[Background: The question was: Concurrence of assembly substitute amendment 1 to Senate Bill 260, relating to patient access to medical records? Senator Berger moved nonconcurrence of assembly substitute amendment 1.]
The question was: Nonconcurrence of assembly substitute amendment 1?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: [Display of roll call vote omitted; ayes-22, noes-10.] So the motion prevailed.
Senator Berger asked unanimous consent that the senate appoint a Committee of Conference on Senate Bill 260. Senator Kleczka objected.
Senator Berger moved that the senate appoint a Committee of Conference on Senate Bill 260.
Senate Journal of March 4, 1980 .......... Page: 1444
[Point of order:]
Senator Kleczka raised the point of order that the motion to appoint a Committee of Conference was not timely.
By request of Senator Berger, with unanimous consent, he withdrew his motion to appoint a Committee of Conference.
By request of Senator Berger, with unanimous consent, all action on Senate Bill 260 was ordered immediately messaged.
The Chair [Pres. Risser] ruled that because Senator Berger withdrew his motion to appoint a Committee of Conference the point of order raised by Senator Kleczka was moot.
70Senate Journal of February 19, 1980 .......... Page: 1365
[Background: Assembly Bill 596, relating to exempting solar energy home heating systems and electricity generating devices from the property tax. Read.]
The question was: Shall the senate adhere to its position?
Senator Flynn in the chair.
Senator Bablitch moved that the senate recede from its position.
The question was: Shall the senate recede from its position?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: [Display of roll call vote omitted; ayes-14, noes-16.] So the motion did not prevail.
The question was: Shall the senate adhere to its position?
[Point of order:]
Senator Bablitch raised the point of order that a tie vote on the question of adherence would have the same effect as the senate receding from its position.
The chair [Sen. Flynn] ruled the point of order untimely.
Senator Berger asked unanimous consent that the senate adhere to its position and appoint a Committee of Conference. Senator Bablitch objected.
Senator Berger moved that the senate adhere to its position and appoint a Committee of Conference.
By request of Senator Bablitch, with unanimous consent, the motion was divided into two parts.
The question was: Shall the senate adhere to its position?
The ayes and noes were demanded and the vote was: [Display of roll call vote omitted; ayes-17, noes-13.] So the senate adheres to its position.
By request of Senator Bablitch, with unanimous consent, the chair will appoint members of the Committee of Conference on Senate Bill 596.
1 9 7 7 A S S E M B L Y
Assembly Journal of February 16, 1977 .......... Page: 300
Point of order:
Representative Shabaz rose to the point of order that Representative Johnson could not be appointed to the committee of conference on Senate Bill 63 pursuant to Sections 45 and 46 of Jefferson's Manual because he had voted "Aye" on receding from the assembly's position on assembly amendment 1. Representative Shabaz stated that although Representative Johnson had voted for concurrence in
Senate Bill 63, he did not support assembly amendment 1, and therefore, could not represent the position of the majority of the assembly.
The speaker [Jackamonis] ruled that it is not necessary to have voted with the majority on consideration of amendments in order to be appointed to serve on the conference committee. Therefore, the point of order is not well taken.
1 9 7 5 A S S E M B L Y
Assembly Journal of July 9, 1975 .......... Page: 1411
Point of order:
71 Representative Azim rose to the point of order that the conference committee report [on Assembly Bill 725; relating to provisions of professional liability insurance policies for health care providers] required a fiscal note pursuant to Joint Rule 24 and Wisconsin Statutes 13.10.
The speaker [Anderson] ruled the point of order not well taken.
Assembly Journal of July 9, 1975 .......... Page: 1411
Point of order:
Representative Shabaz rose to the point of order that the report of the committee of conference on Assembly Bill 725 [relating to provisions of professional liability insurance policies for health care providers] was not germane under Assembly Rule 55.
The speaker [Anderson] ruled the point of order not well taken.
Assembly Journal of July 9, 1975 .......... Page: 1411
Point of order:
Representative Duren rose to the point of order that the report of the committee of conference [on Assembly Bill 725; relating to provisions of professional liability insurance policies for health care providers] was amendable.
The speaker [Anderson] ruled the point of order not well taken.
1 9 7 3 S E N A T E
Senate Journal of May 22, 1974 .......... Page: 188
[Selection of conferees: Senate Bill 5, Special Session, relating to regulation of elections and campaign contributions and expenditures, providing for public financing of certain political campaigns, granting rule-making authority, providing penalties and making appropriations.]
Senator Johnson moved nonconcurrence in assembly substitute amendment 2. The motion prevailed.
Senator Johnson moved that a Committee of Conference be appointed on Senate Bill 5, Special Session. The motion prevailed.
The chair appointed Senators Murphy, Bablitch and LaFave as conferees on the part of the senate.
Senate Journal of May 22, 1974 .......... Page: 193
[Point of order:]
Senator Risser raised the point of order that Senator LaFave was shown as being absent on the vote of passage on Senate Bill 5, (Spring 1974) Special Session and therefore, should not be appointed to the Committee of Conference on the bill.
The chair ruled the point of order well taken as page 133 of the special session journal showed the senator absent.
Senator Johnson appealed the ruling of the chair. The question was: Shall the ruling of the chair stand as the decision of the senate? The ayes and noes were required and the vote was: [Display of roll call vote omitted; ayes-14, noes-15.] So the ruling of the chair was not sustained.
72 Senator Risser moved to amend the appointments by substituting Senator Lorge for Senator LaFave.
By request of Senator Lorge, with unanimous consent, the amendment was laid on the table.
Senator Johnson moved confirmation of the conferees to Senate Bill 5, Special Session. The motion prevailed.
Upon motion of Senator Johnson the senate adjourned pursuant to a 48 hour notice by the majority and minority floor leaders.
Senate Journal of July 26, 1973 .......... Page: 1500
[Senate control over conference committee appointments:]
By request of Senator Risser, with unanimous consent, Senate Bill 9 was ordered immediately messaged with a request for a committee on conference.
Senate Journal of July 26, 1973 .......... Page: 1567
State of Wisconsin
Office of the Lieutenant Governor
Madison
Mr. William P. Nugent September 19, 1973
Senate Chief Clerk
243 South Capitol
Madison, Wisconsin
Dear Bill:
I hereby notify you that the Senate Conferees on Senate Bill 9 are:
Senator Fred Risse
Senator Walter Hollander
Senator Walter J. Chilsen
Yours very truly
MARTIN J. SCHREIBER, Lieutenant Governor
Senate Journal of October 4, 1973 .......... Page: 1629
[Point of order:]
Senator Knutson raised the point of order challenging the composition of the chair's appointments to the Conference Committee on Senate Bill 9. The chair took the point of order under advisement.
Senate Journal of October 11, 1973 .......... Page: 1713
Senator Knutson called the chair's attention to the point of order raised on Senate Bill 9 as it related to the membership of the senate Committee of Conference.
[Point of order:]
Senator Dorman raised the point of order that Senator Knutson's point of order was not timely.
The chair ruled the point of order not well taken as the senate remains in control of its members appointed to the Committee of Conference.
The question was: Shall the point of order, as raised by Senator Knutson, stand as the ruling of the senate?
73 Senator Risser moved a call of the senate. [Display of roll call omitted; present-29, absent-1, with leave-3; intervening text omitted.]
Senator Schuele called the chair's attention to the fact that all members being present the question was: Shall Senator Knutson's point of order stand as the ruling of the senate?
Senator Thompson asked unanimous consent that the question be laid on the table. Senator Knutson objected.
President of the senate in the chair.
Senator McKenna moved that the senate recall its members on the Committee of Conference on Senate Bill 9 and appoint new members pursuant to joint rule 2.
[Point of order:]
Senator Chilsen raised the point of order that the question on Senator Knutson's point of order took precedence over the motion made by Senator McKenna. The chair took the point of order under advisement.
Senate Journal of October 26, 1973 .......... Page: 1905
By request of Senator Knutson, with unanimous consent, his point of order as it related to the membership of the conference committee on Senate Bill 9 was withdrawn.
The question was: Adoption of the conference committee report on Senate Bill 9?
The report was adopted.
By request of Senator Risser, with unanimous consent, Senate Bill 9 was ordered immediately messaged.
