137.16(4)(b)
(b) A requirement under a law other than this subchapter to send, communicate, or transmit a record by 1st-class or regular mail or with postage prepaid may be varied by agreement to the extent permitted by the other law.
137.16 History
History: 2003 a. 294.
137.17
137.17
Attribution and effect of electronic records and electronic signatures. 137.17(1)
(1) An electronic record or electronic signature is attributable to a person if the electronic record or electronic signature was created by the act of the person. The act of the person may be shown in any manner, including a showing of the efficacy of any security procedure applied to determine the person to which the electronic record or electronic signature was attributable.
137.17(2)
(2) The effect of an electronic record or electronic signature that is attributed to a person under
sub. (1) is determined from the context and surrounding circumstances at the time of its creation, execution, or adoption, including the parties' agreement, if any, and otherwise as provided by law.
137.17 History
History: 2003 a. 294.
137.18
137.18
Effect of change or error. 137.18(1)
(1) If a change or error in an electronic record occurs in a transmission between parties to a transaction, then:
137.18(1)(a)
(a) If the parties have agreed to use a security procedure to detect changes or errors and one party has conformed to the procedure, but the other party has not, and the nonconforming party would have detected the change or error had that party also conformed, the conforming party may avoid the effect of the changed or erroneous electronic record.
137.18(1)(b)
(b) In an automated transaction involving an individual, the individual may avoid the effect of an electronic record that resulted from an error made by the individual in dealing with the electronic agent of another person if the electronic agent did not provide an opportunity for the prevention or correction of the error and, at the time the individual learns of the error, the individual:
137.18(1)(b)1.
1. Promptly notifies the other person of the error and that the individual did not intend to be bound by the electronic record received by the other person;
137.18(1)(b)2.
2. Takes reasonable steps, including steps that conform to the other person's reasonable instructions, to return to the other person or, if instructed by the other person, to destroy the consideration received, if any, as a result of the erroneous electronic record; and
137.18(1)(b)3.
3. Has not used or received any benefit or value from the consideration, if any, received from the other person.
137.18(2)
(2) If neither
sub. (1) (a) nor (b) applies, the change or error has the effect provided by other law, including the law of mistake, and the parties' contract, if any.
137.18 History
History: 2003 a. 294.
137.19
137.19
Notarization and acknowledgement. If a law requires a signature or record to be notarized, acknowledged, verified, or made under oath, the requirement is satisfied if the electronic signature of the person authorized to administer the oath or to make the notarization, acknowledgment, or verification, together with all other information required to be included by other applicable law, is attached to or logically associated with the signature or record.
137.19 History
History: 2003 a. 294.
137.20
137.20
Retention of electronic records; originals. 137.20(1)(1) Except as provided in
sub. (6), if a law requires that a record be retained, the requirement is satisfied by retaining the information set forth in the record as an electronic record which:
137.20(1)(a)
(a) Accurately reflects the information set forth in the record after it was first generated in its final form as an electronic record or otherwise; and
137.20(2)
(2) A requirement to retain a record in accordance with
sub. (1) does not apply to any information the sole purpose of which is to enable the record to be sent, communicated, or received.
137.20(3)
(3) A person may comply with
sub. (1) by using the services of another person if the requirements of that subsection are satisfied.
137.20(4)
(4) Except as provided in
sub. (6), if a law requires a record to be presented or retained in its original form, or provides consequences if the record is not presented or retained in its original form, a person may comply with that law by using an electronic record that is retained in accordance with
sub. (1).
137.20(5)
(5) Except as provided in
sub. (6), if a law requires retention of a check, that requirement is satisfied by retention of an electronic record containing the information on the front and back of the check in accordance with
sub. (1).
137.20(6)(a)(a) Except as provided in
sub. (6), a record retained as an electronic record in accordance with
sub. (1) satisfies a law requiring a person to retain a record for evidentiary, audit, or like purposes, unless a law enacted after May 5, 2004 specifically prohibits the use of an electronic record for the specified purpose.
137.20(6)(b)
(b) A governmental unit that has custody of a record is also further subject to the retention requirements for public records of state agencies, and the records of the University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics Authority established under
ss. 16.61, and
16.611 and the retention requirements for documents of local governmental units established under
s. 16.612.
137.20(7)
(7) The public records board may promulgate rules prescribing standards consistent with this subchapter for retention of records by state agencies, the University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics Authority and local governmental units.
137.20(8)
(8) This section does not preclude a governmental unit of this state from specifying additional requirements for the retention of any record subject to the jurisdiction of that governmental unit.
137.20 History
History: 2003 a. 294.
137.21
137.21
Admissibility in evidence. In a proceeding, a record or signature may not be excluded as evidence solely because it is in electronic form.
137.21 History
History: 2003 a. 294.
137.22
137.22
Automated transactions. In an automated transaction:
137.22(1)
(1) A contract may be formed by the interaction of electronic agents of the parties, even if no individual was aware of or reviewed the electronic agent's actions or the resulting terms and agreements.
137.22(2)
(2) A contract may be formed by the interaction of an electronic agent and an individual, acting on the individual's own behalf or for another person, including by an interaction in which the individual performs actions that the individual is free to refuse to perform and which the individual knows or has reason to know will cause the electronic agent to complete the transaction or performance.
137.22(3)
(3) The terms of a contract under
sub. (1) or
(2) are governed by the substantive law applicable to the contract.
137.22 History
History: 2003 a. 294.
137.23
137.23
Time and place of sending and receipt. 137.23(1)(1) Unless otherwise agreed between the sender and the recipient, an electronic record is sent when it:
137.23(1)(a)
(a) Is addressed properly or otherwise directed properly to an information processing system that the recipient has designated or uses for the purpose of receiving electronic records or information of the type sent and from which the recipient is able to retrieve the electronic record;
137.23(1)(b)
(b) Is in a form capable of being processed by that system; and
137.23(1)(c)
(c) Enters an information processing system outside the control of the sender or of a person that sent the electronic record on behalf of the sender or enters a region of the information processing system designated or used by the recipient which is under the control of the recipient.
137.23(2)
(2) Unless otherwise agreed between a sender and the recipient, an electronic record is received when:
137.23(2)(a)
(a) It enters an information processing system that the recipient has designated or uses for the purpose of receiving electronic records or information of the type sent and from which the recipient is able to retrieve the electronic record; and
137.23(2)(b)
(b) It is in a form capable of being processed by that system.
137.23(3)
(3) Subsection (2) applies even if the place where the information processing system is located is different from the place where the electronic record is deemed to be received under
sub. (4).
137.23(4)
(4) Unless otherwise expressly provided in the electronic record or agreed between the sender and the recipient, an electronic record is deemed to be sent from the sender's place of business and to be received at the recipient's place of business. For purposes of this subsection:
137.23(4)(a)
(a) If the sender or recipient has more than one place of business, the place of business of that person is the place having the closest relationship to the underlying transaction.
137.23(4)(b)
(b) If the sender or the recipient does not have a place of business, the place of business is the sender's or recipient's residence, as the case may be.
137.23(5)
(5) An electronic record is received under
sub. (2) even if no individual is aware of its receipt.
137.23(6)
(6) Receipt of an electronic acknowledgment from an information processing system described in
sub. (2) establishes that a record was received but, by itself, does not establish that the content sent corresponds to the content received.
137.23(7)
(7) If a person is aware that an electronic record purportedly sent under
sub. (1), or purportedly received under
sub. (2), was not actually sent or received, the legal effect of the sending or receipt is determined by other applicable law. Except to the extent permitted by the other law, the requirements of this subsection may not be varied by agreement.
137.23 History
History: 2003 a. 294.
137.24
137.24
Transferable records. 137.24(1)
(1) In this section, "transferable record" means an electronic record that is a note under
ch. 403 or a record under
ch. 407.
137.24(1m)
(1m) An electronic record qualifies as a transferable record under this section only if the issuer of the electronic record expressly has agreed that the electronic record is a transferable record.
137.24(2)
(2) A person has control of a transferable record if a system employed for evidencing the transfer of interests in the transferable record reliably establishes that person as the person to which the transferable record was issued or transferred.
137.24(3)
(3) A system satisfies the requirements of
sub. (2), and a person is deemed to have control of a transferable record, if the transferable record is created, stored, and assigned in such a manner that:
137.24(3)(a)
(a) A single authoritative copy of the transferable record exists which is unique, identifiable, and, except as otherwise provided in
pars. (d) to
(f), unalterable;
137.24(3)(b)
(b) The authoritative copy identifies the person asserting control as the person to which the transferable record was issued or, if the authoritative copy indicates that the transferable record has been transferred, the person to which the transferable record was most recently transferred;
137.24(3)(c)
(c) The authoritative copy is communicated to and maintained by the person asserting control or its designated custodian;
137.24(3)(d)
(d) Copies or revisions that add or change an identified assignee of the authoritative copy can be made only with the consent of the person asserting control;
137.24(3)(e)
(e) Each copy of the authoritative copy and any copy of a copy is readily identifiable as a copy that is not the authoritative copy; and
137.24(3)(f)
(f) Any revision of the authoritative copy is readily identifiable as authorized or unauthorized.
137.24(4)
(4) Except as otherwise agreed, a person having control of a transferable record is the holder, as defined in
s. 401.201 (2) (km), of the transferable record and has the same rights and defenses as a holder of an equivalent record or writing under
chs. 401 to
411, including, if the applicable statutory requirements under
s. 403.302 (1),
407.501, or
409.330 are satisfied, the rights and defenses of a holder in due course, a holder to which a negotiable record of title has been duly negotiated, or a purchaser, respectively. Delivery, possession, and endorsement are not required to obtain or exercise any of the rights under this subsection.
137.24(5)
(5) Except as otherwise agreed, an obligor under a transferable record has the same rights and defenses as an equivalent obligor under equivalent records or writings under
chs. 401 to
411.
137.24(6)
(6) If requested by a person against which enforcement is sought, the person seeking to enforce the transferable record shall provide reasonable proof that the person is in control of the transferable record. Proof may include access to the authoritative copy of the transferable record and related business records sufficient to review the terms of the transferable record and to establish the identity of the person having control of the transferable record.
137.24 History
History: 2003 a. 294;
2009 a. 320,
322.
137.25
137.25
Submission of written documents. 137.25(1)
(1) Unless otherwise prohibited by law, with the consent of a governmental unit of this state that is to receive a record, any record that is required by law to be submitted in writing to that governmental unit and that requires a written signature may be submitted as an electronic record, and if submitted as an electronic record may incorporate an electronic signature.
137.25(2)
(2) The department of administration shall promulgate rules concerning the use of electronic records and electronic signatures by governmental units, which shall govern the use of electronic records or signatures by governmental units, unless otherwise provided by law. The rules shall include standards regarding the receipt of electronic records or electronic signatures that promote consistency and interoperability with other standards adopted by other governmental units of this state and other states and the federal government and nongovernmental persons interacting with governmental units of this state. The standards may include alternative provisions if warranted to meet particular applications.
137.25 History
History: 1997 a. 306;
2003 a. 294 ss.
10t,
11,
13m.
137.26
137.26
Interoperability. If a governmental unit of this state adopts standards regarding its receipt of electronic records or electronic signatures under
s. 137.25, the governmental unit shall promote consistency and interoperability with similar standards adopted by other governmental units of this state and other states and the federal government and nongovernmental persons interacting with governmental units of this state. Any standards so adopted may include alternative provisions if warranted to meet particular applications.
137.26 History
History: 2003 a. 294.
