2 business days a legible certified duplicate of its records for the fees established under
par. (d).
908.03(6m)(d)
(d)
Fees. The department of health and family services shall, by rule, prescribe uniform fees based on an approximation of the actual costs that a health care provider may charge under
par. (c) 3. for certified duplicate health care records. The rule shall also allow the health care provider to charge for postage or other delivery costs.
908.03(7)
(7) Absence of entry in records of regularly conducted activity. Evidence that a matter is not included in the memoranda, reports, records or data compilations, in any form, of a regularly conducted activity, to prove the nonoccurrence or nonexistence of the matter, if the matter was of a kind of which a memorandum, report, record, or data compilation was regularly made and preserved, unless the sources of information or other circumstances indicate lack of trustworthiness.
908.03(8)
(8) Public records and reports. Records, reports, statements, or data compilations, in any form, of public offices or agencies, setting forth (a) the activities of the office or agency, or (b) matters observed pursuant to duty imposed by law, or (c) in civil cases and against the state in criminal cases, factual findings resulting from an investigation made pursuant to authority granted by law, unless the sources of information or other circumstances indicate lack of trustworthiness.
908.03(9)
(9) Records of vital statistics. Records or data compilations, in any form, of births, fetal deaths, deaths, or marriages, if the report thereof was made to a public office pursuant to requirements of law.
908.03(10)
(10) Absence of public record or entry. To prove the absence of a record, report, statement, or data compilation, in any form, or the nonoccurrence or nonexistence of a matter of which a record, report, statement, or data compilation, in any form, was regularly made and preserved by a public office or agency, evidence in the form of a certification in accordance with
s. 909.02, or testimony, that diligent search failed to disclose the record, report, statement, or data compilation, or entry.
908.03(11)
(11) Records of religious organizations. Statements of births, marriages, divorces, deaths, whether a child is marital or nonmarital, ancestry, relationship by blood or marriage, or other similar facts of personal or family history, contained in a regularly kept record of a religious organization.
908.03(12)
(12) Marriage, baptismal, and similar certificates. Statements of fact contained in a certificate that the maker performed a marriage or other ceremony or administered a sacrament, made by a member of the clergy, public official, or other person authorized by the rules or practices of a religious organization or by law to perform the act certified, and purporting to have been issued at the time of the act or within a reasonable time thereafter.
908.03(13)
(13) Family records. Statements of fact concerning personal or family history contained in family Bibles, genealogies, charts, engravings on rings, inscriptions on family portraits, engravings on urns, crypts, or tombstones, or the like.
908.03(14)
(14) Records of documents affecting an interest in property. The record of a document purporting to establish or affect an interest in property, as proof of the content of the original recorded document and its execution and delivery by each person by whom it purports to have been executed, if the record is a record of a public office and an applicable statute authorized the recording of documents of that kind in that office.
908.03(15)
(15) Statements in documents affecting an interest in property. A statement contained in a document purporting to establish or affect an interest in property if the matter stated was relevant to the purpose of the document, unless dealings with the property since the document was made have been inconsistent with the truth of the statement or the purport of the document.
908.03(16)
(16) Statements in ancient documents. Statements in a document in existence 20 years or more whose authenticity is established.
908.03(17)
(17) Market reports, commercial publications. Market quotations, tabulations, lists, directories, or other published compilations, generally used and relied upon by the public or by persons in particular occupations.
908.03(18)
(18) Learned treatises. A published treatise, periodical or pamphlet on a subject of history, science or art is admissible as tending to prove the truth of a matter stated therein if the judge takes judicial notice, or a witness expert in the subject testifies, that the writer of the statement in the treatise, periodical or pamphlet is recognized in the writer's profession or calling as an expert in the subject.
908.03(18)(a)
(a) No published treatise, periodical or pamphlet constituting a reliable authority on a subject of history, science or art may be received in evidence, except for impeachment on cross-examination, unless the party proposing to offer such document in evidence serves notice in writing upon opposing counsel at least 40 days before trial. The notice shall fully describe the document which the party proposes to offer, giving the name of such document, the name of the author, the date of publication, the name of the publisher, and specifically designating the portion thereof to be offered. The offering party shall deliver with the notice a copy of the document or of the portion thereof to be offered.
908.03(18)(b)
(b) No rebutting published treatise, periodical or pamphlet constituting a reliable authority on a subject of history, science or art shall be received in evidence unless the party proposing to offer the same shall, not later than 20 days after service of the notice described in
par. (a), serve notice similar to that provided in
par. (a) upon counsel who has served the original notice. The party shall deliver with the notice a copy of the document or of the portion thereof to be offered.
908.03(18)(c)
(c) The court may, for cause shown prior to or at the trial, relieve the party from the requirements of this section in order to prevent a manifest injustice.
908.03(19)
(19) Reputation concerning personal or family history. Reputation among members of a person's family by blood, adoption, or marriage, or among a person's associates, or in the community, concerning a person's birth, adoption, marriage, divorce, death, relationship by blood, adoption, or marriage, ancestry, whether the person is a marital or nonmarital child, or other similar fact of this personal or family history.
908.03(20)
(20) Reputation concerning boundaries or general history. Reputation in a community, arising before the controversy, as to boundaries of or customs affecting lands in the community, and reputation as to events of general history important to the community or state or nation in which located.
908.03(21)
(21) Reputation as to character. Reputation of a person's character among the person's associates or in the community.
908.03(22)
(22) Judgment of previous conviction. Evidence of a final judgment, entered after a trial or upon a plea of guilty (but not upon a plea of no contest), adjudging a person guilty of a felony as defined in
ss. 939.60 and
939.62 (3) (b), to prove any fact essential to sustain the judgment, but not including, when offered by the state in a criminal prosecution for purposes other than impeachment, judgments against persons other than the accused. The pendency of an appeal may be shown but does not affect admissibility.
908.03(23)
(23) Judgment as to personal, family or general history, or boundaries. Judgments as proof of matters of personal, family or general history, or boundaries, essential to the judgment, if the same would be provable by evidence of reputation.
908.03(24)
(24) Other exceptions. A statement not specifically covered by any of the foregoing exceptions but having comparable circumstantial guarantees of trustworthiness.
908.03 History
History: Sup. Ct. Order, 59 W (2d) R250; Sup. Ct. Order, 67 W (2d) vii (1975);
1983 a. 447; Sup. Ct. Order, 158 W (2d) xxv (1990);
1991 a. 32,
269;
1993 a. 105;
1995 a. 27 s.
9126 (19).
Effective date note
Judicial Council Note, 1990: Sub. (6m) is repealed and recreated to extend the self-authentication provision to other health care providers in addition to hospitals. That such records may be authenticated without the testimony of their custodian does not obviate other proper objections to their admissibility. The revision changes the basic self-authentication procedure for all health care provider records (including hospitals) by requiring the records to be served on all parties or made reasonably available to them at least 40 days before the trial or hearing. The additional 30 days facilitates responsive discovery, while elimination of the filing requirement reduces courthouse records management impacts. [Re Order eff. 1-1-91]
908.03 Annotation
Hearsay in a juvenile court worker's report not admissible under (6) or (8) at a juvenile court delinquency hearing. Rusecki v. State, 56 W (2d) 299, 201 NW (2d) 832.
908.03 Annotation
A medical record containing a diagnosis or opinion is admissible but may be excluded if the entry requires explanation or a detailed statement of judgmental factors. Noland v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co. 57 W (2d) 633, 205 NW (2d) 388.
908.03 Annotation
Statement of operator that the press had repeated 3 times, which was made 5 minutes after the malfunction causing his injury, was admissible under the excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule. (2) cited in footnote. Nelson v. L. & J. Press Corp. 65 W (2d) 770, 223 NW (2d) 607.
908.03 Annotation
Under the "res gestae" exception to the hearsay rule (described as the "excited utterance" exception under (2)), testimony by the victim's former husband that his daughter called him at 5 a.m. the morning after the murder and told him, "daddy, daddy, Wilbur killed mommy," was admissible. State v. Davis, 66 W (2d) 636, 225 NW (2d) 505.
908.03 Annotation
Official minutes of the highway committee were admissible under (6) as "Records of regularly conducted activity." State v. Nowakowski, 67 W (2d) 545, 227 NW (2d) 697.
908.03 Annotation
A public document, filed under oath, notarized by the defendant, is one having "circumstantial guarantees of trustworthiness" under (24). State v. Nowakowski, 67 W (2d) 545, 227 NW (2d) 697.
908.03 Annotation
Statements made by the 5-year-old child to his mother one day after an alleged sexual assault by defendant were admissible under the excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule, since a more liberal interpretation is provided for that exception in the case of a young child alleged to have been the victim of a sexual assault. State ex rel. Harris v. Schmidt, 69 W (2d) 668, 230 NW (2d) 890.
908.03 Annotation
Department of H&SS probation files and records are public records and admissible as such at probation revocation hearing. State ex rel. Prellwitz v. Schmidt, 73 W (2d) 35, 242 NW (2d) 227.
908.03 Annotation
Statement by victim within minutes after stabbing that defendant "did this to me" was admissible under (2). La Barge v. State, 74 W (2d) 327, 246 NW (2d) 794.
908.03 Annotation
Personal observation of startling event is not required under (2). State v. Lenarchick, 74 W (2d) 425, 247 NW (2d) 80.
908.03 Annotation
Admission of hospital records did not deprive defendant of right to confrontation. State v. Olson, 75 W (2d) 575, 250 NW (2d) 12.
908.03 Annotation
Observations of prior trial judge in decision approving jury's award of damages were properly excluded as hearsay in later trial. Johnson v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co. 93 W (2d) 633, 287 NW (2d) 729 (1980).
908.03 Annotation
See note to Art. I, sec. 7, citing Hagenkord v. State, 100 W (2d) 452, 302 NW (2d) 421 (1981).
908.03 Annotation
Chiropractor could testify as to patient's self-serving statements when those statements were used to form medical opinion under (4). Klingman v. Kruschke, 115 W (2d) 124, 339 NW (2d) 603 (Ct. App. 1983).
908.03 Annotation
Interrogator's account of child witness's out of court statements made four days after murder, where notes of the conversation were available although not introduced, held admissible under (24). State v. Jenkins, 168 W (2d) 175, 483 NW (2d) 262 (1992).
908.03 Annotation
A defendant has a burden of production to come forward with some evidence of a negative defense to warrant jury consideration. State v. Pettit, 171 W (2d) 627, 492 NW (2d) 633 (Ct. App. 1992).
908.03 Annotation
For a statement to be an excited utterance there must be a "startling event or condition" and the declarant must have made the statement "while under the stress of excitement caused by the event or condition". State v. Boshcka, 173 W (2d) 387 reprinted at 178 W (2d) 628, 496 NW (2d) 627 (Ct. App. 1992).
908.03 Annotation
Where proffered hearsay has sufficient guarantees of reliability to come within a firmly rooted exception, the confrontation clause is satisfied. State v. Patino, 177 W (2d) 348, 502 NW (2d) 601 (Ct. App. 1993).
908.03 Annotation
In applying the excited utterance exception in child sexual assault cases, a court must consider factors including the child's age and the contemporaneousness and spontaneity of the assertions in relation to the alleged assault. In applying the sub. (24) residual exception in such a case, the court must consider the attributes of the child, the person to whom the statement was made, the circumstances under which the statement was made, the content of the statement and corroborating evidence. State v. Gerald L.C. 194 W (2d) 549, 535 NW (2d) 777 (Ct. App. 1995).
908.03 Annotation
Portions of investigatory reports containing opinions or conclusions are admissible under (8) exception. Beech Aircraft Corp. v. Rainey, 488 US 153, 102 LEd 2d 445 (1988).
908.03 Annotation
Convictions through hearsay in child sexual abuse cases. Tuerkheimer. 72 MLR 47 (1988).
908.03 Annotation
Children's out-of-court statements. Anderson, 1974 WBB No. 5.
908.03 Annotation
Evidence review: Past recollections refreshed v. past recollection recorded. Fine. WBB March 1984.
