Restraining action against dogs.
Owner's liability for damage caused by dog; penalties; court order to kill a dog.
Dogs running at large and untagged dogs subject to impoundment; penalties.
Publication of the dog license requirement and rabies vaccination requirement.
Multiple dog licenses.
Exemption for owners of dogs kept for educational or scientific purposes.
Exemption of dogs for blind, deaf and mobility-impaired.
Dog licenses and collar tags.
License fees paid to county treasurer.
Dog license fund; how disposed of and accounted for.
Dog licensing in populous counties.
Claims for damage by dogs to domestic animals including ranch mink.
Actions against owners.
Humane use of dogs for scientific or educational purposes.
As used in this chapter, unless the context indicates otherwise:
“Collar" means a band, strip or chain placed around the neck of a dog.
“Department" means the department of agriculture, trade and consumer protection.
“Domestic animal" includes livestock, dogs and cats.
“Intergovernmental commission" means an intergovernmental commission formed by contract under s. 66.0301 (2)
by all of the municipalities in a county with a population of 750,000 or more for the purpose of providing animal control services.
“Livestock" means any horse, bovine, sheep, goat, pig, llama, alpaca, domestic rabbit, farm-raised deer, as defined in s. 95.001 (1) (ag)
, or domestic fowl, including any farm-raised game bird, as defined in s. 169.01 (12m)
“Owner" includes any person who owns, harbors or keeps a dog.
The casual presence of a dog on someone's property does not make that person a “keeper." “Harboring" a dog means to afford it lodging, to shelter it, or give it refuge; it does not include the transient presence in one's home of another's dog. Pattermann v. Pattermann, 173 Wis. 2d 143
, 496 N.W.2d 613
(Ct. App. 1992).
There is a distinction between “keeping" and “harboring." Keeping generally requires exercising some measure of care, custody, or control over the dog, while harboring is often defined as sheltering or giving refuge to a dog. Thus, harboring lacks the proprietary aspect of keeping. However, the concepts of “harbor" and “keep" are similar, and the liability of one who harbors a dog and one who keeps a dog is the same. Pawlowski v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 2009 WI 105
, 322 Wis. 2d 21
, 777 N.W.2d 67
The relevant consideration in deciding a question of “harboring" is whether the owner of the home knowingly afforded lodging and shelter to the dog. That an owner resided in a separate home from the dog and was not in a convenient position to and in fact did not exercise custody or control over or care for the dog, would be most relevant if the issue was whether the owner was a “keeper" of the dog, but not a harborer. Augsburger v. Homestead Mutual Insurance Company, 2013 WI App 106
, 350 Wis. 2d 486
, 838 N.W.2d 88
Restraining action against dogs. 174.01(1)(a)(a)
Except as provided in par. (b)
, a person may intentionally kill a dog only if a person is threatened with serious bodily harm by the dog and:
A person may intentionally kill a dog if a domestic animal that is owned or in the custody of the person is threatened with serious bodily harm by the dog and the dog is on property owned or controlled by the person and:
Inapplicable to officers, veterinarians, and persons killing their own dog.
This section does not apply to an officer acting in the lawful performance of his or her duties under s. 29.921 (7)
, 173.23 (1m) (c)
, or (4)
, or 174.02 (3)
, or to a veterinarian killing a dog in a proper and humane manner, or to a person killing his or her own dog in a proper and humane manner.
Liability and penalties.
A person who violates this section:
Is liable to the owner of the dog for double damages resulting from the killing;
May be subject to prosecution, depending on the circumstances of the case, under s. 951.02
Within the meaning of the 4th amendment, domestic animals are effects and the killing of a companion dog constitutes a seizure, which is constitutional only if reasonable. Viilo v. Eyre, 547 F.3d 707
Owner's liability for damage caused by dog; penalties; court order to kill a dog. 174.02(1)(a)(a)
Subject to s. 895.045
and except as provided in s. 895.57 (4)
, the owner of a dog is liable for the full amount of damages caused by the dog injuring or causing injury to a person, domestic animal or property.
Subject to s. 895.045
and except as provided in s. 895.57 (4)
, the owner of a dog is liable for 2 times the full amount of damages caused by the dog biting a person with sufficient force to break the skin and cause permanent physical scarring or disfigurement if the owner was notified or knew that the dog had previously, without provocation, bitten a person with sufficient force to break the skin and cause permanent physical scarring or disfigurement.
Penalties imposed on owner of dog causing damage. 174.02(2)(a)(a)
The owner of a dog shall forfeit not less than $50 nor more than $2,500 if the dog injures or causes injury to a person, domestic animal, property, deer, game birds or the nests or eggs of game birds.
The owner of a dog shall forfeit not less than $200 nor more than $5,000 if the dog injures or causes injury to a person, domestic animal, property, deer, game birds or the nests or eggs of game birds, and if the owner was notified or knew that the dog previously injured or caused injury to a person, domestic animal, property, deer, game birds or the nests or eggs of game birds.
Penalties in addition to liability for damages.
The penalties in this subsection are in addition to any other liability imposed on the owner of a dog.
The state, any municipality, or a person who is injured by the dog, whose minor child was injured by the dog, or whose domestic animal is injured by the dog may commence a civil action to obtain a judgment from a court ordering an officer to kill a dog. The court may grant the judgment if the court finds both of the following:
The dog caused serious injury to a person or domestic animal on 2 separate occasions off the owner's property, without reasonable cause.