Point of order:
Representative Krug rose to the point of order that the motion to take up Assembly Bill 781 was not properly before the Assembly because the bill had died pursuant to Joint Rule 83 and Senate Joint Resolution 1 on March 30, 2000, when the last general business floorperiod ended.
Speaker Pro Tempore Freese took the point of order under advisement.
[Note:] There was no ruling on the point of order.
Joint Rule 83 (4) At the conclusion of the last general-business floorperiod scheduled by the session schedule for the spring of the even-numbered year, any bill or joint resolution not yet agreed to by both houses, and any resolution not yet passed by the house of origin, is adversely disposed of for the biennial session and recorded as "failed to pass," "failed to adopt," or "failed to concur."
1999 Senate Joint Resolution 1 Section 1 (2) (p) Last general-business floorperiod. The last general-business floorperiod commences on Tuesday, March 7, 2000, at 10 a.m., and, unless adjourned earlier, ends on Thursday, March 30, 2000.
1 9 9 7 A S S E M B L Y
Assembly Journal of May 5, 1998 .......... Page: 851
Point of order:
Representative Handrick rose to the point of order that Assembly substitute amendment 3 to Assembly Bill 159 was not germane under Assembly Rule 54(3)(f).
Ruling on the point of order:
Speaker Pro Tempore Freese ruled the point of order well taken.
Representative Schneider appealed the ruling of the Chair.
The question was: Shall the ruling of the Chair stand as the ruling of the Assembly?
The roll was taken. The vote was: Ayes-52, Noes-45. Motion carried.
[Note:] The bill prohibited school districts from beginning school before Labor Day. The substitute amendment provided a study in lieu of the bill's provisions.
Assembly Rule 54 (3) Assembly amendments that are not germane include:
(f) An amendment that substantially expands the scope of the proposal.
1 9 9 5 A S S E M B L Y
Assembly Journal of February 16, 1995 .......... Page: 104
Point of order:
Representative Schneider rose to the point of order that, because the hour of 8:00 P.M. had arrived, the Assembly shall stand adjourned under Assembly Rule 28 (2).
Ruling on the point of order:
The chair (Speaker Pro Tempore Freese) ruled the point of order well taken.
[Note:] The 8:00 P.M. rule was later repealed.
Assembly Journal of February 17, 1995 .......... Page: 105
Point of order:
Representative Kunicki rose to the point of order that the Assembly was not properly in session under Assembly Rule 29 (3). The Assembly Calendar of Friday, February 17 was distributed at 8:50 P.M. on Thursday, February 16, therefore violating the rule that requires the calendar to be distributed at least eighteen hours before the Assembly can proceed to the calendar.
Ruling on the point of order:
The Speaker ruled the point of order well taken.
[Note:] Assembly Rule 29 (3) A calendar, except a calendar for a Saturday, Sunday, or state holiday specified in section 230.35 (4) (a) of the statutes, shall be provided to each member at least 12 hours before the calendar is to be acted upon during the last week of the last general-business floorperiod preceding the veto review session and 18 hours before the calendar is to be acted upon at other times.
Assembly Journal of February 28, 1995 .......... Page: 118
Point of order:
Representative Duff rose to the point of order that under Assembly Rule 15 (3), a motion to withdraw Assembly Bill 3 from committee required a two-thirds vote because a vote to withdraw the bill from committee had already been taken on January 17, 1995.
Ruling on the point of order:
Speaker Prosser ruled the point of order not well taken, because the vote taken on January 17, 1995 to withdraw Assembly Bill 3 from committee was a vote on suspension of the rules, and not on a motion allowed under Assembly Rule 15 (2).
[Note:] This may have been a parliamentary inquiry, not a point of order.
Assembly Rule 15 (3) Once a motion to withdraw a proposal from a committee which requires a vote of a majority of the members present and voting fails, all subsequent motions to withdraw that proposal from the same committee require a vote of two-thirds of the members present and voting for adoption and must be decided without debate.
Assembly Journal of April 7, 1995 .......... Page: 228
Point of order:
Ruling on the point of order:
Speaker Pro Tempore Freese ruled not well taken the point of order raised by Representative Hubler that Assembly members may be referred to by name when reading from a document that is currently under debate, because under Assembly Rule 56(1), a member "shall confine his or her remarks to the question before the assembly and shall avoid personalities. A member may be recognized or addressed only by the number of the member's district."
Representative Hubler appealed the ruling of the chair.
Representative Hubler withdrew her point of order to refer to members of the Assembly by name when reading from a printed document currently before the Assembly.
[Note:] This may have been a parliamentary inquiry, not a point of order.
Assembly Journal of October 2, 1995 .......... Page: 535
Point of order:
Representative Hubler rose to the point of order that the hour of 8:00 P.M. had arrived and the Assembly is adjourned under Assembly Rule 28 (2).
Assembly Journal of October 2, 1995 .......... Page: 535
Speaker Pro Tempore Freese took the point of order under advisement.
Ruling on the point of order:
Speaker Pro Tempore Freese ruled well taken the point of order raised by Representative Hubler that the hour of 8:00 P.M. had arrived and the Assembly is adjourned under Assembly Rule 28 (2).
[Note:] The 8:00 P.M. rule was later repealed.
Assembly Journal of October 5, 1995 .......... Page: 555
Point of order:
Representative Bock rose to the point of order that Assembly amendment 22 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 to Assembly Bill 557 was not germane under Assembly Rule 54(3)(f).
Ruling on the point of order:
Speaker Pro Tempore Freese ruled the point of order not well taken.
[Note:] The bill was a budget adjustment bill. The amendment related to the transportation facilities economic assistance and development aid.
Assembly Rule 54 (3) Assembly amendments that are not germane.
(f) An amendment that substantially expands the scope of the proposal.
Assembly Journal of October 5, 1995 .......... Page: 558
Point of order:
Representative Hubler rose to the point of order that the hour of 8:00 P.M. having arrived the Assembly is adjourned under Assembly Rule 28 (2).
Speaker Pro Tempore Freese took the point of order under advisement.
The Assembly stood informal.
Representative Jensen asked unanimous consent that Assembly Bill 557 be laid on the table. Granted.
Representative Hubler withdrew her point of order.
[Note:] The 8:00 P.M. rule was later repealed.
Assembly Journal of October 11, 1995 .......... Page: 583
Point of order:
Representative Hubler rose to the point of order that the hour of 8:00 P.M. had arrived and that the Assembly stand adjourned under Assembly Rule 28 (2).
Ruling on the point of order:
Speaker Pro Tempore Freese ruled the point of order well taken.
[Note:] The 8:00 P.M. rule was later repealed.
Assembly Journal of November 14, 1995 .......... Page: 655
Point of order:
Representative Travis rose to the point of order that Assembly Bill 69 was not properly before the Assembly under Assembly Rules 32(1)(a), 35(1), 42(1)(a) & (3), and 52(2)(b).
Ruling on the point of order:
Speaker Pro Tempore Freese ruled the point of order not well taken. Under Assembly Rule 95(60) Senate amendment 3 to Assembly Bill 69 is not considered a proposal, making the point of order raised under Assembly Rule 32(1)(2) not well taken. The Senate adopted Senate amendment 3 to Assembly Bill 69 last week, making the point of order raised under Assembly Rule 35(1) not well taken. Senate amendment 3 to Assembly Bill 69 does not require a second reading reading, making the point of order raised under Assembly Rule 42(1)(a) not well taken. Senate amendment 3 to Assembly Bill 69 is only considered a proposal for the purpose of amending, making the point of order raised under Assembly Rule 52(2)(b) not well taken.
[Note:] Assembly Rule 32 (1) (a) Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph, messages from the senate or from the governor may be received and read, and any proposal referenced in the messages that is a senate proposal initially received for consideration of the assembly shall be referred and any other proposals referenced in the messages shall be taken up immediately unless referred by the presiding officer to a standing committee or to the calendar. Any messages from the senate referring to a senate joint resolution memorializing Congress or any branch or officer of the federal government that is received for consideration of the assembly may be read but the senate joint resolution may not be received for consideration. The senate joint resolution shall be transmitted to the senate immediately after the message is read;
Assembly Rule 35 (1) A proposal, conference committee report, or veto, except a resolution under rule 33 or 43, may not be considered until it has been made available to the members for at least 24 hours excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays. If the rules are suspended for the consideration of any proposal before it is available, the proposal shall be read at length at least once before its final passage or final adoption and concurrence.
Assembly Rule 42 (1) (a) Any proposal that requires 2 or more readings shall be referred by the presiding officer or speaker to committee, or to the calendar for the 2nd legislative day following the referral, or to the committee on rules.
Assembly Rule 42 (3) (a) Beginning on inauguration day and on any day of the regular biennial session period, proposals may be introduced or offered and referred by the speaker or presiding officer if the action is not in conflict with any limitations imposed by the session schedule or otherwise agreed to by both houses.
Assembly Rule 52 (2) (b) Solely for the purpose of amending, senate amendments presented to the assembly for concurrence are treated like proposals; therefore, an amendment to a simple amendment to a senate amendment is in order.
Assembly Rule 95 (60) Proposal: A resolution, joint resolution, or bill put before the assembly for consideration.
Assembly Journal of March 14, 1996 .......... Page: 930
Point of order:
Representative Jensen rose to the point of order that the motion to program all the phones in the Assembly Chamber to be able to make outside calls was out of order.
The chair (Representative Duff) took the point of order under advisement.
Assembly Journal of March 14, 1996 .......... Page: 931
Ruling on the point of order:
Speaker Pro Tempore Freese ruled well-taken the point of order raised by Representative Jensen that the motion to have all the phones in the Assembly Chamber programmed to be able to make outside calls was out of order.
[Note:] The motion did not relate to parliamentary procedure.
Assembly Rule 95 (56) Point of order: A request that the presiding officer rule on a matter of parliamentary procedure.
Assembly Journal of March 25, 1996 .......... Page: 1015
Point of order:
Representative Hubler rose to the point of order that the hour of 8:00 P.M. had arrived and that the Assembly stand adjourned under Assembly Rule 28 (2).
Speaker Pro Tempore Freese took the point of order under advisement.
Ruling on the point of order:
Speaker Pro Tempore Freese ruled the point of order raised by Representative Hubler that the Assembly stand adjourned under Assembly Rule 28 (2) well taken.
[Note:] The 8:00 P.M. rule was later repealed.
